80JSC022R0003 JETS II RFP Change Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JSC Engineering, Technology and Science (JETS) II Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80JSC022R0003
About this file
This document summarizes changes made to the solicitation and request for proposal for the JETS II contract opportunity with NASA. Key details include:
-
The solicitation is for the JSC Engineering, Technology and Science (JETS) II contract, number 80JSC022R0003. Proposals are due by December 15, 2021 and questions are due by November 29, 2021.
-
A virtual pre-proposal pricing conference will be held on November 23, 2021 to discuss the opportunity. Interested parties must register with their company information by November 22.
-
The work involves engineering, technology, and science services in support of NASA's Johnson Space Center. An attachment provides details on required manufacturing capabilities.
-
Changes were made to past performance evaluation periods, page limits, templates for the electronic pricing model, and clarification of subcontracting and telework requirements. Award fee terms were also updated in the cost templates.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet2
| 80JSC022R0003 Change Matrix | ||||
| Change # | RFP Reference | RFP Section | Page No. | Change |
| 1 | L.23 | RFP Section L.23. (b); M.5.1 (c); Attachment L-10 | 155, 182 | L.23, M.5.1c and L-10 Key Personnel Past Performance changed to 5 years. |
| 2 | Attachment L-2 | Attachment L-2; TA-4 | TA-4 is requesting a "normal" steady-state operations Telework Approach (insert TA-4 reference here). TA-4 has been clarified to request a post-pandemic telework approach for off-site personnel | |
| 3 | Attachment L-2 | Attachment L-2; TA-4 | TA-4 has been clarified to request a post-pandemic telework approach for off-site personnel | |
| 4 | L.22 | L.22 MISSION SUITABILITY (MS) FACTOR - VOLUME I | 150 | DRD MGMT-02 has been clarified to show that it is submitted as Attachment J-16 as part of the Model Contract. |
| 5 | Attachment L-3 | Attachment L-3 TA5 - Approach to Manufacturing | 13 | TA-5 outlines the capabilities required by NASA. The offeror's approach may include but is not required to have onsite manufacuring as long as the desired capabilities are addressed. TA-5 has been renamed from "Efficient Onsite Manufacturing Model" to "Efficient Manufacturing Operation Model" |
| 6 | Attachment L-9 | Attachment L-9 Past Performance Questionnaire | 3 | The Past Performance Questionnaire and L & M have been changed to reflect 3/5 years for contracts/Key Personnel. |
| 7 | L.23 | SECTION L.23, Past Performance | 156 | L.23 (h) has been clarified to include Past Performance Questionaires to references on L-10, Key Personnel Resume in L.23 (b). |
| 8 | L.21 | MISSION SUITABIILITY VOLUME I (L.21 Page Limitations) | 147 | The SB Subcontracting Plan and Commitment to the SB Program will be excluded from the page count limitation. Table L.21.1 has been updated to reflect that the total Mission Suitability page count was updated from 75 pages to 70. |
| 9 | Attachment L-3 | MISSION SUITABIILITY VOLUME I (Manufacturing Approach) | 12 | Attachment L-3 has been updated to state that there is 10% of Class I flight hardware and the remainder is Class III or uncontrolled hardware. |
| 10 | Attachment L-2 | Attachment L-2; TA4 | The Government will provide desktop IT equipment only for on-site JETS II employees. Please note that the NEST service contract has a limitation of a 10 mile radius from JSC. Offeror's must determine how IT equipment will be provided for off-site personnel and this should be consistent with the proposal. |
| 11 | Attachment L-4 | L.24 Cost/Price, Attachment L-4 EPM | FBR Tab | The FBR template has been updated to reflect the correct template references. |
| 12 | Attachment L-4 | RFP Section M.6 | 185 | SOW 1.0 shall be proposed as CPAF. The Excel Pricing Model and Section M.6 have been updated to reflect this instruction in the Final RFP. |
| 13 | Attachment L-4 | Attachment L-4 EPM | ISCT SOW-1 Tab; B.12 | Offerors shall propose the Award Fee in the ISCT SOW-1 Tab of the EPM. The EPM template has been updated to reflect this instruction. |
| 14 | Attachment L-4 | Attachment L-4 EPM | ISCT SOW-2 Tab; B.12 | Offerors shall propose the Award Fee in the ISCT SOW-2 Tab of the EPM. The EPM template has been updated to reflect this instruction. |
| 15 | Attachment L-4 | Attachment L-4 EPM | ISCT Tabs | According to Clause H.17 (b), "Any material or service procurements conducted in performance of this contract (including materials and supplies procured through subcontracts), are not subject to any burdened costs and/or indirect rate costs including but not limited to: Fee, material handling fees, salary related expenses (SREs), or any other rates, costs, fees, or a combination thereof associated with the performance, management and oversight of procurement functions with the exception of G&A. New Mexico Gross Receipts Tax (NMGRT) may be added, when not exempt under New Mexico State Type 9 and/or 15 Nontaxable Transaction Certificate, or any other exemption. " |
The template has been updated to, "The template currently assumes that the NTE fee rate is applied to all labor proposed dollars."
| 16 | L.21 table.21 | RFP Table L.21.1 | 148 | The model contract is Volume V, this has been corrected in the L.21 table. |
| 17 | L24.2, L.24.4, Attachment L-4 | RFP Tables L.24.3, L.24.4 | 164-165 | The miscellaneous NLR values in tables L.24.2 and L.24.4 are non-teammate subcontractors that are not included in the fully burdened composite rate. The tables have been updated to reflect "Misc" as "Minor Subcontractors." |
| 18 | L.21.1 | RFP Table L.21.1 and L.23 (f) | 148 | The Past Performance Matrix is not included in the Volume II page count and has been added to Table L.21.1 |
| 19 | M.5.1 (c ) | Section M.5 ( c ) | 183 |
Pg. 153 Pg. 154
| Table 1/Pg. 1 | The language for Joint Venture past performance has been modified to reflect the change to SBA affiliation rules regarding Joint Ventures. | ||||
| 20 | Attachment L-4 | L-4 Electronic Pricing Model | TRST worksheet | The TRST is only for SOW 1.0. The templates have been updated to include this clarification. | |
| 21 | H.18 | Section I.18(b)(iii) | Pg. 101 | The reference to H.18 in Section I has been updated to reference H.17. | |
| 22 | Attachment J-2, DRD MGMT-06 | J-2 | DRD MGMT-06/Pg. J-2-18 | The DRD MGMT-06 has been updated to include clarification for how the offeror may consider working with economic development organizations in partnership with JSC organizations to identify businesses and create on-ramps for the discovery and delivery of technology driven products or services to NASA, or for the use of space technologies in terrestrial business applications. | |
| 23 | Attachment L-4 | L-4 Electronic Pricing Model; 80JSC021R0005 JETS II Draft RFP | EPM Tabs ISCT - SOW 1 and ISCT - SR SOW 2, H.17(b)/Pg. 70 | The EPM workbook has been updated to sync with Clause H. 17 (b) | |
| 24 | B.12 | B.12 Fully Burdened Rate Table for Pricing Task Orders | 14 | Corrected a reference to I.17. | |
| 25 | L.22.1 | L.23(b) | 155 | The Government does intend to evaluate Key Personnel (KP) approach as part of Mission Suitability and the Past Performance of the proposed KP. KP Past Performance will be evaluated in accordance with M.5.1. MA4 has been updated to provide clarification. | |
| 26 | K.11 | H.27/Pg. 78, L.28/Pg. 174 | Yes, the Government intends for the offeror to complete the Offeror Fill-Ins before and after award. The provision L.28 has been moved to K.11 and is intended to be filled-in before award, while the provision in Section H is intended to be filled-in after award. | ||
| 27 | H.17.4 | Attachment L-4 EPM | Attachment L-4, the EPM template, has been updated to say "Offerors shall apply any allowable applicable burdens to the proposed NLR dollars, please see clause H.17. " | ||
| 28 | L.24 | L.24 (b) 1, 2, & 3; & EPM Template | Page 160; OHT and GAT tabs | The Government will accept Forward Pricing Rate Recommendations (FPRR) if a Forward Pricing Rate Agreement (FPRA) is not available. Langauge in Section L.24 has been updated | |
| 29 | L.24 | RFP Section L.24(b)1 | 159 | The Government will accept FPRR if a FPRA is not available. Langauge in Section L.24 has been updated | |
| 30 | L.24 | RFP Section L.24(b) | 159 | The Government will accept FPRR if a FPRA is not available. Langauge in Section L.24 has been updated | |
| 31 | L.24 | RFP Section L.24(b)3 | 160 | The Government will accept FPRR if a FPRA is not available. Langauge in Section L.24 has been updated | |
| 32 | L.24 | RFP Section L.24 | 172 | Supplemental Cost Data for the not to exceed profit rate has been added to Section L.24. | |
| 33 | Attachment J-2, DRD BP-01 | J-2 | DRD BP-01/Pg. J-2-38 | BP-01 NF533 Contractor Financial Management Reporting has been replaced with the final version. | |
| 34 | I.1 | I.1 Clauses Incorporated by Reference | 84 | 52.223-99 ENSURING ADEQUATE COVID-19 SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS. (Deviation PCD 21-03) has been updated from OCT to NOV 2021. | |
| 35 | L.25, M.7 | L.25, M.7 Responsibility Considerations | 172, 189 | Removed "All required Department of Labor Information" as this is redundant with the information provided in the Total Compensation Plan. | |
| 36 | Attachment J-11 | Attachment J-11 Performance Evaluation Plan | Corrected references to Options to Transition from Award Fee to Fixed Fee and vice versa. (H.7 and H.8) | ||
| 37 | B.12 | B.12 Fully Burdened Rate Table for Pricing Task Orders | 15-20 | Removed OFI% from CY1 NTE Fixed Fee to clarify that the Government does not intend to convert the first Award Fee period to Fixed Fee. | |
| 38 | L.24, Attachment L-4 | L.24 (e) 3, Attachment L-4 EPM | TRST and ICST SOW 1.0 and SOW 2.0 have been modified to include Award Fee and Fixed Fee in the total estimated cost and fee. L.24 has been updated to require offerors to propose uniform NTE Fee/Profit Rates across the contract POP. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .