80JSC022R0003 JETS II Preproposal Bulletin.pdf

Johnson Space Center (JSC) Engineering, Technology and Science

(JETS) II

Preproposal Bulletin

November 18, 2021

Orientation and Procurement Overview

Disclaimer

• These slides are not to be interpreted as a comprehensive description of the procurement strategy or requirements in the Request for Proposal (RFP).

• To the extent there are any inconsistencies between this briefing and the RFP, the RFP will govern.

Purpose of Preproposal Bulletin

• The purpose of this Preproposal Bulletin is to help industry understand the Government’s requirements

• Questions:

Official responses to written questions received by the

Contracting Officer will be posted to the JETS II procurement website

Questions may be submitted via email, JSC- JETSII@mail.nasa.gov and at the conclusion of the Pricing Session on November 23, 2021. (Chart 95)

The deadline for submitting questions regarding the RFP or this bulletin is November 29, 2021.

Source Selection Authority and Acquisition Team Members

• Source Selection Authority Donna M. Shafer, Associate Center Director, Johnson Space

Center

• Acquisition Team Jeff Dutton, EA13 Shine Lin, BH3 Regina Senegal, NT4 Joseph Hamilton, XI4 Marie Kowal, EC Phillip Callen, ER Scott Coughlin, ES3

Points of Contact

• Contracting Officer:

Shine Lin JSC-JETSII@mail.nasa.gov

• JETS II web address:

https:// procurement.jsc.nasa.gov/jets2/

Send questions to the Contracting Officer.

Office of Small Business Programs - JSC

• Main phone number: (281) 483-4512

• Robert Watts, Senior Small Business Specialist

• Monica Craft, Small Business Specialist

• Tumarrow Romain, Small Business Specialist

• All emails should be sent to: jsc-smallbusiness@mail.nasa.gov

• Location: Building 1, Suite 453

• Address:

NASA Johnson Space Center, Industry Assistance Office Mail Code: BA 2101 NASA Parkway Houston, TX 77058-3696

Ombudsman

Ombudsman (NFS 1852.215-84): “…before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the Contracting Officer for resolution … If resolution cannot be made by the Contracting Officer, interested parties may contact the installation ombudsman whose name, address, telephone number, and email address may be found at:

http://prod.nais.nasa.gov/pub/pub_library/Omb.html ”

Current Contract Overview

• Contract Number: NNJ13HA01C

• Prime Contractor: Jacobs Technology, Inc.

• Contract Type: Cost-Plus Award Fee (CPAF), Firm-Fixed Price, Single-Award Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ)

• Period of Performance:

May 1, 2013 – September 30, 2022

• Skills currently provided on contract include:

Engineering, technology development, scientific products and technical services support at JSC, including: engineering design, development, sustaining engineering, analysis, assessment, test services, planetary missions and physical science research, and laboratory/facility operation and maintenance

Engineering Directorate

Updated November 2021

Engineering Directorate

ENGINEERING DIRECTORATE

Julie Kramer White, Director Jay LeBeau, Deputy Director Carolyn Fritz, Associate Director Montgomery Goforth, Assistant Director

EA13/DIRECTORATE

INTEGRATION OFFICE

Eddie King, Manager Betsy Kluksdahl, Deputy

EA12/CHIEF ENGINEERS

OFFICE

Julie Grantier, Acting Manager

EC/CREW & THERMAL

SYSTEMS DIVISION

Raul Blanco, Chief Tim Ames, Deputy Teresa Shurtz, Associate

EG/AEROSCIENCE & FLIGHT

MECHANICS DIVISION

Carlos Westhelle, Chief Mark Hammerschmidt, Deputy John Gowan, Associate

EP/PROPULSION & POWER

DIVISION

Edgar Castro, Chief Mike Salinas, Acting Deputy Sandra Ruttle, Associate

ER/SOFTWARE, ROBOTICS &

SIMULATION DIVISION

Cliff Farmer, Acting Chief Kofi Burney, Acting Deputy Pedro Martinez, Associate

ES/STRUCTURAL

ENGINEERING DIVISION

Jasen Raboin, Acting Chief Luis Saucedo, Acting Deputy Stan Donahoe, Associate

EV/AVIONIC SYSTEMS

DIVISION

Bruce Manners, Chief Ricky Villarreal, Acting Deputy Darilyn Peddie, Associate

EX/PROJECT MANAGEMENT & SYSTEMS

ENGINEERING DIVISION

Jay Leggett, Acting Chief Debbie Buscher, Deputy Terry Hill, Acting Associate

JSC Engineering Core Competencies

- Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLSS)

- Active Thermal Control

- Extravehicular Activity (EVA)

- Includes Suits and Tools

- Flight Crew/Hab Systems

- Environmental Test

Human Rated Software - Autonomy -

Robotics - Crew Exercise -

Simulation -

Propulsion Systems - Power Systems -

Fuel Cells/Electrolysis - Pyrotechnics -

Integrated ISRU - Hazardous Testing -

GN&C System/Software DDT&E - GN&C Flight Simulations -

Flight Mechanics, Trajectory & Mission Design - Aerosciences Characterization -

Aerodynamic Decelerators DDT&E -

- Structures, Fracture Control

- Thermal Design

- Materials and Processes

- Mechanical Design and Analysis

- Loads and Structural Dynamics

- Human System Interfaces (CHI)

- Wireless and Communication

Systems

- Command and Data Handling

- Radiation & EEE Parts

EA

Chief Engineers -

EX

- Project/Partner Lead Engineers

- System Engineers for Programs and Mid to High-Level Cross Discipline GFE

- Spacecraft Test & Verification

- Mid to High-Level Cross Discipline Project Management

- Process, Tools, and Standards Management

Mission:

• Provide Spacecraft DDT&E and System Subject Matter Expertise for all of NASA’s developing and sustaining Human Space Flight programs, including –Providing Project Management, Systems Engineering Expertise –Executing testing in one of a kind, environmental test facilities –Conducting Complex systems level, integrated test –Producing Government Furnished Equipment to programs to fill critical mission capability gaps –Developing technology as required to retire risk and enable mission success

Key Challenges:

• Growing Program portfolio with increasing demand on Systems

Expertise and GFE projects

• Enable Commercial LEO capabilities, while transitioning government focus to Exploration

• Balance insight/oversight functions with development to sustain

‘smart buyer’ capability of the government

• Develop creative, non-traditional partnerships infuse new ways of doing business and provide DDT&E opportunities

• Evolving core capabilities to meet program customer and commercial industry needs

Illustrative Current GFE and Development Commitments:

• xEMU Development

• Crew Systems for Orion, GW and HLS

• Orion GN&C Mode Team

• ISRU technology and payload development

• Gateway Vehicle Systems Manager

• VIPER

• Orion hatch design

• Lunar Terrain Vehicle

The Engineering Directorate enables critical thinking and innovation for human exploration in space. We accomplish this challenging work hand in hand with our contractors, who bring a wide breath and depth of talent and perspectives. The JSC Engineering team fosters technical excellence thru collaboration and working across the Directorate’s technical domains.

JSC Engineering is the premiere organization for the design and development of human spacecraft and human systems integration

Exploration Integration and

Science Directorate

Updated November 2021

Exploration Integration and Science Directorate

Organizational Mission: Unify and Explore to Discover

• Integrate JSC exploration support

• Provide mission-level program and vehicle integration

– Human and robotic support; ISS, Artemis, EVA, CLPS, Mars

• Formulate lunar surface and Mars activities via collaborative efforts across the Agency

• Cultivate mission-enabling partnerships & technology

• Develop exploration leaders and teams for the future

• Align core competencies to achieve customer needs

– SE&I, mission analysis, EVA, orbital debris, astromaterials curation & research, and partnerships

• Leverage collaboration within the directorate

Exploration Integration and Science Directorate (XA)

Exploration Integration and Science Directorate

Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS)

• Agency capability for rapid acquisition of commercial lunar delivery services

Extra-Vehicular Activity Office

(XX)

• ISS EVA Operations

• ISS EVA Sustaining

Engineering

• Exploration EVA

Development & Integration

Exploration Mission Planning Office (XM)

• HEO Architecture and Mission Planning/Studies

• Mars Study Capability

• Project/HAB Formulation

Exploration Development Integration Division (XE)

• Exploration Programs SE&I

• Exploration Mission

Integration

• HEO Systems Protection

Analysis

Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division (XI)

• Astromaterials Curation

• Research & Science

Operations

• Orbital Debris &

Hypervelocity Impact

• Image Analysis

Exploration Technology Office

(XT)

• Portfolio Management for

AES, STMD, IRAD, SBIR,

STTR

• Tech Transfer

• Tech Partnerships

Strategic Business Integration Office (XB)

• Center, Programmatic & Enterprise assessments and PP&C support’

JSC Chief Technologist JSC Chief Scientist

HLS Associate Program Manager

AES SE&I Deputy Lead

Eileen K. Stansbery, JSC Chief Scientist Ronnie Clayton, (Acting) JSC Chief Technologist

Michele DiGiuseppe, AES SE&I Deputy Lead Lisa Hammond, HLS Associate Prog Mgr for JSC

Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS)

Christopher J. Culbert, Manager Darryl C. Gaines, Deputy Manager

LaToya E. Eaglin, Administrative Specialist I (CBF)

Strategic Business Integration Office

(XB)

Cathy L. Claunch, Manager Vickie H. Gutierrez, Deputy Manager

Integrated Cost/Schedule Analysis

Performance Management EISD Business Integration Center Risk Management

Extra-Vehicular Activity Office (XX)

Christopher P. Hansen, Manager Michael J. Mankin, Deputy Manager

ISS EVA Operations

ISS EVA Sustaining Engineering Advanced Suit Development &

Integration

Exploration Mission Planning Office (XM)

Nujoud Merancy, Manager George Nelson, Deputy Manager

HEO Architecture and Mission

Planning/Studies Mars Study Capability

Project/HAB Formulation

Exploration Development Integration Office (XE)

Burt Laws, Manager Lisa L. Pace, (Acting) Deputy Manager

Exploration Programs SE&I

Exploration Mission Integration HEO Systems Protection Analysis

Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division (XI)

Eileen K. Stansbery, Chief Regina B. Blue, (Acting) Deputy Chief

Astromaterials Curation

Research & Science Operations Orbital Debris / Hypervelocity Impact

Mission Support Image Analysis

Exploration Integration and Science Directorate (XA) John A. McCullough, Director

Holly Ridings, (Acting) Deputy Director Rebekah D. Reed, Associate Director

Sharon R. Edmond, Administrative Officer Toni M. Townsend, Directorate Secretary (CBF)

Katie Stelly, International Travel Coordinator (CBF)

Exploration Technology Office (XT)

Nicholas Skytland, (Acting) Manager

Portfolio Management for

(AES, STMD, IRAD, SBIR, STTR)

Tech Transfer

Tech Partnerships

Nov 2021

Artemis: Landing Humans On the Moon

Artemis: Extending Lunar Missions to Prepare for Mars

ISS and Artemis/Gateway EVA Integration

EMU: EVA Office directly supports ISS Program

• EVA Hardware: Extra-vehicular Mobility Unit (EMU), Airlock H/W, Tools & Crew Aids

• EVA Plan for CY21: 5 US EVAs completed. 4 additional US EVAs and 3 RS EVAs currently planned in remainder of year in support of ISS

• EMU was originally designed to achieve a 15 year/100 mission life and is in its 40th year of operation; extended through a robust life extension program xEMU: EVA Office supports Artemis Mission via Gateway Program

• xEVA Project initiated in mid 2019 to provide next generation exploration EVA capabilities for

ISS (2026) , HLS (2024) and Gateway (2028)

• xEMU is in the development verification & test phase following PDR completion late in 2020.

Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division (XI)

Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science

ASTROMATERIALS RESEARCH AND EXPLORATION SCIENCE

DIVISION

Division Chief and JSC Chief Scientist

Deputy Division Chief

ADMINISTRATIVE AND BUSINESS

SUPPORT TEAM

EXPLORATION SCIENCE OFFICE

(XI4)

ASTROMATERIALS RESEARCH OFFICE

(XI3)

HYPERVELOCITY IMPACT & ORBITAL

DEBRIS OFFICE (XI5)

*Orbital Debris Chief Scientist

Planetary Process Simulation Experimental Impacts, Experimental Petrology

Research Analysis of Astromaterials cosmochemistry, geochronology, organic geochemistry, element and isotope mapping

Planetary Mission Surface Science Surface Science Operations

Site selection and sample collection, traverse planning, instrument development and calibration

Measurement “Ground Truth” analog standards, flight-like instruments & measurement interpretation

Analytical Capability Support for Community E-Beam Suite, NanoSIMs, Cosmochem &

Isotopes, Experimental Impact Lab, Soluble Organics Lab, Experimental Petrology, Light

Element Lab, Laser MassSpec

Orbital Debris Program Office (ODPO)

Mission safety (compliance, re-entry); Debris Measurements (radar, optical, in-situ, laboratory); Modeling (engineering, environment, breakup); Mission Support;

Policy

Hypervelocity Impact Technology (HVIT) Hypervelocity Testing of Spacecraft Materials;

Meteoroid and Orbital Debris Risk Assessments; Mission Support (shielding, requirements)

*Agency Role

Image Science & Analysis Imagery acquisition planning, ops integration, enhancement, inspection, and derivation of 3D static/dynamic engineering data

Earth Science & Remote Sensing ISS Earth Science Payload Operations & Crew Training, Planetary GIS & Remote Sensing, Machine Learning & Informatics, AR/VR

Exploration Science Integration Science integration, SMEs and science support to human exploration, relevant environment operational testing, Payload/Mission Development, Field Training, simulant development, ISRU studies, technology development

ASTROMATERIALS ACQUISITION &

CURATION OFFICE (XI2)

*Astromaterials Curator

Emerging Curation Collections Hayabusa 2, OSIRIS-REx, Mars 2020 CK, Artemis, MMX

Astromaterials Curation Collections Apollo, Meteorite, Stardust, Cosmic Dust, Genesis, Hayabusa, Microparticle Impacts, Education Samples, Data Center & Security, White Sands Remote Storage

Advanced Curation Planetary Ices & Volatiles, Medical Geology, Curation Microbiology, Infometrics, Curation

CT Lab, Raman Lab

Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division (ARES)

• Curate all NASA-held extraterrestrial materials

• Preserve, protect, document, and distribute samples

• Conduct world-class research of astromaterials

• Support access to unique analytical and experimental capability

• Prepare for future human exploration

• Support astronaut training, relevant environment operational testing, simulant development, science integration, and payload/mission concept development

• Keep spaceflight safe

• Lead NASA's orbital debris prediction and mitigation policy development

• Perform meteoroid and orbital debris risk assessments for spaceflight, hypervelocity testing of spacecraft materials, and develop shielding recommendations

• Acquire and interpret spacecraft engineering imagery for performance and inspection

• Explore planetary worlds

• Support surface science operations, site selection, traverse planning, instrument development and calibration

• Interpret mission observations for “ground truth" with flight-like laboratory instruments

Exploration for Discovery – Integrating Science into the Mission

Cross-Program Systems Integration is a mission-level integration function between Orion, SLS, Exploration Ground Systems, Gateway, Lander, & Surface

• Artemis Campaign Formulation Support

– ConOps definition, Mission/architectural modeling

– Functional analysis and requirements development

• Architecture Definition

– Integrated architecture design constraints, Design Analysis Cycle GR&As

– Program-to-program interface integration

– Integrated aborts/contingency approach and assessments

• Integrated Risk and Agreements Management

– Agreements/interdependencies for deliverables across programs

• Integrated Verification and Validation Planning & Products

• Mission Operations Integration

– Mission preparation and execution – products, processes, schedules, training, roles and responsibilities, facilities, real-time operations through post-mission assessment

• Human Rating, Flight Cert & Mission Readiness Approach/Processes

• Mission/Systems Protection

– Develop protection plans, system vulnerability assessments, and coordinates threat information

Exploration Systems Engineering & Integration

Enterprise strategic and tactical mission design, integration, and analysis for human exploration systems

• Campaign and architecture analysis and formulation including Mars transportation, lunar surface, and interim mission design

• Artemis mission design conops, trajectories, and capabilities including integrated mission availability and constraints

• Artemis campaign evaluation and integration for programmatic, technical, and integrated execution risk

• Element definition, test integration, and evaluation during transition from strategic planning through formulation and definition

Exploration Mission Planning Office

Cross-Program Mission Definition & Analysis

Integrated Mission Availability

Surface Mission Planning & IntegrationLunar Surface Pre-Formulation

Mars Architecture Studies Artemis Campaign Assessments

Build, Integrate Test & LaunchDetailed Mission MgmtDetailed Mission RqmtInitial Mission PlanningMission CapabilityStudies

Exploration Mission Planning Office

Build, Integrate Test & Launch

Detailed Mission Mgmt

Detailed Mission Rqmt

Initial Mission Planning

Mission CapabilityStudies

Lunar Surface, Mars, Campaign Formulation & Functional Analysis Artemis III & IV Definition, Surface Mission Integration, & Validation Artemis I & II Objectives, Implementation, and Analysis

• Strategic Analysis & Formulation

– Advanced concept analysis, capabilities definition, and performance assessments

– Development and analysis of concept architectures across disciplines

– Cross program surface mission planning, integration, and analysis

• Project & Systems Integration

– Technical integration, management, and coordination of projects for advanced systems evaluation and testing

– High-fidelity integrated multi-disciplinary operational testing and mission planning to demonstrate exploration missions

• Mission Analysis & Integrated Assessments (MAIA)

– Artemis mission design definition, integration, and implementation

– Systems and mission analysis, identification of cross-program constraints, and definition of mission achievability

Technology Development and Partnerships

JSC Partnership Gateway

ETO BUSINESS

MANAGEMENT

TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER

• New Technology Reporting

• Software Release Administration

• DAA Reviews

• Licensing

• Patent Portfolio Administration

• Innovation Design Center

Enabling Support

• Intellectual Property Portfolio Panel

Integrated JSC Portfolio Management (Resources and Strategies)

• AES

• GCD

• CIF/IR&D

• SBIR/STTR

• STRG

Enabling Support

• JSC Technology Working Group (JTWG)

PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT

Partnership Portfolio Management

• Technical & Science Partnerships

• Strategic Partnerships

XT Partnership Services

• Technology Collaboration Center

Interface

• Local / Regional Capability Alignment

Enabling Support

• Agreements Management Team

• Partnership Development Forum

EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICE

Office Manager and JSC Chief Technologist

Deputy Office Mgr Deputy JSC Chief Technologist

Strategic Business Integration Office

The Strategic Business Integration Office (XB) is an enabling capability for human exploration initiatives, providing tailored and adaptive cost, schedule, and technical risk assessments and analyses for NASA programs and projects; business integration for the Exploration Integration and Science Directorate; institutional support to the Johnson Space Center; and programmatic analysis support to Agency stakeholders.

Schedule and Cost Analysis Integrated Cost/Schedule/Risk Analysis for Program PP&C JSC Exploration Roadmap

JSC Exploration Forum

Independent Analysis for Agency Standing Review Boards and Independent Review Teams

EISD QMS and CAM Integration

JSC Representative to Agency EVM Working Group and NASA PP&C Steering Committee

JSC Agreements Mgr & SAA Process OwnerCenter OSMA Risk

Mgmt

JSC

eITA System Mgmt

Eileen K. Stansbery, JSC Chief Scientist Carlos Westhelle, JSC Chief Technologist

Ronnie Clayton, JSC Deputy Chief Technologist

Michele DiGiuseppe, AES SE&I Deputy Lead Lisa Hammond, HLS Associate Prog Mgr

Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS)

Christopher J. Culbert, Manager Darryl C. Gaines, Deputy Manager

Strategic Business Integration Office (XB)

Cathy L. Claunch, Manager Vickie H. Gutierrez, Deputy

Manager

Extra-Vehicular Activity Office (XX)

Christopher P. Hansen, Manager

Michael J. Mankin, Deputy Manager

Exploration Mission Planning Office (XM)

Nujoud Merancy, Manager George Nelson, Deputy

Manager

Exploration Development

Integration Division

(XE)

Burt Laws, Manager Lisa F. Pace, (Acting) Deputy Manager

Astromaterials Research and

Exploration Science Division (XI)

Eileen K. Stansbery, Chief Regina B. Blue, (Acting)

Deputy Chief

Exploration Integration and Science Directorate (XA)

John A. McCullough, Director Ginger Kerrick, Deputy Director

Rebekah D. Reed, Associate Director

Exploration Technology Office (XT)

Carlos Westhelle, Manager Nicholas Skytland, Deputy Manager

April 2021

Exploration Integration and Science Directorate

• Customer-oriented service

– Impactful, influential, reliable, positive, value-added leaders with effective communications

• Mission focus

– Driven to mission success; strategic, executable exploration plans

• Team development

– Develop relationships, individuals, capabilities, collaboration, respectful culture; fostering the environment to grow and learn

• Technical excellence

– Expertise in mission analysis & planning, EVA, astromaterials curation & research, orbital debris, technology advancement, integration, programmatic insight, and partnering

Exploration Integration and Science Guiding Principles

Communicate

Mindset

Relationship

Listen

Action

UNIFY & EXPLORE TO DISCOVER

SOW, J Attachments, DRDs Overview

Known Statement of Work (SOW) Changes

• The SOW, RFP Section Section C, is composed of 2 sections, which outlines the following:

• SOW Section 1

1.1 Management

1.2 Institutional Compliance

1.2.5 Export Control was added

• SOW Section 2 (ordered work)

2.1 Product Safety and Mission Assurance

2.2 Hardware and Software

2.2.7 Project Management was added

2.3 Analysis and Assessment

2.3.6 System and Subsystem Management was added

2.3.7 Export Control Compliance was added

2.4 Facilities

2.4.3 Facility and Laboratory Oversight and Integration was

removed

Known Statement of Work (SOW) Changes (cont.)

2.5 Research and Development

2.6 Special Projects

2.7 Education and Outreach

J Attachments

Section J – Contents PAGE J-1 Applicable Documents .............................................................................................. J1-1 J-2 Data Requirement Description (DRD) ...................................................................... J2-1 J-3 Installation Accountable Government Property ........................................................ J3-1 J-4 Government Furnished Property ............................................................................... J4-1 Appendix 1: List of Government Furnished Property ............................................. J4-1-1 J-5 Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Mitigation Plan ........................................ J5-1 J-6 Safety and Health Plan .............................................................................................. J6-1 J-7 Small Business Subcontracting Plan ......................................................................... J7-1 J-8 Information Technology (IT) Security Plan .............................................................. J8-1 J-9 Government Property Management Plan .................................................................. J9-1 J-10 Contract Phase-In Plan .............................................................................................. J10-1 J-11 Performance Evaluation Plan .................................................................................... J11-1 J-12 Wage Determination .................................................................................................. J12-1 J-13 Total Compensation Plan .......................................................................................... J13-1 J-14 DD Form 254, Department of Defense Contract Security Classification

Specification .............................................................................................................. J14-1 J-15 Partnership and Technology Incubation Plan ............................................................ J15-1 J-16 Efficiencies and Innovations ..................................................................................... J16-1 J-17 Export Control Plan ................................................................................................... J17-1 J-18 Contract Management Plan ....................................................................................... J18-1 J-19 Quality Plan ............................................................................................................... J19-1 J-20 External Customer Plan ............................................................................................. J20-1 J-21 Technology, Innovation and Process Improvements Plan ......................................... J21-1 J-22 Electrical, Electronic and Electromechanical (EEE) Parts Plan ................................ J22-1 J-23 Government-Furnished Computer Software ............................................................. J23-1 J-24 Quality Requirements ............................................................................................... J24-1 J-25 RESERVED ............................................................................................................. J25-1 J-26 Standard Labor Categories (SLCs) ........................................................................... J26-1

DRDs

• Significant DRD changes from the current contract include:

Eliminated DRDs:

o MGMT-02 Work Breakdown Structure and Dictionary o MGMT-04 Staffing and Critical Skills Plan o MGMT-07 Labor Relations Plan o MGMT-14 Contract Closeout Plan o BP-06 Patent Rights Retention o SMA-04 Safety and Health Program Self-Evaluation o SMA-05 Lessons Learned Program Plan and Lessons

Learned o TD-07 Flight Product User’s Guide o TD-10 Space Station Reliability and Maintainability

Predictions Report o TD-19 Risk Assessment Executive Summary Report o TD-20 Non Conformance Record (NCR) o TD-21 Flight Products Failure Analysis Report o TD-22 Engineering Design Change Proposal

Added DRDs:

o MGMT-02 Efficiencies and Innovations o MGMT-04 Export Control Plan o MGMT-06 Partnership and Technology Incubation Plan o BP-04 Financial Reporting Contractor-Held Property o BP-05 Environmental Compliance Reports o BP-06 New Technology Summary Reports o BP-08 SOW 1 Cost Proposal o SMA-05 Software Assurance Plan

Modified DRDs, with brief description of modification:

o MGMT-03 – Clarified the monthly and quarterly contract reviews and reports o BP-02 – Added records to the Data Management Plan o RV-06 – Added Interface Requirements Document (IRD) o TD-16 – Deleted reference to Space Station o TD-18 – Deleted reference to Space Station

• DRDs that are due with the proposal are:

o MGMT-01 Contract Management Plan (as specified in MA1)

(Attachment J-18) o MGMT-02 Efficiencies and Innovations (Attachment J-16) o MGMT-05 Phase-in Plan (Attachment J-10) o MGMT-06 Partnership and Technology Incubation Plan

(Attachment J-15) o MGMT-09 Total Compensation Plan (Attachment J-13) o MGMT-11 Technology, Innovations, and Process Improvement

(TIPI) Plan (Attachment J-21) o MGMT-12 Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) Plan

(Attachment J-5) o MGMT-13 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Attachment J-7) o SMA-03 Safety and Health Plan (as specified in MA2)

(Attachment J-6)

NUMBER TITLE

SECTION 1.0 Contract Management

MGMT-01 Contract Management Plan

MGMT-02 Efficiencies and Innovations

MGMT-03 Contract Management Report and Contract Management Summary Review

MGMT-04 Export Control Plan

MGMT-05 Contract Phase-In Plan

MGMT-06 Partnership and Technology Incubation Plan

MGMT-07 RESERVED

MGMT-08 Notification of Potential Labor Dispute and Contingency Strike Plan

MGMT-09 Total Compensation Plan

MGMT-10 External Customer Plan

MGMT-11 Technology, Innovation, and Process Improvement Plan

MGMT-12 Organizational Conflicts of Interest Mitigation Plan

MGMT-13 Small Business Subcontracting Plan

MGMT-14 RESERVED

SECTION 1.1 Information Technology

IT-01

Information Technology (IT) Capital Planning and Investment Control

(CPIC)

IT-02 Information Technology (IT) Security Plan and Reports

SECTION 1.2 Business Processes

BP-01 NASA Contractor Financial Management Report

BP-02 Data and Records Management Plan

BP-03 Flights Products Configuration Management Plan

BP-04 FINANCIAL REPORTING CONTRACTOR-HELD PROPERTY

BP-05 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE REPORTS

BP-06 New Technology Summary Report

BP-07 Reports Required for Logistics

BP-08 SOW 1 Cost Proposal

BP-09 Government Property Management Plan

BP-10 Re-procurement Data Package

SECTION 1.3 Safety and Mission Assurance

SMA-01 Quality Plan

SMA-02 Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical (EEE) Parts Control Plan

SMA-03 Safety and Health Plan

SMA-04 RESERVED

SMA-05 Software Assurance Plan

SMA-06

Problem Reporting and Corrective Action (PRACA) for the JSC Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) and Flight Products

SMA-07

Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP) and NASA Advisory Problem Data Sharing and Utilization Program Documentation and Reporting

SECTION 2.0 Planning, Requirements, and Verification Documentation

RV-01 Project Schedule

RV-02 Regular Status Report/Summary Review

RV-03 Project Technical Requirements Specification (PTRS)

RV-04 Project Requirements and Verification Document (PRVD)

RV-05 Certification and Acceptance Requirements Document (CARD)

RV-06

Interface Requirements Document (IRD) and/or Interface Control Document

(ICD)

RV-07 End Item Specification

RV-08 Engineering Drawings and Model Files

RV-09 Flight Projects Authorization to Proceed Record

RV-10 Flight Products Verification and Validation Plan

RV-11 Flight Products Qualification Plan

RV-12 Flight Products Qualification Test Procedures

RV-13 Flight Products Acceptance Test Procedures

RV-14 Flight Products Qualification Report

SECTION 2.1

Software Requirements and Verification Documentation

SW-01 Software Requirements Document

SW-02 Software Development Plan

SW-03 Software Design Document

SW-04 Software Code

SW-05 Software Quality Assurance Plan

SW-06 Software Test Description

SW-07 Software Test Plan

SW-08 Version Description Document (Software and/or Firmware)

SECTION 2.2 Technical Products and Data Packages

TD-01 Flight Products System Requirements Review (SRR) Data Package

TD-02 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Data Package

TD-03 Flight Products Critical Design Review (CDR) Data Package

TD-04 Acceptance Data Package (ADP)

TD-05 Limited Life Items List

TD-06 Certification Data Package

TD-07 RESERVED

TD-08 Engineering Analysis

TD-09 Flight Products Verification and Validation Report

TD-10 RESERVED

TD-11 Test Report

TD-12 Delivery and Acceptance Report

TD-13 Electronic Government Certification Approval Request (eGCAR)

SECTION 2.2 Technical Products and Data Packages

TD-14 Flight Products Workmanship Specification List

TD-15

Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical (EEE) Parts List and Analysis Report

TD-16

Hardware Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Critical Items List (CIL)

TD-17 Space Station Payload Safety Data Package

TD-18 Hazard Reports (HRs)

TD-19 RESERVED

TD-20 RESERVED

TD-21 RESERVED

TD-22 RESERVED

Overview of RFP

80JSC022R0003

General Information

• The RFP and amendments take precedence over this conference.

• Competition: Total Small Business Set-aside; NAICS Code 541715, Exception C and Size Standard 1,250

• Subcontracting Goals:

Note: Column A and Column B are for Performance Evaluation Plan, Attachment J-11, purposes only. Column C is for the Basic Contract Goals and Column D is for the Goals for all Option Periods for purposes of Subcontracting Plans (DRD-MGMT-13/J-7 Small Business Subcontracting Plan).

The Contracting Officer’s determination of the appropriate subcontracting goals for this acquisition are as follows:

Target SB Goal Percentages Year 1 (A)

Target SB Goal Percentages

Years 2-3 (B)

Target SB Goal Percentages

Years 4-5 (C)

Target SB Goal Percentages

Years 6-10 (D)

Total SB 30% 31.5% 34% 37%

SDB 5% 5% 5% 5%

WOSB 20% 21% 22% 23%

HBCU/MSI 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 1%

HUBZone 9% 10% 11% 12%

VOSB 9% 10% 11% 12%

SDVOSB 8% 9% 10% 11%

General Information

• Period of Performance:

−Phase-in: August 1, 2022 – September 30, 2022 −Base: October 1, 2022 – September 30, 2027 −Option 1: October 1, 2027 – September 30, 2029 −Option 2: October 1, 2029 – September 30, 2031 −Option 3: October 1, 2031 – September 30, 2032

Contract Type

• Type of Contract: CPAF, with the option to convert to Cost-Plus Fixed Fee, Single-Award IDIQ, cost-reimbursable and FFP task orders IDIQ Task Orders issued will be priced using the established prices in B.12 Fully Burdened Rate Table For Pricing Task Orders for the skills listed in the B.12 tables

B.10 IDIQ Minimum And Maximum Ordering Limits – Minimum Contract Total - $20,000,000, NTE Maximum Contract Total - $1,803,000,000.

The Task Order Procedure is described in Clause I.17, NFS 1852.216-80, Task Ordering Procedure.

Clauses and Provisions

• When reading the RFP, note that:

Important information is contained in the SF33 and numerous clauses and provisions that have been incorporated, via full text and/or referenced text, throughout the document

Clauses incorporated by reference have the same force and effect as if they were included in their full text

Section J includes documents, exhibits, and other attachments For example, Wage Determination Data; Data Requirement

Descriptions (DRD)

System for Award Management (SAM)

• The System for Award Management (SAM) is a Federal Government owned and operated free web site that collects data from suppliers, validates and stores this data, and disseminates it to various government acquisition agencies.

• The SAM website is located at: https://sam.gov/

• You are required to create an account in SAM.

• Verify that your information in this database is current.

Subcontractor Arrangement Information

• If a subcontracting arrangement is proposed, Offerors shall include specific detail as defined in the RFP Section L.25 Responsibility Considerations – Volume

IV.

Joint Ventures

• The Small Business Administration’s new regulation changes the definition of a joint venture to exclude populated joint ventures.

Joint Ventures are defined in FAR 19.101(7)(i) and 13 C.F.R.

121.103(h).

• All parties to the Joint Venture must sign the Model Contract.

Government Property

• Under Clause G.5, NFS 1852.245-71, Installation Accountable Government Property, NASA anticipates providing:

Office Space, work area space, and utilities (including desktop

IT equipment) Office Furniture Property Listed in Section J, Attachment J-3 Publications and blank forms stocked by the installation Safety and Fire Protection Installation service facilities: none Medical treatment of a first aid nature Cafeteria privileges Building maintenance Moving and hauling for office moves

Additional Responsibility Requirements

• In accordance with FAR 16.301-3(a)(3), a cost-reimbursable contract may only be used when the contractor’s accounting system is adequate for determining costs applicable to the contract or order. This requirement also extends to subcontractors performing under a cost-reimbursable subcontract.

• Offerors should review Chapter 8 of the DCAA Audit Manual to determine if they are subject to full or modified Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) coverage and if they require an adequate Disclosure Statement prior to award.

• The link is:

https://www.dcaa.mil/Content/Documents/cam/Chapter_08_- _Cost_Accounting_Standards.pdf

Discussions

• Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the best terms from a price and technical standpoint

• The Government preference is to award without discussions, however, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions with those Offerors who have made it to competitive range

• If discussions are held, the Offeror will:

Have the opportunity to address potentially acceptable items and;

Be requested to resubmit the SF33 with Final Proposal

Revisions (FPR) which will include clearly marked changes.

Anticipated Proposal Outline

• Volume I – Mission Suitability Factor Subfactor 1: Management Approach

Contract Management Approach (targeted portions of the Contract Management Plan including EO 13985)

Safety and Health Approach (targeted portions of the S&H Plan), per NFS provision 1852.223-73

Total Compensation Plan, per NFS provision 1852.231-71 Key Personnel Approach Contract Phase-In Plan

Subfactor 2: Technical Approach Technology, Innovation, and Process Improvement (TIPI) Plan Partnership and Technology Incubation Plan Approach to Project Manager Training/Development Approach to Telework and Remote Work Approach to Manufacturing

Subfactor 3: Small Business Utilization Small Business Subcontracting Plan, per FAR Clause 52.219-9, Small Business

Subcontracting Plan and its Alternate II Commitment to the Small Business Program

• Volume II – Past Performance Introductory Material Past Performance Description Key Personnel Resume Past Performance Attachments Consent Letters

• Volume III – Cost/Price Proposal Cost Narrative Templates

• Volume IV – Responsibility Considerations Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) Information Security Clearance Requirements All Required Department of Labor Information Subcontractor Responsibility Listing Company Information

• Volume V— Model Contract

SF33

Contract Clauses (Fill-ins required Sections B through I) Section J - Attachments Section K - Representations and Certifications

Anticipated Proposal Outline

Mission Suitability factor and Past Performance factor when combined are significantly more important than the Cost or Price factor. As individual factors, Past Performance is equal to Mission Suitability which is more important than Cost/Price.

Mission Suitability consists of 3 subfactors:

Management Approach 600 points Technical Approach 300 points Small Business Utilization 100 points Total 1000 points

Evaluation Factors and Criteria

Proposal Formatting

• Instructions for proposal arrangement, page limitations, copies and the due date are specified in JPI 52.215-113 Proposal Formatting Instructions and Section L.21 Proposal Arrangement, Page Limitations, Copies, And Due Dates of the RFP.

Offerors shall submit their proposals in accordance with those instructions.

Pages submitted in excess of the limitations specified in

Section L.21 will not be evaluated by the Government and will be returned to the offeror in accordance with NFS 1815.204- 70(b).

Minor informalities or irregularities in a proposal that can be adjusted, corrected, or waived without being prejudicial to other offerors may be accepted if it is immaterial to the acquisition.

However, any pages contained in a page limited section of your proposal which do not comply with the RFP requirements may be returned by the Government and not evaluated.

Proposal Formatting, Continued

• Pay close attention to ensure that the number of pages, page margins, font type, font size, and page size are in conformance to Section L.21.

• Return the entire model contract, not just the pages with the fill-ins.

The model contract becomes the actual contract and so it must be complete and correct.

• Please note page limitations.

Some volumes/sections are subject to a page limitation and others are not.

In the Past Performance Volume, the Past Performance

Information is subject to the page limit of 30 pages, but the Environmental Non-Compliance, OSHA Forms 300 and 300A, Insurance Carrier Information, Past Performance Matrix, and Consent Letter are not subject to the page limitation.

Proposal information must be provided in the correct volume.

Proposal information in a page-limited volume or section should not be moved to another volume/section without such page limitations.

• Having non-conforming pages returned may affect the government’s evaluation of a proposal, and how this proposal is ultimately rated.

Responsibility Considerations

• The Contracting Officer makes the determination of responsibility per

FAR 9.104.

Responsible means that the contractor has adequate organizational and financial controls, satisfactory business ethics, financial resources, the ability to successfully perform the work, is eligible, etc.

This determination is performed by the CO and is separate from the selection decision.

If an offeror is not responsible, then they are not eligible for award.

• The Contracting Officer will also check the FAPIIS database (includes records of the Contractor’s previous contracts.)

• The Contracting Officer will request an Equal Opportunity clearance and check to ensure the veteran’s reports are submitted.

• This determination is performed for offerors in the competitive range or the apparent successful offeror only.

Model Contract

• The Model Contract consists of the elements requested in Volume V of the RFP.

• The Evaluation Criteria, and Instructions are used for selection purposes only.

• The Offerors will submit a signed Model Contract with their proposal.

The Model Contract becomes the actual contract and so it must be complete and correct.

The Model Contract must be signed by a person authorized to commit the offeror.

All pages must be returned – not just the pages with the fill-ins.

• The Contracting Officer will sign the Model Contract of the Successful Offeror once all issues are resolved and the selection decision is made.

• Errors or inconsistencies in the Model Contract (that cannot be resolved) may result in an offeror being removed from consideration for award.

• The Model Contract takes precedence over the proposal.

Ensure that your rates in the Cost/Price Volume are reflected in

Section B of the Model Contract.

Model Contract Required Documents

Contract Section Areas of Model Contract Offerors are Required to Complete

Section A

Complete blocks 12 through 18, provide an original signature on each copy, and date the SF 33.

Offerors shall indicate, in Block 12 of the SF 33, a proposal validity period of 365 days.

Section B B.3 – Fill-in value of Firm-Fixed-Price Phase-in B.12 – Fill-in Labor Rate Tables 12.1 and 12.2

Section C No Offeror fill-ins Section D No Offeror fill-ins Section E No Offeror fill-ins Section F No Offeror fill-ins Section G No Offeror fill-ins

Section H H.5, H.6, H.10, H.28, H.27

Section I No Offeror fill-ins

Section J Offerors shall submit the required documents:

J-1, J-2, J-3, J-4, J-5, J-6 (partial), J-7, J-10, J-11, J-12, J-13, J-14, J-15, J- 16, J-18 (partial), J-20, J-21, J-23, J-24, J-26

Section K K.2, Annual Representations and Certifications (FAR 52.204-8), certifications shall be completed electronically and submitted with this volume in accordance with provision.

For the following Provisions the Offeror shall complete as instructed in each provision:

K.3, K.4, K.5, K.6, K.7, K.8, K.9, K.10, K.11

Special Consideration

NOTE TO PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS

Prospective Offerors are reminded not to contact incumbent personnel (either directly or through electronic means) during duty hours or at their place of employment, as such contacts are disruptive to the performance of the current contract.

Jalisa Sims JSC Contractor Industrial Labor Relations

Officer

Labor Relations Guidelines for Responding to Labor Relations

Requirements in the Request for Proposal (RFP)

RFP Requirements

Department of Labor (DOL) Wage Determination Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) Data Requirements Descriptions (DRDs)

•Notification of Potential Labor Dispute & Contingency Strike Plan (MGMT-08) •Total Compensation Plan (MGMT-09)

Labor Relations FAR Clause Updates Points of Contact References

DOL Wage Determination (WD)

The following Service WD is applicable to the DRFP and resultant contract:

Wage Determination 2015-5233, Revision 19 (TX)

► The WD applies to all non-exempt labor categories (not covered by the CBA), and sets forth the minimum labor rates, health and welfare benefits, vacation/holiday leave and sick leave for these categories.

► Based upon your company’s unique staffing approach, please ensure you are mapping all non-exempt labor categories to the appropriate WD Labor Category.

ODD-Numbered WD

Per employee fixed cost fringe benefit requirement computed on the basis of “all hours paid for” by service employees on the contract.

The Health and Welfare benefit is currently $4.23 an hour.

The term “all hours paid for” includes up to 40 hours per workweek and 2,080 hours per year for each employee;

includes paid leave hours, such as for vacations, holidays, or sick leave.

What is a “bona fide” fringe benefit?

The primary purpose of the plan must be to provide systematically for the payment of benefits to employees on account of death, disability, advanced age, retirement, illness, medical expenses, hospitalization, supplemental unemployment benefits, and the like.

29 C.F.R. § 4.171 (a)

What is Not a Bona Fide Fringe Benefit?

Unemployment compensation

Social Security

Relocation Expenses

Any benefit required by federal, state, or local law

Workers’ Compensation

Travel and Transportation

Recruitment Bonuses & Paid Coffee

Breaks

Incentive or Suggestion

Awards

Social Functions or Parties for Birthdays, Anniversaries, etc.

FAR 52.222-62, “Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706”

This clause, dated January 2017 must be read in depth.

This clause to all individuals performing work under the contract subject to FAR 52.222-41 or the Fair Labor Standards Act, i.e. non-exempt employees.

The Contractor shall permit each non-exempt employee engaged in performing work on or in connection with this contract to earn not less than 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked.

The paid sick leave required by this clause is in addition to the

Contractor's obligations under the Service Contract Labor Standards statute, i.e. Health and Welfare benefit, vacation and holiday leave.

Sick leave benefits for unionized employees are stated in the CBA.

WD Responsibilities

• Offeror responsibilities include the following:

Proposing exempt and non-exempt labor categories, based upon their own unique staffing approach.

29 CFR 541 defines exempt and non-exempt employees.

For service non-exempt employees:

Proposing at least the minimum labor rates for the mapped categories as stated in the WD or CBA.

Proposing at least the minimum health and welfare, vacation, sick leave, and holiday benefits that are stated in the WD or

CBA.

CBA

Title: Collective Bargaining Agreement Between Jacobs Technology Inc.

and International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL- CIO and its District No. 37 Local Lodge 1786

Effective Period: July 1, 2021 through April 30, 2024

CBA is included as a Section J attachment.

CBA General Requirements

Offerors are required to work with the union as long as the union is representative of the covered employees.

In accordance with FAR 22.1002-2, Wage determinations based on prevailing rates: “Contractors performing on service contracts in excess of $2,500 to which no predecessor contractor’s collective bargaining agreement applies shall pay their employees at least the wages and equivalent fringe benefits found by the Department of Labor to prevail in the locality or, in the absence of a wage determination, the minimum wage set forth in the Fair Labor Standards Act”.

FAR 22.1002-3(a), Wage determinations based on collective bargaining agreements: “Successor contractors performing on contracts in excess of $2,500 for substantially the same services performed in the same locality must pay wages and fringe benefits (including accrued wages and benefits and prospective increases) at least equal to those contained in any bona fide collective bargaining agreement entered into under the predecessor contract.”

Notification of Potential Labor Dispute & Contingency Strike Plan

Used to facilitate the coordination of activities between the Contractor and the affected NASA operational directorates to ensure that necessary steps are taken to prepare for any potential strike situations and to prevent the disruption of work.

A Notification of Potential Labor Dispute must be submitted by the prime and any subcontractors at the first indication of potential labor unrest and 45 days prior to the expiration of any Collective Bargaining Agreement.

A Contingency Strike Plan must be submitted at contract start and updated if there is any indication of potential labor unrest or potential picketing activity.

Copies of all CBAs must be provided within 30 days of ratification or modification to the Contracting Officer and Contractor Industrial Relations Officer.

Total Compensation Plan (TCP)

• The TCP (MGMT-09) is due with the proposal.

• TCPs identify and discuss wages, salaries, and fringe benefits for professional employees and non-exempt service employees for both the prime and all major subcontractors.

The compensation subcontract threshold can be found in NFS 1852.231-

71(d).

The SLPT is required to evaluate TCPs per FAR 52.222-46, “Evaluation Of

Compensation for Professional Employees” Offeror teams can submit a separate TCP for each team member, a combined TCP for all team members, or any combination thereof.

• Submit FBAC and IRAP in your Cost/Price volume.

• Tip: Be specific when describing employee fringe benefits.

Is the benefit employer versus employee paid, or a combination?

What is the specific benefit and cost to the employee?

When are employees eligible for this benefit? 79

FAR Clause Updates

•FAR 52.222-17, Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers has been removed from the FAR.

•Executive Order (EO) 13495 of January 30, 2009 (Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts), required that successor Federal contractors in certain circumstances offer a right of first refusal of employment to employees employed under the predecessor contract.

•EO 13897 Improving Federal Contractor Operations by Revoking Executive Order 13495 was signed on October 31, 2019.

•Revokes regulations, guidelines, and policies implementing or enforcing Executive Order 13495.

Labor Relations Points of Contact

Name Title Point of Contact Information

Jalisa Sims JSC Contractor Industrial Relations Officer

Jalisa.C.Sims@nasa.gov

Diana DeNardo JSC Contractor Industrial Relations Officer

Diana.Denardo-1@nasa.gov

Byron Williams Union…