ESES IV RFP Questions and Answers (Amend 002).pdf
PDF 137 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 80GSFC21R0051
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Electrical Systems Engineering Services
(ESES) IV
Request for Proposal
Questions and Answers
80GSFC21R0051
May 16, 2023
Note: The questions/comments that were produced in this document were typed as they were submitted.
1. Question: A new SF 33 was not provided in the May 12 update on SAM. Will a new one be provided that reflects the new due date of the proposal?
Response: Yes, an updated SF33 has been provided.
2. Question: Is the May 12 updated RFP an amendment to the RFP issued on April 12?
Will an SF 30 be provided for this update? Should this update be listed on the SF 33 as
Amendment 001?
Response: Yes, May 12 updates were Amendment 001 to the RFP. An updated SF30, as well as updated SF33 have been provided accordingly.
3. Question: The header at the top of the pages of Sections B-M shows it as Draft RFP.
Will another update be released to remove the word "Draft" from the header?
Response: Yes, Sections B-M have been updated to remove the word “Draft”.
4. Question: Advanced Coating and Film Technology Services has been changed to be item
M, now skipping item L. Would the Government please restore Advanced Coating and
Film Technology Services as item L?
Response: Yes, the SOW has been updated to restore the requirements in the previous version.
5. Question: The May 12 version of the SOW Table of Contents (TOC) contains two 3K labels, no 3L label, and one 3M label. The TOC reflects the labeling in the body of the
May 12 SOW. Content wise, the two documents are the same. We request the government to correct the labeling to be as it was in the SOW version released on April
20 with the RFI.
Response: The SOW has been updated to correct the Table of Contents.
6. Question: Please consider removing the page limitation from the Acronym list, since it is not evaluated material and merely an aid to the SEB members. Barring that, please clarify that ‘2 pages (double-sided)’ equals 4 PDF pages.
Response: The page limitation for the Acronym list remains as stated in the May 12th
Questions and Answers document. Yes, “2 pages (double-sided) is equivalent to 4 pdf pages.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .