OCX ATTACHMENT A 418-XO-OCXSOW-0060_V_1_1 Updated.pdf

Effective Date: September 16, 2021 418-XO-OCXSOW-0060 Expiration Date: Five years from date of last signature Baseline Version 1.1 Responsible Organization: GeoXO Flight Project/Code 418

Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work (SOW)

Signature page

Prepared by:

Electronically approved by: 05/19/2021

Marc D. Rafal Date GeoXO Flight Project, Instrument Systems Engineer NASA GSFC, Code 418

Reviewed by:

Electronically approved by: 08/04/2021

Steven W. Bidwell Date GeoXO Flight Project, Mission Systems Engineer NASA GSFC, Code 418

Approved by:

Electronically approved by: 08/12/2021

Monica Todirita Date GeoXO Flight Project, Deputy Project Manager NOAA GSFC, Code 418

/GeoXO Flight Project OCX

OCXSOW

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work (SOW)

Version: 1.1 Printed by: rkhoover Printed on: Monday, September 20, 2021

No filter applied.

No sort applied.

Generated from DOORS 9.6.1.11

Contents

1 1Introduction

1.1 1Top-Level Summary of Work Required

1.2 1Guiding Assumptions About the Eventual Flight Program

1.3 2Study Milestone Schedule

1.4 3Applicable and Reference Documents

2 4Tasks

2.1 4Trade Studies

2.1.1 4Revisit Time Trade Study

2.1.2 4Spectral Resolution Trade Study

2.1.3 4SNR Trade Study

2.1.4 4Reserved

2.1.5 4Data Compression Study

2.2 5OCX Design Concept Development and Related Analyses

2.3 6Technology Assessment and Demonstration

2.4 7Management Planning

3 9Reviews, Reporting, and Deliverable Products

3.1 9Status Meetings and Reviews

3.1.1 9Kickoff Meeting

3.1.2 9Monthly Progress Review (MPR)

3.1.3 9Midterm Review (MTR)

3.1.4 9Final Study Review (FSR)

3.1.5 9Final Report Package (FRP)

3.2 10Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)

4 13Appendix A: Acronyms

Project: GeoXO Flight Project OCX Module: OCXSOW Baseline Version: 1.1

Contents ii

Page 1 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW1

OCXSOW2

OCXSOW3

OCXSOW4

OCXSOW5

OCXSOW6

OCXSOW7

OCXSOW8

Object Number

1.0-1

1.0-2

1.0-3

1.1

1.1.0-1

1.2

1.2.0-1

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

1 Introduction The Ocean Color GeoXO (OCX) is a hyperspectral, UV through infrared, passive imaging radiometer used to measure environmental data as part of a 3-axis stabilized, geostationary weather satellite system. The OCX remotely collects imagery of the Earth’s coastal waters for harmful algal blooms, water turbidity, general water quality, fisheries management, habitat quality/assessment/mapping, pollution tracking, and biogeochemical processing in coastal regions.

The OCX will meet, as a minimum, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) requirements as defined in this Statement of Work (SOW), the OCX Performance and Operation Requirements Document (PORD), the OCX Unique Instrument Interface Document (UIID), the General Interface Requirements Document (GIRD), and the Instrument Mission Assurance Requirements (IMAR) over a ten year mission. For this procurement, in the case of any conflicting requirements, the SOW requirement takes precedence.

This SOW specifies the vendor requirements for performing definition-phase studies and design development as part of OCX formulation activities.

1.1 Top-Level Summary of Work Required

The details of the deliverables are described in later sections. At the top level, the Government requires:

a) An OCX Design that satisfies the baseline requirements defined in the PORD, UIID, GIRD, and IMAR Enhancements to the design beyond the baseline requirements are acceptable if can be implemented on the specified delivery timeline. The list of potential enhancements that the Government has identified are documented in the PORD Appendix.

b) An Assessment of OCX performance against requirements specified in the

PORD.

c) Trade Studies as specified in section 2.1

d) Technical Analysis as described in section 2.2

e) Notional Development Schedule as described in section 2.4

f) Cost Analysis as described in section 2.4

g) Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Assessment and a Technology

Development Plan as described in section 2.3

h) Identification of Development Risks as defined in section 2.4

i) As applicable, performance of any work awarded for Technology

Development and/or Risk Mitigation effort(s)

j) Identification of hardware and software heritage assumptions as defined in section 2.3

1.2 Guiding Assumptions About the Eventual Flight Program

The Flight hardware development cost and schedule estimates shall be based on the following assumptions:

a) 1 Engineering Development Unit (EDU).

Page 2 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW8

OCXSOW10

OCXSOW11

Object Number

1.2.0-1

1.3

1.3.0-1

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

b) 2 Flight Units and spare parts as per sparing philosophy plus options for 2 additional flight units.

c) Deliveries will be as shown in the following schedule (all dates are for the Government Fiscal Year)

MILESTONE DATE (assume 1st day of quarter)

Flight Contract Award Q4 FY23

Flight Model 1 Pre‐Ship

Review (PSR1)

Q1 FY29

Launch 1 Readiness Date Q3 FY32

Flight Model 2 PSR (PSR2) Q4 FY30

Launch 2 Readiness Date Q3 FY35

d) No Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) will be provided.

e) Mission durations: See the PORD. Requirements are to be met at end of operational life.

f) The following instrument-level reviews will be held for the first flight build: SRR, IBR, PDR, CDR, PER, PSR.

g) Subsequent flight builds will hold a PER and PSR. Review pre-requisites, content, and success criteria are documented in NPR 7123.1.

1.3 Study Milestone Schedule

The Contractor shall execute the study in accordance with the following milestone schedule. Requirements and deliverables for these milestones are described in Section 3.

Milestone Schedule

Kickoff Meeting Within two weeks of award

Monthly Progress Reviews Kickoff + 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 months

Mid‐Term Review Kickoff + 6 months

Final Study Review Kickoff + 11.5 months

Final Report Package Kickoff + 12 months

Risk Mitigation Report (as applicable) Kickoff + 20 months

Technology Development Report (as applicable)

Kickoff + 20 months

Page 3 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW12

OCXSOW13

Object Number

1.4

1.4.0-1

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

1.4 Applicable and Reference Documents

Reference Number Title

Applicable Documents

418‐XO‐OCXPORD‐0061 OCX Performance and Operational Requirements

Document

418‐XO‐OCXUIID‐0062 OCX Unique Instrument Interface Document

418‐XO‐GXIGIRD‐0025 GeoXO General Interface Requirements Document

418‐XO‐IMAR‐0026 GeoXO Instrument Mission Assurance Requirements

Reference Documents

NPR 7123.1 NASA Systems Engineering Process and

Requirements

SP‐2016‐6105 NASA Systems Engineering Handbook

GPR 7120.4D GSFC Guideline for Performing Risk Assesments

CCSDS 120.2‐G‐1 Report Concerning Space Data System Standards

GREEN BOOK: LOSSLESS MULTISPECTRAL AND

HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE COMPRESSION

CCSDS 122.1‐B‐1 Recommendation for Space Data System Standards

BLUE BOOK: SPECTRAL PREPROCESSING

TRANSFORM FOR MULTISPECTRAL AND

HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE COMPRESSION

CCSDS 123.0‐B‐2 Recommendation for Space Data System Standards

BLUE BOOK: LOW‐COMPLEXITY LOSSLESS AND

NEAR‐LOSSLESS MULTISPECTRAL AND

HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE COMPRESSION

Page 4 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW14

OCXSOW15

OCXSOW16

OCXSOW17

OCXSOW18

OCXSOW19

OCXSOW20

OCXSOW21

OCXSOW22

OCXSOW23

OCXSOW24

OCXSOW25

OCXSOW26

OCXSOW27

OCXSOW28

OCXSOW29

OCXSOW30

OCXSOW31

OCXSOW32

Object Number

2.0-1

2.1

2.1.0-1

2.1.1

2.1.1.0-1

2.1.1.0-2

2.1.2

2.1.2.0-1

2.1.2.0-2

2.1.3

2.1.3.0-1

2.1.3.0-2

2.1.4

2.1.5

2.1.5.0-1

2.1.5.0-2

2.1.5.0-3

2.1.5.0-4

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

2 Tasks The Contractor shall analyze the OCX requirements, perform trade studies to justify design and a conceptual design for the OCX, and perform all other tasks as specified below.

2.1 Trade Studies

The Contractor shall perform the following trade studies and report on the results at the Midterm Review:

2.1.1 Revisit Time Trade Study

The Contractor shall conduct a trade study to determine the implications of increase the refresh rate beyond the baseline for the time enhancements listed in the PORD Appendix 1, while maintaining compliance to all other specifications defined in the PORD. (CDRL 1)

The Contractor shall document the associated cost, schedule, and risk relative to that of the baseline compliant design. (CDRL 1)

2.1.2 Spectral Resolution Trade Study

The Contractor shall conduct a trade study to augment the baseline OCX with any of the resolution enhancements listed in the PORD Appendix. (CDRL 2)

The Contractor shall document the associated cost, schedule, and risk weighed against predicted performance associated with each design enhancement beyond the baseline requirements. (CDRL 2)

2.1.3 SNR Trade Study

The Contractor shall conduct a trade study to determine the implications of increasing the SNR beyond the baseline for the SNR enhancement listed in the PORD Appendix, while maintaining compliance to all other specifications defined in the PORD. (CDRL 3)

The Contractor shall document the associated cost, schedule, and risk relative to that of the baseline compliant design. (CDRL 3)

2.1.4 Reserved

2.1.5 Data Compression Study

Should the projected data rate exceed the requirement in the UIID, the Contractor shall evaluate compression options to meet the data rate requirement.

Lossy compression algorithms will be considered if the requirements of the PORD are met. (CDRL 4)

In the trade study, the Contractor shall weigh the data quality against data rate and disclose any impact on performance. (CDRL 4)

The Contractor shall assess impacts to the electronics and/or software, cost, schedule, and development risk.

Page 5 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW33

OCXSOW34

OCXSOW35

OCXSOW36

OCXSOW37

OCXSOW38

OCXSOW40

OCXSOW43

OCXSOW44

OCXSOW46

OCXSOW47

OCXSOW48

OCXSOW49

Object Number

2.1.5.0-5

2.2

2.2.0-1

2.2.0-2

2.2.0-3

2.2.0-4

2.2.0-5

2.2.0-6

2.2.0-7

2.2.0-8

2.2.0-9

2.2.0-10

2.2.0-11

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

After the kickoff, the Government will provide standard scenes to be assessed in the trade study. The results of this trade study are due at the Midterm Review. (CDRL 4)

2.2 OCX Design Concept Development and Related Analyses

The Contractor shall develop an OCX design concept and perform associated engineering analyses to justify design parameters, tolerances, design/performance margins, and associated budgets. (CDRL 5)

The Contractor shall provide a quantitative comparison of the OCX performance against the performance requirements in Section 3 of the PORD. (CDRL 6)

The Contractor shall provide a summary of compliance to the Level 3 requirements (PORD, UIID, GIRD, and IMAR), including initial engineering analyses showing compliance to environmental requirements. (CDRL 7)

The Contractor shall review all requirements listed as "TBR" or “TBD” and either concur or suggest new requirement values. The Contractor will quantify potential cost, schedule, and risk impacts of any suggested requirements changes. (CDRL 8)

The Contractor shall define a calibration methodology (both pre-launch and on-orbit) and provide the associated accuracy (pre-launch and on-orbit). Included in this effort will be a description of planned observations, and an examination of calibration FOV impacts, as it is not possible to guarantee a clear FOV in any direction other than down the instrument optical axis (as described in the UIID).

This effort will identify the known spacecraft accommodation dependencies. (CDRL 9)

The Contractor shall analyze the radiometric performance of the instrument concept including the development of a preliminary radiometric model and a preliminary end-to-end radiometric accuracy budget and preliminary radiometric uncertainty budget (pre-launch and on-orbit). (CDRL 10)

The Contractor shall describe the systems approach to meeting all INR and coregistration requirements in the PORD. Such descriptions, including an preliminary error budget, will span relevant flight hardware characteristics, spacecraft motions, operational aspects, and ground processing. (CDRL 11)

The Contractor shall describe the algorithms to be used on the GeoXO ground system for decompression (if needed) and processing to data Level 1b, as described in the PORD. (CDRL 12)

The contractor shall describe the Level 1beta stopping point in the Level 1b OCX ground processing algorithm flow that would yield calibrated and navigated output that is not on the fixed grid (i.e. not resampled if resampling is needed to generate Level 1b on the fixed grid). Impacts to data rate or data processing to achieve L1beta instead of Level1b can be included. (CDRL 12)

The contractor shall review optical safe zones of operation, zones of reduced data quality (ZRDQ), and provide stray light mitigation concept. (CDRL 13)

The Contractor shall identify what operational scans are possible with the concept system. The Contractor will propose efficient combinations of EEZE and GL (as defined in the OCX PORD) that will be compatible with temporal refresh

Page 6 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW49

OCXSOW116

OCXSOW54

OCXSOW55

OCXSOW56

OCXSOW58

OCXSOW61

OCXSOW62

OCXSOW63

OCXSOW64

OCXSOW65

OCXSOW66

Object Number

2.2.0-11

2.2.0-12

2.2.0-13

2.2.0-14

2.2.0-15

2.2.0-16

2.2.0-17

2.2.0-18

2.2.0-19

2.3

2.3.0-1

2.3.0-2

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work requirements. The Contractor will propose efficient combinations of subsections of EEZE (or EEZW) and regions of interest that will be compatible with temporal refresh requirements, especially for EEZW. Regions of interest are smaller, targeted regions that may be ~ 400 km x ~400 km, in a format which are more suitable to the instrument observing format. The complexity of commanding required to change coverage and the impact to data should be minimized. The Contractor will propose the ability to command observation of these regions N times in a flexible pattern in addition to the EEZE or EEZW (instead of repeating the EEZE+GL pattern or EEZW pattern in three hours) and suggest the dimensions and number of the smaller, targeted region of interest that can be covered during a three hour refresh time in additional to the EEZW coverage, using the nominal EEZ+GL coverage rate and meeting other performance requirements. (CDRL 14)

The Contractor shall develop a operation concept for an automated process that uses cloud conditions from GeoXO Imager data and knowledge of solar position to prioritize or optimize scan schedules to acquire the highest value scans within available resources. (CDRL 15)

The Contractor shall provide an initial analysis, and a detailed state diagram, of all use cases/modes for a concept of operations of the instrument and its ability to support engagement and disengagement of all cases/modes (as defined in the PORD) and delivery of telemetry. (CDRL 16)

The Contractor shall describe a reliability approach (planned redundancy, parts selection, etc.) to meet the PORD required reliability for the specified lifetime. (CDRL 17)

The Contractor shall identify single-point failures and fault critical elements. As part of this analysis the Contractor will describe the fault tolerant/graceful degradation features of the design. (CDRL 18)

The Contractor shall develop a Master Equipment List (MEL). The MEL will document the mass, power, and TRL of each major sub-component. A template for the MEL will be provided by the Government. (CDRL 19)

The Contractor shall study the best method for handling of dead pixels and other detector defects and damage. (CDRL 20)

Additionally, the contract shall develop operational or data processing methods to address detector degradation over life of mission. (CDRL 20)

The Contractor shall provide descriptions of any simulation and analytical tools used in the assessment of the design and/or performance, including the heritage and validation of the tools. (CDRL 21)

2.3 Technology Assessment and Demonstration

The Contractor shall assess the technology readiness of all components of the instrument design. (CDRL 22)

If applicable, the Contractor shall provide a detailed Technology Development Plan (TDP), including a schedule, explaining how all technologies will achieve TRL 6 by the instrument PDR. If the study effort includes Technology Development effort, the TDP and associated schedule will clearly identify all of the work covered by the Technology Development. (CDRL 23)

Page 7 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW68

OCXSOW69

OCXSOW70

OCXSOW71

OCXSOW74

OCXSOW75

OCXSOW76

OCXSOW80

OCXSOW81

Object Number

2.3.0-3

2.3.0-4

2.4

2.4.0-1

2.4.0-2

2.4.0-3

2.4.0-4

2.4.0-5

2.4.0-6

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

The Contractor shall develop a EDU Model Philosophy and Plan that describes test plans, schedule, and cost of development for an end-to-end Engineering Development Unit and a test regime proposed by the Contractor. (CDRL 24)

The Contractor shall document the flight hardware and software heritage as well as any relevant differences between the claimed heritage and the proposed design (for example, on-orbit environment, mission duration, requirements, etc.). (CDRL 25)

2.4 Management Planning

The Contractor shall identify and rank risks to the development of the OCX and describe associated mitigations. The likelihood and criticality of risks will be ranked on a 5x5 matrix per GPR 7120.4D. The Contractor will identify alternate implementation paths for all high-risk items. (CDRL 26)

If the study effort includes Risk Mitigation effort, the Contractor shall implement the Risk Mitigation effort under contract, brief the status of this effort at the reviews described in section 3, and provide a final report detailing the work completed, associated results, and the level to which the risk has been mitigated. (CDRL 27)

The Contractor shall define a Spare Philosophy approach for procuring and maintaining an adequate supply of spare parts and subassemblies to minimize cost, schedule, and performance risks caused by part damage or shortages. (CDRL 28)

The Contractor shall develop an implementation phase schedule. The Contractor will assume that the parts for the 4 Flight models and spares will be procured at the same time. The schedule will show the following major instrument reviews: SRR, IBR, PDR, CDR, MRRs, TRRs, PER, and PSR, achievement of TRL6, development of the instrument physical model(s), long-lead (> 1 year) procurements, I&T and V&V activities, and the top three critical paths. The schedule will identify any flight hardware procurements that are started ahead of the completion of the EDU (or equivalent).

The contractor shall suggest dates for the contract starts and other milestones that will minimize the overall cost and minimize the developmental risks. (CDRL 29)

The Contractor shall suggest dates for the FM3 and FM4 contract option starts, deliveries, and other milestones that will minimize the overall cost and minimize the developmental risks to FM1 and FM2. The nominal PSR dates and Launch Readiness Dates (LRDs) for these units are as follows: (CDRL 30)

Mission PSR (Gov. FY) LRD (Gov. FY)

FM3 Q2 FY32 Q3 FY39

FM4 Q2 FY33 Q1 FY43

Page 8 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW82

Object Number

2.4.0-7

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

The Contractor shall provide a parametric cost estimate for the development and production of four flight model instruments, any spare hardware needed for sparing philosophy, and the engineering model recommended in the EDU Model Philosophy & Plan (see section 2.3). The costs will be separately identified for each model, flight unit, required GSE (ground support equipment), and technology development(s) and organized by WBS element. The costs will be shown phased by Government fiscal year. The Contractor will state what parametric model was used in the analysis and provide any inputs to the model beyond the MEL (reference 2.2), describing the heritage of the model. (CDRL 31)

Page 9 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW86

OCXSOW87

OCXSOW88

OCXSOW89

OCXSOW90

OCXSOW91

OCXSOW94

OCXSOW95

OCXSOW98

OCXSOW99

OCXSOW103

OCXSOW104

OCXSOW108

OCXSOW109

Object Number

3.0-1

3.0-2

3.1

3.1.1

3.1.1.0-1

3.1.2

3.1.2.0-1

3.1.3

3.1.3.0-1

3.1.4

3.1.4.0-1

3.1.5

3.1.5.0-1

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

3 Reviews, Reporting, and Deliverable Products The Contractor shall perform the reviews and reporting tasks and provide deliverable products as specified below.

The Contracting Officer's written determination that Government requests for action (RFA's) or requests for information (RFI's) regarding the deliverable reviews and products have been closed out will constitute acceptance of the deliverable.

3.1 Status Meetings and Reviews

3.1.1 Kickoff Meeting

The Contractor shall support a kickoff meeting within 2 weeks of the Authorization to proceed to provide a team introduction, summary of the proposed work for the study, proposed study schedule, and a high-level introduction to the initial imager design concept. (CDRL 32) The Contractor will plan for a 2-hour virtual meeting.

The Contractor will deliver a soft copy of the Kickoff chart set 24 hours prior to the meeting. (CDRL 32) (CCR X00030)

3.1.2 Monthly Progress Review (MPR)

The Contractor shall present the results of the work performed since the previous MPR and discuss relevant technical and programmatic issues and findings. The topics expected to be covered are listed in the CDRLs table in section 3.2. The MPRs will be planned as 4-hour virtual meetings. The Contractor will deliver a soft copy of the MPR chart set 24 hours prior to the meeting. (CDRL 33)

3.1.3 Midterm Review (MTR)

The Contractor shall present a summary of the results of the work performed for the Midterm Review. This review will be held at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, pending travel restrictions. The Contractor will plan on a one and a half day review. The topics expected to be covered are listed in the CDRLs table in section

3.2. The Contractor will deliver a soft copy of the MTR chart set 72 hours prior to the meeting. (CDRL 34)

3.1.4 Final Study Review (FSR)

The Contractor shall present a summary of the results of the work performed for the Final Study Review. The Contractor will plan on a one and a half day review at the Contractor’s facility. If possible, the Government will travel to attend the review in-person, pending travel restrictions. The topics expected to be covered are listed in the CDRLs table in section 3.2. The Contractor will deliver a soft copy of the FSR chart set 72 hours prior to the meeting. (CDRL 35)

3.1.5 Final Report Package (FRP)

The Contractor shall deliver any CDRLs that were not delivered and approved by the Government Contracting Officer (CO) prior to the FSR or any CDRLs requiring updates in the Final Report Package. The Contractor will address any open action items remaining after the FSR in the Final Report Package. The FRP will be delivered within 2 weeks after the FSR. (CDRL 36)

Page 10 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW112

OCXSOW113

Object Number

3.2

3.2.0-1

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

3.2 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)

The Contractor shall deliver the data products specified in the following table.

Table 2: CDRLs SU – Status Updated, UAN Updates As Necessary

ID Deliverable/Task Deliverable format

Kickoff MPR MTR FSR FRP SOW

Ref

1 Revisit Time Trade Study

Report

Briefing

Charts

Status Final UAN UAN 2.1.1

2 Spectral Resolution Trade

Study Report

Briefing

Charts

Status Final UAN UAN 2.1.2

3 SNR Trade Study Report Briefing

Charts

Status Final UAN UAN 2.1.3

4 Data Compression Trade

Study Report

Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.1.5

OCX Design Briefing

Charts +

Models

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

6 Predicted performance vs.

PORD

Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

7 Level‐3 Requirement

Compliance

Spreadsheet Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

8 Suggested values for TBRs Briefing

Charts

Status, final answer by 3rd

MPR

UAN UAN UAN 2.2

9 Calibration Methodology Briefing

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

Page 11 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW113

Object Number

3.2.0-1

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

10 Radiometric Math Model and

Radiometric budgets

Briefing

Charts +

Model + budget spreadsheets

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

11 INR and Coregistration

Approach

Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

12 Level 1b Algorithm Description Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

13 ZRDQ Review and Straylight

Mitigation Concept

Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

14 Plan for Commanding During

Operations and Regions of

Interest

Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

15 Scan Prioritization Concepts Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

16 Modes Analysis Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

17 Reliability Approach Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

18 Single‐Point Failures & Fault

Critical Elements

Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

19 MEL Spreadsheet Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

20 Detector Management

Approach

Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.2

21 Analytical Tools Audit Briefing

Status Final UAN UAN 2.2

Page 12 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW113

Object Number

3.2.0-1

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

22 TRL Assessment Briefing

Charts

Status Final UAN UAN 2.3

23 Technology Development Plan Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.3

24 EDU Model Philosophy & Plan Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.3

25 Heritage Assessment Briefing

Charts

Status Final UAN UAN 2.3

26 Risk Assessment Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.4

27 Risk Mitigation Effort (if applicable)

Briefing

Charts

Status SU SU UAN 2.4

28 Spares Philosophy and Plan Briefing

Charts

SU Prelim Final UAN 2.4

29 Flight Implementation

Schedule

MS Project +

Briefing

Charts

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.4

30 Options Schedule MS Project +

Briefing

Status Prelim Final UAN 2.4

31 Flight Cost Estimate Spreadsheet Status Prelim Final UAN 2.4

32 Kickoff Meeting Briefing

Charts

Charts due 24 hours before

3.1.1

33 MPR Charts Briefing

Charts

24 hrs before

MPRs

3.1.2

34 MTR Charts Briefing

Charts

72 hrs before

MTR

3.1.3

35 FSR Charts Briefing

Charts

72 hrs before

FSR

3.1.4

36 FRP Charts NA 2 wks post

FSR

3.1.5

Page 13 of 13 Printed Monday, September 20, 2021

ID

OCXSOW114

OCXSOW115

Object Number

4.0-1

418-XO-OCXSOW-0060, RM Version, Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Ocean Color (OCX) Statement of Work

4 Appendix A: Acronyms CDR Critical Design Review CDRL Contract Data Requirement List CO Contracting Officer EDU Engineering Development Unit FM Flight Model FRP Final Report Package FSR Final Study Review GeoXO Geostationary Extended Observations GFE Government Furnished Equipment GIRD General Interface Requirements Document GPR Goddard Procedural Requirements GSE Ground Support Equipment GSFC Goddard Space Flight Center IBR Integrated Baseline Review IMAR Instrument Mission Assurance Requirements INR Image Navigation and Registration LRD Launch Readiness Date MEL Master Equipment List MPR Monthly Progress Review MRR Manufacturing Readiness Review MTR Mid-Term Review NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NPR NASA Procedural Requirements OCX GeoXO Ocean Color PDR Preliminary Design Review PER Pre-Environmental Review PORD Performance and Operation Requirements Document Qx FYz Quarter x of Fiscal Year z PSR Pre-Shipment Review RFA Request for Action RFI Request for Information SNR Signal to Noise Ratio SOW Statement of Work SRR System Requirements Review SU Status Update TBR To Be Reviewed TDP Technology Development Plan TRL Technology Readiness Level TRR Test Readiness Review UAN Update as Necessary UIID Unique Instrument Interface Document ZRDQ Zones of Reduced Data Quality

Effective Date: September 16, 2021 418-XO-OCXSOW-0060 Expiration Date: Five years from date of last signature Baseline Version 1.1 Responsible Organization: GeoXO Flight Project/Code 418

Document Change Record (DCR)

CCR GeoXO#: X00021 Rev: A Title: 418-XO-OCXSOW-0060 Baseline OCX SOW Contract # N/A GOES S/C: GeoXO Effectivity: Instruments CCB Status: Approved Doc #: 418-XO-OCXSOW-0060 CCB Date: 08/12/2021 Doc Version: 1.0 Contract Mod#: N/A DOORs Version: 1.0 Doc Change Date: August 12, 2021 DOORs ID #: All

CCR GeoXO#: X00030 Rev: Title: OCXSOW: for a typo in CDRL cross-reference Contract # N/A GOES S/C: GeoXO Effectivity: Instruments CCB Status: Approved Doc #: 418-XO-OCXSOW-0060 CCB Date: 09/11/2021 Doc Version: 1.1 Contract Mod#: N/A DOORs Version: 1.1 Doc Change Date: Sept 16, 2021 DOORs ID #: Modify: OCXSOW91 (3.1.1.0-1)