Attachment Z - IDIQ Statements of Work CMIST-II Cleaned.pdf

Attachment Z includes SOWs from IDIQ orders expected to be active at the time of CMIST-II award and orders that have already been identified for after award.

Offerors are not to propose to any of these orders.

NEPA Support - Radioisotope Power System Program (Code MR)

1.0 Purpose

The contractor shall provide environmental support services to implement the NEPA process in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), NASA Procedures for Implementing NEPA (14 CFR part 1216.3) and NASA Procedural Requirements (NPR) Implementing NEPA (NPR 8580.1A).

2.0 SCOPE and TASKS

In accordance with NEPA, the contractor shall assist and attend, as requested, with presentations, document preparation and review, and planning, for NEPA related milestones and meetings in support of the NEPA and Launch Approval Management function of the RPS Program. This shall include, but is not limited to:

1. Attendance at

- Regular tag-ups with the RPS TR (1 hour meetings weekly)

- RPS weekly staff meetings (1 hours per week)

- Missions specific and Programmatic NEPA meetings (example Dragonfly, Trident, or Programmatic GPHS NEPA document) (estimated 3 hours per week)

- Support of development of NASA NEPA policy (NPRs), standards, and guidelines at the request of the TR. (1 hour per week)

- Support of intermittent additional RPS NEPA milestones, submittals, and meetings (examples include but are not limited to Programmatic and Mission Specific NEPA kick-off meetings, PPBE, NEPA topics presented to the RPS PCB, NEPA topics presented to the RPS monthly meetings, unique report reviews, and NASA NEPA nuclear working groups, (estimated average 4 hours per week)

Estimated average hours per week for Task 1: 10 hours

2. Specialized knowledge to support as requested, review and comment of RPS NEPA documents and NEPA policy documents (EA, EIS, RECs, Handbooks, SOWs, NPRs, CEQ NEPA Rule, etc) in accordance with NASA requirements (14 CFR 1216.3 and NPR 8580.1A and to assist with both preparation of meetings and resolution of action items (see task 1) from above listed meetings and for milestones, as assigned by the RPS TR.

Estimated average hours per week for Task 2: 10 hours

Task One

3. Support and attendance of community of practice meetings, trainings, and conferences such as N3 (NASA NEPA Network) meetings, NEPA related trainings (both NASA and external, example Shipley’s reviewing NEPA docouments), and the Nuclear Emerging Technology for Space conference over the course of the task. Training courses may have additional costs.

Estimated average hours over the course of the fiscal year for Task 3: 80 hours Estimated cost of training/travel: $2,500

4. Ability to attend regular onsite GRC meetings (once return to work status is established).

5. Familiarity with the NASA NEPA Handbook is beneficial, but not required.

Total estimated hours per week for tasks 1&2: 20 hours per week

Estimated costs for travel/training (task 3): $2,500 + an additional 80 hours

May 16, 2023

Statement of Work Building 302 MOCVD Decommissioning

Work Description Base Bid Please provide a cost for the labor, necessary materials and equipment for the decommissioning of two reactors in Building 302 in their entirety including valves, manifolds, cabinets, scrubbers, tubing and oils. Both reactors shall be free of contaminates once complete to allow for disposal and/or reuse. Reactor one is a home‐ built quartz‐ tube system located in Room 111. Reactor two is the Veeco D125 (stainless steel reaction chamber) located in Room

109. Both systems utilized III‐V materials (toxic gases of Arsenic, Phosphorous, Silane; and organo‐ metallics (pyrophorics) of Trimethyl Indium, Trimethyl Aluminum, Diethyl Zinc, Trimethyl Gallium, Trimethyl Antimony, and maybe 1‐2 more). All of the toxic gases and pyrophoric cylinders were removed from both reactors by NASA personnel. The reactors shall be decommissioned and dismantled. Reactor two shall be crated up for shipping. Once crated NASA will take possession of the reactor for processing through excess. Photograph documentation shall be turned over to NASA showing the reactor placed in the crates prior to sealing them. Reactor one shall remain in place and disposed of during demolition.

Option 1 Please provide a cost for the labor, necessary materials and equipment for the removal of the ductwork associated with the home‐ built quartz‐ tube system located in Room 111 and Veeco D125 located in Room 109. The ductwork shall be removed all the way to the roof and properly disposed of. Roof penetrations shall be patched and sealed to prevent the elements from entering the building.

Task Two

AFFF Replacements and Alternatives Feasibility Study 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I GENERAL

1.01 Introduction

1.02 Background

1.03 Scope of Work

PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.01 50% Report

2.02 70% Report

2.03 Final Report

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.01 Miscellaneous

3.02 Conferences and Meetings

3.03 Submittals

APPENDIX-A Reference Material ……………………….……………………….………..…...

BUILDING 4 FIRE PROTECTION ANALYSIS - FINAL REPORT dated, November 7, 2014

BUILDING 4 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS BASIS OF DESIGN ANALYSIS dated September 11, 2018

AFFF Replacements and Alternatives Feasibility Study 4

SOW for upgrade of the fire suppression systems. The SOW was completed in 2017 but was never constructed.

Now with the new rules and regulations for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) proposed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and AFFF being phase out, NASA is looking to convert legacy foam systems to fluorine free systems to minimize the agency’s environmental liability and reduce impact to mission. NASA is requesting an expert in aircraft hangar fire suppression systems to provide engineering direction, and analysis of alternative system approaches and how best to replace the AFFF system.

1.03 Scope of Work

The scope of this report is for the A/E (fire protection engineer) to review the B4 Fire Protection Assessment from 2014, and the follow on, Performance Based SOW for the Fire Suppression (High Expansion Foam) system and make any revisions based on current codes and standards. Then the focus is to evaluate any other alternatives for providing fire suppression to the hangar with environmentally compliant (fluorine free) foam system or with any other compliant technique or system.

Approach 1: Review existing AFFF system and provide discussion on modifications to convert to fluorine free foam system.

Approach 2: Investigate other fire suppression systems alternatives and techniques to replace AFFF with emphasis on eliminating PFAS and providing an environmentally (fluorine free) compliant system.

For both Approaches use the following factors to evaluate:

1. Code Compliance

2. Pros/Cons with Alternatives

3. Integration with existing Fire Alarm System

4. Cost – Rough order of Magnitude

5. Containment

6. Environmental and Health Concerns

7. Liability

In addition, the A/E shall provide a discussion and ROM cost for all necessary decontamination and disposal required for the existing AFFF replacement. Include any costs for remaining components of the existing AFFF system that were exposed to the AFFF concentrate that will need to be cleaned to remove the PFAS from the component.

Items below shall also be included in the scope of the study for the approaches and included in the Final Report deliverable.

AFFF Replacements and Alternatives Feasibility Study 5

A. Validate the Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimates for each concept study option, potential phases, broken down to include major line items, to verify that each project option is within expected costs and update the cost estimates to reflect calendar year (CY) 2024 costs.

B. Drawings shall be AutoCAD or similar programs, 11 x 17-inch drawings are acceptable provided they are folded and fit in a standard 3 ring binder.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.01 50% Report

A Progress report shall be submitted that includes:

A. A review of the previous B4 Fire Protection Assessment from 2014, and the follow on, Performance Based SOW (High Expansion Foam) for the Fire Suppression system with revisions based on current codes and standards.

B. A list of alternatives for providing fire suppression to the hangar with environmentally compliant (fluorine free) foam system or with any other compliant technique or system.

2.02 75% Report

A Progress report shall be submitted that includes:

A. Evaluation of the alternatives. Discussion shall include description of alternatives conceptual drawings, code compliance, pros/cons, integration with existing fire alarm system, containment, implementation concerns, and environmental and health concerns.

B. Preliminary Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimates for each of the alternatives.

C. Preliminary discussion and ROM cost for all necessary decontamination and disposal required for the existing AFFF replacement.

2.03 Final Report

The final report shall be submitted that includes:

A. Final Evaluation of Alternatives and discussion.

AFFF Replacements and Alternatives Feasibility Study 6

B. Final Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimates, implementation plan, P&ID and all back-up data.

C. Final ROM cost for all necessary decontamination and disposal required for the existing AFFF replacement.

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.01 Miscellaneous

A. The requested services require A/E firms who have expertise in aircraft structures fire suppression systems and equipment. The fire protection engineer shall be a licensed professional engineer in the principles and practices of fire protection engineering in the state of Ohio.

B. This Statement of Work, field investigation, and coordination with NASA research and facilities personnel shall be used as the basis for this study.

C. This study shall utilize English units of measure unless directed otherwise by NASA research personnel.

D. The A-E services shall result in an interim submittal reports, and a final report, containing any conceptual drawings/sketches, calculations, cost estimates, back-up data, etc…

E. Upon completion of the project, the A-E shall return any Government furnished material to the COR.

F. Any design recommendations / modifications shall comply with the pertinent requirements of the latest edition of the following codes and standards as applicable including but not limited to:

1. Ohio Building Code & Fire Code

2. International Building Code

3. Life Safety Code

4. NASA-STD-8719.11B, Safety Standard for Fire Protection

5. NASA STD 8719.17,

6. NFPA 70 National Electrical Code

7. IEEE power system standards

8. NFPA 11, 20 and 409 (or others that may apply)

9. U.S. Air Force ETL 02-15

10. MIL-PRF-32725 Performance Specification - Fire Extinguishing

Agent, Fluorine-Free Foam (F3) Liquid Concentrate, For Land- Based, Fresh Water Applications

AFFF Replacements and Alternatives Feasibility Study 7

3.02 Conferences and Meetings

A. Prior to beginning the project, an initial telecon or face-to-face session shall take place between the A-E Project Team and the NASA Project Team, within two weeks from the date of contract award. This shall be used as a ‘kick-off’ meeting to review the scope of work tasks and agree on a go-ahead plan.

B. The A-E shall be responsible for taking notes at all conferences and meetings.

Pertinent items in telephone conversations between the A-E and NASA project team shall be included in these notes. Notes of conferences, meetings, and telephone conversations shall be submitted within five (5) working days of the occurrence. The A-E shall acknowledge, in the conference notes, transmittal of any material between parties, submit copies of the correspondence pertinent to the execution of the contract, and provide a brief statement of job progress.

C. Bi-weekly scheduled project meetings will be held at Glenn Research Center and teleconference calls will be held as required by the NASA project team. An agenda shall be prepared in advance of each meeting by the A-E to assure a thorough exchange of information on each part of the work.

D. Virtual teleconferences are acceptable to communicate and relay project information. NASA prefers utilizing Microsoft TEAMS to conduct virtual team meetings.

3.03 Submittals

A. All drawings, computer disks, and other submittal documents submitted by the A-E along with accompanying transmittal letters shall be sent directly to:

Paul Kuehn, C.O.R.

NASA Glenn Research Center Facilities Division, MS 86-7 21000 Brookpark Road BrookPark, Ohio 44135 Email: paul.a.kuehn@nasa.gov

B. The reports shall be formatted using MS Word or Adobe Acrobat pdf submitted electronically or on a NASA designated shared cloud system.

Printouts suitable for reproduction on a standard copier shall also be provided.

The final report shall be assembled into 3-ring binders with 8-1/2 x 11-inch pages. 11 x 17-inch drawings are acceptable provided they are folded and fit in a standard 3 ring binder. Five (5) copies shall be provided.

AFFF Replacements and Alternatives Feasibility Study 8

C. The reports shall include:

1. Table of Contents

2. Scope of Report

3. Evaluation of Alternatives

4. Cost Estimates (if applicable)

5. Conclusions / Recommendations

6. Appendices (calculations, reference documents, back-up data, etc…)

If the COR determines that the submittal is incomplete, it will be returned to the A-E within ten (10) business days after the submittal is received. The A-E shall correct the deficiencies and resubmit at the same progress level until the submittal is acceptable.

STATEMENT OF WORK FOR RETROCOMMISSIONING ACTIVITES AT BUILDING 49 AT GLENN

RESEARCH CENTER (GRC)

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The overall purpose of this project is to perform the final phase of the retro-commissioning activities in Building 49, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH. This portion of the project will perform a full test and balance (TAB) of Building 49. All air and water flows in the HVAC systems will be rebalanced to CxA developed and owner reviewed TAB schedules.

Equipment which was repaired in earlier phases of the project will have the repairs validated. All HVAC equipment will undergo final functional testing by the CxA to ensure optimum system operation and validate the previous phases of the retro-commissioning process.

2. BACKGROUND

A goal of this effort will be to test and verify repairs completed in earlier phases of this project were completed successfully and return the HVAC system to peak efficiency. See Attachment A for Phase 1 Investigative Reports for B49 that included preliminary functional testing and identification of repairs.

Building 49 Materials and Structures Laboratory is a two-story structure with a basement, approximately 100,000 sf, and was originally built in 1949. The building underwent a major renovation in 1998. It now consists of a mixture of 30% office space and 70% laboratory space.

The offices are served by fan coil units and a dedicated Make Up Air (MAU) unit. The laboratory areas are served by AHUs and VAV boxes with reheat and VAV tracking exhaust systems. The total maximum outdoor air to the building is 117,000 cfm. The basement, first, and second floor laboratories are served by 3 different air handlers connected to VAV boxes in each room. Most fume hoods in each room are connected to one of two Manifold Exhaust Systems (MEF1 & 2 and MEF 3&4) which exhaust fume hood exhaust out of the building. There are also separate room exhaust fans. Pressurization of each lab is controlled by using VAV supply boxes, fume hood sash sensors, fume hood exhaust boxes, and general exhaust boxes. These systems run 24/7 all year round and this building is one of the largest energy consumption buildings. The following is a breakdown of the scope of work for the building. See attached spreadsheet outlining the existing HVAC assets in Building 49, which shall be used as a template for the final report.

3. OBJECTIVES

Retro-Commissioning (RCx) is a systematic process applied to existing buildings for identifying and implementing operational and maintenance improvements and for ensuring their continued performance over time. RCx assures system functionality. It is an inclusive and systematic process that intends not only to optimize how equipment and system operate, but also to optimize how the

Task Four system components function together. The primary focus is using Operations & Maintenance (O&M) tune-up activities and diagnostic testing to optimize the building systems.

This scope of work is for the final phase of the retro-commissioning process in Building 49. It includes validation of repairs completed in earlier phases of the retro-commissioning process as well as system functional testing and a full test and balance of the building.

Primary Objectives:

1. Validate operational and maintenance enhancements that result in improvements in energy efficiency, occupant comfort, or indoor air quality.

2. Test and document system operation using standardized check sheets for each piece of equipment.

3. Optimize and tune control systems through recommendation of any available control strategies that are not already implemented. Document any changes.

4. Improve building performance by saving energy and reducing operational costs.

5. Identify and document any remaining building system operation, control, and maintenance problems.

6. Reduce occupant comfort complaints and increase occupant satisfaction.

7. Improve indoor environmental comfort and quality. Document ventilation to each space.

8. Provide and implement recommendations for trending, logging, or alarming to

“Continuously Commission” the buildings.

9. Document HVAC System Operation.

Commissioning Agent Qualifications: The Commissioning Agent (CxA) should have experience in Commissioning, Recommissioning and Retro-commissioning in the climate and type of commissioning to be performed. For example, if the building to be commissioned is laboratory, office, or warehouse, the firm should have experience with the systems and equipment in that type of building. And as climates often dictate the type of HVAC, lighting, and other controls used, experience in the geographic area is required. Building 49 is mostly office spaces.

Contractor/CxA Responsibilities:

1. Review and become familiar with the retro-commissioning work already completed on building

49. See Attachment A for Phase 1 Investigative Report for B49.

a. Documentation Review and Initial Site Walk-through - Review building drawings and documentation to understand the building energy usage and initial basis of design, changes to design and use, and to evaluate the system integration. The review process includes the evaluation of all record drawings, previous Test and Balance Reports, Operations & Maintenance Manuals (typically related to mechanical, electrical and controls), and any past Commissioning Reports. NASA project team will provide relevant drawings and any available test reports or documents. New balance schedules will be provided by the CxA.

b. Review the current facility functions to identify changes from the original design criteria and assumptions. Identify any potential issues.

c. Review current codes and standards to identify those applicable to the current facility requirements.

2. Develop a full TAB air and water balancing schedule for building 49 containing each space, each piece of exhaust and makeup air equipment, and each water side balancing point. Schedules shall be prepared utilizing existing drawings, previous air balancing schedules (where available), and building walkthroughs.

a. Evaluate each space to determine how much makeup air should be provided and how much exhaust air is removed.

b. For spaces with pressurization control (namely labs), determine the CFM offset between supply and exhaust flows to maintain sufficient negative pressurization.

c. Evaluate each space in the field and provide a recommended amount of makeup air that should be provided based on HVAC industry standards (ex. ASHRAE 62.1) and good engineering practice.

d. Provide building pressurization control.

e. For all VAV boxes in the building provide a recommended air flow range for a test and balancing contractor to balance to.

f. For all general exhaust boxes in the building, provide a recommended air flow range for a test and balancing contractor to balance to.

g. For all waterside balancing points (namely coils and triple duty valves) provide a flow balancing point for the TAB contractor to balance to.

h. For all exhaust sources in the building (fume hoods, snorkels, etc.), provide an exhaust flow rate for each piece of equipment to be balanced to.

i. Balancing schedule shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the government before TAB activities begin.

3. CxA shall be (or shall hire a subcontractor who is) TABB, AABC or NEBB certified and shall conduct appropriate testing and balancing TAB procedure and reports. All HVAC airside and waterside equipment shall be rebalanced to CxA developed balancing schedules for the building which have been reviewed and approved by the government.

4. Prefunctional Testing: Early in the project schedule, the CxA/TAB shall perform prefunctional testing on systems identified for balancing and functional testing. The goal of this activity is to identify any additional repairs or work that may be needed to fully balance and functional test the building systems.

5. CxA shall develop a functional testing program that objectively verifies that the building systems perform interactively in accordance with project documents. Written repeatable test procedures, prepared specifically for this project, will be used to functionally test components and systems in all modes of operating conditions specified for testing. These tests shall be documented to clearly describe the individual systematic test procedures, the expected systems response or acceptance criteria for each procedure, the actual response or findings, and any pertinent discussion. Testing procedures or “check sheets” shall be submitted to the government and approved before TAB and retro-commissioning activities begin. CxA shall perform or witness all testing performed.

a. System Functional Testing - Perform system testing to evaluate the building systems performance. System testing includes going through equipment sequence of operations. In addition, any anomalies or issues identified in earlier investigation Cx Phase 1 steps should be evaluated during system testing to ensure the issue has been addressed or determine root causes and possible solutions. The testing process includes the verification of all sensors. Additionally, the local onsite controls representative is Siemens. Subcontract and coordinate with Siemens as necessary for performing functional testing. All subcontracting costs shall be broken out separately for each subcontractor when submitting bids to the government.

6. System tuning – Optimize and implement recommended control sequences. Partner with Siemens to make changes. Review control sequences and EMCS trend data to ensure systems are functioning efficiently. Ensure industry standard optimization sequences (temperature resets, static resets, etc.) have been implemented or work with Siemens to implement these sequences. A complete documentation of the updated control sequences for each piece of equipment shall be supplied with the final revalidation report. This sequence shall include both existing unchanged and new/updated sequence components.

a. An EMCS trending and logging plan shall be developed and implemented by the CxA to provide “Continuous Commissioning” of the building. These trends shall indicate and alarm when additional repairs or adjustments are needed to equipment.

7. Any additional repairs or system deficiencies discovered during the TAB or Revalidation process shall be brought to the attention of the government.

8. CxA shall provide a final retro-commissioning report, providing a comprehensive record of the entire retro-commissioning project. Final report to include facility description, retro-commissioning process, TAB reports, functional system test reports, documentation of current operational requirements. The Final Report shall include completed copies of all testing records including filled out check sheets and forms, data trends, or logs that indicate testing results.

9. Provide retro-commissioning implementation schedule.

10. Provide meeting minutes.

4. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS.

In addition to the services discussed above, the CxA shall be responsible for the following:

a. Field Survey Details

a. Project Liaison. A Team Lead will work closely with GRC Facilities Team. The Contractor

Team Lead will be responsible for all contractor coordination and for coordination with the NASA project team. The Contractor shall develop a project schedule ensure that all work is coordinated with the appropriate base personnel.

b. Center Regulations. All Center regulations must be followed. If access to normally restricted areas is needed, the Contractor shall request assistance from the NASA project team in arranging for such access.

b. Schedule of Work

a. Following award of this authorization, the Contractor shall prepare a proposed schedule of work.

c. Minimum Meeting Requirements (in person)

a. Kickoff Meeting to discuss scheduling, field work, and any other hurdles to project implementation

b. Upon completion of the field work, the Contractor shall provide an out brief to the designated GRC personnel on findings and recommendations so far as is known at the time of the out-brief.

c. After the final submittal and system tuning, the Contractor shall brief GRC regarding findings and recommendations.

d. Contractor shall be responsible for documenting meeting notes and observations from the briefings and distributing them to the GRC Facilities Team.

5. DELIVERABLES:

1. The number of copies required for the study report submittal shall be as follows. In addition, all originals will be submitted at the final stage.

ITEM

Final Retro-commissioning Report (Including appendices with completed check sheets, updated sequences, new balancing schedule, and any other relevant documentation or engineering work performed during the project)

2 hard copies and 1 electronic copy.

Appendices shall be supplied to the government in their native format (Excel, CAD, etc.)

Updated Sequence of Operations (can be included in report appendices)

2 hard copies and 1 CAD file for each piece of equipment

2. The time allowed for development of the study submittal and the respective review periods shall be as follows. The number of days indicated shall be construed as calendar days. The A/E shall develop a plan of action and milestones (POAM) to accelerate submission of the final study as possible.

REVALIDATION STAGES DUE DATES

Kick-off Meeting Within 7 days of award. Coordinate meeting with GRC.

RCx TAB & Functional Testing Plan 15 business days after kick-off.

Prefunctional Testing Complete 90 days from award.

TAB Schedule 90 days from award.

Functional Testing Procedures 120 days from award.

Draft Final Retro-commissioning Report 60 days after completion of testing.

Government Review Period Completed within 5 days of draft report submittal.

Final Retro-Commissioning Report 30 days after Draft submittal

STATEMENT OF WORK FOR RETROCOMMISSIONING ACTIVITES AT BUILDING 105 AT GLENN

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The overall purpose of this project is to perform the final phase of the retro-commissioning activities in Building 105, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH. This portion of the project will perform a full test and balance (TAB) of Building 105. All air and water flows in the HVAC systems will be rebalanced to CxA developed and owner reviewed TAB schedules.

Equipment which was repaired in earlier phases of the project will have the repairs validated. All HVAC equipment will undergo final functional testing by the CxA to ensure optimum system operation and validate the previous phases of the retro-commissioning process.

2. BACKGROUND

A goal of this effort will be to test and verify repairs completed in earlier phases of this project were completed successfully and return the HVAC system to peak efficiency. See Attachment A for Phase 1 Investigative Reports for B105 that included preliminary functional testing and identification of repairs.

Building 105 Materials Processing Laboratory is a two story structure with a basement, approximately 42,000 sf and was originally built in 1960. The building had various mechanical and electrical rehabilitations in 1993, 1997 and 2002. The building consists of offices, laboratories, and machine shop space. The Building 105 Retro-Commissioning Study recommended repair of the majority of HVAC equipment in the building. A budget was prepared to include cleaning and repairing of air handlers, fan coil units and VAV boxes, controls modifications, test and balancing (TAB) and recommissioning of all systems. The following is a breakdown of the scope of work for the building. See attached spreadsheet outlining the existing HVAC assets in Building 105, which shall be used as a template for the final report.

3. OBJECTIVES

Retro-Commissioning (RCx) is a systematic process applied to existing buildings for identifying and implementing operational and maintenance improvements and for ensuring their continued performance over time. RCx assures system functionality. It is an inclusive and systematic process that intends not only to optimize how equipment and system operate, but also to optimize how the system components function together. The primary focus is using Operations & Maintenance (O&M) tune-up activities and diagnostic testing to optimize the building systems.

This scope of work is for the final phase of the retro-commissioning process in Building 105. It includes validation of repairs completed in earlier phases of the retro-commissioning process as well as system

Task Five functional testing and a full test and balance of the building.

Primary Objectives:

1. Validate operational and maintenance enhancements that result in improvements in energy efficiency, occupant comfort, or indoor air quality.

2. Test and document system operation using standardized check sheets for each piece of equipment.

3. Optimize and tune control systems through recommendation of any available control strategies that are not already implemented. Document any changes.

4. Improve building performance by saving energy and reducing operational costs.

5. Identify and document any remaining building system operation, control, and maintenance problems.

6. Reduce occupant comfort complaints and increase occupant satisfaction.

7. Improve indoor environmental comfort and quality. Document ventilation to each space.

8. Provide and implement recommendations for trending, logging, or alarming to

“Continuously Commission” the buildings.

9. Document HVAC System Operation.

Commissioning Agent Qualifications: The Commissioning Agent (CxA) should have experience in Commissioning, Recommissioning and Retro-commissioning in the climate and type of commissioning to be performed. For example, if the building to be commissioned is laboratory, office, or warehouse, the firm should have experience with the systems and equipment in that type of building. And as climates often dictate the type of HVAC, lighting, and other controls used, experience in the geographic area is required. Building 105 is a mixture of laboratory and office spaces.

Contractor/CxA Responsibilities:

1. Review and become familiar with the retro-commissioning work already completed on building

105. See Attachment A for Phase 1 Investigative Report for B105.

a. Documentation Review and Initial Site Walk-through - Review building drawings and documentation to understand the building energy usage and initial basis of design, changes to design and use, and to evaluate the system integration. The review process includes the evaluation of all record drawings, previous Test and Balance Reports, Operations & Maintenance Manuals (typically related to mechanical, electrical and controls), and any past Commissioning Reports. NASA project team will provide relevant drawings and any available test reports or documents. New balance schedules will be provided by the CxA.

b. Review the current facility functions to identify changes from the original design criteria and assumptions. Identify any potential issues.

c. Review current codes and standards to identify those applicable to the current facility requirements.

2. Develop a full TAB air and water balancing schedule for building 105 containing each space, each piece of exhaust and makeup air equipment, and each water side balancing point.

Schedules shall be prepared utilizing existing drawings, previous air balancing schedules (where available), and building walkthroughs.

a. Evaluate each space to determine how much makeup air should be provided and how much exhaust air is removed.

b. For spaces with pressurization control (namely labs), determine the CFM offset between supply and exhaust flows to maintain sufficient negative pressurization.

c. Evaluate each space in the field and provide a recommended amount of makeup air that should be provided based on HVAC industry standards (ex. ASHRAE 62.1) and good engineering practice.

d. Provide building pressurization control.

e. For all VAV boxes in the building provide a recommended air flow range for a test and balancing contractor to balance to.

f. For all general exhaust boxes in the building, provide a recommended air flow range for a test and balancing contractor to balance to.

g. For all waterside balancing points (namely coils and triple duty valves) provide a flow balancing point for the TAB contractor to balance to.

h. For all exhaust sources in the building (fume hoods, snorkels, etc.), provide an exhaust flow rate for each piece of equipment to be balanced to.

i. Balancing schedule shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the government before TAB activities begin.

3. CxA shall be (or shall hire a subcontractor who is) TABB, AABC or NEBB certified and shall conduct appropriate testing and balancing TAB procedure and reports. All HVAC airside and waterside equipment shall be rebalanced to CxA developed balancing schedules for the building which have been reviewed and approved by the government.

4. Prefunctional Testing: Early in the project schedule, the CxA/TAB shall perform prefunctional testing on systems identified for balancing and functional testing. The goal of this activity is to identify any additional repairs or work that may be needed to fully balance and functional test the building systems.

5. CxA shall develop a functional testing program that objectively verifies that the building systems perform interactively in accordance with project documents. Written repeatable test procedures, prepared specifically for this project, will be used to functionally test components and systems in all modes of operating conditions specified for testing. These tests shall be documented to clearly describe the individual systematic test procedures, the expected systems response or acceptance criteria for each procedure, the actual response or findings, and any pertinent discussion. Testing procedures or “check sheets” shall be submitted to the government and approved before TAB and retro-commissioning activities begin. CxA shall perform or witness all testing performed.

a. System Functional Testing - Perform system testing to evaluate the building systems performance. System testing includes going through equipment sequence of operations. In addition, any anomalies or issues identified in earlier investigation Cx Phase 1 steps should be evaluated during system testing to ensure the issue has been addressed or determine root causes and possible solutions. The testing process includes the verification of all sensors. Additionally, the local onsite controls representative is Siemens. Subcontract and coordinate with Siemens as necessary for performing functional testing. All subcontracting costs shall be broken out separately for each subcontractor when submitting bids to the government.

6. System tuning – Optimize and implement recommended control sequences. Partner with Siemens to make changes. Review control sequences and EMCS trend data to ensure systems are functioning efficiently. Ensure industry standard optimization sequences (temperature resets, static resets, etc.) have been implemented or work with Siemens to implement these sequences. A complete documentation of the updated control sequences for each piece of equipment shall be supplied with the final revalidation report. This sequence shall include both existing unchanged and new/updated sequence components.

a. An EMCS trending and logging plan shall be developed and implemented by the CxA to provide “Continuous Commissioning” of the building. These trends shall indicate and alarm when additional repairs or adjustments are needed to equipment.

7. Any additional repairs or system deficiencies discovered during the TAB or Revalidation process shall be brought to the attention of the government.

8. CxA shall provide a final retro-commissioning report, providing a comprehensive record of the entire retro-commissioning project. Final report to include facility description, retro-commissioning process, TAB reports, functional system test reports, documentation of current operational requirements. The Final Report shall include completed copies of all testing records including filled out check sheets and forms, data trends, or logs that indicate testing results.

9. Provide retro-commissioning implementation schedule.

10. Provide meeting minutes.

4. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS.

In addition to the services discussed above, the CxA shall be responsible for the following:

a. Field Survey Details

a. Project Liaison. A Team Lead will work closely with GRC Facilities Team. The Contractor

Team Lead will be responsible for all contractor coordination and for coordination with the NASA project team. The Contractor shall develop a project schedule ensure that all work is coordinated with the appropriate base personnel.

b. Center Regulations. All Center regulations must be followed. If access to normally restricted areas is needed, the Contractor shall request assistance from the NASA project team in arranging for such access.

b. Schedule of Work

a. Following award of this authorization, the Contractor shall prepare a proposed schedule of work.

c. Minimum Meeting Requirements (in person)

a. Kickoff Meeting to discuss scheduling, field work, and any other hurdles to project implementation

b. Upon completion of the field work, the Contractor shall provide an out brief to the designated GRC personnel on findings and recommendations so far as is known at the time of the out-brief.

c. After the final submittal and system tuning, the Contractor shall brief GRC regarding findings and recommendations.

d. Contractor shall be responsible for documenting meeting notes and observations from the briefings and distributing them to the GRC Facilities Team.

5. DELIVERABLES:

1. The number of copies required for the study report submittal shall be as follows. In addition, all originals will be submitted at the final stage.

ITEM

Final Retro-commissioning Report (Including appendices with completed check sheets, updated sequences, new balancing schedule, and any other relevant documentation or engineering work performed during the project)

2 hard copies and 1 electronic copy.

Appendices shall be supplied to the government in their native format (Excel, CAD, etc.)

Updated Sequence of Operations (can be included in report appendices)

2 hard copies and 1 CAD file for each piece of equipment

2. The time allowed for development of the study submittal and the respective review periods shall be as follows. The number of days indicated shall be construed as calendar days. The A/E shall develop a plan of action and milestones (POAM) to accelerate submission of the final study as possible.

REVALIDATION STAGES DUE DATES

Kick-off Meeting Within 7 days of award. Coordinate meeting with GRC.

RCx TAB & Functional Testing Plan 15 business days after kick-off.

Prefunctional Testing Complete 90 days from award.

TAB Schedule 90 days from award.

Functional Testing Procedures 120 days from award.

Draft Final Retro-commissioning Report 60 days after completion of testing.

STATEMENT OF WORK FOR RETROCOMMISSIONING ACTIVITES AT BUILDING 60 AT GLENN

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The overall purpose of this project is to perform the final phase of the retro-commissioning activities in Building 60, Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH. This portion of the project will perform a full test and balance (TAB) of building 60. All air and water flows in the HVAC systems will be rebalanced to CxA developed and owner reviewed TAB schedules.

Equipment which was repaired in earlier phases of the project will have the repairs validated. All HVAC equipment will undergo final functional testing by the CxA to ensure optimum system operation and validate the previous phases of the retro-commissioning process.

2. BACKGROUND

A goal of this effort will be to test and verify repairs completed in earlier phases of this project were completed successfully and return the HVAC system to peak efficiency. See Attachment A for Phase 1 Investigative Reports for B60 that included preliminary functional testing and identification of repairs.

Building 60 Business Service Center is a two-story structure, approximately 43,400 sf and was originally built in 1951. The building underwent a complete rehabilitation in 2007. Building 60 consists of mostly office spaces and conference rooms. The Building 60 Retro-Commissioning Study recommended repair of several pieces of equipment in order to restore efficient HVAC operation in the building and maximize occupant comfort. See attached spreadsheet outlining the existing HVAC assets in Building 60, which shall be used as a template for the final report.

3. OBJECTIVES

Retro-Commissioning (RCx) is a systematic process applied to existing buildings for identifying and implementing operational and maintenance improvements and for ensuring their continued performance over time. RCx assures system functionality. It is an inclusive and systematic process that intends not only to optimize how equipment and system operate, but also to optimize how the system components function together. The primary focus is using Operations & Maintenance (O&M) tune-up activities and diagnostic testing to optimize the building systems.

This scope of work is for the final phase of the retro-commissioning process in building 60. It includes validation of repairs completed in earlier phases of the retro-commissioning process as well as system functional testing and a full test and balance of the building.

Task Six

Primary Objectives:

1. Validate operational and maintenance enhancements that result in improvements in energy efficiency, occupant comfort, or indoor air quality.

2. Test and document system operation using standardized check sheets for each piece of equipment.

3. Optimize and tune control systems through recommendation of any available control strategies that are not already implemented. Document any changes.

4. Improve building performance by saving energy and reducing operational costs.

5. Identify and document any remaining building system operation, control, and maintenance problems.

6. Reduce occupant comfort complaints and increase occupant satisfaction.

7. Improve indoor environmental comfort and quality. Document ventilation to each space.

8. Provide and implement recommendations for trending, logging, or alarming to

“Continuously Commission” the buildings.

9. Document HVAC System Operation.

Commissioning Agent Qualifications: The Commissioning Agent (CxA) should have experience in Commissioning, Recommissioning and Retro-commissioning in the climate and type of commissioning to be performed. For example, if the building to be commissioned is laboratory, office, or warehouse, the firm should have experience with the systems and equipment in that type of building. And as climates often dictate the type of HVAC, lighting, and other controls used, experience in the geographic area is required. Building 60 is mostly office spaces.

Contractor/CxA Responsibilities:

1. Review and become familiar with the retro-commissioning work already completed on building

60. See Attachment A for Phase 1 Investigative Report for B60.

a. Documentation Review and Initial Site Walk-through - Review building drawings and documentation to understand the building energy usage and initial basis of design, changes to design and use, and to evaluate the system integration. The review process includes the evaluation of all record drawings, previous Test and Balance Reports, Operations & Maintenance Manuals (typically related to mechanical, electrical and controls), and any past Commissioning Reports. NASA project team will provide relevant drawings and any available test reports or documents. New balance schedules will be provided by the CxA.

b. Review the current facility functions to identify changes from the original design criteria and assumptions. Identify any potential issues.

c. Review current codes and standards to identify those applicable to the current facility requirements.

2. Develop a full TAB air and water balancing schedule for building 60 containing each space, each piece of exhaust and makeup air equipment, and each water side balancing point. Schedules shall be prepared utilizing existing drawings, previous air balancing schedules (where available), and building walkthroughs.

a. Evaluate each space to determine how much makeup air should be provided and how much exhaust air is removed.

b. For spaces with pressurization control (namely labs), determine the CFM offset between supply and exhaust flows to maintain sufficient negative pressurization.

c. Evaluate each space in the field and provide a recommended amount of makeup air that should be provided based on HVAC industry standards (ex. ASHRAE 62.1) and good engineering practice.

d. Provide building pressurization control.

e. For all VAV boxes in the building provide a recommended air flow range for a test and balancing contractor to balance to.

f. For all general exhaust boxes in the building, provide a recommended air flow range for a test and balancing contractor to balance to.

g. For all waterside balancing points (namely coils and triple duty valves) provide a flow balancing point for the TAB contractor to balance to.

h. For all exhaust sources in the building (fume hoods, snorkels, etc.), provide an exhaust flow rate for each piece of equipment to be balanced to.

i. Balancing schedule shall be submitted, reviewed and approved by the government before TAB activities begin.

3. CxA shall be (or shall hire a subcontractor who is) TABB, AABC or NEBB certified and shall conduct appropriate testing and balancing TAB procedure and reports. All HVAC airside and waterside equipment shall be rebalanced to CxA developed balancing schedules for the building which have been reviewed and approved by the government.

4. Prefunctional Testing: Early in the project schedule, the CxA/TAB shall perform prefunctional testing on systems identified for balancing and functional testing. The goal of this activity is to identify any additional repairs or work that may be needed to fully balance and functional test the building systems.

5. CxA shall develop a functional testing program that objectively verifies that the building systems perform interactively in accordance with project documents. Written repeatable test procedures, prepared specifically for this project, will be used to functionally test components and systems in all modes of operating conditions specified for testing. These tests shall be documented to clearly describe the individual systematic test procedures, the expected systems response or acceptance criteria for each procedure, the actual response or findings, and any pertinent discussion. Testing procedures or “check sheets” shall be submitted to the government and approved before TAB and retro-commissioning activities begin. CxA shall perform or witness all testing performed.

a. System Functional Testing - Perform system testing to evaluate the building systems performance. System testing includes going through equipment sequence of operations. In addition, any anomalies or issues identified in earlier investigation Cx

Phase 1 steps should be evaluated during system testing to ensure the issue has been addressed or determine root causes and possible solutions. The testing process includes the verification of all sensors. Additionally, the local onsite controls representative is Siemens. Subcontract and coordinate with Siemens as necessary for performing functional testing. All subcontracting costs shall be broken out separately for each subcontractor when submitting bids to the government.

6. System tuning – Optimize and implement recommended control sequences. Partner with Siemens to make changes. Review control sequences and EMCS trend data to ensure systems are functioning efficiently. Ensure industry standard optimization sequences (temperature resets, static resets, etc.) have been implemented or work with Siemens to implement these sequences. A complete documentation of the updated control sequences for each piece of equipment shall be supplied with the final revalidation report. This sequence shall include both existing unchanged and new/updated sequence components.

a. An EMCS trending and logging plan shall be developed and implemented by the CxA to provide “Continuous Commissioning” of the building. These trends shall indicate and alarm when additional repairs or adjustments are needed to equipment.

7. Any additional repairs or system deficiencies discovered during the TAB or Revalidation process shall be brought to the attention of the government.

8. CxA shall provide a final retro-commissioning report, providing a comprehensive record of the entire retro-commissioning project.