J.1-A Statement of Work - Amendment 2.pdf

RFP 80GRC022R0016 Attachment J.1-A

Space Flight Systems Development and Operations

Contract III (SpaceDOC III)

Base Contract and Indefinite Delivery Indefinite

Quantity (IDIQ)

Statement of Work

DRAFT

Dated: January 6, 2023

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

2. Scope

3. Applicable and Reference Documents

4. Performance Work Statements

4.1. MANAGEMENT

4.1.1. Cost Reporting

4.1.2. Configuration Management

4.1.3. Property Management

4.1.4. Systems Engineering Management

4.1.5. Reviews

4.1.6. Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Task Orders

4.1.7. Export Control

4.1.8. Education and Public Outreach

4.2. PRODUCT ASSURANCE

4.2.1. Quality Management

4.2.2. System Safety

4.2.3. Materials and Processes

4.2.4. Reliability and Maintainability

4.2.5. Software Product Assurance

4.2.6. Risk Management

4.3. CONCEPT STUDIES

4.3.1. Key Activities

4.3.2. Reviews

4.3.3. Documentation/Deliverables

4.4. CONCEPT AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT

4.4.1. Key Activities

4.4.2. Reviews

4.4.3. Documentation/Deliverables

4.5. PRELIMINARY DESIGN & TECHNOLOGY COMPLETION

4.5.1. Key Activities

4.5.2. Reviews

4.5.3. Documentation/ Deliverables

4.6. FINAL DESIGN AND FABRICATION

4.6.1. Key Activities

4.6.2. Reviews

4.6.3. Documentation / Deliverables

4.7. SYSTEM ASSEMBLY, INTEGRATION & TEST, LAUNCH & CHECKOUT

4.7.1. Key Activities

4.7.2. Reviews

4.7.3. Documentation / Deliverables

4.8. OPERATIONS & SUSTAINMENT

4.8.1. Key Activities

4.8.2. Reviews

4.8.3. Documentation / Deliverables

4.9. CLOSEOUT

4.9.1. Key Activities

4.9.2. Reviews

4.9.3. Documentation / Deliverables

4.10. RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY

4.10.1. Formulation

4.10.1.1. Key Activities

4.10.1.2. Reviews

4.10.1.3. Documentation / Deliverables

4.10.2. Implementation

4.10.2.1. Key Activities

4.10.2.2. Reviews

4.10.2.3. Documentation / Deliverables

4.11. GLENN CONTRACT WORK CONTROL SYSTEM (GCWCS)

Appendix A

1. INTRODUCTION

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Glenn Research Center

(GRC) implements several space-related programs within the Space Flight Systems Directorate (SFSD). GRC has space flight development responsibility that range from the Space Launch System (SLS) program, Orion service module, Gateway, numerous microgravity research investigations on International Space Station (ISS) and launch vehicles, ISS power system, electric propulsion systems, human research projects, space flight technology developments and demonstrations of advanced power, propulsion, communications and other systems, and the potential for space science instrumentation packages. In addition, NASA works with other government agencies and organizations to develop technologies and space flight hardware and software.

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the contractor’s efforts required to perform definition, design, development, analysis, fabrication, assembly, test, verification, delivery, and/or operation of space flight systems. The statement of work defines a Base portion of the contract, broken down into multiple project-specific Base Orders, and an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) portion defined further by separate Delivery Orders.

The statement of work is structured by the NASA project life-cycle phases as outlined in NPR 7120.5 for NASA Space Flight Programs (Figure 1):

Formulation

- Pre-Phase A Concept Studies

- Phase A Concept and Technology Development

- Phase B Preliminary Design and Technology Completion

Implementation

- Phase C Final Design and Fabrication

- Phase D System Assembly, Integration & Test, and Launch

- Phase E Operations and Sustainment

- Phase F Closeout

The statement of work is structured by the NASA project life-cycle phases as outlined in NPR 7120.8 for NASA Research and Technology Development projects (Figure 2).

Figure 1 - Typical Project Management Process, NASA Project Life Cycle (Ref: NPR 7120.5)

Figure 2 –NASA Research & Technology Project Life Cycle (Ref: NPR 7120.8A)

Requirements and end-item deliverables for each Base/Delivery Order will be defined based upon the life-cycle phase of the project. The development approach may be tailored as appropriate to most effectively meet the requirements of the particular deliverable.

2. SCOPE

The contract encompasses the development and delivery of technology development hardware and software, space flight hardware and software, ground support equipment, spares, as well as mission integration and operations, and sustaining engineering. As such, the contractor shall be responsible for the definition, design, development, analysis, fabrication, assembly, test, verification, delivery, and/or operation of space flight systems, associated support systems and equipment, and related ground development activities, that include research and technology developments and demonstrations. During execution of this scope, the contractor shall be able to conduct frequent and timely interactions either onsite or near onsite to GRC to ensure effective interactions between the contractor hardware development teams, and the GRC Base Order and Delivery Order Managers and/or Project Scientists to ensure the Principal Investigator’s (PI's) science or other customer requirements are satisfied. In addition to conducting interactions with NASA, the contractor shall provide customer (e.g., PI and science team or other customers) access and use of hardware and/or software early in the development cycle as well as in the latter stages of hardware development. This contract scope can support all NASA GRC work content as described above and all NASA mission directorates as well as other agreements NASA has with other government agencies and non-government organizations.

Space flight hardware and research & technology development and demonstrations may include, but is not limited to:

1. Research investigations on the International Space Station and/or other space or suborbital platforms (commercial or government) including Lunar-based platforms and free-fliers, for, however not limited to, study phenomena in fluid physics, soft matter, combustion science, material science, bioscience and other microgravity areas and investigate commercial applications;

2. Applied research and technology investigations on the International Space Station and/or other space or suborbital platforms (commercial or government) including Lunar-based platforms and free-fliers, to accommodate space exploration requirements for, however not limited to, life support systems, power, propulsion, communications, navigation, radiation, human health, and energy storage and distribution;

3. Human Research investigations to include exercise countermeasures, exploration medical capability, computational modeling, and crew health risk assessments;

4. Acceleration measurement instruments that measure and characterize the acceleration environment of or within space flight systems and/or vehicles;

5. Sustaining engineering and operations of ISS or other space-based research investigations, technology demonstrations, facility class and individual payloads, acceleration measurement instruments, and other space related operations;

6. Flight hardware and software development for the ISS subsystems, space science satellite and robotic instruments, space flight vehicle subsystems, space flight test articles (e.g. payloads and satellites), and space communications systems that could fly on commercial or government launch vehicles;

7. Technology developments and/or demonstrations leading to advanced space flight systems in the areas of power, propulsion, in-space propulsion, lunar surface and in-situ resource applications, communications, navigation, and energy storage and distribution.

8. Advanced ground and suborbital systems in support of research, testing and technology development and/or the overall system development and operations.

Particular requirements and tailoring of this SOW for the Base and IDIQ portion will be defined in a Base/Delivery Order for each specific project’s deliverables and milestones. The contractor shall, except as otherwise specified herein and/or in the Base/Delivery Orders, furnish all personnel, facilities, materials, services, and other items and functions necessary to complete the work. Each Base/Delivery Order will be complete upon acceptance of all required deliverables by the designated NASA Project Manager.

3. APPLICABLE AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

The nature of flight hardware development is such that conformance to various standards and codes will be specified if required. Those that are applicable will be specified in each Base/Delivery Order. Typical standards and codes, which may be required of the contractor, are the following:

• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM International) Standards

• Military Specifications and Standards

• American National Standards Institute (ANSI) codes as sponsored by American Society Of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

• Department of Transportation Regulations

• NASA Standards and Handbooks

• Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Standards

The NASA Office of Chief Engineer OCE has established a set of endorsed engineering standards for NASA Space Flight and Technology Development projects. These standards apply for spacecraft, launch vehicles, instruments developed for space flight projects, research and technology for infusion into space flight projects, critical technical facilities specifically developed or significantly modified for space flight systems, and ground systems that are in direct support of space flight operations. These endorsed technical standards are listed in the applicable documents Table 1 and are required for all portions of this Statement of Work unless deviation or waiver approval has been granted by NASA.

The contractor may propose alternatives to these standards if use of alternatives can lead to a better or less costly product that satisfies requirements and regulations. NASA will review the alternatives to determine if they are acceptable.

The contractor shall identify and acquire additional applicable documents, not explicitly called out herein, needed to meet the requirements of the base or delivery order. NASA will review the additional applicable documents for approval prior to implementation. The contractor shall be responsible for properly utilizing such documents.

The contractor shall ascertain the totality of the applicable documents and shall use each in accordance with the document’s purpose. In the event of conflicting requirements, the requirements stated in the Base/Delivery Order shall take precedence.

Refer to the most current approved version of documents listed in Table 1, Table 2 or anywhere in this SOW. Table 2 identifies some key reference documents that define NASA’s approach to developing and managing space flight and technology development programs.

See http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/ for the current versions of applicable and reference NASA policy and procedure documentation. See http://standards.nasa.gov for the current versions of the OCE Endorsed Engineering Standards (where multiple versions of a standard exist, the most recent version shall be used). See https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/grcdirectives/ for the latest GRC Policies and Procedures.

Table 1: Applicable specification and standards documents for the Prime Contract

Document Number Document Title

NPD 2810.1 NASA Information Security Policy

NPR 6000.1

Requirements for Packaging, Handling, and Transportation for Aeronautical and Space Systems, Equipment, and Associated Components

NPR 7120.5 NASA Space Flight Program and Project Management Requirements

NPR 7120.8 NASA Research and Technology Program and Project Management Requirements

NPR 7123.1 NASA Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements

NPR 7150.2 NASA Software Engineering Requirements

NPR 8735.2 Hardware Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Programs and Projects

GLPR 8000.4 GRC Risk Management

GLPR 7120.5.20 GRC Project Deviation/Waiver Process

GLPR 7120.5.30 Space Assurance Requirements

Document Number Document Title

GLPR 8739.1 GRC Software Assurance and Software Safety

GLP-QS-8715.1 NASA Glenn Safety Manual

GLM-FE-8500.1 GRC Environmental Programs Manual

Draft Surveillance Plan

AFSPCMAN 91-710-V1-7 Range Safety User Requirements Manuals, Volumes 1 through 7- Air Force Space Command Range Safety

AIA/NAS NAS 410 National Aerospace Standard Certification and Qualification of Nondestructive Test Personnel

AIAA G-077-1998 Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations

AIAA S-080 Space Systems - Metallic Pressure Vessels, Pressurized Structures, and Pressure Components

AIAA S-081 Space Systems - Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels (COPVs)

AIAA S-110 Space Systems - Structures, Structural Components, and Structural Assemblies

AIAA S-111 Qualification and Quality Requirements for Space Solar Cells

AIAA S-112 Qualification and Quality Requirements for Space Solar Panels

AIAA S-113 Criteria for Explosive Systems and Devices Used on Space and Launch Vehicles

AIAA S-114 Moving Mechanical Assemblies for Space and Launch Vehicles

AIAA S-119 Flight Dynamics Model Exchange Standard

AIAA S-120 Mass Properties Control for Space Systems

AIAA S-121 Electromagnetic Compatibility Requirements for Space Equipment and Systems

AIAA S-122 Electrical Power Systems for Unmanned Spacecraft

FAA HF-STD-001 Human Factors Design Standard

Document Number Document Title

IEEE 24765 Systems and Software Engineering - Vocabulary

EEE-INST-002 Instructions for EEE Parts Selection, Screening, Qualification, and Derating

MIL-STD-1472 DoD Design Criteria Standard - Human Engineering

MIL-STD-1542 Electromagnetic Compatibility and Grounding Requirements for Space System Facilities

MIL-STD-1553 Digital Time Division Command/Response Multiplex Data Bus

MIL-STD-1576 Electro explosive Subsystem Safety Requirements and Test Methods for Space Systems

MIL-STD-461 Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Subsystems and Equipment

MIL-STD-464 Electromagnetic Environmental Effects, Requirements for Systems

MIL-STD-704 Aircraft Electric Power Characteristics

MIL-STD-810 Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests

SMC-S-008 Electromagnetic Compatibility Requirements for Space Equipment and Systems

SMC-S-016 Test Requirements for Launch, Upper-Stage and Space Vehicles

NASA-SPEC-5022 NASA Manufacturing and Test Requirements for Normally Closed Pyrovalves for Hazardous Flight Systems Applications

NASA-STD-1006 Space System Protection Standard

NASA-STD-1008 Classifications and Requirements for Testing Systems and Hardware to be Exposed to Dust in Planetary Environments

NASA-STD-2831 Metadata Standard for Data Discoverability

NASA-STD-3001, VOL. 1 NASA Space Flight Human-System Standard, Volume 1: Crew Health

NASA-STD-3001, VOL. 2 NASA Space Flight Human-System Standard Volume 2: Human Factors, Habitability, and Environmental Health

NASA-STD-4003 Electrical Bonding For NASA Launch Vehicles, Spacecraft, Payloads, And Flight Equipment

Document Number Document Title

NASA-STD-4005 Low Earth Orbit Spacecraft Charging Design Standard

NASA-STD-4009 Space Telecommunications Radio Systems (STRS) Architecture Standard

NASA-STD-5001 Structural Design and Test Factors of Safety for Spaceflight Hardware

NASA-STD-5002 Load Analyses Of Spacecraft And Payloads

NASA-STD-5005 Standard for the Design and Fabrication of Ground Support Equipment

NASA-STD-5006 General Welding Requirements for Aerospace Materials

NASA-STD-5008 Protective Coating of Carbon Steel, Stainless Steel, And Aluminum On Launch Structures, Facilities, And Ground Support Equipment

NASA-STD-5009 Nondestructive Evaluation Requirements for Fracture Critical Metallic Components

NASA-STD-5012 Strength and Life Assessment Requirements for Liquid Fueled Space Propulsion System Engines

NASA-STD-5017 Design and Development Requirements for Mechanisms

NASA-STD-5018 Strength Design and Verification Criteria for Glass, Ceramics, and Windows in Human Space Flight Applications

NASA-STD-5019 Fracture Control Requirements for Spaceflight Hardware

NASA-STD-5020 Requirements for Threaded Fastening Systems in Spaceflight Hardware

NASA-STD-6001 Flammability, Offgassing, and Compatibility Requirements and Test Procedures

NASA-STD-6012 Corrosion Protection for Space Flight Hardware

NASA-STD-6016 Standard Materials and Processes Requirements for Spacecraft

NASA-STD-6030 Additive Manufacturing Requirements for Spaceflight Systems

NASA-STD-7001 Payload Vibroacoustic Test Criteria

NASA-STD-7002 Payload Test Requirements

Document Number Document Title

NASA-STD-7003 Pyroshock Test Criteria

NASA-STD-7009 Standard for Models and Simulations

NASA-STD-7012 Leak Test Requirements

NASA-STD-8739.8 Software Assurance and Software Safety

SAE AS-22759 Wire, Electrical, Fluoropolymer-Insulated, Copper or Copper Alloy

SAE AS-4373 Test Methods for Insulated Electric Wire

SAE AS-50881 Wiring, Aerospace Vehicles

SAE AS-5698 Space Power Standard

SAE/EIA 649-2 Configuration Management Requirements for NASA Enterprises

SAE/EIA-649C Configuration Management Standard

RTCA/DO-178 Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification (only for aviation-related projects)

Table 2: Reference documents for the Prime Contract

Document Number Title

SAE AS9100

Quality Management Systems - Requirements for Aviation, Space, and Defense Organizations

GLP-1120.1 GRC Technical Authority Implementation Plan (TAIP)

GLP-LS-7123.17 Trade Study Handbook

SP-2016-6105 NASA Systems Engineering Handbook

4. PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENTS

The following describes what is required of the contractor for the successful implementation of the overall contract as well as mission-specific Base/Delivery Order requirements. The contractor shall deliver all data that is required by this contract including the Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) in accordance with the delivery schedule in the CDRL in Attachment J.1-B.

4.1. MANAGEMENT

The contractor shall be responsible for the overall management of the SpaceDOC III contract. As part of the management function, the contractor shall deliver the following contract level documents to NASA, per the schedule identified in the Contract Deliverable Requirements List (CDRL) for each DID, in Attachment J.1-B:

CDRL# TITLE

CD-01 CONTRACTOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT REPORTING

CD-02 TECHNICAL REPORTING AND MANAGEMENT REVIEWS

CD-03 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN

CD-04 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN

PM-01 SPACEDOC III MANAGEMENT PLAN

PM-02 RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

PM-04 CONFIGURATION AND DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN

PM-06 CONTRACTOR BASE/DELIVERY ORDER WORK PLAN

PM-09 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT PLAN

V-08 SIMULATION SOFTWARE VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PLAN

PA-01 SAFETY AND MISSION ASSURANCE PLAN

PA-11 SAFETY AND HEALTH PLAN

The contractor shall provide a management function for the monitoring, control, and reporting of the specific Base/Delivery Order efforts. The contractor shall develop and maintain a management plan for the overall contract in accordance with SpaceDOC III Management Plan (DID# PM-01) that describes the contract implementation approach, including the systems and processes, to provide overall coordination of contract management activities for accomplishing the Statement of Work.

The contractor’s management function shall provide an integrated master schedule to NASA for each Base/Delivery Order, with milestones, activities, tasks, key design reviews/decision gates and the critical path out to the projected delivery date clearly defined, taking into account available resources. The contractor’s schedule shall identify priorities of tasks, dependencies and relationships among tasks and schedule margin. The contractor’s schedule shall also include similar information from subcontractors, where applicable, in sufficient detail to develop a realistic critical path. The schedule shall be updated and delivered monthly in accordance with Technical Reporting and Management Review (DID# CD-02).

The contractor’s management function shall provide reporting to NASA and real-time insight into status in accordance with the Contractor Financial Management Reporting (DID# CD-01), as well as technical and performance measurement of all contractor responsibilities and activities performed under the Base/Delivery Order.

The contractor shall deliver Base/Delivery Order monthly technical reports and contract-level monthly reports and reviews in accordance with Technical Reporting and Management Reviews (DID# CD-02).

The contractor shall implement appropriate management systems that prevent the improper dissemination of NASA, Government and/or commercial sensitive information. All contractor and subcontractor internal data, reviews, audits, meetings, and other activities pertinent to the execution of a Base/Delivery Order shall be open to NASA attendance to provide NASA insight.

To facilitate NASA attendance the contractor shall provide reasonable and timely notification of events to NASA.

The contractor shall develop an Information Technology System Management Plan to document the cybersecurity controls employed for all information systems and resources used in support of the SpaceDOC III contract per the Information Technology System Security Plan (DID# CD-03). The contractor shall also develop an Information Technology Security Management Plan to describe the processes and procedures that will be followed to ensure appropriate cybersecurity controls are used to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of NASA data that is developed, processed, stored, or transmitted under the SpaceDOC III contract at the Glenn Research Center per Information Technology Security Management Plan (DID# CD-04).

The contractor shall develop a Simulation Software Verification and Validation Plan that describes processes that will be used to conduct Verification and Validation (V&V) of software used for modeling and simulation software per the Simulation Software Verification and Validation Plan (DID# V-08).

The contractor shall respond to all new and updated Base/Delivery Orders submitted by NASA with an integrated work plan in accordance with Contractor Base/Delivery Order Work Plan (DID# PM-06).

The following paragraphs describe detailed requirements for performance measurement, configuration management, property management, and review requirements that apply to all elements.

4.1.1. Cost Reporting

The contractor shall provide NASA with the necessary information to implement the Government Surveillance Plan to monitor product assurance, identify significant problems, and implement corrective action. The contractor shall provide monthly cost, projected cost, and approach to controlling resources in accordance with Contractor Financial Management Reporting (DID# CD-01) and Technical Reporting and Management Reviews (DID# CD-02) for the contract. Additional Base/Delivery Order specific technical performance measurement requirements may also be identified in the Base/Delivery Order. The contractor shall participate in a monthly progress review meeting for each Base/Delivery Order with the identified NASA Project Manager (Base/Delivery Order technical manager) to review their cost analysis, schedule status, technical status, issues, and to conduct technical discussions to assure understanding of all Base/Delivery Order requirements.

4.1.2. Configuration Management

The contractor shall establish a configuration management process to control critical hardware, software, and documentation. The contractor shall develop a Configuration Management Plan that defines the specific processes in accordance with Configuration and Data Management Plan (DID# PM-04). The contractor shall also implement an engineering control system that shall review and approve changes to drawings, documentation, software design, software code, parts lists, assembly/handling procedures, test procedures and quality procedures.

Any modifications to configuration managed material shall be documented in accordance with Configuration and Data Management Plan (DID# PM-04). In some cases, individual NASA Programs may require the contractor to utilize certain existing databases and software tools managed by the Government for input of design data, status, risk, etc.

The contractor shall have procedures in place to provide traceability of engineering models, prototypes, qualification and flight hardware, software and systems.

4.1.3. Property Management

The contractor shall maintain an inventory of all Government Furnished Property and of items purchased for Base/Delivery Orders for both GRC on-site and at contractor facilities per the Property Clauses of the contract in accordance with the Property Management Plan in Attachment J.1-G.

4.1.4. Systems Engineering Management

The contractor shall perform systems engineering in the conduct and management of the required technical effort for Base/Delivery Orders. The contractor shall develop a Systems Engineering Management Plan in accordance with Systems Engineering Management Plan (DID# PM-09) that demonstrates that proper procedures and processes are in place for the management of the various system engineering functions as defined in NPR 7123.1, “NASA Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements”. The contractor may develop an additional SEMP pre-tailored for all Technology Development orders if they determine this additional SEMP will provide cost and/or schedule benefits. Tailoring of the SEMP for specific Base/Delivery Orders is possible upon agreement by both the contractor and NASA. Waivers and Deviations to requirements shall be handled in accordance with Waivers and Deviations

(DID# PM-10).

The contractor shall be responsible for the submission of all change order proposals (in accordance with Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) (DID# PM-05).

4.1.5. Reviews

The contractor shall provide engineering, management, documentation, and planning support for NASA design reviews required by NASA Headquarters, other NASA field centers and NASA GRC to certify hardware and software maturity readiness. NASA design reviews are based upon the project life cycle defined in NPR 7120.5, NPR 7120.8, and described in NPR

7123.1. The contractor shall also participate in other technical reviews based on the individual Base/Delivery Order, such as Verification and Safety Reviews and integration reviews with relevant launch vehicles and space or suborbital platforms.

Reviews shall be held at the location specified by the individual Base/Delivery Order.

System Acceptance Reviews will normally be held at the location of the deliverable equipment so that it may be viewed and inspected prior to shipment. The contractor shall ensure that appropriate personnel attend each review. The baseline dates for each review and any modifications to the review requirements will be defined in the Base/Delivery Order to meet unique project requirements. No later than 8 weeks prior to each review the contractor shall develop and deliver a review plan for NASA acceptance. The contractor shall define the scope and content of the review in this plan consistent with NPR 7123.1 Appendix G Life-cycle and Technical Review Entrance and Success Criteria. Plan details can be tailored by agreement between the NASA PM and the Contractor. Review presentation packages shall be developed in accordance with Review Presentation Package (DID# D-01), unless otherwise defined in the Base/Delivery Order. Action Items from the reviews generated by NASA shall require written responses for closure from the contractor within 30 calendar days of receipt of the Engineering Panel or Review Board Report, unless specified otherwise in the review plan.

4.1.6. Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Task Orders

In accordance with the task ordering procedures in this contract, the Contractor shall perform SpaceDOC III IDIQ tasks as initiated by written direction from the Contracting Officer.

Content may include, but is not limited to: build to print orders, orders that include capital assets, and any content that does not fit under the scope of the other CLINs.

4.1.7. Export Control

1. In order to facilitate the possible need for discussions and information exchange with

International Partners, the Contractor should support NASA in establishing cooperative relationships with up to two (2) International Partners to be identified by NASA.

2. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to seek and obtain Technical Assistance Agreements (TAAs) for technical interactions with any International Partners as required.

3. For the export of hardware, software or technical data (if required), the Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary authorization (export licenses, license exceptions, license exemptions) and conducting the export.

4. The Contractor should perform an export control assessment for all Data Item Descriptions shown in the CDRL, Attachment J.1-B.

a. If a product is determined to contain information controlled by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the following statement shall be included on the product cover page:

International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) Notice

This document contains information which falls under the purview of the U.S. Munitions List (USML) as defined in the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), 22 CFR §120-

130, and is export-controlled. It shall not be transferred to foreign persons in the U.S. or abroad without specific approval of a knowledgeable NASA export control official, and/or unless an export license or license exemption is obtained/available from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, United States Department of State. Violations of these regulations are punishable by fine, imprisonment or both.

b. If a product is determined to contain information controlled by the Export Administration Regulations and which requires a license or exception prior to export, the following statement shall be included on the product cover page:

Export Administration Regulations (EAR) Notice

This document contains information within the purview of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), 15 CFR §730-774, and is export-controlled. It may not be transferred to foreign persons in the U.S. or abroad without specific approval of a knowledgeable export control official, and/or unless an export license or license exception is obtained/available from the Bureau of Industry and Security, United States Department of Commerce. Violations of these regulations are punishable by fine, imprisonment or both.

c. If a product has been determined to be suitable for public release, it shall be so labeled.

4.1.8. Education and Public Outreach

The Contractor shall provide education and public outreach support to NASA to develop and disseminate communication materials such as fact sheets, images, photographs, or other information.

4.2. PRODUCT ASSURANCE

The contractor shall plan, implement and maintain a product assurance system to support all orders under the Contract. The governing Product Assurance requirements are defined in the

Space Assurance Requirements (SAR). Specific Orders may have additional product assurance requirements levied by carriers and/or launch vehicles. In addition, each order may tailor the SAR requirements.

The contractor shall prepare, implement, and maintain an overall contract Safety and Mission Assurance Plan in accordance with Safety and Mission Assurance Plan (DID# PA-01) to demonstrate how the SAR requirements will be implemented. The contractor shall develop SAR compliance matrices per the Base/Delivery Order to show how applicable product assurance requirements will be addressed.

The contractor is subject to periodic review by NASA GRC or its designated NASA representative(s) as defined in the Government’s Surveillance Plan.

4.2.1. Quality Management

The contractor shall be certified to AS9100, in the process of becoming certified or, as a minimum, have an established proven effective quality program that is in accordance with FAR 52.246-11 Higher-level Contract Quality Requirement. In the absence of third-party certification of the Quality Management system, the contractor shall provide for additional audits. The contractor’s Quality Management system shall meet the quality assurance requirements or other program quality assurance requirements of the documents specified in Section 3 of this SOW.

The Contractor shall implement a closed-loop system for identifying, documenting, controlling, and correcting failures and non-conformances for flight hardware/software development and GSE that interfaces with flight hardware/software, to ensure corrective action is taken to prevent recurrence in accordance with Problem Report and Corrective Action (PRACA) Plan (DID# PA-07). The Contractor shall report all non-conformities from the technical specifications which occur during flight hardware/software manufacture, assembly, or testing and GSE that interfaces with flight hardware/software in accordance with Nonconformance Report

(DID# PA-12).

4.2.2. System Safety

The contractor shall assure the overall system safety of the design that eliminates, reduces, or minimizes safety risk to an acceptable level. The contractor shall perform hazard analyses in accordance with System Safety Hazard Analyses (DID# PA-03). The contractor shall deliver all safety documentation required by the applicable vehicle and/or carrier flight and ground safety requirements in accordance with their delivery schedules. The contractor shall support all reviews and meetings associated with this safety documentation. Any activity conducted at NASA GRC facilities shall be conducted in accordance with NASA Glenn Safety Manual (GLP- QS-8715.1) and the GRC Environmental Programs Manual (GLM-FE-8500.1). The contractor shall impose the applicable safety requirements on all subcontractors and suppliers.

The contractor shall provide an overall contract Safety and Health Plan in accordance with Safety and Health Plan (DID# PA-11). This plan shall address all hazards related to the work to be performed at GRC, other NASA facilities, and the contractor’s facilities, including hazardous exposures to contractors and NASA personnel, and plans to mitigate these hazards.

4.2.3. Materials and Processes

The contractor shall have a materials assurance process for documenting the Materials and Processes associated with the final design hardware using a Materials Identification and Usage List (MIUL) and Materials Usage Agreements (MUA). An MUA shall also be submitted for all materials on the MIUL that do not meet the requirements of NASA-STD-6016 in accordance with Materials Identification and Usage List (MIUL); Material Usage Agreement (MUA) (DID# PA-06). The materials assurance process must provide for certification of all parts and materials for composition and properties as defined by the design criteria. Materials used in applications that can be classified as limited life items, safety critical, and fracture critical shall be traceable through all critical processing procedures up to end-item application. The contractor shall verify that the space flight materials used meets all relevant safety requirements and can be flight certified by NASA.

For hardware developed under the contract, the contractor shall utilize only materials in the fabrication of space flight hardware that conform with the design, application and operational requirements. Depending on the vehicle and/or carrier, other program-specific materials requirements shall be addressed at that time, e.g. Orion, SLS, Gateway, commercial launch vehicles, and standalone hardware.

4.2.4. Reliability and Maintainability

The contractor shall perform all the reliability, availability, and maintainability engineering and assurance processes defined in the Space Assurance Requirements (SAR) document for projects and payloads on ISS or other space-based platforms. The contractor shall be responsible for imposing the Reliability and Maintainability (RAM) requirements on all subcontractors and suppliers and to integrate all subcontractor and supplier RAM products into a comprehensive compliance package as specified in the SAR.

For specific Base/Delivery Orders, the contractor shall be required to perform RAM assessments. In addition, the contractor shall conduct tests when required to demonstrate the ability of deliverables to survive mission simulation conditions, and be reliable/maintainable in the space environment.

4.2.5. Software Product Assurance

The contractor shall assure the management, safety, and control of all flight-related software/firmware (including that used for ground support or mission operations) and the software development requirements in accordance with NPR 7150.2 and NASA-STD-8739.8, Software Assurance and Software Safety Standard. The contractor shall develop and utilize a Software Assurance Plan and Metrics (DID# PA-10) to ensure the management, safety, and control of the software products and the software development process (e.g., configuration management, risk management, performance, functionality, safety, reliability, verification & validation processes and non-conformance reporting).

4.2.6. Risk Management

The contractor shall maintain a risk management process to control critical flight hardware, software, and documentation, as well as risks to the overall program management. The contractor shall document their specific risk management process to be used in a Risk Management Plan in accordance with the Risk Management Plan (DID# PM-02). The contractor shall provide a status of critical risks in the Technical Reports in accordance with Technical Reporting and Management Reviews (DID# CD-02).

4.3. CONCEPT STUDIES

NASA will provide initial system level concept(s) for the Mission Concept Review (MCR) to meet the requirements as defined by the researcher and/or technologist (R/T), and identify any engineering feasibility issues and perform key tests that demonstrate the proposed engineering/science requirements can be satisfied. NASA will support the R/T’s identification and refinement of the engineering/science requirements by designing and developing bench-top hardware (breadboards) and rigs for laboratory and/or low-gravity ground-based testing. The NASA development phases are defined in NPR 7120.5 for Space Flight Systems. These requirement documents shall be used as the set of initial requirements for each area of the project cycle. The following sections are provided to emphasize the key areas of activities that will be defined in a Base/Delivery Order for the Concept Studies phase of a project:

4.3.1. Key Activities

The contractor shall conduct system design and mission analyses as needed to produce feasible concept(s) that address the requirements and to evaluate potential mission carrier options. The concepts identify possible subsystems that address the project objectives and the key high-risk development areas as informed by a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) assessment. The mission analyses will include: technology alternatives, operational scenarios, risk identification, and infrastructure evaluations.

The contractor shall identify engineering feasibility issues based on the project requirements to determine a resolution approach and perform initial breadboard level testing as required. Engineering feasibility issues include: identification of fundamental capabilities required to meet project objectives, reduction of life-cycle costs, assessment of technical viability based on current industry capabilities, and assessment of the diagnostic methods utilized in prior work.

4.3.2. Reviews

The contractor shall provide a key review for the Concept Studies phase. The Mission Concept Review (MCR), or equivalent, typically affirms the mission need and examines the proposed mission’s objectives and the concept for meeting the project objectives. The MCR is defined in NPR 7123.1 that includes the entrance and success criteria. Any tailoring of these reviews will be called out in the Base/Delivery Order.

4.3.3. Documentation/Deliverables

The contractor key deliverables during this phase of the project shall include but are not limited to a draft set of project requirements and a mission concept report/presentation that defines the project. Breadboard hardware and associated test reports/data from performing risk reduction activities shall also be provided to NASA. The draft project requirements and mission concept shall be documented as part of the MCR Presentation Package in accordance with Review Presentation Package (DID #D-01) per the Base/Delivery Order.

NPR 7120.5 defines deliverables typically generated in this phase. The CDRL in Attachment J.1-B contains the detailed description of content required for many of the deliverables. Any tailoring of the deliverables will be called out in the Base/Delivery Order.

4.4. CONCEPT AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT

During this phase, the contractor shall thoroughly define project requirements and provide sufficient detailed definition of the project technical, management, budget, and institutional support plans needed to enable a firm NASA commitment to accomplish the project objectives on schedule and within budget. Emphasis shall be placed on accurately characterizing the complexity and scope of the project; demonstrating an understanding of project requirements;

and identification and mitigation of high technical, acquisition, cost and schedule risks. The outcome of the Concept and Technology Development phase is to establish that the proposed mission/system architecture is credible and responsive to project objectives and constraints, including resources. The contractor shall ensure the engineering concept is sufficient and meets the detailed engineering requirements derived from the project requirements that have been determined. The contractor shall resolve major feasibility issues or establish feasibility resolution plans and provide a project plan and initial costs to enable NASA to assess the readiness of the project in order to enter the preliminary design phase. The NASA development phases are defined in NPR 7120.5 for Space Flight Systems and NPR 7120.8 for Technology Development.

The contractor shall use the requirements documents as the set of initial requirements for each area of the project cycle. The following sections are provided to emphasize the key areas of activities that will be defined in a Base/Delivery Order for the Concept and Technology Development phase of the project:

4.4.1. Key Activities

The contractor shall define the fundamental system requirements based on engineering, science, potential carrier, operations, and safety and quality requirements. The selection and use of technical standards products and constraints on the project, including objectives, goals, and success criteria should be developed. The contractor shall determine the overall feasibility of the candidate project concept(s) that consider affordability, technology readiness, operations, infrastructure, content, risk, safety, reliability, and potential procurement strategies. The contractor shall utilize the technology readiness assessment to evaluate the fundamental technology requirements of the project concept. The contractor shall ensure that specified project objectives are met, project cost or risk is minimized, and identify where significant technology gaps exist. The contractor shall demonstrate scenarios in which it would be difficult for objective concepts to be realized.

The contractor shall develop an initial integrated concept of the project that includes the design constraints and interfaces of the recommended cargo carrier (commercial services such as, SpaceX, Northrop Grumman, Blue Origin etc.), destination (ISS, Gateway, Commercial Platform, Commercial Lunar Provider, etc.), or next higher-level element. The contractor shall provide an initial concept that includes sufficient detail showing the overall feasibility, compliance to the system requirements, integration compatibility, and subsystem level packaging. The contractor shall provide as required an integrated concept for the use of ground integration units or simulators to determine overall feasibility. The contractor shall identify the need for proper availability for testing to NASA.

The contractor shall minimize development risk based on identified engineering feasibility issues through the design and development of breadboards, as appropriate, to evaluate functional performance. Breadboard testing shall focus on determining whether the engineering concept meets the project requirements. The contractor shall identify concept limitations, alternate concepts, and technologies where project requirements are challenging. The contractor shall provide the results of the breadboard testing for NASA review. The contractor shall identify requirements for additional hardware breadboards of high-risk subsystem function(s), or special equipment necessary to reach the Preliminary Design & Technology Completion phase. The contractor shall identify and document findings in the System Definition Review (SDR) presentation package. The contractor shall formulate an overall engineering plan that defines and details the approach, schedule, hardware classification, and resource requirements, so that programmatic commitments can be made. The contractor shall provide a life cycle costing analysis necessary to produce the selected concept. Schedule and budget information shall be developed and presented as part of the SDR review package with a rough order of magnitude estimate for the life cycle costs and overall schedule that includes key milestones and an implementation approach to flight. The schedule shall be detailed to the next review milestone and identify the critical path.

4.4.2. Reviews

The key reviews for the Concept and Technology phase are the Systems Requirements Review (SRR) and Mission Definition Review/System Definition Review (MDR/SDR). The SRR examines the functional and performance requirements that are defined for the project and ensures that requirements and the selected concept will meet the project objectives. The SDR examines the proposed project formulation and the flow down of the functional elements of the system; key technologies and risks are identified and assessed. The MDR/SDR examines whether the proposed mission/system architecture is responsive to the program mission/system functional and performance requirements and whether requirements have been allocated to the next lower product layer. The SRR and the MDR/SDR are defined in NPR 7123.1 that includes the entrance and success criteria. Any tailoring of these reviews will be called out in the Base/Delivery Order.

4.4.3. Documentation/Deliverables

The contractor key deliverables during this phase of the project shall include but are not limited to a set of project requirements, and a mission concept report/presentation that defines the project. The contractor shall provide a compliance matrix for the established baseline concept.

The selected concept shall be documented as part of the SRR Presentation Package in accordance with Review Presentation Package (DID #D-01) and a draft Operations Concept document in accordance with Operations Concept (DID# OP-09) per the Base/Delivery Order. The project architecture and allocation of requirements shall be documented as part of the MDR/SDR Presentation Package in accordance with Review Presentation Package (DID #D-01).

Breadboard test reports/data from performing risk reduction activities shall be provided to

NASA.

NPR 7120.5 defines deliverables typically generated in this phase. The CDRL in

4.5. PRELIMINARY DESIGN & TECHNOLOGY COMPLETION

During this phase, the contractor shall develop a preliminary design and technology development plan that can demonstrate acceptable risk at the system, subsystem and component level in compliance with system and project requirements. The outcome of the Preliminary Design and Technology Completion phase is to establish, through independent engineering-review, that the proposed engineering design solution for the project is expected to meet the performance and functional requirements at the configuration item level, the design is verifiable and does not pose major problems which may cause schedule delays or cost overruns, all interfaces and verification methodologies have been identified, and all system requirements have been allocated to the subsystem and component level and the flow down is adequate to verify system performance. The NASA development phases are defined in NPR 7120.5 for Space Flight Systems and NPR 7120.8 for Technology Development. These requirement documents shall be used as the set of initial requirements for each area of the project cycle. The following sections are provided to emphasize the key areas of activities that will be defined in a Base/Delivery Order for the Preliminary Design and Technology Development phase of the project:

4.5.1. Key Activities

The contractor shall provide overall system architecture, identify all the external interfaces, develop an operations concept and equipment layouts, develop requirements for flight and ground support hardware and software, produce preliminary drawings, software design, mass properties, interface schematics, and preliminary materials & parts lists. The requirements for the design are defined in the specific Project Requirements Document and System Requirements Document in accordance with System Requirements Document (DID #R-01) or as identified in the Base/Delivery Order. The contractor shall perform engineering analyses (thermal, dynamic, vibration, optics, etc.) as required in the design of the mechanical, electrical, and system hardware. The contractor shall also develop a software design and initial programming in parallel with the hardware design.

The contractor shall also identify, design, and develop/procure any required ground support equipment necessary for the development, operation and handling of the project hardware.