Attachment_2_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 268 KB Posted

Attached to
Flight and Payload Integration Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80AFRC18R0006
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Armstrong Flight Research Center

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for flight and payload integration services. The past performance questionnaire requests information about a previous contract including the period of performance, total value, contractor and subcontractor roles, contract type, scope of work, and ratings of the contractor's performance, relationship building, problem resolution, safety protocols, management, and an overall assessment. The federal contract opportunity notice is for indefinite delivery indefinite quantity flight and payload integration services over five years to provide various flight profiles for payloads including reduced gravity, high altitude exposure, space environment with freefall descent, controlled descent with vertical landing, and controlled high altitude ascent and descent. The solicitation number is 80AFRC18R0006 and is issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Armstrong Flight Research Center.

Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Flight and Payload Integration Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Solicitation 80AFRC18R0006 Amendment 1 (002).pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A - Pricing Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_1_-_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf PDF
80AFRC18R0006_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Questions_and_Answers.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_-_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 2 Solicitation No. 80AFRC18R0006

CONTRACT INFORMATION

Project Title and Contract Number:

Period of Performance, Including Option Periods:

Total Project Value, Including Option Periods:

Was the Offeror a prime contractor or subcontractor?

Contract type (firm-fixed price or cost-reimbursement):

Please provide your contact information, your role with this program/contract, and the length of your involvement.

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project:

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE

Based on your knowledge of the contract identified above, please provide your assessment of how well the contractor performed on each of the following questions.

1. How consistent is/was the Contractor in understanding the customer’s requirements and providing sufficient staffing?

2. Was the Contractor able to build effective working relationships with associate contractors, subcontractors and the government in a team environment?

Attachment 2 Solicitation No. 80AFRC18R0006

3. How effective is/was the Contractor in identifying, responding and resolving problems?

4. How is/was the Contractor’s emphasis on safety protocol and responsiveness to mishap investigations (if applicable)?

5. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to provide sufficient management to ensure effective performance over the course of the contract.

6. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

In summary, please rate the quality of the Contractor’s services and overall performance:

____ Excellent/Exceptional: Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance.

____ Very Good: Very effective performance, fully responsive to contract requirements;

contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies.

____ Good/Satisfactory: Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements;

reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

____ Fair/Marginal: Meets or only slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial effects, on overall performance.

____ Poor/Unsatisfactory: Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas;

remedial action required in one or more areas, deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .