Amendment 2 - Q and A for Solicitation.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- On-site Record Information Management
- Solicitation number
- 75F401
View the file
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Attachment H - RFQ Question Submittal Form; Solicitation No. 75F40120R00004 |
| Offerors must use this form to submit all questions in relation to Solicitation No. 75F40120R00004 - On-Site Record Information Management (RIM) |
The Reference column contains drop-down menus from which the applicable document must be selected. The remaining sections are fill-in cells.
| # | Reference | Section & Page #s | Question | Agency Response | |
| 1 | Updated Attachment L; Amendment 1, List of Attachments | Updated Attachment L – DOL Wage determination 2015-4269 and 2015-4282; Amendment 1, Page 93, List of Attachments | Updated Attachment L includes an odd numbered Wage Determination (2015-4269 rev 11) and an even numbered Wage Determination (2015 -4282 rev 16). The odd numbered WD (4269) requires the contractor to meet the minimum fringe benefit requirements for each employee individually. | ||
| It is our understanding that DOL requires the use of an odd-numbered WD when an odd-numbered WD has already been in place for the prior contract. Therefore, we believe that odd-numbered WDs would apply. WD 2015-4281 rev 15 is the odd numbered equivalent for WD 2015-4282 rev 16. For compliance with DOL requirements, will FDA please revise Attachment L to include WD 2015-4281 Rev 15 and revise the RFP List of Attachments in the RFP? | Please see updated Wage Determinations, ending in odd numbers. | ||||
| 2 | Solicitation Instructions | General Formatting Instructions, pg. 58 | Working in the limited page count, and per the General Formatting Instructions (page 58), would FDA please confirm that Arial Narrow is acceptable as a similar font style? | Arial Narrow would be considered a similar font style. | |
| 3 | Q&As #106 and 112 | As the Attachment F – Relevant Experience form takes up a considerable amount of space in the proposal, would the FDA please confirm its answer to question 106 (“Yes, include as an appendix”), which allows the offeror to include the completed Relevant Experience forms in an appendix to the proposal, exempt from the 40-page limitation? There is a discrepancy with answer 115. | This is correct, the Relevant Experience can be included as an Appendix and is exempt from the 40-page limit. Please disregard the Government's response to Question 115 in Amendment 1. | ||
| 4 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| 6 | |||||
| 7 | |||||
| 8 | |||||
| 9 | |||||
| 10 | |||||
| 11 | |||||
| 12 | |||||
| 13 | |||||
| 14 | |||||
| 15 | |||||
| 16 | |||||
| 17 | |||||
| 18 | |||||
| 19 | |||||
| 20 | |||||
| 21 | |||||
| 22 | |||||
| 23 | |||||
| 24 | |||||
| 25 | |||||
| 26 | |||||
| 27 | |||||
| 28 | |||||
| 29 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .