Attachment_6,_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 209 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USCGC HEALY Dry Dock FY19
- Solicitation number
- 70Z08519RP4500801
About this file
Attachment 6_PPQ
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
70Z08519RP4500801
Attachment 6
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
1. The USCG Form PPQ shall be utilized for all evaluations that require a Past Performance Questionnaire.
2. Solicitation No: 70Z08519RP4500801 USCGC HEALY (WAGB 20) DRY DOCK
REPAIRS FY2019
“Solicitation Submittal Requirements: IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS
AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A
COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the PPQ included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Past Performance. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT
SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.
IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contacts.
Fill out the first 2 blocks and submit to customers to complete, utilizing the attached Rating Guidelines. Have your customer send his/her questionnaire response directly via email to KO Amy Kelm at Amy.A.Kelm@uscg.mil referencing the solicitation number and your name in the subject line. (i.e., 70Z08519RP4500801 USCGC HEALY (WAGB 20)
DRY DOCK REPAIRS FY2019).
Offerors are responsible for ensuring that questionnaires reach the intended destination through confirmation with customers. Offerors shall not seek confirmation of receipt from the Government.
PAST PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER QUESTIONNAIRE
70Z08519RP4500801 (2 pages)
1.OFFEROR FIRM/ORGANIZATION: (enter your shipyard’s name)
2.
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: (from) (to)
CONTRACTING OFFICE:
CONTRACT NUMBER: TASK NO:
CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION:
CUSTOMER POC:
CUSTOMER PHONE NO.
ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:
CONTRACT AWARD DATE:
CONTRACT VALUE (final value): $
TYPE OF CONTRACT:
DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT (Title):
QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: (Rating ___)
Additional Comments on Rating:
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE: (Rating ___)
Additional Comments on Rating:
BUSINESS RELATIONS: (Rating ___) Additional Comments on Rating:
Signature (Customer)
RATING GUIDELINES FOR CUSTOMERS
Summarize contractor performance in each of the rating areas. Assign each area a rating of
0 (Unsatisfactory) 1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 3 (Good) 4 (Excellent) 5 (Outstanding) Use the following instructions as guidance in making these evaluations.
Criteria: Quality of Product or Service Timeliness of Performance Business Relations
Compliance with contract requirements
Accuracy of reports
Effectiveness of personnel
Technical excellence
Met interim milestones
Reliability
Responsive to technical direction
Completed on time including wrap-up and contract administration
Met delivery schedules
No liquidated damages assessed
Effective management, including subcontracts
Reasonable/cooperativ e behavior
Responsive to contract requirements
Notification of problems
Flexibility
Pro-active vs reactive
0 – Unsatisfactory Nonconformances are jeopardizing the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of
Customer resources
Delays are jeopardizing performance of contract requirements, despite use of
Customer resources
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrati ve issues is not effective
1 – Poor Overall compliance requires major
Customer resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Delays require major Customer resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrati ve issues is marginally effective
2 - Fair Overall compliance requires minor Customer resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Delays require minor Customer resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrati ve issues is somewhat effective
3 - Good Overall compliance does not impact achievement of contract requirements
Delays do not impact achievement of contract requirements
Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrati ve issues is usually effective
4 - Excellent There are no quality problems There are no delays Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrati ve issues is always effective
5 - Outstanding - The contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level in any of the above three categories that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances when contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Excellent."
File details come from the government source that posted it.