Q and A.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 38 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70US0926R70094023
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for a federal design-build contract solicitation (70US0926R70094023) issued by the U.S. Secret Service for an Ammunition Bunker Extended Storage Expansion Project at the James J. Rowley Training Center (JJRTC). The document addresses 45 substantive inquiries and numerous follow-up clarifications submitted by prospective offerors, with corresponding government responses.
The project involves two primary phases: Phase 1 requires relocating two existing ARMAG outdoor explosives storage magazines to new concrete pads adjacent to the Knight Building with associated electrical and utility work, and Phase 2 requires constructing a new 5,400 square-foot Multiplex ammunition storage facility with HVAC systems, fire alarm integration, reconfigured parking (reducing 130 spaces to 111), and stormwater management compliance. Key clarifications addressed include: the period of performance extended to 365 calendar days from Notice to Proceed (originally 180 days); a $175,000 BGE (Baltimore Gas and Electric) allowance for electrical services; project magnitude of $1,000,000–$5,000,000 for bid bond purposes; concrete pad specifications requiring medium broom finish with extreme levelness and moisture mitigation; removable bollards (not boulders) for Phase 1; Designer of Record licensure restricted to Maryland, Virginia, or District of Columbia (Pennsylvania excluded); Key Personnel requirements including Project Manager (10 years' experience), Site Safety/Health Officer, and Superintendent (who cannot be dual-hatted); no geotechnical or electrical load data provided (contractor responsibility); and contractor responsibility for environmental testing, utility verification, and determining maximum loading capacity based on ARMAG manufacturer specifications. Optional pricing line items include custom exterior panels and reinforced concrete driveway. The revised proposal submission deadline is September 11, 2026, with five volumes required: Cover Page, Volume 1 (Past Performance), Volume 2 (Technical Approach with key personnel resumes), Volume 3 (Schedule), and Volume 4 (Pricing in Excel format with no page limit).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q and A Rev 1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attch 3 Provisions and Clauses Rev 1.pdf | ||
| Attch 2 SOW Rev 1.pdf | ||
| Attch 1 Instructions Rev 1.pdf | ||
| 70US0926R70094023 Rev 1.pdf | ||
| Attch 4 RTCFAC Access requests for Contractors.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attch 5 Pre bid RFI.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attch 3 Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| Attch 1 Instructions.pdf | ||
| Attch 2-SOW.pdf | ||
| 70US0926R70094023 DRAFT.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFIs
| Project: | Ammo Bunker Expansion |
| Solicitation No. | 70US0926R70094023 |
| RFI No. | Request for Information | Government Response |
| 1 | Please provide sign-in sheet from the site visit on 2026-08-26. | The Government will provide the Sign In Sheet |
| 2 | We do not see FAR 52.211-15 (Defense Prioritization Act) included in the provisions and clauses section of the solicitation. Based on the timeline of 180 days to perform the contract, we recommend the Government includes this provision and provides and defence priorities and allocations systems rating to ensure timely delivery of manufactured equipment. | The Government will add the clause. |
| 3 | Volume 3: Schedule (Factor 3) requires a schedule and schedule narrative. However, Volume 2: Technical Approach (Factor 2) askes for the following " Provide a clear and realistic project schedule, including key milestones and deliverables." We respectfully request this duplicate requirement be removed from Factor 2. | The Government will remove Schedule Veriabage from Factor 2 |
| 4 | Volume 1 – Past Performance (Factor 1) requires that, “If a subcontractor will be performing 25% or more of the work, one of the references must be from the subcontractor.” |
This requirement will restrict subcontractor selection and limit the Offeror’s ability to obtain the most competitive pricing. Requiring a past performance reference from any subcontractor can also discourage Offerors from utilizing otherwise qualified and competitively priced subcontractors solely because of the subcontractors in ability to provide past performance in a timely manner during a competitive bidding process.
To promote maximum competition and allow Offerors to select the most qualified and competitively priced subcontractors, we respectfully request that this requirement be removed.
| The Government's determination is to keep this requirement in place. | ||
| 5 | Volume 1: Past Performance (Factor 1) are we permitted to use designer past performance in the three references? | The Government will not provide a Past Performance Template. You can use your own. |
| 6 | Volume 1: Past Performance (Factor 1) "Use the Government-provided Past Performance Template." The governemnt did not provide a template, are we permitted to use our own format? | The Government will not provide a Past Performance Template. You can use your own. |
| 7 | Attachment 2 – Statement of Work, Section 22, Key Personnel states that the Contractor “shall submit qualifications for key personnel.” However, Attachment 1 – Instructions to Offerors does not identify resumes as a required proposal submission. |
Please clarify the following:
1-Are resumes required with the proposal?
2-If required, in which volume should the resumes be submitted, and are they included in or excluded from the applicable page limit?
3-Should resumes be provided in the Offeror’s format, or will the Government provide a required template?
| Resumes for Key personnel are required. They shall be submitted in Technical Factor (Volume 2). No template will be provided and there is no page limit. | ||
| 8 | Please confirm if tax should be included in our proposal? | Tax Should not be incuded. |
| 9 | Please provide the latest wage determination for this project’s county. | Wage Determination will be provided |
| 9 | Please provide final solicitation (SF1442) document for proposal submission. | The Government provided SF 1442 in Solicitation Amendment 1 |
| 10 | Can you please provide the magnitude for this project? This information is necessary for acquiring a compliant bid bond. | $1,000,000.00-$5,000,000.00 |
| 11 | Please indicate the appropriate volume to include the SF 1442, Amendments, and Provisions and Clauses with our proposal submission. | The Government provided SF 1442 in Solicitation Amendment 1 |
| 12 | Please provide a final SF 1442. The current SF 1442 included in the solicitation package is a draft. | The Government provided SF 1442 in Solicitation Amendment 1 |
| 13 | Please confirm whether the 180-calendar-day period of performance begins at contract award or Notice to Proceed. | Notice to Proceed |
| 14 | The SOW requires completion of the project within 180 calendar days. Based on the size and complexity of the specified 5,400 SF Multiplex magazine, the anticipated manufacturing lead time for the magazine alone is approximately 14 months. |
| Will the Government consider extending the required period of performance to accommodate the manufacturing, delivery, and installation timeline for a facility of this size? | The Government is extending the PoP to 365 days; however, it is our understanding that the Multiplex is available for shipment approximately 40 - 52 weeks after approved drawings. | ||
| 15 | Please provide BG&E customer service representee contact information. | The last known BGE POC is Mr. Jack Voelker |
Jack.Voelker@bge.com
| 16 | Please confirm that the existing storage shed will be empty prior to start of construction. | Contractor shall provide the Government with at least 1-month advanced written notification prior to the units being relocated and disassembly of the shed structure. The shed shall remain operational until the two (2) ARMAGS are relocated. |
| 17 | Please confirm that 480 Volt 3-phase power is required at both locations, the new ARMAG 5,400 sf concrete pad and new ARMAG pad adjacent to the Knight building. | If sufficient power is unavailable at each of the project locations, then new transformer (s) shall be designed as 277/480V 3-phase permanent power to include the anticipated electrical loads plus 50% spare capacity. The contractor is responsible to step down power as neccesary to fullfill the requirements and intent of the contract. |
| 18 | Please provide the thickness of the existing pavement section at the Wilkie parking lot. | During the existing conditions survey and design phase, the Design builder is responsible for making a determination if the existing equipment and materials are suitable for reuse or require replacing. |
| 19 | Due to the limited solicitation period of only three weeks from issuance to bid submission, it is not feasible to obtain an accurate and comprehensive concept-level estimate from BG&E. Because this procurement is being conducted as a hard bid and BG&E's pricing must be incorporated into the contractor's proposal, we recommend that the Government establish a dedicated allowance for these services. This approach will provide a more equitable basis for bidding and help mitigate the risk associated with incomplete pricing information during the proposal period. | BGE allowance is $175,000. |
| 20 | There are multiple references throughout the Statement of Work (SOW) that specify the use of welded wire fabric (WWF) within the concrete while also indicating that wire mesh is not permitted. Since the terms welded wire fabric and wire mesh are often used interchangeably within the construction industry, the current requirements appear to be conflicting. |
| To clearly define the acceptable reinforcing material and avoid varying interpretations among bidders, please provide the minimum wire diameter (or WWF designation) that is acceptable for use under this contract. This clarification will ensure all bidders are pricing and proposing the same reinforcing requirements | The concrete pad shall be designed & constructed with high strength rebar (regular steel rebar, WWF, or FRP) no wire mesh shall be used. References to WWF and FRP will be removed from the SOW. | ||
| 21 | Confirm that adequate electrical power supply is local to the proposed load connections. | The Design-Build Contractor is responsible for determining the power requirements and ensuring that there is adequate electrical power supply for the entire project. | |
| 22 | Confirm that existing ARMAG units can be lifted by the lifting lugs provided on the top of the units. | The Design-Build Contractor is responsible for the means and methods of lifting and the installation of the existing ARMAG units. | |
| 23 | It appears that the limit of disturbance for the new Phase 2 5,400 sf storage units will exceed the 5k SF MDE threshold for disturbance, should bidders include a full MDE SWM and ESC permit review in their bid pricing? | Yes, to include MS4 permit requirements. | |
| 24 | In Phase 1, a metal shed is referenced to be dissassembled, stored and protected, please clarify where this metal shed is curretly located? Is this shed to the left of the existing ARMAGs when looking at the ARMAGs? | During the site visit the metal shed was identified; when looking at the two exisitng ARMAGs, it is currently positioned to the left of them. | |
| 25 | Is there any geotechnical information for the site or should bidder include geotechnical investigation in the bid price? | Existing Conditions Tests: The Contractor shall be responsible for performing any testing necessary to confirm the existing conditions are adequate for the full execution of all planned work (e.g. structural capability, geotechnical investigation, mechanical equipment). If the Contractor proceeds with the work before testing and confirmation have been completed, any rework due to issues with unsuitable existing conditions shall be at the cost of the Contractor. This includes implementation of manufacturer’s recommendations, recommended tests, and validation of product’s installation requirements. | |
| 26 | The SOW indicates that portions of the existing Wilkie Parking Lot will need to be removed to accommodate Phase 2 of the project. However, the requirements for restoration and final configuration of the affected parking areas are not clearly defined. |
Please clarify the required scope of parking lot restoration, including the following:
Is a new curb required to separate the Phase 2 area from the remaining Wilkie Parking Lot? NO To satisfy the concept drawing shown on Page 12 of the SOW, should bidders include painted islands or curbed islands within the existing Wilkie Parking Lot? Painted Island.
Should bidders include milling and overlaying the newly configured drive lane serving the Wilkie Parking Lot?
Is a new concrete island nose required at the entrance to the reconfigured parking lot, and if so, please provide the desired dimensions and details. Design Phase Are there any additional pavement restoration, striping, signage, drainage, or traffic control modifications required as part of the parking lot reconfiguration? Restriped for vehicles and signed accordingly.
For bidding consistency, it would be in the Government's best interest to prescribe the desired restoration scope and finish requirements so that all offerors are pricing the same work.
The SOW indicates that portions of the existing Wilkie Parking Lot will need to be removed to accommodate Phase 2 of the project. However, the requirements for restoration and final configuration of the affected parking areas are not clearly defined.
Please clarify the required scope of parking lot restoration, including the following:
Is a new curb required to separate the Phase 2 area from the remaining Wilkie Parking Lot? Not at this time.
To satisfy the concept drawing shown on Page 12 of the SOW, should bidders include painted islands or curbed islands within the existing Wilkie Parking Lot? Painted Island.
Should bidders include milling and overlaying the newly configured drive lane serving the Wilkie Parking Lot? If referring to the service road it shall match the same concrete requirements as determined for the Multiplex.
Is a new concrete island nose required at the entrance to the reconfigured parking lot, and if so, please provide the desired dimensions and details. Design Phase Are there any additional pavement restoration, striping, signage, drainage, or traffic control modifications required as part of the parking lot reconfiguration? Stripping for vehicles and signage accordingly.
For bidding consistency, it would be in the Government's best interest to prescribe the desired restoration scope and finish requirements so that all offerors are pricing the same work.
27 Based on observations made during the site visit on August 26, 2026, it appears that the existing Wilkie Parking Lot generally drains toward the corner of the proposed ARMAG facility location.
| For bidding consistency, please confirm whether stormwater management facilities and/or drainage improvements will be required as part of this project scope. If so, please identify the applicable requirements, design criteria, and any anticipated stormwater management, water quality, erosion and sediment control, or drainage modifications that should be included in the bid price. Additionally, please clarify whether the Design-Build Contractor will be responsible for analyzing and mitigating any impacts to the existing drainage patterns resulting from the proposed work. | If the limit of disturbance exceeds the MDE threshold for disturbance, requirements under the MS4 permit are applicable. | ||
| 28 | Please clarify the exterior lighting requirements for both project locations. Specifically, please identify the required illumination levels, fixture types, mounting requirements, controls, and any applicable security or operational criteria. If lighting design standards, photometric requirements, or preferred fixture specifications exist, please provide them for pricing and design purposes. | BGE owns and maintains the exterior street lights on the JJRTC. In conjunction with the lighting and energy requirements specified as part of the contract, follow the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) for illuminance standards. |
Regarding fixture and mounting types shall follow BGE requirements and/or best practices. The SOW provides guidance for daylighting and lighting controls.
| 29 | Additionally, Attachment 3, Clause 3052.215-70 identifies the Quality Control Manager as Key Personnel but does not identify the SSHO, while Attachment 2, Section 22 identifies the SSHO but does not include the Quality Control Manager in the Key Personnel table. Please confirm the positions considered Key Personnel for proposal submission and identify the positions for which resumes/qualifications are required. | Quality Control Manager has been removed from Attachement 3 and replaced with Site Safety Officer |
| 30 | Attachment 2, Section 22 states that Key Personnel shall not be dual-hatted unless granted prior approval by the COR; however, Section 22.6 states that dual roles between Key Personnel are allowed provided the individual meets the requirements for each position. Please clarify whether Key Personnel may serve in dual roles without prior Government approval, particularly Superintendent and SSHHO. | Section 22.6 has been updated |
| 31 | Attachment 2, Section 22 states that the Project Manager shall have a minimum of seven (7) years of experience; however, the Key Personnel table requires fifteen (15) years of experience managing similar design-build telecommunications and secured facility construction projects in a high-density occupied office building environment. Please clarify the minimum Project Manager experience requirement and confirm whether the references to telecommunications and high-density occupied office building experience are applicable to this project. | This has been changed to 10 yesr's experience |
| 32 | Please confirm that the boulders are only required as part of Phase 1 of the project. |
Additionally, please clarify whether the boulders are intended to serve a strictly functional purpose or if there is an architectural and aesthetic requirement associated with their selection and placement. If an architectural component is required, please provide representative examples, specifications, or images to establish the desired appearance and quality level for pricing purposes.
| Finally, please confirm whether existing boulders located elsewhere on the campus may be reused for this application, or if all boulders are required to be newly sourced and installed. | Removable heavy duty commercial stainless steel bollards with flush mount sleeves are required not boulders. The SOW will be revised. | |
| 33 | Please provide the available as-built drawings for the Knight Building, specifically the structural, civil, and electrical disciplines. |
| We are concerned that an existing underground electrical feeder between two transformers and/or switchgear may be located directly beneath the proposed Phase 1 construction area. This existing infrastructure could conflict with the planned work and may impact the design and construction approach. Please provide any available as-built documentation and information regarding the location of existing underground utilities within the project area. | Attachment: 1.4.4.4 – GIS Data (Knight Building Area) was provided as part of the SOW. A closer view is attached herein and in the updated SOW. Contractor is responsible for verifying and accounting for utilities as a part of this contract during design and construction. | |
| 34 | Please confirm that the proposed location of the existing ARMAG structures adjacent to the Knight Building is structurally acceptable and will not adversely impact the building foundation or overall structural integrity. |
| Additionally, please confirm whether there are any below-grade levels, basements, utility tunnels, or other subsurface structures within the Knight Building in the vicinity of the proposed ARMAG installation area. Please also provide the foundation type and any available foundation plans or geotechnical information applicable to this portion of the building to assist in evaluating potential impacts and conflicts. | Design the transformer for the anticipated electrical loads plus 50% spare capacity. | |
| 35 | Please confirm whether the Phase 1 and Phase 2 layouts depicted in the SOW represent the required final configurations for the ARMAG structures and associated site features, or if the Design-Build Contractor has the flexibility to develop an alternative layout within the identified project areas. |
| If alternative configurations are permitted, please identify any required setbacks, operational constraints, security criteria, utility clearances, or other design parameters that must be incorporated into the proposed layout. Additionally, please confirm the extent to which the Design-Build team may optimize the configuration to accommodate constructability, site conditions, and project requirements. | The Government is open to alternative ARMAG structural design layouts that achieve 5,400 square feet of usable interior space. However, the Government will evaluate and select the layout determined to be most advantageous to the Government. | ||
| 36 | Section 1.4.2.8 of the SOW requires the replacement of existing handhole/manhole covers; however, there is no mention of providing riser rings or grade adjustment rings to bring the new covers to finished grade. Please confirm whether contractors are to include risers as part of their pricing. | We are unable to locate said requirement within the Statement of Work (SOW). | |
| 37 | Please confirm that a broom finish will be acceptable for the concrete pads supporting the ARMAG structures. A broom finish is recommended to provide a slip-resistant surface and enhance safety for construction personnel and end users. | Top of concrete pad shall be finished with medium broom finish with extreme structural levelness, high abrasion resistance, and moisture mitigation to prevent container warping, rust, and ground settling. | |
| 38 | Please confirm that is accept to provide 10 - 12 foot long ARMAG structures compared to the 12 - 10 Foot long structures as illistrated in the SOW. | The Government is open to alternative ARMAG structural design layouts that achieve 5,400 square feet of usable interior space. However, the Government will evaluate and select the layout determined to be most advantageous to the Government. |
39 Can you please provide anticipated location of the shed structure and if this shed structure will be placed on a new pad or existing asphalt? The shed structure shall be reassembled on the new concrete pad/service road area within the Phase 2 location. The exact location will be identified during the design phase.
| 40 | Our understanding is that the ARMAG structures have an estimated lead time of approximately 14 months from approved submittals. This exceeds the 180-day period of performance identified in the SOW. Please clarify how the Government intends to address this discrepancy and whether schedule adjustments are anticipated. This alos onclicts with Section 13.13.3 states that the Finish Milestone shall be 30 days after award. | The Government will consider extending the PoP to 365 days; however, it is our understanding that the Multiplex is available for shipment approximately 40 - 52 weeks after approved drawings. |
| 41 | We respectfully request the bid date for the proposal be extended to 17-Sept-2026 | FOR PROCUREMENT RESPONSE |
| 42 | Can a superintendent be a triple hat to cover the requirements of SSHO and QA/QC? | No. |
| 43 | The SOW states that the Government will not furnish restroom facilities and that temporary portable toilets will not be allowed on the grounds. Please identify the restroom arrangements the contractor is expected to use. | We are unable to address the disallowance of temporary portable units within the Statement of Work (SOW). Self-contained portable toilets are permitted at the Contractor’s expense, coordination and responsibility. |
| 44 | To allow sufficient time to review responses and prepare our bid we kindly request that you please extend the bid date. | FOR PROCUREMENT RESPONSE |
| 45 | Please confirm that we can schedule an “over the shoulder review” for designs on the 15th calendar day. | Design review meetings will be scheduled in accordance with the design schedule. |
| Is there any electrical load reports or studies on the “Wilkie Parking Lot Panel”? | Unfortunately, the requested information is not available. |
| Is there any electrical load reports or studies on the transformer that feeds the “Wilkie Parking Lot Panel”? | Unfortunately, the requested information is not available. |
| Is there any electrical load reports or studies on the transformer that feeds the ARMAGs being relocated as part of Phase 1? | Unfortunately, the requested information is not available. |
| Are there any environmental testing reports for the site that the COR selected for the ARMAG relocation as part of Phase 1? | Unfortunately, the requested information is not available. |
| What documentation is required to secure temporary, non-daily site access for personnel who will be working continuously throughout the project? | All access requirements are listed under Section 23 Security Requirements. |
| If non-daily, temporary site access is available what is the submission and approval timeline? | All access approval timelines are the same. |
| Do delivery drivers need to meet the criteria of that is all “contractor personnel requesting access to JJRTC must be a U.S. citizen? | Yes. |
| Please clarify whether Offerors are to include Key Personnel resumes with their quotes. Attachment 1 Instructions does not address them, but Attachment 2 SOW section 22 specifically references “changes to Key Personnel from those identified in Contractor’s proposal…” | FOR PROCUREMENT RESPONSE |
| The narrative in Attachment 2 SOW requires the Project Manager to have a minimum of 5 years of experience. The following table calls for 15 years of experience. Please clarify the requirements for Project Manager. | Ten (10) years; the SOW will be updated to reflect the revision. |
| Please reconcile the Existing Conditions Report due date. SOW §3.3 requires the report within 60 calendar days of award, while the Design Deliverables Table in §6.6 requires it within 14 calendar days of award and prior to the first design submission. | The existing conditions report due date is within 14 calendar days after notice to proceed; the SOW will be updated to reflect the revision. |
| Please confirm the required design submission sequence. The SOW identifies 65%, 100%, and IFC submissions, while §6.6 references 35%, 65%, and IFC design submissions. | The design sequence is 65%, 100% and IFC submissions; the SOW will be updated to reflect the revision. |
| Please clarify how the Custom Exterior Panels option and Forklift Reinforced Concrete Driveway option are to be priced and evaluated, and whether separate option pricing will be provided in the solicitation pricing structure. | Please Add Optional Items as a Separate Line Item |
| Attachment 1 requires use of a Government-provided Past Performance Template. Please provide the required template or confirm that offerors may use their own format containing the required information. | A Past Performance Template will not be provided. Attachment 1 has been updated. |
| Please confirm that Offerors may include milestones on the construction schedule to meet the requirement in Attachment 1 B.3, rather than provide separate schedules for baseline/preliminary construction and milestones. | Please elaborate on what is being requested; specify the reference location in the SOW. |
| The proposal instructions require a Technical Plan demonstrating the Offeror’s capability and approach, with no reference to providing a design solution. Section M Factor 2 evaluation criteria refer to demonstration of “quality and completeness of the Design Solution.” Please confirm Offerors are not required to submit design materials as part of Volume 2. | This is not a requirement |
| The SOW states the Designer of Record shall determine concrete compressive strength (PSI), but no geotechnical/soils report is provided. Please provide any existing geotechnical data for the Knight Building and Wilkie Parking Area sites, or confirm that geotechnical investigation is a Contractor design responsibility. | Existing Conditions Tests: The Contractor shall be responsible for performing any testing necessary to confirm the existing conditions are adequate for the full execution of all planned work (e.g. structural capability, geotechnical investigation, mechanical equipment). If the Contractor proceeds with the work before testing and confirmation have been completed, any rework due to issues with unsuitable existing conditions shall be at the cost of the Contractor. This includes implementation of manufacturer’s recommendations, recommended tests, and validation of product’s installation requirements. |
| Only the empty weight (~54,000 lbs each) of the existing ARMAG units is provided. Please provide the maximum loaded weight/operational capacity of each ARMAG unit so the new concrete pad can be designed to the "maximum required load capacity" as specified. | The Design-Build Contractor is responsible for determining the maximum loading capacity based on the ARMAG manufacturer’s specifications, best practices and contract requirements. |
| The SOW requires a wall-mounted HVAC and humidity control system for the Multiplex but does not specify target temperature/relative humidity setpoints, tolerance ranges, redundancy, or monitoring/alarm requirements. Please provide the environmental control design criteria for explosives storage. | The Design-Build Contractor is responsible for determining the environmental control design criteria based on the ARMAG manufacturer’s specifications, best practices, and contract requirements. |
| Please confirm whether the new Multiplex and/or relocated ARMAG magazines require connection to the campus Notifier® fire alarm and mass notification system, or whether these outdoor magazine structures are exempt. | The two (2) existing ARMAGs to be relocated are not connected to the campus fire alarm system. However, provide a contract option forTurnkey fire alarm services to provide alarm coverage for the 5,400-square-foot Multiplex system. In addition to the requirements under this section, at a minimum, the scope shall include adding, connecting, testing, programming, and certifying the Multiplex system for integration with the campus-wide fire alarm and mass notification system. |
| Please provide the existing electrical transformer's rated capacity and available spare amperage near the Knight Building site to determine whether it can support new loads without a BGE service upgrade. | Unfortunately, the Government does not have the requested data. The Design-Build Contractor is responsible for calculating the loads and determining whether the existing transformer(s) can support the new load without requiring a BGE service upgrade. |
| The Phase 1 Location Map shows a general "New Location" area (circle) on the west side of the Knight Building rather than a fixed point. Please confirm whether the exact final ARMAG relocation location is fixed prior to bid or will be determined by the COR during the design phase. | The maps and drawings provided in the SOW are approximate and not to scale. The approximate ARMAG location is shown in Attachment 1.4.4.3, Site Plan (Conceptual), of the SOW and was also identified during the pre-bid site walk. |
| The SOW states the reassembly location for the existing metal shed "will be provided by COR during design phase." Please provide the shed's current as-is dimensions and any existing utility connections so disassembly, storage, and reassembly can be scoped and priced. | During the pre-bid site walk, bidders had the opportunity to take required measurements, identify utility connections, and gather any other information necessary to prepare their bids for the project. |
| The Phase 2 site plan shows existing parking of 130 spaces reduced to 111 reconfigured spaces (net loss of 19 spaces). Please confirm this reduction is acceptable as final, or advise if replacement parking must be provided elsewhere on campus. | Confirmed. |
| The SOW calls for storm drainage to discharge "by daylight into the existing drainage ditch/swale." Please confirm whether this feature is a jurisdictional water requiring a Clean Water Act Section 404/401 permit, and whether existing capacity/hydrology data for the receiving ditch is available. | The referenced statement in the SOW will be removed. However, the Contractor shall still comply with all applicable Clean Water Act requirements under this contract. |
| Section 1.4.2.5 references an option for a forklift-reinforced concrete driveway from the concrete apron to the "existing electrical station." This term/location is not otherwise defined on the attached site plans. Please clarify which structure this refers to and confirm its location. | During the walk through, the structure was identified. See image under attachment 1.4.4.5 - Electrical Transformer (Existing). |
| The Key Personnel table (Sec. 22) lists Virginia, Maryland, DC, or Pennsylvania as acceptable licensing jurisdictions for the Designer of Record, while Section 22.2 states the DOR "must be licensed in the state in Maryland, Virginia, or the District of Columbia" (omitting Pennsylvania). Please confirm whether Pennsylvania licensure is acceptable for the DOR role. | Pennsylvania licensure is not acceptable. The SOW will be updated to reflect this revision. |
| With soil disturbance over 5,000 square feet, we expect submission to the Maryland Dept of the Environment to be required. Please confirm required site approvals for this project. | If the limit of disturbance exceeds the MDE threshold for disturbance, requirements under the MS4 permit are applicable. |
| SOW Phase 1 1.4.2.6 and Phase 2 1.1.1.2 -Please provide estimated weight of ammunition and other items to be stored in the (2) existing Armag 1 and 2 and the 5400 square foot Multiplex ATF Spec Outdoor Explosives Storage and Ammunition Storage Magazines. | The Design-Build Contractor is responsible for determining the maximum loading capacity based on the ARMAG manufacturer’s specifications. |
| Will any detonators be stored? If so, what type and how many? Is the Contractor to furnish and install any detonator boxes? | There is not requirement for Contractor proivded detonator boxes. |
| SOW Phase 2 1.1.2 - Concrete reaches 99% of its design strength in 28 days and continues to develop strength beyond 28 days. We recommend specifying that the concrete mix reaches the design strength required to carry the imposed loads within 28 days and that no load is placed on the concrete until concrete testing affirms the design strength has been achieved. We assume the same applies to the new pad for Armag 1 and Armag 2. | Concur. The SOW will be updated to reflect the revision. |
| SOW Phase 1.4.2.1.2 - Please provide Utility maps for the two sites. | Included as part of the SOW. |
| Do the Armags or the Multiplex have any fire protection requirements? | The two (2) existing ARMAGs to be relocated are not connected to the campus fire alarm system. However, provide a contract option forTurnkey fire alarm services to provide alarm coverage for the 5,400-square-foot Multiplex system. In addition to the requirements under this section, at a minimum, the scope shall include adding, connecting, testing, programming, and certifying the Multiplex system for integration with the campus-wide fire alarm and mass notification system. |
| Please confirm the Multiplex is used solely for storage and retrieval had has no regular occupants. | Please elaborate on "regular occupants". There is no office space in the Multiplex. |
| Please confirm the number of exterior doors required on the Multiplex. | In addition to the main double door, at least two (2) single doors shall be provided. However, the Design-Build Contractor shall determine the life/safety requirements during the design phase whether this configuration satisfies applicable life safety requirements. |
| Please confirm if awnings are required at Multiplex doors. | Confirmed. |
| Item 1.4.2.10: Are the boulders provided by the Government? If not, what size/spacing are required. | Removable bollards with flush mount sleeves are required not boulders. The SOW will be revised. |
| For the temporary storage location, what restoration will be required after the storage is removed? | The requirement is to bring the temporary location area back to the condition before storage. |
| Item 1.1.1.3: Is there any available geotechnical information. | Existing Conditions Tests: The Contractor shall be responsible for performing any testing necessary to confirm the existing conditions are adequate for the full execution of all planned work (e.g. structural capability, geotechnical investigation, mechanical equipment). If the Contractor proceeds with the work before testing and confirmation have been completed, any rework due to issues with unsuitable existing conditions shall be at the cost of the Contractor. This includes implementation of manufacturer’s recommendations, recommended tests, and validation of product’s installation requirements. |
| Item 4.18.2: Please provide more detail on future expansion utility needs. | If sufficient power is unavailable at each of the project locations, then new transformer (s) shall be designed as 277/480V 3-phase permanent power to include the anticipated electrical loads plus 50% spare capacity. The contractor is responsible to step down power as neccesary to fullfill the requirements of the contract. |
| Item 4.18.4: This item specifically requires elevations of existing utilities within the work area. The way this item is written, we need to fully excavate each utility during the design phase. We suggest that this be limited to periodic test pitting of the utilities in the work area to obtain a general sense of depth. | Section 4.18.4 provides guidance related to utility locating services; however, it does not state that each utility must be excavated. |
| Please confirm, no modification for BLAST design will be required for existing Kngiht buidling due to proximity of proposed storage facility and estimated weight of ammunition to be stored. Per eCFR 27.II.C.555.206., minimum spacing requirements must be considered for magazines per table 555.218. | The ARMAGs and Multiplex specifications are presumed to meet the applicable blast-resistance requirements. |
| Since the concrete pads are to be dead flat, and the magazines and Multiplex sit up on beams, we recommend sealing all edges of the magazines and Multiplex so water does not accumulate under them. Please confirm | Top of concrete pad shall be finished with medium broom finish with extreme structural levelness, high abrasion resistance, and moisture mitigation to prevent container warping, rust, and ground settling. The Government has not provided direction indicating that the Multiplex will be elevated on beams. |
| Please clarify the existing fire alarm/MNS/protection/suppression in use in the magazines and projected for use in the Multiplex. | The two (2) existing ARMAGs to be relocated are not connected to the campus fire alarm system. However, provide a contract option forTurnkey fire alarm services to provide alarm coverage for the 5,400-square-foot Multiplex system. In addition to the requirements under this section, at a minimum, the scope shall include adding, connecting, testing, programming, and certifying the Multiplex system for integration with the campus-wide fire alarm and mass notification system. |
| Please state specific temperature and humidity requirements within the magazines and Multiplex required for safe storage of ammunition. | The Design-Build Contractor is responsible for determining the environmental control design criteria based on the ARMAG manufacturer’s specifications, best practices, and contract requirements. |
| Please confirm duration of project | The Government will consider extending the PoP to 365 days; however, it is our understanding that the Multiplex is available for shipment approximately 40 - 52 weeks after approved drawings. |
| SOW 1.4.1.3 states that the new concrete pads and aprons shall support the maximum capacity of the two existing outdoor explosives & Ammunition storage magazine, each of which have an empty weight of 54,000 lbs. What is the expected weight of each storage magazine at maximum capacity? | The Design-Build Contractor is responsible for determining the maximum loading capacity based on the ARMAG manufacturer’s specifications, best practices and contract requirements. |
| Has a geotechnical survey or test borings been performed for the proposed locations and if so, can this be shared? | Existing Conditions Tests: The Contractor shall be responsible for performing any testing necessary to confirm the existing conditions are adequate for the full execution of all planned work (e.g. structural capability, geotechnical investigation, mechanical equipment). If the Contractor proceeds with the work before testing and confirmation have been completed, any rework due to issues with unsuitable existing conditions shall be at the cost of the Contractor. This includes implementation of manufacturer’s recommendations, recommended tests, and validation of product’s installation requirements. |
| SOW 1.4.2.4 states to provide custom exterior panels as an option. The SF1442 provided does not have a pricing line item for this option. Please advise. | Please Add Optional Panels as a Separate Line Item |
| SOW 1.4.2.5 states to provide an option for a reinforced concrete driveway from the concrete apron to the electrical station. The SF1442 provided does not have a pricing line item for this option. Please advise. | Please Add Optional Reinforced Concrete as a Line Item |
| What is the size of the existing electrical transformer. | During the pre-bid site walk, bidders had the opportunity to take required measurements, identify utility connections, and gather any other information necessary to prepare their bids for the project. Existing Conditions Tests: The Contractor shall be responsible for performing any testing necessary to confirm the existing conditions are adequate for the full execution of all planned work (e.g. structural capability, geotechnical investigation, mechanical equipment). If the Contractor proceeds with the work before testing and confirmation have been completed, any rework due to issues with unsuitable existing conditions shall be at the cost of the Contractor. This includes implementation of manufacturer’s recommendations, recommended tests, and validation of product’s installation requirements. |
| SOW 7.5 states that IT requirements are to be designed in accordance with CIO requirements listed in the SOW. There does not appear to be a list of IT requirements. Please provide IT requirements. | The IT requirement will be removed from the SOW. |
| Are the transformers on the site owned and operated by the facility of the utility provider? | BGE owns and maintains the transformers at JJRTC. |
| Please confirm that the Project Manager must be a licensed design professional. The project is design-build and will have a DOR that is licensed in the appropriate locations. This requirement seems redundant. | The requirement for Project Manager to be a licensed design professional will be removed. |
| Please confirm that Dual roles between Key Personnel will be allowed. Item #22 on page 46 of the SoW states, "Key personnel shall not be dual hatted unless granted prior approval by the COR." While Item #22.6 on page 48 states, "Dual roles between Key Personnel shall be allowed." | The Superintendent shall not be dual hatted; however, the SSHO & QC may be dual hatted if the individual meet the requirements for each position. |
| SOW 22.6 states that dual roles between key personnel are allowed. Can the superintendent also act as the SSHO and QC manager, or can any on person only occupy two roles? | The Superintendent shall not be dual hatted; however, the SSHO & QC may be dual hatted if the individual meet the requirements for each position. |
| Referencing attachment 1; the pricing shall be submitted on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Please define the level of detail required in the pricing volume. | FOR PROCUREMENT RESPONSE |
| Is there a facility BAS system that the new magazine must be tied into for monitoring of HVAC systems? If so, where is the nearest tie-in point and is the a preferred or required O&M contractor? | No |
| Does the facility have a blanket NDPES or MDE disturbance permit? | No |
| Page 3 of Attachment 1 Instructions states the proposal shall consist of the Cover Page and 4 volumes. Should the cover page be submitted on its own or should a cover page be provided in each volume? | Cover Page Can be submitted on it's own |
| Page 3 of Attachment 1 Instructions states the proposal shall consist of the Cover Page and 4 volumes. However, 5 volumes are listed. Please clarify how many volumes are to be submitted. | Page 3 has been updated to 5 volumes |
| Page 3 of Attachment 1 Instructions states that Volume 4 should be submitted in Excel format. However, page 4 states that Volume 4 shall not exceed 3 pages. Should a PDF of the price be provided in this Volume in addition to the Excel? | This has been updated to No Page Limit |
| Page 4 of Attachment 1 Instructions states to use the Government provided Past Performance Template for Volume 1: Past Performance. However, one was not provided with the RFP. Please provide. | NO Past Performance Template will be provided |
| Please confirm 11"x17" format is acceptable for the Schedule (Volume 3). | No,please see Instructions |
| Will the government allow a relevant project to be used for Volume 1: Past Performance if it was awarded approximately one week after the solicitation was issued? | Yes |
| Please confirm if the HVAC unit to be positioned on the exterior of the Multiplex unit? | Confirmed. For maintenance and access purposes, the preference is for the unit(s) to be positioned on the exterior of the Multiplex closest to the forested area. The details can be finalized during the design phase. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .