Revised Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionaire.pdf

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528

May 2020 Version

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: 70RFP420RE7000003

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE: __________________

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal Protective Service is considering this Contractor for Protective Security Officer services at various Federal buildings located in the State of New Mexico. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.)

respond to this questionnaire. More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.

Upon completion of the survey, please email to Adam.L.Reynoso@fps.dhs.gov and Marcus.L.Mason@fps.dhs.gov. If you have any questions, please call Adam L. Reynoso at 215.287.6944 or Marcus Mason at 817.690.1657. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE: _____________________________________

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS:_________________________________________

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS: _________________________________________

ANNUAL NO. OF PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER HOURS (Note: If ID/IQ contract, provide the maximum post hours available for the most recent one year ordering period):_________________________________________

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we determine any similarities to this contract:

RFP: 70RFP420RE7000003 PSO Services in the State of New Mexico

Revised June 03, 2020 Amendment 0002 mailto:Adam.L.Reynoso@fps.dhs.gov mailto:Marcus.L.Mason@fps.dhs.gov

May 2020 Version

QUESTIONS

PERFORMANCE:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. How consistent is the Contractor in providing required staffing at each post of duty?

Comments:

2. How consistent is the Contractor in providing employees who report to duty properly groomed, uniformed, and equipped?

Comments:

3. How consistent is the Contractor in keeping training records, certifications, and related documentation complete, accurate, and current?

Comments:

4. Discuss the overall level of professionalism, attentiveness, and bearing of the Contractor's workforce.

Comments:

RFP: 70RFP420RE7000003 PSO Services in the State of New Mexico

Revised June 03, 2020 Amendment 0002

May 2020 Version

5. How effective is the Contractor in identifying potential problems and resolving them on his own?

Comments:

6. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to him by owner and tenant representatives?

Comments:

7. Discuss the Contractor’s quality control of the project.

Comments:

8. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project

Comments:

RFP: 70RFP420RE7000003 PSO Services in the State of New Mexico

Revised June 03, 2020

May 2020 Version

9. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to seamlessly transition or phase-in under a newly awarded contract (if applicable):

Comments:

10. Discuss the Contactor’s ability to provide the level of supervision sufficient to ensure effective performance by the productive Protective Security Officers over the course of the Contract.

Comments:

11. Did this contract require the contractor to submit a subcontracting plan? If so, has the contractor been making a good faith effort to meet the subcontracting goals contained within the plan? (NOTE: The individual completing this questionnaire may need to contact the cognizant contracting officer in order to ascertain whether the contractor is meeting subcontracting goals.)

12. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

RFP: 70RFP420RE7000003 PSO Services in the State of New Mexico

Revised June 03, 2020

May 2020 Version

13. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a. _____ Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.

b. _____ Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.

c. _____ Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.

Your Name: ______________________________ Your Position: ______________________________ Company: ______________________________ Telephone No: ______________________________ Fax: ______________________________ E-mail address: ______________________________

RFP: 70RFP420RE7000003 PSO Services in the State of New Mexico

Revised June 03, 2020