Attachment_3_-_HAIBP_Oral_Presentation_Questions.pdf
PDF 90 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Helium-3 Alternative Implementation Backpack Program Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 70RDND18R00000005
About this file
Attachment 3 - HAIBP Oral Presentation Questions
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HAIBP_-_Instructions_to_Offerors_-_Amd_A00004.pdf | ||
| A00003_-_RFP_70RDND18R00000005_-_DRAFT_HAIBP_Interface_Control_Document.pdf | ||
| A00003_-_RFP_70RDND18R00000005_-_HAIBP_-_Instructions_to_Offerors_-_Track_Changes.pdf | ||
| RFP_70RDND18R00000005_-_HAIBP_Offerors_Questions_&_Answers.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| A00003_-_RFP_70RDND18R00000005_-_HAIBP_RTM_(2017-11-07)_v1.00.pdf | ||
| A00001_-_Att1_-_Incoming_Foreign_National_Visitors_Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_70RDND18R00000005_-_HAIBP_Instructions_to_Offerors.pdf | ||
| RFP_70RDND18R00000005_SF_1449.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_DNDO_Replay_Requirements_Specification_January_2016.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_-_HAIBP_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2_-_HAIBP_Self-Assessment_Scorecard.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3 –HAIBP RFP 70RDND18R00000005
Oral Presentation Questions
1) Production Readiness: As noted in the proposed timeline for vendors that continue to the Low
Rate Initial Production Phase (LRIP) phase (Phase 2), the program seeks to have five (5) testable production representative HAIBP systems. How do you mitigate the risk that you will not meet this timeline?
2) Authority to Operate (ATO) Risk: As noted, any system that will be deployed at the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) must first achieve an ATO. Our schedule includes vulnerability testing during LRIP. How would you proceed if a vulnerability is identified that would preclude certification? What would be your path forward if a part became obsolete during Full Rate
Production (FRP) and the Configuration Control Board (CCB) process identified a vulnerability at this stage?
3) Acquisition Innovation: If you were in charge of designing the HAIBP Government Solicitation, what changes would you make to the RFP that would enable industry to be positioned to rapidly develop and field innovative solutions? In reviewing the customized commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) approach, what aspects do you like and not like?
4)
a) Your presentation addresses innovative ideas. What metrics would be appropriate for verifying that your innovative ideas can be achieved in the six months available for the Initial Article Phase
(Phase 1)?
b) If unforeseen issues cause your innovation goals to not be met, (for instance the weight does not meet the goal threshold of 17 lbs) what is your plan to ensure a compliant prototype (KPP threshold: under 22lbs) will be provided on schedule?
Note: devices that are not provided in time to participate in scheduled testing will be disqualified.
5) What do you consider to be the three highest risks to your modification strategy and why? How do you plan to mitigate those risks?
File details come from the government source that posted it.