7-MW26-8 Part-8-form MECSH for-public-posting.pdf

PDF 220 KB Posted

Attached to
MW26-8 MECSH HOM-VEE evidence-based nursing-provided home visiting model
Solicitation number
MW26-8
Issued by
Utah

About this file

This is a Notice of Intent to Award a Contract Without Engaging in a Standard Procurement Process issued by the Utah Department of Government Operations, Division of Purchasing and General Services, on behalf of the Utah Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). The procurement seeks a license and implementation support for the Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting (MECSH) evidence-based home visiting model, which includes training, facilitator training materials, and support to adapt and implement the program over three years. The contract term is three years with two additional renewal options for a potential total of five years. No specific response date, due date, site visit, or bidder's meeting is identified in this notice. The procurement is being conducted as a sole-source award to Western Sydney University, the trademark owner of the MECSH program.

The estimated contract value is $405,095 with no freight costs. DHHS justifies the sole-source designation on the grounds that Western Sydney University is the only vendor authorized to provide MECSH services and that federal funding requirements limit eligible models to those listed on the Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HOM-VEE) website. Additionally, DHHS determined that the model must be nursing-based, a criterion met by very few HOM-VEE-approved models. Market research conducted by DHHS included review of approved federal models, consultation with other states implementing these models, and evaluation of comparable nursing-provided home visiting programs such as Nurse-Family Partnership, which was determined not to meet Utah's needs due to enrollment restrictions and staffing barriers in rural and frontier areas. This federal funding initiative will enable the Home Visiting Program to serve more families across Utah using a nursing-based model.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Department of Government Operations Division of Purchasing and General Services

4315 S 2700 W, FL 3, Taylorsville, UT 84129-2128 Phone: 801-957-7160 www.purchasing.utah.gov

Issuing Procurement Unit: Division of Purchasing

Conducting Procurement Unit: Utah Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)

NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD A CONTRACT WITHOUT ENGAGING IN A STANDARD PROCUREMENT PROCESS

The Division of Purchasing is publishing this notice pursuant to the Utah Procurement Code. The Conducting Procurement Unit submitted this form to the Division of Purchasing claiming that it intends to award a contract without competition if it is determined by the Division of Purchasing, in writing, that:

there is only one source for the procurement item;

transitional costs are a significant consideration in selecting a procurement item; or the award of a contract is under circumstances, described in rules adopted by the applicable rulemaking authority, that make awarding the contract through a standard procurement process impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit.

In the subsequent pages the Conducting Procurement Unit has identified its justification for wanting to award a contract without engaging in standard procurement process.

Determination of Other Interested Vendors

If the procurement item identified in this notice is to be awarded as a sole source (only one source for the procurement item), then this notice will help determine if there are any other interested and qualified vendors that meet the specifications of this notice. Any such vendors must submit the following information:

The name of the contesting person; and

A detailed explanation of the challenge, including documentation showing that there are other competing sources for the procurement item.

In addition, a vendor should include:

Documentation that your firm can provide a comparable or better procurement item that meets or exceeds the specifications;

Documentation that your firm can also provide the same proprietary procurement item or an equivalent procurement item; and

If transitional costs are identified as the justification for this notice, submit a cost comparison of the identified transitional costs with your firm’s anticipated transitional costs.

Regardless of any prior communications with the Division of Purchasing or the State, all vendors interested in responding to this notice must submit a response to this posting containing complete responses to all of the information requested above.

DO NOT CONTACT THE CONDUCTING PROCUREMENT UNIT. Any questions regarding this notice, including obtaining additional information, can be obtained through the Division of Purchasing during the publication period. No action is required if you agree with this Notice.

If the purpose of this notice is an intent to award a sole source, after the public notice period has passed, and the Division of Purchasing determines that there are other interested and qualified vendors that meet the specifications of this notice, then the Division of Purchasing will not award a contract pursuant to this notice. An award without competition may still be made even if there are other interested vendors when the basis for the award is due to transitional costs or impracticality as stated above.

If, after the public notice period has passed, no valid challenges have been received, then the Division of Purchasing may award a contract to the identified vendor without competition.

Read the entire form very carefully before responding to this notice.

It is anticipated that this procurement will result in a:

RESULT ACTION

Agency Contract

The term of this contract (or extension) will be: 3 years and renewal options: 2 additional years for a potential of 5 years total, if all renewals are used.

The agency may not make the procurement until the solicitation process is completed and a contract is written and signed by the agency, the vendor, and the Division of Purchasing.

Purchase Order The agency may not make the procurement until the solicitation process is completed, the purchase order is signed by the Division of Purchasing and delivered to the agency and the vendor.

Description of procurement item to be purchased:

Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting (MECSH) license and support services

Estimated value of the contract/purchase order/increase: $405,095

Freight Cost (F.O.B. Destination, Freight Prepaid): $0.00

Vendor Name: Western Sydney University

Explain in detail the service or product to be procured (additional information included in attached Scope of Work):

License and implementation support for the Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting (MECSH) evidence-based home visiting model. This includes provision of training(s), facilitator training materials, and support to adapt and implement the program over three years. This will enable the Home Visiting Program with the support needed to implement this nursing-based model using federal dollars. This will result in being able to serve more families across the state.

CHECK THE BOX THAT IDENTIFIES WHY A CONTRACT SHOULD BE AWARDED WITHOUT ENGAGING IN A STANDARD

PROCUREMENT PROCESS:

Sole Source - There is only one source for the procurement item. Complete Section A

Transitional Costs - Transitional costs are a significant consideration in selecting a procurement item and the results of a cost-benefit analysis demonstrate that transitional costs are unreasonable or cost-prohibitive, and that the award of a contract without engaging in a standard procurement process is in the best interest of the procurement unit.

Complete Section B

Impracticality - The award of a contract is under circumstances, described in rules adopted by the applicable rulemaking authority, that make awarding the contract through a standard procurement process impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit.

Complete Section C

Trial use contract for a new or innovative procurement item, or for a procurement item with a novel or unproven use or application.

Complete Section D

Extension of a contract without engaging in a standard procurement process. If extension will result in a request to increase the contract total, then also complete Section F below.

Complete Section E

Request to increase total contract amount. Complete Section F

SECTION A: ONLY ONE SOURCE

1.

What is unique about this procurement item to justify an award of contract without engaging in a standard procurement process? (Explain in detail why the service, product, etc. is only available from a single supplier.)

Western Sydney University owns the trademark for the MECSH program, therefore there are no other vendors available to provide the services under this agreement. Because of the federal funding for this project, DHHS is limited to evidence-based models listed on the Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HOM-VEE) website ( https://homvee.acf.gov/models?field_miechv_eligible=1&meets-hhs=1 ). Additionally, based on DHHS needs, DHHS has determined that the model selected needs to be nursing-based (i.e. must be administered by nurses). Very few of the models on the HOM-VEE website are nursing-based and the ones that are have significant differences in programmatic components. See the answers to questions 3 and 5 below for more information about DHHS' determination that the MECSH model is unique in this niche market.

2. Could the procurement item be reasonably modified to allow for competition?

No. See response above.

3. Explain the market research performed.

In looking for evidence-based nursing-provided home visiting models, HVP first looked at the approved models for this federal funding. These models are vetted by the federal government and listed on the Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HOM-VEE) website. From there, Utah met with other states implementing these models to learn about their experiences and recommendations. After these conversations, Utah determined that this model best fits the needs of Utah families, as it allows for enrollment up to 8 weeks postpartum and to serve families with any number of children. It is scalable in urban, rural, and frontier areas.

4.

What research have you conducted to ensure the requested procurement item is not available on an existing state cooperative contract?

DHHS searched the statecontracts.utah.gov website. MECSH does not not have a Utah cooperative contract.

5.

If there is only one source for the procurement item, list the names of other similar vendors contacted, contact person, and a summary of their response.

The only evidence-based, nursing-provided similar model is Nurse-Family Partnership and DHHS has communicated with their Government Services Representative, Cam Scott, over the course of many years. This model does not meet Utah's needs, as it requires early enrollment and only serves first time moms. Additionally, the staffing requirements create barriers for implementation in rural and frontier areas of the state.

SECTION B: TRANSITIONAL COSTS

Describe the existing equipment, technology, software, accessories, replacement parts, or service, hereafter referred to as equipment; include the original purchase price and date of purchase for the existing equipment.

2. Supply the following:

a. Procurement method that was used to purchase the existing equipment? (e.g. IFB, RFP, Sole Source):

b. Solicitation number, RQS number, or sole source number for the existing equipment:

c. Contract number for the existing equipment:

3.

Attach the cost-benefit analysis, as required by Utah Code Section 63G-6a-802, that demonstrates that transitional costs are unreasonable or cost-prohibitive.

SECTION C: STANDARD PROCUREMENT PROCESS IMPRACTICABLE

Review R33-108-101c and provide supporting justification why awarding the contract through a standard procurement process is impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit under the circumstances; including any supporting documentation.

2. Supply the following, if applicable:

a. Procurement method that was used to purchase the existing equipment? (e.g. IFB, RFP, Sole Source):

b. Solicitation number, RQS number, or sole source number for the existing equipment:

c. Contract number for the existing equipment

SECTION D: TRIAL USE CONTRACT

1. Describe how this trial use contract for the new or novel procurement item will benefit your agency.

2.

Describe how the procurement item is new or innovative, or how the procurement item has a proposed use/application that is novel or unproven.

3.

Describe why a trial use contract exception is necessary for this procurement item at this time as opposed to conducting a standard procurement process to procure the procurement item.

4.

What research have you conducted to ensure the requested procurement item is not available on an existing state cooperative contract?

5.

How long does the agency need to test the procurement item and what quantities of the procurement item (if applicable) will be necessary to test this procurement item? Note trial use contracts generally cannot exceed a period of 24 months.

SECTION E: EXTENSION OF CONTRACT WITHOUT ENGAGING IN A STANDARD PROCUREMENT PROCESS

The procurement official may extend a contract up to 120 days. For extensions beyond 120 days, the procurement official may extend the contract after consulting with legal counsel.

Contract Start Date: Enter date. Current End Date: Enter date.

Proposed End Date: Enter date. Contract Number: Enter text.

Is this request for a contract extension the result of a protest, appeal or court action? If yes, agency does not need to complete items 2-5 below. Provide the solicitation number that resulted in a protest and date of the protest, appeal or court action.

2.

Describe why extending this contract without engaging in a standard procurement process is necessary to avoid a lapse in a critical government service, OR to mitigate a circumstance that is likely to have a negative impact on public health, safety, welfare, or property.

3.

Confirm the procurement unit is currently engaged in a standard procurement process for the procurement item that is subject to the contract extension request and that the standard procurement process is delayed due to an unintentional error.

4.

Justification for Extension: check all that apply:

☐ The standard procurement process is delayed due to an unintentional error.

☐ A change in an industry standard requires one or more significant changes to specifications for the procurement item.

☐ To prevent the loss of federal funds.

☐ To mitigate the effects of a delay of a state or federal appropriation.

☐ To enable the procurement unit to continue to receive a procurement item during a delay in the implementation of a contract awarded pursuant to a procurement that has already been conducted.

☐ To enable the procurement unit to continue to receive a procurement item during a period of time during which negotiations with a vendor under a new contract for the procurement item are being conducted.

5. For the selection(s) above, provide any additional details regarding the circumstances justifying a contract extension.

SECTION F: REQUEST TO INCREASE TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT

If the original solicitation type was an ACWESPP (e.g. sole source) and the additional amount will make the contract total go above $50K, then a public notice is required to increase the contract total. This public notice is not necessary if the procurement official waives the public notice requirement in accordance with R33-108-101e.

Contractor Name: Enter text. Contract Number: Enter text.

Original Contract Total: Enter text. Current Contract Total: Enter text.

Proposed Contract Total: Enter text. % Increase from Original: Enter text.

Solicitation Number: Enter text. Solicitation Type: Enter text.

Product or Service Description:

Click to enter text.

Why is the contract total being increased? Check all that apply.

☐ The term of the contract is being extended (also complete Section E above if extending).

☐ The quantity of products or services needed has increased.

☐ The price, rate, or fee for a product or service has increased.

☐ A new or upgraded product or service is needed.

Provide details for the answer that was selected in the previous question. Provide any reasons for the increase.

Click to enter text.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .