7-Attachment E Scoresheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 77 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Collections Management System
- Solicitation number
- JK26-21
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for a Collections Management System procurement issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing on behalf of Cultural and Community Engagement. The solicitation number is JK26-21, and the contract is for a five-year term to procure design professional services and consulting expertise for collections management system implementation. The procurement seeks vendors with demonstrated experience in museum collections data management, library cataloging, or archival work to support the setup and cleanup of a collections database while interfacing with Lucidea's backend product and support infrastructure.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a 800-point technical scoring framework with seven scoreable criteria weighted by importance, including approach to collections database management (200 points, 25%), availability and responsiveness (125 points, 15.6%), technical communication ability (125 points, 15.6%), time management and project prioritization (125 points, 15.6%), collaborative relationship management (125 points, 15.6%), project obstacle identification and prevention (50 points, 6.3%), and familiarity with government cultural collections (50 points, 6.3%). A minimum threshold of 560 technical points (70% of total) is required for proposal advancement. Three mandatory qualifications must be met: minimum five years of experience in relevant collections work, extensive knowledge of collections management operations and standards, and demonstrated ability to interface with Lucidea's backend systems. Pricing is explicitly excluded from proposal submissions and will be negotiated separately according to Utah Procurement Code Part 15, with the highest-ranked vendor selected for negotiations at fair and reasonable compensation rates.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-Att.-A-Agency-Terms-and-Conditions-GS (12).docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 5-Attachment C Scope Of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 4-Att.-B-Agency-IT-Terms-and-Conditions (2).docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Attachment D Technical Criteria.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Attachment E | ||
| Collections Management System | ||
| SOLICITATION # JK26-21 | ||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||
| DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Division of Purchasing. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson | ||
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | ||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Offeror certifies that they have a minimum of five years experience with museum collections data, library cataloging, or archival work | ||
| 2 | Offeror certifies that they have extensive knowledge of collections management operations, policies, and standards | ||
| 3 | Offeror certifies that they have the ability to interface with Lucidea's backend product and support teams |
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Describe your approach to managing a scope for collections database setup and cleanup | 40 | 25.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | 180.0 | ||||
| 2 | Describe your availability and responsiveness | 25 | 15.6% | 125.00 | 0.00 | 115.0 | ||||
| 3 | Describe your ability to communicate technical information to both technical and non-technical individuals | 25 | 15.6% | 125.00 | 0.00 | 115.0 | ||||
| 4 | Describe your approach to time management and project prioritization | 25 | 15.6% | 125.00 | 0.00 | 120.0 | ||||
| 5 | Describe your ability to manage collaborative relationships | 25 | 15.6% | 125.00 | 0.00 | 110.0 | ||||
| 6 | Describe your strategy for identifying and preventing project obstacles | 10 | 6.3% | 50.00 | 0.00 | 40.0 | ||||
| 7 | Describe your familiarity with government cultural collections | 10 | 6.3% | 50.00 | 0.00 | 30.0 | ||||
| 8 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 9 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 10 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 11 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 12 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 800.00 | 0.00 | 710.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 70% | 560.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
*Cost will be negotiated according to Part 15 of the Utah Procurement Code.
| Total Evaluation Points | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 800.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Evaluation Points | 800.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .