7-Attachment E - Score Sheet.xls

XLS spreadsheet 41 KB Posted

Attached to
MK26-23 Pharmaceutical Blister Pack and Label Supply
Solicitation number
MK26-23
Issued by
Utah

About this file

This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and the Department of Health and Human Services for procurement MK26-23, Pharmaceutical Blister Pack and Label Supply. The RFP seeks to procure blister cards, sealing paddles, and pharmacy labels for the DHHS Pharmacy, with an anticipated single contract award to the highest-scoring responsive and responsible vendor. The contract term is five years, with vendors required to guarantee pricing for a minimum of one year.

The scoresheet establishes evaluation criteria weighted as follows: technical evaluation comprises 70 percent of the total score (1,000 points), with a minimum required threshold of 700 points, and cost evaluation comprises 30 percent (428.6 points). Technical scoring is based on five primary criteria: detailed overview of DOSIS cold-sealed and heat-sealed blister pack offerings (250 points), capacity for high-frequency, low-volume distribution (100 points), quality assurance processes for prescription label alignment and printer compatibility (250 points), heat-sealing equipment integration and downtime mitigation strategy (200 points), and overall ability to meet DHH operational needs including supply reliability and workflow compatibility (200 points). Six mandatory requirements must be satisfied on a pass/fail basis: ability to supply heat-sealed blister packs with large and extra-large blisters, DOSIS cold-sealed blister packs and lids, prescription labels for DOSIS tower, perforated prescription labels for Zebra printers, heat sealers and compatible paddles, and maintenance of all necessary licenses. Cost points are assigned using a formula whereby the lowest-priced offeror receives 100 percent of available cost points, with all other offerors receiving proportional points based on their price relative to the lowest proposal.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf PDF
6-Attachment C - Cost Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
5-Attachment B - Scope of Work.docx DOCX document
3-Attachment A - Terms and Conditions.docx DOCX document
4-Attachment D - MMTR.docx DOCX document
2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

Pharmaceutical Blister Pack and Label Supply
MK26-23
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1Vendor must be able to supply heat-sealed blister packs with large and extra-large blisters (30/32 blisters per card).
2Vendor must be able to supply DOSIS (the automated blister-packing machines used by the DHHS Pharmacy to fill medication blister packs) cold-sealed blister packs and corresponding lids (large 30/32 blisters per card)
3Vendor must be able to provide prescription labels for DOSIS tower that match current prescription requirements.
4Vendor must be able to provide prescription labels perforated for Zebra printer (bypass printer for DOISIS).
5Vendor must be able to supply heat sealers and paddles for the heat sealers compatible with the blister packs.
6Vendor must have and maintain all licenses necessary to lawfully perform the services.
0
Scoreable Technical CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints
EarnedMinimum Required
1Provide a detailed overview of your DOSIS cold-sealed and heat-sealed blister pack offerings, including material specifications and unique performance features.5025.0%250.000.00
2Outline your capacity for high-frequency, low-volume distribution as an alternative to traditional bulk shipping models.2010.0%100.000.00
3Describe your quality assurance process for ensuring prescription labels maintain 100% alignment with CHS templates and seamless compatibility with our existing printers.5025.0%250.000.00
4Detail how your heat-sealing equipment integrates into existing pharmacy workstations and provide your strategy for addressing wear-and-tear to ensure zero downtime.4020.0%200.000.00
5Please describe the overall ability to meet DHH’s operational needs, including reliability of supply and compatibility with existing pharmacy workflows.4020.0%200.000.00
130.0%0.000.00
140.0%0.000.00
150.0%0.000.00
160.0%0.000.00
170.0%0.000.00
180.0%0.000.00
190.0%0.000.00
200.0%0.000.00
210.0%0.000.00
220.0%0.000.00
230.0%0.000.00
100.0%1000.000.000.00
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
70%700.00.00.0%0
CostRFP SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
30%428.60.0
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points70%1,000.00.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points30%428.60.0
Total Evaluation Points100%1,428.60.0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .