LIMITED ASBESTOS INSPECTION

AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY

Logan First District Court

HVAC Controls, Fire Alarm, and Emergency Generator Upgrade

135 North 100 West Logan, Utah 84321

August 12, 2026

Prepared for:

Mrs. Aubrey Staple

Project Manager, Statewide Programs

State of Utah

Department of Administrative Services

Division of Facilities Construction and Management (DFCM)

Taylorsville State Office Building

4315 S. 2700 W., 3rd Floor

Taylorsville, Utah 84129-2128

Prepared by:

Hill West Environmental

7963 Douglas Drive

Park City, Utah 84098

State of Utah Company Certification # ASBC-495

Claude Dahlk, CHMM, CIEC

(801) 450-8060

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On October 31, 2022, and July 16, 2026, Hill West Environmental conducted a limited pre-renovation inspection for asbestos and lead-based paint of the Logan First District Courthouse as identified in Figure 1. The project includes HVAC Controls, fire alarm, and emergency generator upgrade /replacement within the facility, which is located at 135 North 100 West, Logan, Utah 84321.

Mrs. Aubrey Staple, Project Manager with the State of Utah, Division of Facilities Construction and Management (DFCM) requested this inspection to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and building components with lead-based paint that need to be addressed before the building is renovated.

Suspect materials that will be impacted include ceiling tile, block filler and sheetrock wall systems. Areas in which renovations are to occur were inspected, and all other areas were not inspected as part of this survey. Hill West identified the following asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paint during this inspection:

Asbestos-Containing Materials

Homogeneous Area Number

Material Description

Asbestos Content

Amount

Cost Estimate

None No asbestos was detected within the building materials that will be impacted during this renovation project.

N/A N/A $0

Building Components with XRF Lead readings ≥ 0.4 mg/cm2

Material Type Reading (mg/cm2)

No painted building components within the project area tested positive for lead.

N/A

Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes

Material Type Quantity

No Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes will be impacted during this renovation project. N/A

Conclusions

ACM – Asbestos was not detected in any of the suspect building materials that will be impacted during this upgrade project. If the contractor discovers other materials that will be impacted during this project that weren’t sampled, they shall stop work and alert DFCM that suspect materials require additional testing to determine if they are regulated.

Lead – Lead was not detected in any of the suspect building materials that will be impacted during this upgrade project. If the contractor discovers other materials that will be impacted during this project that weren’t sampled, they shall stop work and alert DFCM that suspect materials require additional testing to determine if they are regulated.

Universal Wastes – Universal wastes will not be impacted during this upgrade project.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

As per DFCM’s instructions, Hill West Environmental conducted a limited asbestos and lead-based paint inspection of the Logan First District Courthouse within areas as identified in Figure 1. Due to the remodel and upgrade projects, Hill West was instructed to only inspect areas that will be impacted during the renovation project.

The purpose of this survey was to identify the existence, extent, and condition of both friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paint within the renovation areas.

2.0 SITE VISIT /OBSERVATIONS

2.1 Asbestos Inspection

On July 16, 2026, Hill West Environmental visited the site to survey the renovation areas of the building. A complete asbestos inspection of the areas that will be impacted during renovations was made to determine conditions and develop a sampling scheme for the areas. Table 1 summarizes the asbestos inspection results.

Table 1 – Asbestos Materials

Homogenous Area Number

Material Description/Location Asbestos Content Amount Cost

Estimate

N/A No asbestos was detected within the samples collected for this upgrade project

N/A N/A N/A

Appendix A contains Figure 1 – Project Location and photographs of samples.

Appendix B contains analytical results and certifications.

2.2 Lead-based Paint Inspection

On October 31, 2022, Hill West Environmental conducted a limited lead-based paint inspection of the Logan Court within areas identified in Section 1.0 of this report. Direct measurement of lead in paint was made using a Niton XL2 X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum Analyzer. The Niton XRF non-destructively measures lead concentrations of painted surfaces, regardless of the number of layers present.

According to the manufacturer, the detection limit (lower limit of reliable measurement) for this instrument is 0.1 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) ±0.3 mg/cm2 with the instrument set on the “quick” measuring mode.

The quick mode provides 95% confidence that the lead concentration in the paint is above or below the set point of the instrument which, for this survey is 0.4 mg/cm2. For this survey, measurements below 0.4 mg/cm2 were not reported as lead containing.

The Niton XRF sometimes reports negative values. According to the manufacturer, negative values should be expected and interpreted as zero lead content due to the statistical variability of XRF measurement technology. Both HUD and the EPA recognize the statistical variability of XRF technology and the possibility of obtaining negative values where the lead content is near zero.

Table 2 summarizes the lead-based paint inspection results. Measurements are reported in milligrams of lead per square centimeter (mg/cm2). All the coatings tested during this inspection were in good to fair condition. Only positive readings (>0.4 mg/cm2) are summarized in Table 2. Appendix B contains all XRF readings for this survey.

Table 2 – Positive Lead-Based Paint Readings

Building Component Material Description/Location Lead Content (mg/cm2)

None No building components tested positive for lead within the project area.

N/A

3.0 RESULTS

Table 3 summarizes the analytical results for the asbestos samples collected.

Table 3 – Asbestos Analytical Results

Sample Number

Homogeneous Area Number

Material Sampled Sample Location Estimated Quantity*

Analytical Results

LC – 01A M001 2 ’x 2’ Ceiling Tile Offices 6,000 ft2 None Detected

LC – 01B M001 2’ x 2’ Ceiling Tile Offices 6,000 ft2 None Detected

LC – 02A M002 Sheetrock Wall System Offices <1,000 ft2

None Detected

LC – 02B M002 Sheetrock Wall System Offices <1,000 ft2 None Detected

LC – 02C M002 Sheetrock Wall System Offices <1,000 ft2 None Detected

LC – 03A M003 12 Inch Ceiling Tile Offices <1,000 ft2

LC – 03B M003 12 Inch Ceiling Tile Offices <1,000 ft2 None Detected

LC – 04A M004 White Block Filler Electrical Room <1,000 ft2 None Detected

LC – 04B M004 White Block Filler Electrical Room <1,000 ft2

LC – 04C M004 White Block Filler Electrical Room <1,000 ft2 None Detected

* Estimated Quantity is based on amount to be disturbed during the upgrade project.

4.0 DISCUSSION/CONCLUSTIONS

In Utah, EPA asbestos regulations are administered by the Utah Division of Air Quality. Utah Occupational Safety and Health Administration (UOSHA) has adopted the Federal OSHA regulations. In addition, the Salt Lake Valley Health Department (SLVHD) regulates demolition activities in Salt Lake County. The SLVHD regulations for pre-demolition building inspections require an asbestos inspection, but also required building owners to inspect the building for other hazardous materials such as universal wastes, hazardous and toxic wastes and lead-based paint. Similar to asbestos, these wastes, if present must be removed prior to demolition/renovation.

A copy of this report should be on-site during all renovation activities.

This limited asbestos and lead-based paint inspection was conducted on the Logan First District Courthouse that will be impacted during renovation activities.

Only items that are believed to be impacted during renovation activities were inspected during this survey. This survey is not intended to represent exhaustive research of all asbestos or other hazards or conditions which may exist within other buildings located at this project site.

This report does not purport to represent future indoor conditions or events.

Situations or activities, which transpire subsequent to this report, which result in adverse environmental, construction and/or engineering impacts, are not to be construed as relevant to this study.

This report is intended for the sole use of Hill West's client. This report may not be used or relied upon by any other party without the written consent of Hill West.

The scope of services performed in execution of the evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and the use or re-use of this document or the finding, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user. Appendix B contains all Company certifications and individual inspector certifications.

Prepared by:

Claude Dahlk, CHMM, CIEC Asbestos Inspector ASB-0433

First Judicial District Court Figure 1

Legend

First Judicial District Court

200 ft

N

N

Appendix A

Photographs of Samples

Logan Courts

135 North 100 West

Logan, Utah

LC – 01A 2 Foot Ceiling Tile

LC – 01B 2 Foot Ceiling Tile

LC – 02A Sheetrock Wall System

LC – 02B Sheetrock Wall System

LC – 02C Sheetrock Wall System

LC – 03A 12 Inch Ceiling Tile

LC – 03B 12 Inch Ceiling Tile

LC – 04A White Block Filler

LC – 04B White Block Filler

LC – 04C White Block Filler

Appendix B

Analytical Results

Certifications

November 2, 2022

Mr. Claude Dahlk

Hill West Environmental

7963 Douglas Drive

Park City, UT 84098

Ref: Batch # 193991, Lab # HW2278 - HW2284

Received November 1, 2022

Test report, Page 1 of 3

135 N 100 W Logan, UT 84321

Logan Courts

Sampled by Dominic Hobbs 10/31/22

Dear Mr. Dahlk:

Samples HW2278 through HW2284 have been analyzed by visual estimation based on the Interim

Method of the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples, EPA -- 40 CFR Appendix E to

Subpart E of Part 763, with guidance from EPA 600/R-93/116: Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials as well as the EPA-600/M4-82-20 and OSHA ID-191 methods. Appendix

"A" contains statements which an accredited laboratory must make to meet the requirements of accrediting agencies. It also contains additional information about the method of analysis. Appendix "A" must be included as an essential part of this test report. This analysis is accredited under NVLAP Lab

Code: 101012-0. It does not contain data or calibrations for tests performed under AIHA-LAP LLC Lab

Code: 101579.

This report may be reproduced but all reproduction must be in full unless written approval is received from the laboratory for partial reproduction. The results of analysis are as follows:

Lab HW2278, Field LC-01A 2FT CEILING TILE

This is a light gray sample with perlite, 5% plant fiber, and 50% mineral wool in resin binder with a white coating on one side. Asbestos is none detected.

The white coating is 5% of the sample.

Lab HW2279, Field LC-01B 2FT CEILING TILE

This is a light gray sample with perlite, 5% plant fiber, and 50% mineral wool in resin binder with a white coating on one side. Asbestos is none detected.

The white coating is 3% of the sample.

Lab HW2280, Field LC-02A SHEET ROCK WALL SYSTEM

This sample contains four types of material: The first type is white paint; the second type is white limestone plaster with perlite; the third type is tan plant fiber paper; and the fourth type is white gypsum plaster with 1% fiberglass. This sample is non-homogeneous. Asbestos is none detected.

The first type is 1% of the sample. The second type is 6% of the sample. The third type is 3% of the sample. The fourth type is 90% of the sample.

Batch # 193991

Lab # HW2278 - HW2284

Lab HW2281, Field LC-02B SHEET ROCK WALL SYSTEM

This sample contains four types of material: The first type is white paint; the second type is white limestone plaster with perlite; the third type is tan plant fiber paper; and the fourth type is white gypsum plaster with 1% fiberglass. This sample is non-homogeneous. Asbestos is none detected.

The first type is 1% of the sample. The second type is 6% of the sample. The third type is 3% of the sample. The fourth type is 90% of the sample.

Lab HW2282, Field LC-02C SHEET ROCK WALL SYSTEM

This sample contains four types of material: The first type is white paint; the second type is white limestone plaster with perlite; the third type is tan plant fiber paper; and the fourth type is white gypsum plaster with 1% fiberglass. This sample is non-homogeneous. Asbestos is none detected.

The first type is 1% of the sample. The second type is 6% of the sample. The third type is 3% of the sample. The fourth type is 90% of the sample.

Lab HW2283, Field LC-03A 12 IN. CEILING TILE

This sample contains two types of material: The first type is white coating with limestone; the second type is 90% glass wool in yellow resin. This sample is non-homogeneous. Asbestos is none detected.

The first type is 60% of the sample. The second type is 40% of the sample.

Lab HW2284, Field LC-03B 12 IN. CEILING TILE

This sample contains two types of material: The first type is white coating with limestone; the second type is 90% glass wool in yellow resin. This sample is non-homogeneous. Asbestos is none detected.

The first type is 60% of the sample. The second type is 40% of the sample.

In order to be sure reagents and tools used for analysis are not contaminated with asbestos, blanks are tested. Asbestos was none detected in the blanks tested with this bulk sample set.

Very truly yours, Steve H. Dixon, President

Analyzed by Alex C. Kachel on November 1, 2022

Batch # 193991

Lab # HW2278 - HW2284

APPENDIX "A"

"This report relates only to the items tested. This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA-LAP LLC, or any agency of the US government."

NVLAP and AIHA-LAP LLC require laboratories to state the condition of the samples received for testing. The condition of these samples is acceptable for analysis unless there is a characteristic indicating otherwise. If a test item is not acceptable, requires a modification to the standard method, or has cause for analysis sensitivity, it will be identified by a note for that particular test item under the laboratory number on the final report. If the samples are non- homogenous, a statement will be included with the sample result. Each component or sub-sample is analyzed separately. The reported results and percentages of each material type are based on the sample received by the laboratory and may not be representative of the parent material. Orientation of top and bottom may not be specified due to uncertainty of orientation.

METHODS OF ANALYSIS AND LIMIT OF DETECTION

For air count analysis, samples are not blank corrected unless otherwise noted.

For air count analysis, the results may be biased when interferences are noted.

The accuracy of asbestos analysis in bulk samples increases with increasing concentration of asbestos. Pigments, binders, small sample size, and multiple layers may affect the analysis sensitivity.

There are two methods for analysis of asbestos in a bulk test sample: Visual Estimation and Point Count. Visual estimation with gravimetry is the most sensitive method. If an analyst makes a patient search, 0.1% or less asbestos can be detected in a bulk sample. Point count analysis is a method with a statistical approach.

Government agencies regulate asbestos containing materials (ACM) whenever the ACM is more than 1%. EPA will not accept visual estimation to verify that trace amounts of asbestos are less than 1%. EPA requires point count to verify less than 1% asbestos content. OSHA requirements apply on samples containing any amount of asbestos.

Due to higher charge for a point count analysis, Dixon Information Inc. does not perform a point count unless authorized to do so by the customer. If a sample is point counted, when possible, various chemical and/or physical means may be used to concentrate the asbestos in the sample. This is permitted by the EPA method and it increases the accuracy of the analysis.

Approved by:

Approved Signatory Renee Luna-Trepczynski

Report for:

Claude Dahlk Hill West Environmental, LLC 7963 Douglas Drive Park City, UT 84098

Regarding:

Eurofins Aerotech Built Environment Testing, LLC Project: Logan 1st Judicial Court; 135 N 100 W. Logan, UT

EML ID: 4631094

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the samples as received and tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data for sample results with >1% asbestos concentration can be provided when requested.

Eurofins Aerotech Built Environment Testing, LLC ("the Company"), a member of the Eurofins Built Environment Testing group of companies, shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Asbestos PLM: 07-22-2026

Service SOPs: Asbestos PLM (EPA 40CFR App E to Sub E of Part 763 & EPA 600/R-93-116, EBET-PLM-SOP83921) NVLAP Lab Code 500031-0

EMLab ID: 4631094, Page 1 of 3Eurofins Aerotech Built Environment Testing, LLC

Eurofins Aerotech Built Environment Testing, LLC 1501 West Knudsen Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85027

(800) 651-4802 www.eurofinsus.com/BuiltClient: Hill West Environmental, LLC C/O: Claude Dahlk Re: Logan 1st Judicial Court; 135 N 100 W. Logan, UT

Date of Sampling: 07-16-2026 Date of Receipt: 07-21-2026 Date of Report: 07-22-2026

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT

Total Samples Submitted: 3 Total Samples Analyzed: 3

Total Samples with Layer Asbestos Content > 1%: 0

Location: LL-04A, White Block Filler Lab ID-Version‡: 23368782-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray/Black Concrete Masonry Unit with Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate Comments: Block filler not observed in submitted sample.

Location: LL-04B, White Block Filler Lab ID-Version‡: 23368783-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray/Black Concrete Masonry Unit with Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate Comments: Block filler not observed in submitted sample.

Location: LL-04C, White Block Filler Lab ID-Version‡: 23368784-1

Sample Layers Asbestos Content Gray/Black Concrete Masonry Unit with Paint ND

Sample Composite Homogeneity: Moderate Comments: Block filler not observed in submitted sample.

EMLab ID: 4631094, Page 2 of 3Eurofins Aerotech Built Environment Testing, LLC

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

All components not quantified as asbestos content and non-asbestos content are considered to be non-fibrous matrix components. Matrix components may include, but are not limited to, gypsum, paint, silicate minerals, vinyl, binder, calcium carbonate, tar, and foam.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers were detected. When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Eurofins Aerotech Built Environment Testing, LLC 1501 West Knudsen Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85027

(800) 651-4802 www.eurofinsus.com/BuiltClient: Hill West Environmental, LLC C/O: Claude Dahlk Re: Logan 1st Judicial Court; 135 N 100 W. Logan, UT

Date of Sampling: 07-16-2026 Date of Receipt: 07-21-2026 Date of Report: 07-22-2026

ASBESTOS PLM REPORT

PROJECT ANALYST AND SIGNATORY REPORT

Project Analyst

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Analyst: Aaron Agajanian

EMLab ID: 4631094, Page 3 of 3Eurofins Aerotech Built Environment Testing, LLC

Inspector: Dominic Hobbs

Date Inspected: 10-31-2022

PB-2781

Limited-Lead Based Paint Readings Logan Courthouse

135 North 100 West

Logan, Utah

Reading # Time Results Component Substrate Condition Color Site PbC

480 10/31/2022 14:25 Positive CALABRATE 1.2

481 10/31/2022 14:25 Positive CALABRATE 1

482 10/31/2022 14:26 Positive CALABRATE 1.1

483 10/31/2022 14:27 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

484 10/31/2022 14:27 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

485 10/31/2022 14:27 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

486 10/31/2022 14:28 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

487 10/31/2022 14:28 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

488 10/31/2022 14:28 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

489 10/31/2022 14:28 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

490 10/31/2022 14:29 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

491 10/31/2022 14:29 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

492 10/31/2022 14:29 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

493 10/31/2022 14:30 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

494 10/31/2022 14:30 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

495 10/31/2022 14:30 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

496 10/31/2022 14:31 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE LOGAN COURT < LOD

497 10/31/2022 14:33 Negative FENCE METAL FAIR BLACK LOGAN COURT < LOD

498 10/31/2022 14:33 Negative FENCE METAL FAIR BLACK LOGAN COURT < LOD

499 10/31/2022 14:33 Negative FENCE METAL FAIR BLACK LOGAN COURT < LOD

500 10/31/2022 14:34 Negative FENCE METAL FAIR BLACK LOGAN COURT < LOD

501 10/31/2022 14:34 Negative FENCE METAL FAIR BLACK LOGAN COURT < LOD

502 10/31/2022 14:34 Negative FENCE METAL FAIR BLACK LOGAN COURT < LOD

503 10/31/2022 14:34 Negative FENCE METAL FAIR BLACK LOGAN COURT < LOD

504 10/31/2022 14:38 Positive CALABRATE LOGAN COURT 1

505 10/31/2022 14:38 Positive CALABRATE LOGAN COURT 0.9

Date Inspected: 10-31-2022

PB-2781

Limited-Lead Based Paint Readings Logan Courthouse

135 North 100 West

Logan, Utah

Reading # Time Results Component Substrate Condition Color Site PbC

506 10/31/2022 14:38 Positive CALABRATE LOGAN COURT 0.9

507 10/31/2022 14:38 Positive CALABRATE LOGAN COURT 0.9

Date Inspected: 7-16-2026

PB-2781

Limited-Lead Based Paint Readings Logan First District Courthouse

Index Time Results Component Substrate Condition Color Floor PbC

28 7/16/2026 13:54 Positive CALABRATE 0.86

29 7/16/2026 13:54 Positive CALABRATE 0.86

30 7/16/2026 13:55 Positive CALABRATE 0.83

31 7/16/2026 13:55 Positive CALABRATE <LOD

32 7/16/2026 13:55 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE <LOD

33 7/16/2026 13:55 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE <LOD

34 7/16/2026 13:55 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE <LOD

35 7/16/2026 13:58 Negative WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE <LOD

36 7/16/2026 13:58 Negative WALL CMU BRICK FAIR WHITE <LOD

37 7/16/2026 13:58 Negative WALL CMU BRICK FAIR WHITE

38 7/16/2026 13:58 Negative WALL CMU BRICK FAIR WHITE <LOD

39 7/16/2026 13:58 Negative WALL CMU BRICK FAIR WHITE <LOD

40 7/16/2026 13:59 Negative WALL CMU BRICK FAIR WHITE <LOD

41 7/16/2026 13:59 Negative PANEL METAL FAIR GREEN 0.02

42 7/16/2026 13:59 Negative PANEL METAL FAIR GREEN <LOD

43 7/16/2026 14:07 Negative PANEL METAL FAIR GREEN <LOD

44 7/16/2026 14:07 Negative GENERATOR METAL FAIR GREEN <LOD

45 7/16/2026 14:08 Negative GENERATOR METAL FAIR GREEN <LOD

46 7/16/2026 14:08 Negative GENERATOR METAL FAIR GREEN <LOD

47 7/16/2026 14:08 Negative GENERATOR METAL FAIR GREEN 0.06

48 7/16/2026 14:08 Negative GENERATOR METAL FAIR GREEN <LOD

49 7/16/2026 14:08 Negative GENERATOR METAL FAIR BLACK <LOD

50 7/16/2026 14:08 Negative GENERATOR METAL FAIR BLACK 0.2

51 7/16/2026 14:09 Negative GENERATOR METAL FAIR BLACK 2.76

52 7/16/2026 14:09 Positive CALABRATE 0.79

53 7/16/2026 14:09 Positive CALABRATE 0.81

Date Inspected: 7-16-2026

PB-2781

Limited-Lead Based Paint Readings Logan First District Courthouse

Index Time Results Component Substrate Condition Color Floor PbC

54 7/16/2026 14:09 Positive CALABRATE 0.93