697DCK-24-R-00168 Amendment 0001 Verbiage.docx

DOCX document 16 KB Posted

Attached to
QKA Cattle Guard Replacement
Solicitation number
697DCK-24-R-00168
Issued by

About this file

This document is an amendment to Solicitation Number 697DCK-24-R-00168 for the QKA Cattle Guard Replacement project in Waialua, Hawaii. The amendment includes the following key details:

(A) Addition of an attachment with photos of the existing cattle guards, (B) updates to Sections L and M of the solicitation, and (C) establishment of a new proposal due date of June 21, 2024 at 3:00 PM ET. Key changes in Section L include revisions to the Relevant Experience/References and Technical Proposal factors. Section M changes include revisions to the Technical Evaluation Criteria. The solicitation is a small business set-aside for the NAICS code 237310 - Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction, with an estimated cost range of $250,000 to $500,000 and a projected period of performance of approximately 45 calendar days. An optional site visit is scheduled for June 6, 2024.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QKA Cattle Guard Replacement

697DCK-24-R-00168

Amendment 0001 verbiage:

The purpose of this amendment is to (A) include an attachment with photos of the cattle guards, (B) provide updated aspects of Sections L and M, and (C) establish a new due date for proposal submissions.

(A) Document "QKA Cattle Guards 1 thru 5 photos.pdf" is hereby added to this solicitation.

(B) Section L changes: PLEASE NOTE: all other terms and conditions in Section L that are not listed in this amendment are still applicable.

** Aspects of Clause SA18 PROPOSAL CONTENT are hereby changed to read as follows:

Proposals are due Jun 21, 2024 at 3:00 PM ET.

Factor 1: Relevant Experience/References

Offerors must demonstrate relevant experience by submitting a List of Relevant Work Experience/References containing at least three (3) contracts over the past five (5) years on projects with the same or similar size (i.e., road construction, culverts, concrete spillways, trenches, cattle guards, road paving/asphalt, or road drainage) and scope requirements as this acquisition as of the final submission date of the SIR.

The List of Relevant Experiences/References must include projects where the Offeror furnished all labor, products, equipment, materials, supervision, permits, and insurance, etc. necessary for Cattle Guard Road Drainage Repair and Cattle Guard Replacement (or comparable projects with similar size and scope).

Offerors will be evaluated as to whether their company has a proven track record of timeliness of performance, quality of service, financial stability, and customer satisfaction. The FAA reserves the right to contact customers listed as references and apply its findings in the final determination.

Offerors are strongly advised to submit the List of Relevant Work History/References in the following format. If other formatting is used, Offerors MUST provide the following information for each contract:

Agency or Company Contract Issued By Period of Performance/Project Date Contracting Officer/Contact Phone #/Email Address Contract # Dollar Value Location Description of Work Performed

Factor 2: Technical Proposal

Offerors are required to submit a comprehensive and complete technical proposal that demonstrates their ability to design and perform the work described in the Specifications and/or Drawings. Offerors are cautioned to be responsive to all the requirements and provide sufficient information to allow evaluation of the proposals as listed in this Solicitation.

The technical proposal must be well written and presented in a clear straightforward manner. Absolutely NO pricing information shall be included in the technical proposal. For ease of evaluation, offerors are to submit the technical proposal organized into the following three (3) parts:

A. Plan of Action - The offeror must present an organized and detailed narrative that meets the specifications listed in the Scope of Work. In addition, the offeror must submit a schedule in order to verify the requirements described for this project will be completed in a timely and efficient manner.

B. Statement of Understanding - The offeror must submit a brief statement that demonstrates that it understands the objectives the Government has established for QKA Road Drainage Repair and Cattle Guard Replacement, Honolulu, HI. This cannot be a repeat or mere summary of the materials provided in this Solicitation, but rather the offeror’s statement of their understanding of that work.

C. Equipment and Materials - The offeror must submit a brief statement that describes the specific equipment and materials (or the equivalents), as outlined within the Summary of Work, to be used within this project.

PLEASE NOTE: all other terms and conditions in clause SA18 PROPOSAL CONTENT that are not listed in this amendment are still applicable.

** Aspects of Clause SA19 QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SOLICITATION are hereby changed to read as followed:

The Offeror may begin submitting questions and comments immediately after release of this amendment and up to Jun 10, 2024 at 3:00 PM ET.

PLEASE NOTE: all other terms and conditions in clause SA19 QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SOLICITATION that are not listed in this amendment are still applicable.

** Aspects of Clause SA30 SITE VISIT are hereby changed to read as followed:

There is an optional site visit on Jun 6, 2024; 10:00am

c. To attend the site visit, advanced notice via Paul.shibe@faa.gov is required by Jun 4, 2024, at 3:00pm ET to the FAA point of contact listed below. You are required to provide your company representative's name. Note, the site visit will be canceled without notice, if no advanced notices of attendance are received.

PLEASE NOTE: all other terms and conditions in Clause SA30 SITE VISIT that are not listed in this amendment are still applicable.

Section M changes: PLEASE NOTE: all other terms and conditions in Section M that are not listed in this amendment are still applicable.

** Aspects of Clause SA59 TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA are hereby changed to read as followed:

II. TECHNICAL EVALUATION – After meeting the eligibility qualifications, technical acceptability will be rated overall as either “acceptable” or “unacceptable” based on the (non-cost/price) evaluation factors stated below. Any proposal determined to be “unacceptable” in any evaluated area or criteria is rendered to be unacceptable and therefore rejected from further consideration.

Factor 1: Relevant Experience/References

The degree to which the Offeror demonstrates its Relevant Experience/References in performing at least three (3) contracts over the past five (5) years on projects with the same or similar size (i.e., road construction, culverts, concrete spillways, trenches, cattle guards, road paving/asphalt, or road drainage) and scope requirements as this acquisition as of the final submission date of the SIR.

Rating Description:

ACCEPTABLE: Offeror demonstrates relevant experience performing at least three (3) contracts over the past five (5) years on projects with the same or similar size and scope requirements as this acquisition as of the final submission date of the SIR.

UNACCEPTABLE: Offeror DOES NOT demonstrate relevant experience performing at least three (3) contracts over the past five (5) years on projects with the same or similar and scope (requirements as this acquisition as of the final submission date of the SIR.

Factor 2: Technical Proposal The degree to which the Offeror submitted a comprehensive and complete technical proposal that demonstrates their understanding and ability to perform the work described in the Statement of Work and Specification (attachment 1).

Rating Description:

ACCEPTABLE: Offeror submitted a comprehensive and complete technical proposal that demonstrates an adequate understanding and ability to perform the work described in the Statement of Work and applicable attachments that included a Plan of Action, schedule, Statement of Action, and an Equipment and Materials statement.

UNACCEPTABLE: Offeror DID NOT submit a comprehensive and complete technical proposal that demonstrates an adequate understanding and ability to perform the work described in the Statement of Work and applicable attachment and/or the approach proposed fails to adequately meet acceptable performance expectations. Proposal did not include any of the following: a Plan of Action, schedule, Statement of Action, and an Equipment and Materials statement.

PLEASE NOTE: all other terms and conditions in clause SA59 TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA that are not listed in this amendment are still applicable.

PLEASE NOTE: all other terms and conditions in Sections L and M that are not listed in this amendment are still applicable.

(C) As stated above in clause SA18 - Proposals are due Jun 21, 2024 at 3:00 PM ET.

All other terms and conditions listed in this solicitation remain unchanged and are still applicable.

this solicitation remain unchanged and are still applicable.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .