PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE_697DCK-22-R-00233.pdf
PDF 127 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MOBILE ASSET SUSTAINMENT PROGRAM (MASP) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-22-R-00233
About this file
This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity with the Federal Aviation Administration.
The past performance questionnaire is a template to be completed by an offeror and reference for a prior contract. It requests information on the offeror, contract details including value and period of performance, and evaluation ratings in areas such as quality of service, timeliness, cost control, program management, and customer relationship.
The federal contract opportunity is a competitive small business set-aside solicitation issued by the FAA to provide infrastructure maintenance support for mobile assets. Interested vendors must submit proposals by June 8th, 2022 for consideration. Eligible offerors must have active SAM registration and proposals must include all required documents outlined in Sections L and M of the solicitation. The contract is covered by the Service Contract Act and anticipated to be a single award made in accordance with FAA small business regulations.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 697DCK-22-R-00233 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| 697DCK-22-R-00233.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-1 Statement of Work_MASP.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-2 Seed Project.pdf | ||
| 697DCK-22-R-00233.pdf | ||
| 697DCK-22-R-00233.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-1 Statement of Work_MASP.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-4 2015-5101 SCA.pdf | ||
| Attachment J-3 Seed Project Price Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J-2 Seed Project.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE)
A. OFFEROR INFORMATION
Offeror Name:
Offeror Address:
B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Project Title:
Contract Number:
Agency/Customer:
Agency/Customer POC Name:
Agency/Customer POC Email Address
Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other:
Contract Type:
Contract Purpose (e.g., Service, Supply, Deveopment/First Article, R&D)?
Contract Award Date:
Period of Performance
Total Contract Value:
Value of Offeror’s Share
Was the Offeror a Prime Contractor? Yes No
Was the Offeror a Sub Contractor? Yes No
Competitive Award? Yes No
Program Title and nature of the effort (i.e., describe the scope of the effort, the type of tasks involved, labor skills used, and products/support delivered).
PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT)
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support very high or very low rating should be noted on page 5.
Assign each area a rating of, 4 (Outstanding), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory), and 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines which is provided as Exhibit 1 as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating.
A. IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDENT
Name:
Title:
Telephone Number:
Address:
Email:
B. EVALUATION
QUALITY OF SERVICE:
# Category Rating
1 2 3 4 N/A
1 Compliance with contract requirements
2 Accuracy of reports
3 Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel
4 Capability of personnel to perform required services
5 Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services
6 Overall quality of service
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
# Category Rating
1 2 3 4 N/A
1 Reliability
2 Responsive to technical direction
3 Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines
COST CONTROL:
# Category Rating
1 2 3 4 N/A
1 Current, accurate and complete billings
2 Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals
3 Cost effectiveness
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT:
# Category Rating
1 2 3 4 N/A
1 Adequate and complete management plan
2 Specific management team dedicated to this project
3 Indications that the provided team had experience in subcontractor management and surveillance
4 Process, or metrics, for the evaluation of their own overall management performance
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP:
# Category Rating
1 2 3 4 N/A
1 Effective management, including subcontracts
2 Reasonable/cooperative behavior
3 Responsive to contract requirements
4 Notification of problems
5 Flexibility
6 Proactive vs. reactive
OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
# Category Response
Yes No
1 The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction:
a. Contractor Manageent Personnel
b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
| sourceevaluationtradeoff 24 |
| sourceevaluationtradeoff 25 |
| sourceevaluationtradeoff 26 |
| sourceevaluationtradeoff 27 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .