Attachment 6 PPS.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 6973GH-24-R-00131, Technical, Management, & Admin Support for AAM-500 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-24-R-00131
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Survey related to a federal contract opportunity with Solicitation Number 6973GH-24-R-00131 for Technical, Management, and Administrative Support for AAM-500 at the Federal Aviation Administration.
The survey requests information about a contractor's past performance on a relevant contract, including details on cost control, quality and timeliness of services, business relations, customer satisfaction, and integrity. Respondents are asked to provide ratings and supporting narratives across various performance criteria. The survey also requests contact information for a point of contact who can provide additional details on the contractor's past performance. The federal contract opportunity seeks a contractor to provide on-demand technical, management, and administrative support to the FAA's Civil Aerospace Medical Institute Human Factors Research Division.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001 Revised Attachment 2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Questions and Answers_7.15-24 Final Clean.pdf | ||
| Technical Management and Admin AAM-500 Support SOW_07.11.24 Final Clean.pdf | ||
| Qualifications of Personnel Appendix A_Updated 07.11.24 Final Clean.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attach 1 Technical Management and Admin AAM-500 Support SOW_05-23-24 with Appendix A.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 AMS 3.6.2-29 StatementofEquivalentRates.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Section B 5-29-24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 6-Client Authorization Letter.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6973GH-24-R-00131 6-20-24.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
6973GH-20-R-00137
Attachment 7 AVS Safety, Analytical Technical Support Services
PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SIR/RFO No. 6973GH-24-R-00131
TECHNICAL, MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT FOR AAM-500
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
To:
Organization:
Fax No.: E-mail Address:
Date: Number of Pages (including this sheet): 10 in total
Your name was provided as a point of contact for the following:
Contractor Name: Contract Number:
Project Title:
In regard to the above contractor’s performance on the referenced contract, please complete the attached Past Performance Survey and return as follows:
Send to: Cynthia Cooper, Contracting Officer
E-mail Address: cynthia.cooper@faa.gov
For questions, please contact me at telephone 405-954-2601.
Please provide your response no later than AUGUST 13, 2024, 2:00 p.m. CST
Thank you!
Offeror to complete this page:
1. Name of Contractor:
2. Provide a brief description of the referenced contract and why it is relevant to 6973GH-20-R-00137:
3. Type of contract; e.g., firm fixed-price, cost-reimbursable:
4. Contractor Role (circle one): Prime Contractor, Subcontractor _______________________________________
4. Contract Number (if applicable):
5. Total Contract Amount (if a Subcontract, then include value of subcontract):$
6. Date of Contract Award:
7. Contract Period of Performance: Start End
6973GH-24-R-00131
Attachment 6 Technical, Management and Administrative Support for AAM-500
PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
8. Was a deficiency notice issued?
9. Was a Cure Notice issued?
If so, was the issue successfully resolved? If so, was the issue successfully resolved?
10. Was a Show Cause issued? If so, was the issue successfully resolved?
Name of Responding Point of Contact:
Agency/Organization:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address: __________________________________________________________________
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Please complete this questionnaire. E-mail the completed questionnaire to the address as shown in the letter. Handwritten responses are sufficient. If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information.
2. PERFORMANCE QUALITY ASSESSMENT DEFINED:
EXCEPTIONAL (E) Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The category being assessed was accomplished with minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD (VG) Performance meets contract requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The category being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems, for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY (S) Performance meets contract requirements. The category being assessed contains some minor problems, for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL (M) Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The category being assessed reflects a serious problem, for which the contractor has not identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY (U) Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The category being assessed contains a serious problem(s), for which the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (NA) Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.
3. For each item on the questionnaire, select the appropriate quality assessment and provide supporting narrative for your response.
COST CONTROL
(1) Contractor’s cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
COMMENTS:
(2) How effective did the contractor use innovation and efficiencies to enhance contract performance and reduce cost?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
QUALITY AND TIMELINESS OF SERVICES
(3) Did the contractor deliver according to the agreed-to schedule? What were the causes of any schedule variances?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
| (4) | Has the Contractor ever been issued a contract discrepancy report (CDR)? | |
| If yes, provide circumstance(s). |
Yes __ No ___
Circumstances(s):
(5) How well did contractor meet response times?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(6) Did the contractor provide timely and accurate deliveries of contract data reports (CDRLS)?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
BUSINESS RELATIONS – EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT
(7) How well did the contractor’s organizational support structure provide an adequate span of control and supervision?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(8) How well did the contractor team with his/her subcontractors?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(9) How would you rate the contractor’s ability to maintain/retain skilled workforce?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(10) How well did the contractor manage an effective security program?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(11) How would you rate the contractor’s ability to promptly obtain security clearances for hired personnel?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(12) How would you rate the contractor’s utilization of appropriately skilled employees, equipment and materials to accomplish work requirements?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(13) How well did the contractor meet emergency requirements?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(14) How would you rate the contractor’s workforce recruitment, training, qualification and certification programs during mobilization and transition?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(15) Did the contractor comply with contract terms and conditions?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
(16) How would you rate the contractor’s on-site upper management personnel?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(17) How effectively did the contractor provide customer support?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(19) How would you rate overall customer satisfaction with the contractor’s performance?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
INTEGRITY
(20) How well did the contractor identify inefficiencies that could adversely affect performance, and take corrective or preventive action to resolve problems?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(21) Did the contractor comply with the Service Contract Act and Davis-Bacon Act (i.e., were certified payrolls submitted timely)?
EXCEPTIONAL(E)
VERY GOOD (VG)
SATISFACTORY (S)
MARGINAL(M)
UNSATISFACTORY (US
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)
(22) Has the contractor ever been given a cure notice, a show cause notice, a suspension of payment, or had a claim denied? If yes, provide circumstance(s).
Yes __ No ___ N/A __
Circumstances(s):
(23) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? If no, state why.
Yes ___ No __
Supporting Narrative:
(24) Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
Yes __ No ___
Contract/Program: _____________________________________________________________
Point of Contact Name: _________________________________________________________
Point of Contact Phone Number: __________________________________________________
Other information: _____________________________________________________________
Thank you for your assistance in completing this questionnaire!
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .