RFI (2) Questions.pdf
PDF 70 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-23-Q-00135
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0003 RFI and pic.pdf | ||
| NW-D-112-41889-02.pdf | ||
| RFI Salmon ID Questions.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002 RFI and pics.pdf | ||
| IMG_0959.JPG | JPG image | |
| IMG_0964.JPG | JPG image | |
| IMG_0953.JPG | JPG image | |
| IMG_1083.JPG | JPG image | |
| IMG_1082.JPG | JPG image | |
| IMG_0952.JPG | JPG image | |
| IMG_1084.JPG | JPG image | |
| IMG_0951.JPG | JPG image | |
| Salmon ID Amendment.pdf | ||
| 6973GH-23-Q-00135 SAM - RFP.pdf | ||
| LKT VOR NEW FENCE INSTALLATION PROJECT 100 percent DESIGN SPECS.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination 01-20-23.pdf | ||
| DRAWINGS.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
6973GH-23-Q-00135 Salmon, ID - RFI 05/04/2023
With the pictures that have been supplied and no topography drawings.
Can the contractor go off of the side profile as depicted on the plans and assume that there is no excavation needed to establish grade and install the new fencing?
(see attached drawing of topography)
It is shown that the Jack Leg Fence cannot exceed elevation 9258.4. What, if any, excavation is needed to be able establish the correct grade? (see attached drawing of topography)
Is this an item that the bidding contractors need? (see attached drawing of topography)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .