QandA_SHM_07.14.2020.pdf
PDF 60 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693JJ320R000023
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to a solicitation for structural health monitoring services. The solicitation seeks proposals to investigate current practices and policies on the use of structural health monitoring technologies and develop a comprehensive structural health monitoring web manual. Academic institutions are eligible to compete for the contract. Offerors must register in SAM and submit proposals electronically to james.mikell@dot.gov by July 23 at 0900 EDT. Past performance will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 52.212-2. The structural health monitoring tool deliverable can be an excel spreadsheet or software and must be 508 compliant. Front matter does not count toward the 25-page proposal volume limit.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 693JJ320R000023_0001.pdf | ||
| QandA_SHM_07.10.2020.pdf | ||
| Exhibit 2 Deliverable Schedule.pdf | ||
| Exhibit 1_Peformance Requirements Summary.pdf | ||
| 693JJ320R000023_SHM.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 QASP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
# Question Answer Date
Are academic institutions eligible for this grant? It seems to be directed at industry firms.
A FFP contract will result from this solicitation ‐ it is not a grant. Academic insititutions can compete for this requirement. All Offerors must be registered in SAM at https://www.sam.gov at the time an offer is submitted to be eligible for award.
6/30/20
If so, how is past performance evaluated? Is it possible to use previous research projects, particularly those with local DOTs?
Addendum to FAR 52.212‐1 (page 31) describes past performance submittal requirements. FAR
52.212‐2 (page 32) describes how past performance will be evaluated.
6/30/20
Task 2 requires the Contractor to develop a
“tool” to quantity the Added Value and
Return on Investigation. Can additional guidance be provided regarding this deliverable. For example, is a flow chart, decision matrix, MSExcel spreadsheet or computer application software envisioned, and what GOV format, structure and distribution requirements would apply to the end product?
The “tool” can be as complex as a software code or as simple as an excel spreadsheet. Offerors shall propose their own solutions to satisfy
Government requirements and meet performance objectives. The tool will be used by transportation agencies, not just a research prototype. It shall be be 508 compliant.
7/13/20
Does frontmatter (cover page, TOC, acronyms) count towards the 25‐page limit in
Volume 1?
No. 7/13/20
Please confirm the submittal information
(date/time/method) for this proposal, as the
RFP seems to give conflicting information.
Proposals are due at 0900 EDT on July 23rd.
Proposals must be submitted electronically to james.mikell@dot.gov. Amendment to follow.
7/13/20
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .