Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-192P.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-19-B-000001
About this file
Bridge Inspection Rpt_STR#5460-192P
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CULVERT INSPECTION REPORT
WHITE OAK BRANCH CULVERT
LITTLE RIVER ROAD OVER WHITE OAK BRANCH
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LE
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-192P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 5/9/14
Report prepared by: ND
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-192P
WHITE OAK BRANCH CULVERT INSPECTION DATE: 5/9/14
CULVERT IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ........ CONCRETE NO. OF BARRELS:
FOUNDATION: ....................... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L BARREL LENGTH: ............... 36 FT (11 M)
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ... 12.5 FT (3.8 M) SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ............ 6.0 FT (1.8 M) YEAR BUILT:
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: .......... 000000000000 / NONE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
NPS ROAD CLASS: ............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 12.03 (KM PT 19.36)
STATE: .................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 1.1 MI TO TOWNSEND WYE
FACILITY CARRIED: ............. LITTLE RIVER ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: ... WHITE OAK BRANCH
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This double barrel concrete culvert is in good condition overall and has only minor problems at this time. Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: K. CLEVER, J. WEIMER (GANNETT FLEMING)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
KATIE CLEVER, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW :
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-192P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT ENDS OF RAILING. 4 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-192P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVG. CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 6
G F G G
7 FT.
HIGH
SUFF
N
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
62. CULVERT 7
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS9.
ADEQUACY OF COVER8.
SETTLEMENT AND/OR DEFLECTION7.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR6.
DEBRIS AND/OR SILT 5.
WINGWALLS4.
3. HEADWALLS
FOOTINGS2.
BARREL(S)1.
ROADWAY SURFACE10.
11. RIDEABILITY
OTHER 12.
G N G G G F G G G G G N
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS2.
APPROACH SLABS1. N
N F G G G F G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONSB.
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
N
ROCK
61.2, 62.6 PREVIOUSLY NOTED SCOUR AT UPSTREAM END HAS BEEN FILLED
IN SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION. SCOUR 18" AT DOWNSTREAM
END. NO UNDERMINING NOTED.
62.1 MODERATE ABRASION DAMAGE TO CONCRETE FLOOR. MINOR
VERTICAL CRACKING OF CENTER WALL. MINOR VOIDS AT BOTH
ENDS OF CENTER WALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR. MINOR TO
MODERATE SCALING ALONG BOTTOM OF BARREL AND CENTER
WALLS. MORTAR SEPARATION BETWEEN STONE FACADE AND
WEST BARREL WALL WITH 1.5'H X 1.5"D SPALL AT BOTTOM OF
JOINT.
62.3,5 MINOR DETERIORATION OF HEADWALL MORTAR JOINTS. MINOR
DEBRIS IN WEST BARREL. PREVIOUSLY NOTED DEBRIS IN EAST
BARREL HAS BEEN REMOVED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.
EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES.
62.6 MINOR EROSION AT UPSTREAM WINGWALLS.
222.3, 36.C,D SUBSTANDARD APPROACH GUARDRAIL TERMINAL; SOUTHWEST
CORNER. MINOR RUSTING OF GUARDRAIL.
222.7 OBJECT MARKERS MISSING AT BRIDGE APPROACHES.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required. 3 OF 12
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-192P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 27 24 45 41
TYPE 3 35 32 59 54
TYPE 3S2 56 51 93 84
TYPE 3-3 60 54 100 91
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND CONDITION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-192P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... WHITE OAK BRANCH CULVERT (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 2 - CULVERT (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - BLOUNT
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-192P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 14 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... WHITE OAK BRANCH
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 192P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. LITTLE RIVER ROAD
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460192P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.1 MI TO TOWNSEND WYE
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 12.03 (KM PT 19.36)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
19 - CULVERT
6.0 FT (1.8 M)
12.5 FT (3.8 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 27.0 TONS (24.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 45.0 TONS (40.8 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-192P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°39'35.20" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°42'07.00" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 55 MI (89 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 31.0 FT (9.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 21.0 FT (6.4 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 2384 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 2622 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 32.8 FT (10.0 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.30 FT (0.70 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: ......... N
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: .............. N
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT:
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1N00
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:83�42'07.00 http:35�39'35.20
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-192P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-192P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD CADES COVE
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST
PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF RAIL; NOTE RUSTING
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF EAST BARREL LOOKING
NORTH
PHOTO #6 - DEBRIS IN NORTH END OF WEST BARREL
PHOTO #7 - VOID IN NORTH END OF CENTER WALL WITH EXPOSED
REBAR
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES, NORTH SIDE
SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE
PHOTO #10 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE
File details come from the government source that posted it.