Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-046P.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Great Smoky Mountains National Park
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-19-B-000001
About this file
Bridge Inspection Rpt_STR#5460-046P
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
ELKMONT ROAD BRIDGE AT LAUREL BRANCH
ELKMONT ROAD OVER LAUREL BRANCH
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 5/10/14
Report prepared by: WD
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P
ELKMONT ROAD BRIDGE AT LAUREL BRANCH INSPECTION DATE: 5/10/14
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... ARCH - DECK NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 3A1, 3B15 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1996-JOINTS RESEALED.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.02 (KM PT 0.03)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 1.5 MILES NORTH FROM ELKMONT
RANGER STATION. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ ELKMONT ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LAUREL BRANCH
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete arch bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include a loose coping stone at the northwest parapet, deteriorating mortar joints, and a lack of object markers at the parapet ends.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. REISINGER, B. HENRY (GANNETT FLEMING)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JASON REISINGER, FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW :
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
58.6, 60.6 REPOINT PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AROUND COPING STONE AT
NORTHWEST CORNER AND CLEAN AND REPOINT PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR
JOINTS ON STRUCTURE AS NEEDED.
30 LF
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT NORTHWEST AND
SOUTHEAST PARAPET ENDS.
2 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
N
N N G N N N N G N
N G
G G N G G N
N
N
N
N
58.3 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON PAVEMENT NEAR
CENTERLINE. RANDOM TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON PAVEMENT.
58.6 ISOLATED MODERATE CRACKING ON MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.
MINOR DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.
MODERATE MOSS GROWTH AND MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH IN
SOME JOINTS. MINOR EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT.
59.3,8 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE BETWEEN CONCRETE SLAB AND
FASCIA RING STONES, AND BETWEEN SOME RING STONES.
60.1 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS. WIRE TIES STICKING OUT OF BOTH ABUTMENTS
AND BETWEEN RING STONES. MINOR SCALING BELOW WATER
LINE AT NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.
60.6 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND MOSS GROWTH ON
WINGWALLS. PREVIOUSLY REPORTED DISPLACED COPING STONE
AT NORTHWEST WINGWALL HAS BEEN RESET BUT NOT
REPOINTED. MINOR VINE GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.
60.8 VERTICAL JOINTS RESEALED IN 1996. ISOLATED MODERATE
DETERIORATION AT PARAPET SECTIONS.
60.9 MINOR SCOUR ALONG NORTH ABUTMENT.
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G
PILE BENTS2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. N
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. N
FOUNDATIONS5. N
WINGWALLS6. G
WEEP HOLES7. G
EXPANSION JOINTS8. G
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION11. N
OTHER 12. N
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N
PILE BENTS14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS15. N
FOUNDATIONS16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. N
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. N
OTHER 19. N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 6
F F N G N
MED
SUFF
11 FT.
ROCK, SAND, STONES
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. N
N N G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0
N N N
61.1,2 MODERATE EROSION ALONG CHANNEL BANKS. CHANNEL HAS
SHIFTED AGAINST NORTH ABUTMENT.
61.4 PREVIOUSLY REPORTED FALLEN TREES IN UPSTREAM AND
DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL HAVE BEEN REMOVED; HOWEVER, ONE
TREE REMAINS IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL.
222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT. MINOR
RUTTING AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS IN WHEEL PATHS IN
NORTHBOUND LANE .
222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS MISSING AT BRIDGE
CORNERS.
36.A EXISTING GUARDRAIL HEIGHT OF 1'-9" DOES NOT MEET CURRENT
AASHTO HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 24 22 39 35
TYPE 3 21 19 34 31
TYPE 3S2 30 27 50 45
TYPE 3-3 41 37 68 62
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND
CONDITION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... ELKMONT ROAD BRIDGE AT LAUREL BR
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-046P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 18
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 046P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST.
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 3A1, 3B15
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
155 - SEVIER
164000180
LAUREL BRANCH
ELKMONT ROAD
5460046P0000000
1.5 MILES NORTH FROM ELK
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.02 (KM PT 0.03)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
3 - POSSIBLY ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
11 - ARCH - DECK
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 24.0 TONS (21.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 39.0 TONS (35.4 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°39'57.30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°35'56.80" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 20.0 FT (6.1 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 1 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 2 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 1.75 FT (0.53 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
8 - Stable; scour above top of fo
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1996-JOINTS RESEALED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:83�35'56.80 http:35�39'57.30
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD ELKMONT CAMPGROUND
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #5 - CRACKING OF PAVEMENT ABOVE STRUCTURE
PHOTO #6 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINT MATERIAL AT
NORTHWEST PARAPET END
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF VERTICAL
EXPANSION JOINTS, SOUTHWEST JOINT
SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #9 - CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ALONG NORTH ABUTMENT
BREASTWALL
PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW
LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE
ALONG UNDERSIDE OF ARCH RING STONES,
EAST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #13 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE
PHOTO #14 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE
File details come from the government source that posted it.