Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-046P.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Solicitation number
693C73-19-B-000001
Issued by

About this file

Bridge Inspection Rpt_STR#5460-046P

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

ELKMONT ROAD BRIDGE AT LAUREL BRANCH

ELKMONT ROAD OVER LAUREL BRANCH

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/10/14

Report prepared by: WD

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P

ELKMONT ROAD BRIDGE AT LAUREL BRANCH INSPECTION DATE: 5/10/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... ARCH - DECK NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 3A1, 3B15 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1996-JOINTS RESEALED.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.02 (KM PT 0.03)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 1.5 MILES NORTH FROM ELKMONT

RANGER STATION. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ ELKMONT ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LAUREL BRANCH

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete arch bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include a loose coping stone at the northwest parapet, deteriorating mortar joints, and a lack of object markers at the parapet ends.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. REISINGER, B. HENRY (GANNETT FLEMING)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JASON REISINGER, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.6, 60.6 REPOINT PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AROUND COPING STONE AT

NORTHWEST CORNER AND CLEAN AND REPOINT PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS ON STRUCTURE AS NEEDED.

30 LF

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT NORTHWEST AND

SOUTHEAST PARAPET ENDS.

2 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

N

N N G N N N N G N

N G

G G N G G N

N

N

N

N

58.3 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON PAVEMENT NEAR

CENTERLINE. RANDOM TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON PAVEMENT.

58.6 ISOLATED MODERATE CRACKING ON MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

MINOR DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

MODERATE MOSS GROWTH AND MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH IN

SOME JOINTS. MINOR EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT.

59.3,8 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE BETWEEN CONCRETE SLAB AND

FASCIA RING STONES, AND BETWEEN SOME RING STONES.

60.1 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALLS. WIRE TIES STICKING OUT OF BOTH ABUTMENTS

AND BETWEEN RING STONES. MINOR SCALING BELOW WATER

LINE AT NORTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.6 MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE AND MOSS GROWTH ON

WINGWALLS. PREVIOUSLY REPORTED DISPLACED COPING STONE

AT NORTHWEST WINGWALL HAS BEEN RESET BUT NOT

REPOINTED. MINOR VINE GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.

60.8 VERTICAL JOINTS RESEALED IN 1996. ISOLATED MODERATE

DETERIORATION AT PARAPET SECTIONS.

60.9 MINOR SCOUR ALONG NORTH ABUTMENT.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. N

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. N

FOUNDATIONS5. N

WINGWALLS6. G

WEEP HOLES7. G

EXPANSION JOINTS8. G

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N

PILE BENTS14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS15. N

FOUNDATIONS16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. N

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. N

OTHER 19. N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F F N G N

MED

SUFF

11 FT.

ROCK, SAND, STONES

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N N G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

N N N

61.1,2 MODERATE EROSION ALONG CHANNEL BANKS. CHANNEL HAS

SHIFTED AGAINST NORTH ABUTMENT.

61.4 PREVIOUSLY REPORTED FALLEN TREES IN UPSTREAM AND

DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL HAVE BEEN REMOVED; HOWEVER, ONE

TREE REMAINS IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL.

222.4 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH PAVEMENT. MINOR

RUTTING AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKS IN WHEEL PATHS IN

NORTHBOUND LANE .

222.7 TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS MISSING AT BRIDGE

CORNERS.

36.A EXISTING GUARDRAIL HEIGHT OF 1'-9" DOES NOT MEET CURRENT

AASHTO HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 24 22 39 35

TYPE 3 21 19 34 31

TYPE 3S2 30 27 50 45

TYPE 3-3 41 37 68 62

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND

CONDITION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... ELKMONT ROAD BRIDGE AT LAUREL BR

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-046P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 18

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 046P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST.

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 3A1, 3B15

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

155 - SEVIER

164000180

LAUREL BRANCH

ELKMONT ROAD

5460046P0000000

1.5 MILES NORTH FROM ELK

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

0.02 (KM PT 0.03)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

3 - POSSIBLY ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

11 - ARCH - DECK

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 24.0 TONS (21.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 39.0 TONS (35.4 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°39'57.30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°35'56.80" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 20.0 FT (6.1 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 1 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 2 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 1.75 FT (0.53 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1996-JOINTS RESEALED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:83�35'56.80 http:35�39'57.30

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-046P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD ELKMONT CAMPGROUND

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - EAST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #5 - CRACKING OF PAVEMENT ABOVE STRUCTURE

PHOTO #6 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINT MATERIAL AT

NORTHWEST PARAPET END

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF VERTICAL

EXPANSION JOINTS, SOUTHWEST JOINT

SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #9 - CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ALONG NORTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL

PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE

ALONG UNDERSIDE OF ARCH RING STONES,

EAST SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #13 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE

PHOTO #14 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE

File details come from the government source that posted it.