Little_Sheep_Creek_Bridge_Hydraulics_TSL_Report.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- OR WALLOWA 4602(1), Wallowa Mountain Loop Road
- Solicitation number
- 69056718B000023
About this file
Little_Sheep_Creek_Bridge_Hydraulics_TSL_Report
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Memorandum
Western Federal Lands Highway Division 610 E. Fifth Street
Vancouver, WA 98661-3801
LITTLE SHEEP CREEK BRIDGE
TSL BRIDGE HYDRAULICS MEMO
To: Susan Ellis, WFLHD Project Manager From: Sven Leon, P.E., WFLHD Hydraulics Engineer Date: June 15, 2017 Project: OR WALLOWA 4602(1) – Wallowa Mountain Loop Road
Background
Wallowa County (County), Oregon, is reconstructing five miles of the Wallowa Mountain Loop Road (NSFR 39) between State Highway 350 and the Wallowa National Forest Boundary. The proposed work will widen the roadway, add ditch relief culverts, and repair localized subgrade areas. Culverts in Little Sheep Creek will be replaced with a bridge (Fig. 1). The County will maintain the road and bridge structure. Western Federal Lands Highway Division (WFLHD) is designing the road improvements and new bridge. WFLHD completed a morphologic, hydrologic, and hydraulic analysis for supporting the TS&L development. Results and recommendations are presented.
Recommendations
Bridge waterway and riprap plan and details are attached (Sheets H.3 and H.4).
Bridge Low Chord, Length, and Alignment
Minimum low chord elevation 4193.5 feet (project datum) (50-year waster surface elevation plus 3 feet for woody debris passage.
Minimum 50 feet distance between vertical abutment faces.
Construct new channel with 2(h):1(v) side-slopes and minimum 25 feet waterway bottom width.
Slope new channel to match upstream and downstream channel gradients.
Angle between bridge centerline and channel centerline 10 degrees.
Set new channel elevation at channel centerline and bridge centerline crossing to 4185 feet.
Ensure the new channel has a streambed material gradation consistent with what is in the natural channel immediately upstream of the bridge.
Scour
Based on the hydraulic analysis and geotechnical borings, use;
100-year abutment scour elevation – 4180.8 feet.
500-year abutment scour elevation – 4179.7 feet.
Set the bottom of the GRS wall to elevation 4180.0 feet.
Memo to: Susan Ellis, WFLHD Project Manager June 15, 2017
Abutment Erosion Protection
Install riprap Class 5 (FHWA FP-14), 4 feet thick, and sloped 2(h):1(v).
Set riprap crest elevation to 4192.5 feet (project datum) (50-year waster surface elevation plus 2 feet).
Install riprap toe along abutment wall front face, 10 feet wide and 4 feet thick.
Set riprap toe bottom elevation equal to GRS wall bottom.
Install separation geotextile, class 1-C under all the placed riprap.
Place conserved gravel-cobble streambed material over the placed riprap for creating a smooth, natural appearing bank line transition.
Abutment Type
Based on the hydraulic, scour, and geomorphic analysis, a Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated (GRS) abutment system appears appropriate for the site.
Stream Impacts
Flow conveyance, sediment transport, sediment deposition, and woody debris conveyance through the bridge waterway will be dramatically improved over existing conditions. It is expected to be equal to what is occurring in the upstream and downstream natural channels. Increased woody debris passage will allow more wood to be embedded in the downstream channel, increasing habitat complexity. Aquatic organism passage through the new bridge waterway is expected to be equivalent to the upstream and downstream natural channels for all range of flow conditions.
Floodplain and Flood-rise Impacts
Based on the hydraulic modeling, the proposed bridge is not expected to increase flooding of adjacent property and insurable structures.
Construction
Constructing the new bridge requires access on the channel bottom with heavy, track-mounted equipment.
Flow diversion is necessary. Flow diversion used from late April through early July should have a minimum capacity of 452 cfs (2-year flood). Flow diversion used from middle July through middle April should have a minimum capacity of 100 cfs. Work areas for placing bridge foundation elements and riprap may be isolated with conserved streambed material berms. GRS abutment foundation elements must not be placed in ponded water. Dewatering is required for GRS installation. Geotextile and riprap may be placed in ponded water. Dewatering is not required for riprap placement. Pull the conserved streambed material berm back over the placed riprap.
Operation and Maintenance
Riprap placed for controlling bank erosion should be inspected annually and after each extreme flood event. Replace or reposition dislodged stone. The presence of woody debris trapped upstream, beneath, and downstream of the bridge should be inspected annually and after each extreme flood event. Remove woody debris as needed for maintaining flow conveyance capacity and preventing logs deflecting flow towards riprap or the GRS abutments.
Site Conditions
Two 6-foot diameter CMP culverts convey the stream flow. The twin 6-foot diameter culverts are half filled with sediment and are in poor condition (Photos 1 and 2). Backwater caused by the twin culverts has induced sediment deposition immediately upstream of the culverts (Photo 1). The twin culverts also reduce large woody debris conveyance. Another 6-foot diameter CMP culvert on the left floodplain conveys overbank flow (Photo 3). It is in good condition.
The channel generally has low sinuosity, but is relative straight immediately upstream and downstream of the proposed bridge (Photos 4 and 5). Active channel width (ordinary-high-water) is approximately 20 to 25 feet. Active channel depth (ordinary-high-water) is approximately 2 to 3 feet. Flood-prone (50-year flood event) depth is approximately 5 feet. Flood-prone width is estimated to be 120 to 180 feet. The floodplain is moderately vegetated with grasses, shrubs, willows, and cottonwoods. Channel slope is to 1 to 2 percent. Pool-riffle is the dominant bed form. Based on visual observation, sand, gravel, cobble, and small boulders comprise the streambed material.
The stream banks appear moderately stable where vegetated. Based on Goggle Earth imagery, the channel has not migrated since 1994. It appears to be confined to the south valley wall, an erosion resistant colluvium (Fig. 1, Photo 6). The potential for catastrophic lateral bank migration or channel avulsion is low. Based on observed woody debris, available bank-side vegetation, and expected flood flow depths, the stream can carry a large amount of large woody debris. Height of debris entangled on boulders, bank vegetation, and gravel-bars indicate the site has experienced floodwater depths of 3 to 4 feet (Photo 7).
Hydrology
The Little Sheep Creek originates near Wing Ridge and Ferguson Ridge in the Wallowa Mountains and flows north to merge with Big Sheep Creek and the Imnaha River, approximately 20 miles from the bridge site. Elevations range from 4200 feet at the bridge site to 9650 feet in the mountains. The drainage area is steeply mountainous with moderately incised drainages. Approximately one-half of the watershed is in the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest and approximately one-fourth is in the Eagle Cap Wilderness. Clear-cut logging has occurred and can occur in the future. Development is sparse, primarily rural residences and ranching. No significant flow diversions or lake areas occur. Extreme flooding typically occurs with heavy snow-melt late April, May, June, and early July.
No stream gage station data is available for Little Sheep Creek near the bridge site. USGS StreamStats (version 3) web-based application was used for delineating the watershed and calculating drainage area (39.1 sq. miles), mean annual precipitations (33.1 inches), forest cover (36.1 percent), and maximum elevation (9650 feet, NAD83). Peak discharges were estimated using USGS regression equations from “Estimating Flow-Duration and Low-Flow Frequency Statistics for Unregulated Streams in Oregon" (USGS SIR 2008-5126, 2008). Watersheds are within northeast regression equation area. Peak discharges estimates are presented in Table 1.
Water Surface Elevations and Flow Velocities
Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS 5.0) two-dimensional, unsteady flow model was used for estimating the proposed bridge water surface elevations, flow depths, and flow velocities. Terrain for the proposed bridge model was created by modifying existing ground topography obtained from project mapping to reflect the proposed bridge and road embankment. The model uses a mesh with 4 feet by 4 feet grid spacing extending 140 feet upstream and downstream (Fig. 3). Normal flow depth with 0.01 feet/feet friction slope was set for the downstream boundary condition. Twelve-hour duration, 1-minute interval hydrograph was used for the upstream boundary condition. The hydrograph includes the 2, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 500-year flood flows. A Manning’s Roughness Coefficient of 0.06 was selected for the main channel areas and overbank areas. The model was calibrated with apparent bankfull and high water levels determined in the field. The model uses a 4 second computation interval, full momentum equation set, and 2-hour warmup time. Flow depths, water surface elevations, and design flow velocities are summarized in Table 2 and Figures 4, 5, and 6.
Scour
A HEC-18 (5th ED., April 2012) scour analysis was completed using the HECRAS two-dimensional hydraulic model results (attached). The analysis includes abutment scour for the 100-year and 500-year flood events. Abutment scour was estimated using the NCHRP 24-20 approach. Abutment scour computed from the NCHRP approach is total scour at the abutment. It includes contraction scour. Based on review of site conditions, the channel profile appears stable. Long-term channel degradation was assumed zero. Streambed material gradations were developed with two digital photographs of gravel bar surfaces taken immediately upstream of the bridge. The photographs were processed using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox, version 4.2, gradation analysis tool (Photos 8 and 9). The distance between the yellow circles is 3 feet. D50 is approximately 2.5 inches. D100 is approximately 8 to 10 inches. D15 is approximately 1.5 inches. A D50 of 2.5 inches was used for the scour analysis. Two geotechnical borings indicate the abutments will be founded on approximately 20 feet of poorly graded gravel with sand, cobbles, and boulders. A summary of predicted scour is included in Table 2.
Riprap Sizing
The riprap was sized using the approach from USACE EM 1110-2-1601, June, 1994. Based on the two-dimensional HECRAS modeling, maximum expected flow velocity along the downstream right and left bank revetment is approximately 12 feet/sec for the 50-year flood event (Fig. 6). A stability factor of 0.3 was used for angular rock. Specific gravity of the stone was assumed to be 2.65. Slope of finished riprap surface is 2(h):1(v). To account for unknown flow impingement angles caused by shifting debris and mid-channel sediment deposits, a design factor-of-safety of 1.5 was selected. Riprap sizing analysis is attached.
Floodplain and Flood-rise Limitations
The site is not mapped by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as being in a special flood hazard area. A detailed FEMA mapping study has not been completed for the site. No base flood elevations have been determined. There are no insurable structures near the bridge. A house and barn structure is located approximately 2,200 feet upstream along the left bank.
attachments: Tables 1 and 2 Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 Photographs 1 to 9 Bridge/Riprap Plan Sheet Bridge/Riprap Section Sheet Peak Discharge Estimates Scour Analysis Riprap Design
Estimate Drainage
Method Area (mi2) 2 5 10 25 50 100 500
Little Sheep Creek 39.1 452 678 834 1023 1207 1362 2180
Bridge
Notes:
1. USGS Regression Equations, “Estimating Flow-Duration and Low-Flow Frequency Statistics for
Unregulated Streams in Oregon", USGS SIR 2008-5126, 2008.
2 5 10 25 50 100 500
Abut Low Chord Elev (Feet) 4193.8 4193.8 4193.8 4193.8 4193.8 4193.8 4193.8
WS Elevation (Feet) 4188.7 NA 4189.4 4189.9 4190.5 4191.0 4191.4
Clearance LC to WS (Feet) 5.1 NA 4.4 3.9 3.3 2.8 2.4
Long-term Degradation (Feet) NA NA NA NA NA 0.0 0.0
Contraction Scour (Feet) NA NA NA NA NA 0.0 0.0
Abutment Scour (Feet) NA NA NA NA NA 4.2 5.3
Total Scour Elevation (Feet) NA NA NA NA NA 4180.8 4179.7
Design Flow Velocity (Feet/sec) 7.8 NA 9.2 9.9 10.7 11.4 11.8
Notes:
1. Elevations in local project datum.
NA - Not analyzed.
Table 1. Peak Discharges (ft3/sec)
Location
Recurrence Intervals (years)
Recurrence Intervals (years)
Table 2. Water Surface Elevations, Scour, and Flow Velocities
Image date: 7/29/2016
Project Site Location
Map printed from National Geographic TOPO
FIGURE 1
LOCATION MAP
Wallowa Mountain Loop Road
200 feet
N
Little Sheep Creek Bridge
45.340/-117.074 NAD83
Bridge Site
Map printed from Google Earth Pro, image date 7/29/2016
2 miles
N
0 100 feet
FIGURE 2
LITTLE SHEEP CREEK BRIDGE
DRAINAGE AREA MAP
DA = 39.1 sq. mi.
Project Road
Little Sheep Creek Bridge
Bridge Site
HECRAS 5.0 - Two-Dimensional hydraulic model.
N
0 100 feet
Model Mesh
FIGURE 3
LITTLE SHEEP CREEK BRIDGE
HECRAS 2-D MODEL TERRAIN
N
Flow Depth Plot Location
Flow Depth (Feet)
FIGURE 4
LITTLE SHEEP CREEK BRIDGE
50-YEAR FLOW DEPTH
2-yr
500-yr
100-yr
50-yr
25-yr
10-yr
Water Surface Elevation Plot Location
4186.5
4187.5
4188.5
4189.5
4190.5
4191.5
Water Surface Elevation (Feet‐project datum)
FIGURE 5
LITTLE SHEEP CREEK BRIDGE
50-YEAR WS ELEVATION
2-yr
500-yr
100-yr
50-yr
Velocity Plot Location
Flow Velocity (Feet/sec)
FIGURE 6
LITTLE SHEEP CREEK BRIDGE
50-YEAR FLOW VELOCITY
2-yr
500-yr100-yr 50-yr
Photos Wallowa Mountain Loop Road
PHOTO 1
PHOTO 2
PHOTO 3
10/6/2016
Culvert in good condition.
Culverts filled one-half with sediment and in poor condition.
Little Sheep Creek Overflow Culvert inlet.
Little Sheep Creek Culverts inlets.
Culverts filled one-half with sediment and in poor condition.
Little Sheep Creek Culverts outlets.
PHOTO 4
PHOTO 5
PHOTO 6
10/6/2016
Stream adjacent to road embankment.
Flood-prone depth 3 to 4 feet. Active channel width 20 feet. Banks stable.
Pool-riffle dominant bed form. Cobble-gravel streambed material.
Little Sheep Creek - Channel upstream of culverts.
Active channel width 20 feet. Banks stable. Pool-riffle dominant bed form.
Cobble-gravel streambed material.
Little Sheep Creek - Channel downstream of culverts.
Active channel width 20 feet. Banks stable. Pool-riffle dominant bed form.
Cobble-gravel streambed material.
Little Sheep Creek - Channel upstream of culverts.
PHOTO 7
PHOTO 8
PHOTO 9
10/6/2016
Gradation photo, yellow dots 3 feet apart.
Little Sheep Creek - Channel upstream of culverts.
Gradation photo, yellow dots 3 feet apart.
Little Sheep Creek - Channel upstream of culverts.
Little Sheep Creek - Channel upstream of culverts.
Woody debris indicates maximum flooding depth.
10 200510
SCALE IN FEET
PLAN
SCOUR MITIGATION
LITTLE SHEEP CREEK BRIDGE
N Temporary flow barrier
Temporary flow barrier
F lo w Existing grade contour
Stream edge
H.3
STATE PROJECT
NUMBER
SHEET
I n t_ ft
D c m y fi le s p w p r o d u c ti o n d v S h e e p C r e e k R ip r a p S e c ti o n .d g n
OR WALLOWA 4602(1)
A
M
J u n e
C h e c k e d b y
D e s ig n e d b y
11+00 12+00
Elev. 4196.59
11+12.03
Begin bridge
Placed riprap, class 5 16'-0"10'-0" 9'-0"
15'-0"
Remove existing culverts erosion control, class 1
Placed riprap
Proposed channel CL
Elev. 4199.13
11+75.14
End bridge shape to finished road embankment
Placed riprap erosion control, class 1, GRS Abutment
Placed riprap, class 5
GRS Abutment
Proposed road CL
Existing road CL
Remove existing culvert
Elev 4185.0
11 + 43.1
Proposed channel CL, ° AA
B
B
C
C
OR WALLOWA 4602(1)
Varies
SECTIONS
SCOUR MITIGATION
LITTLE SHEEP CREEK BRIDGE
erosion control, class 1
Placed riprap cobbles
Conserved class 5 riprap, Placed
Conserved cobbles
Placed riprap
Select fill
8'-0"12'-0"
SECTION B
SECTION C
NO SCALE
HYDRAULIC & HYDROLOGIC SUMMARY
50 100 500
2 0.2
4190.5 4191.0 4191.4
0 0
Total Scour (Ft)
Pier Scour (Ft)
Abutment Scour (Ft)
Contraction Scour (Ft)
Flow Velocity (Ft/s)
Predicted Flood Rise (Ft)
Clearance above WS (Ft)
Design High Water (Ft)
Design Discharge (cfs)
Exceedance Probability (%)
Flood Frequency (Yr)
3.2 2.7 2.3
4.2 5.3
0 00
4180.8
4179.7
DESCRIPTIONITEM NO. UNIT QUANTITY
RIPRAP QUANTITIES
25101-0400
25101-0400
20701-0200
Placed riprap, method A, class 1
Placed riprap, method A, class 5
Separation- stabilization geotextile, class 1, type C
CY
CY
SQYD
20'-0"
16'-0" elev 4192.0
Riprap crest, class 1-C
Geotextile, footing bottom
GRS abutment footing bottom
GRS abutment elev 4180
GRS wall bottom, elev 4180
GRS wall bottom, class 1-C
Geotextile, Excavation limit
Existing grade
GRS abutmment bearing seat
GRS abutment wall top
GRS abutment wall
Existing grade
H.4
STATE PROJECT
NUMBER
SHEET
I n t_ ft
D c m y fi le s p w p r o d u c ti o n d v S h e e p C r e e k R ip r a p S e c ti o n .d g n
A
M
J u n e
C h e c k e d b y
D e s ig n e d b y
OHW Elev 4188.7
50-year W.S. Elev 4190.5
25' min.
Placed riprap, class 5 erosion control, class 1
Placed riprap
Placed riprap, class 5
SECTION A
elev 4185 channel bottom, Proposed stream
Elev. 4196.59
11+12.03
Begin bridge elev 4192.5
Riprap crest, Existing Ground at CL
Elev. 4199.13
11+75.14
End bridge elev 4184
Riprap toe, elev 4184
Riprap toe, Geotextile, class 1-C
Geotextile, class 1-C
GRS abutment wall
GRS wall bottom, elev 4180
GRS abutment footing bottom GRS abutment footing bottom
GRS abutment wall
GRS wall bottom, elev 4180
Riprap crest, elev 4192.5 Low chord, elev 4193.75
Select fill 10'-0" shape to finished road embankment
Placed riprap erosion control, class 1, 10'-0"
Proposed road profile9'-0"
11.811.410.7
CALCULATIONS
Peak Discharge Estimates
Scour Analysis
Riprap Sizing
Project: File:
Desc: By:
Region: Date:
Exceed Coefficients Error Equation: Q = K(A^a)*(p^b)*((1+F)^c)
Prob. K a b c +%/-% Source: Magnitude and Freq. Floods in Eastern Oregon
0.50 0.508 0.820 1.360 -0.270 82/45 (USGS WRIR 82-4078, 1983)
0.20 2.440 0.790 1.090 -0.300 79/44 A = Drainage area
0.10 5.280 0.780 0.960 -0.320 83/45 p = mean annual precipitation
0.04 11.800 0.770 0.830 -0.350 89/47 F = Percent DA covered by forest
0.02 19.800 0.760 0.750 -0.360 90/48
0.01 30.700 0.760 0.680 -0.380 101/50 Culvert Type HW/D K M a
CMP Projecting 1.0 0.5 0.667 2.827
Estimated Discharge (Q) Min.
Drain. p F Exceedance Probability 0.02 Culvert
Station Area 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.002 Design Dia
(sq mi) (in) (%) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (ft)
Minimum
39.1 33.1 36.1 452 678 834 1,023 1,207 1,362 2,180 1,207 12.4
0.56 20.4 25.5 8 15 21 29 38 44 71 38 3.1
Target Divide Rd 1.97 24.5 63.0 22 39 51 66 82 93 149 82 4.2
DA 3 0.69 26.2 80.8 10 17 22 29 35 40 64 35 3.0
0.1 25.0 40.0 2 4 6 8 10 12 10 1.8
0.3 25.0 40.0 6 10 14 18 23 27 23 2.6
0.5 25.0 40.0 8 15 21 27 34 39 34 3.0
0.7 25.0 40.0 11 20 27 35 44 51 44 3.3
0.9 25.0 40.0 14 25 33 43 54 62 54 3.6
1.1 25.0 40.0 16 29 38 50 63 72 63 3.8
1.5 25.0 40.0 21 37 49 64 79 91 79 4.2
Notes:
K = Constant from Table 9, HDS-5
M = Constant from Table 9, HDS-5
D = [Q/(0.7844x(1/K^1/M))]^.4 from HDS-5, equation 27. Assumes HW/D < 1.2 ,unsubmerged.
Maximum
Little Sheep Ck
DA 1
General Minor
Major Drainage Peak Flow S. Leon
Northeast 7/1/2016
FLOOD DISCHARGE ESTIMATES
UNGAGED OREGON SITES
OR WALLOWA 4602(1) - Wallowa Mountain Loop Road reg-spec2014
SCOUR ESTIMATE
Project: OR WALLOWA 4602(1) – Wallowa Mountain Loop Road File:
Desc: Little Sheep Creek Bridge Date:
Units: ENG By:
Location Description
0-ye ar
0-ye ar
0-ye ar
0-ye ar
CONSTANTS
UNITS SI or ENG ENG ENG ENG ENG g ACCELERATION OF GRAVITY, 9.81 m/s2, 32.2 ft/s2 32.20 32.20 32.20 32.20
Du D UNIT CONVERSION, 0.001 SI, 0.00328 English 0.00328 0.00328 0.00328 0.00328
LIVE-BED OR CLEAR-WATER DETERMINATION
y AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH, m, ft 4.9 5.1
D50 DIAMETER 50% FINER BED PARTICLES, mm 60 60
V AVERAGE VELOCITY, m/s, ft/s 8.2 8.0
Ku UNIT COEFFICIENT, 6.19 SI, 11.17 English 11.170 11.170 11.170 11.170
Vc (6.1) CRITICAL VELOCITY, m/s, ft/s 0.00 0.00 8.47 8.53
LB / CW LIVE BED or CLEAR WATER CW CW
LIVE-BED CONTRACTION SCOUR
y1 AVERAGE U/S DEPTH, MAIN CHANNEL, m, ft 4.9 5.1 y0 AVERAGE CONTRACTED DEPTH BEFORE SCOUR, m, ft 5.0 5.4
Q1 FLOW IN UPSTREAM CHANNEL, m3/s, ft3/S 1362.0 2180.0
Q2 FLOW IN CONTRACTED CHANNEL, m3/s, ft3/S 1362.0 2180.0
W1 WIDTH OF THE UPSTREAM CHANNEL, m, ft 25.0 25.0
W2 WIDTH OF THE CONTRACTED SECTION, m, ft 25.0 25.0
S1 ENERGY SLOPE OF MAIN CHANNEL, m/m, ft/ft 0.0100 0.0100 w (Fig 6.8) D50 FALL VELOCITY, m/s 0.500 0.500
UNIT COEFFICIENT, 1.0 SI, 3.28 English 3.28 3.28 3.28 3.28
D50 FALL VELOCITY, m/s, ft/s 0.000 0.000 1.640 1.640 k1 (p6.10) TRANSPORT COEFFICIENT 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.64
BED MATERIAL TRANSPORT MODE BL/SL BL/SL
V* SHEAR VELOCITY, m/s, ft/s 0.00 0.00 1.26 1.28 y2 (6.2) AVERAGE DEPTH, CONTRACTED SECTION, m, ft 0.00 0.00 4.90 5.10 yS (6.3) AVERAGE SCOUR DEPTH, m, ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
As AVERAGE SCOUR AREA, m2, ft2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 scour18-5.xls
6/10/2017
S. Leon
CLEAR-WATER CONTRACTION SCOUR
y0 AVERAGE CONTRACTED DEPTH BEFORE SCOUR, m, ft 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.4
D50 MEDIAN DIAMETER BED MATERIAL, mm 0.0 0.0 60.0 60.0
Q DISCHARGE THROUGH THE BRIDGE, m3/s, ft3/s 0.0 0.0 1362.0 2180.0
W BOTTOM WIDTH OF THE CONTRACTED SECTION, m, ft 0.0 0.0 25.0 25.0
Ku UNIT COEFFICIENT, 0.025 SI, 0.0077 English 0.0077 0.0077 0.0077 0.0077
Dm DIA. SMALLEST NONTRANSPORT PARTICLE, m, ft 0.0000 0.0000 0.2460 0.2460 y2 (6.4) AVERAGE DEPTH, CONTRACTED SECTION, m, ft 0.00 0.00 5.71 8.54 yS (6.5) AVERAGE SCOUR DEPTH, m, ft 0.00 0.00 0.71 3.14
As AVERAGE SCOUR AREA, m2, ft2 0.00 0.00 17.73 78.61
PRESSURE FLOW CONTRACTION SCOUR
Hb DISTANCE LOW CHORD TO STREAM BED, m, ft y1 FLOW DEPTH UPSTREAM FACE OF BRIDGE, m, ft
D50 D50 OF BED MATERIAL IN OPENING, mm
Va AVERAGE VELOCITY THROUGH OPENING, m/s, ft/s
Ku UNIT COEFFICIENT, 6.19 SI, 11.17 English 11.170 11.170 11.170 11.170
Vc (5.1) CRITICAL VELOCITY, m/s, ft/s 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ys VERTICAL SCOUR DEPTH, m, ft #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
PIER SCOUR
y1 FLOW DEPTH U/S OF THE PIER, m, ft
V1 APPROACH VELOCITY, m/s, ft/s a PIER WIDTH, m, ft
L PIER LENGTH, m, ft
FA FLOW ANGLE, degrees
K1 (Tbl 7.1) CORRECTION FOR PIER SHAPE (0.9 to 1.1, >5deg, 1)
K3 (Tbl 7.3) CORRECTION FOR BED FORM (1.1 to 1.3)
Sg SEDIMENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65
D50 DIAMETER 50% FINER BED PARTICLES, mm
D84 DIAMETER 95% FINER BED PARTICLES, mm
Ku UNIT COEFFICIENT, 6.19 SI, 11.17 English 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17
Vc50 (6.1) CRITICAL VELOCITY D50, m/s, ft/s 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
L/a PIER LENGTH/WIDTH RATIO (MAX. L/a = 12)) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Fr FROUDE RATIO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
GC SEDIMENT GRADATION COEFFICIENT, D84/D50 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
H DENSIMETRIC PARTICLE FROUDE NUIMBER #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
K2 (7.4) CORRECTION FOR FLOW ANGLE (1 to 5) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 y1/a #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
a/D50 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
V1/Vc #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Kw (7.20-21) WIDE PIER CORRECTION FAC (y1/a<0.8, a/D50>50, Fr<1) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
yS (7.3) SCOUR DEPTH, m, ft 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 yS (7.34) SCOUR DEPTH-COARSE BED, m, ft (D50>20mm & GC>1.5) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ABUTMENT SCOUR - NCHRP 24-20
y1 AVERAGE U/S DEPTH, MAIN CHANNEL, m, ft 4.9 5.1 v1 AVERAGE U/S VELOCITY, MAIN CHANNEL, m/s, ft/s 8.2 8.0 y0 AVERAGE CONTRACTED DEPTH BEFORE SCOUR, m, ft 5.0 5.4
Vbr AVERAGE VELOCITY THROUGH BRIDGE, m/s, ft/s 9.4 9.7
Bf FLOODPLAIN WIDTH, m, ft 95.0 100.0
FLOW THROUGH BRIDGE, m3/s, ft3/s 1362.0 2180.0
WW WATERWAY WIDTH, m, ft 45.0 45.0
L PROJECTED LENGTH EMBANKMENT, m, ft 90.0 95.0
D50 DIAMETER 50% FINER BED PARTICLES, mm 60 60 alpha SCOUR AMPLIFICATION FACTOR (FIG. 8.9 - 8.12) 1.65 1.70
Ku UNIT COEFFICIENT, 6.19 SI, 11.17 English 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17
L/Bf L/Bf > 0.75 USE LB, < 0.75 USE CW #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.95 0.95 q1 UPSTREAM UNIT DISCHARGE, m3/s, ft3/s 0.00 0.00 40.18 40.80 q2 UNIT DISCHARGE IN CONSTRICTED OPENING, m3/s, ft3/s 0.00 0.00 47.00 52.38 q2/q1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1.17 1.28 ymax (8.3) MAXIMUM FLOW DEPTH RESULTING FROM SCOUR, ft, m #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 9.25 10.74 yS (8.4) ABUTMENT SCOUR DEPTH, m, ft #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 4.25 5.34
TOTAL SCOUR
Base Elevation 4,185.0 4,185.0
Contraction Scour
Live Bed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Clear Water 0.0 0.0 0.7 3.1
Pressure Flow (assumes clear water) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Contraction + Pier (without Pressure Flow Scour)
Pier (max 2.4 x pier width) 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Total Live Bed 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Live Bed Scour Elevation 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Total Clear Water 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Clear Water Scour Elevation 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Contraction + Pier (with Pressure Flow Scour)
Pier (max 2.4 x pier width) 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Total Live Bed 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Live Bed Scour Elevation 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Total Clear Water 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Clear Water Scour Elevation 0.0 0.0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Abutment
Abutment #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 4.2 5.3
Total Bed Scour Elevation #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 4,180.8 4,179.7
Note: S. Leon 7/12/12
HEC 18, 5th ED. 4/2012 (EQUATIONS SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS)
Hydraulic Analysis Report
Riprap Analysis
Input Parameters
Riprap Type: Revetment
The channel is a natural channel
Local Depth of Flow: 5 ft
Riprap Shape is Angular
Stability Coefficient: 0.3
This value is updated by the selected Riprap Shape
Blanket Thickness Coefficient: 1
Channel Cross-sectional Average Velocity: 12 ft/s
Which is the Average Velocity with Spurs
Centerline Radius of Curvature of Channel Bend: 1e+009 ft
Width of Water Surface at Upstream End of Channel Bend: 190 ft
Bank Angle: 2 :1 H:V
.966 < Bank Angle < 4.011
The location of the revetment protection is on a straight channel
Specific Gravity of Riprap: 2.65
Safety Factor: 1.5
Result Parameters
Side slope Correction Factor: 0.871418
Velocity Distribution Coefficient: 1
Design Velocity: 12 ft/s
Design velocity never less than average channel velocity
Computed D30: 14.9309 in
Computed D50: 17.917 in
Riprap Class
Riprap Class Name: CLASS V
Riprap Class Order: 5
The following values are an 'average' of the size fraction range for the selected riprap class.
d100: 36 in d85: 25.5 in d50: 18.5 in d15: 13 in
| Little_Sheep_Creek_Bridge_tables-1_2 |
| Wall_fig-1-vicmap |
| Little_Sheep_Creek_Bridge_Fig3-HECRASmodel |
| Little_Sheep_Creek_Bridge_Fig5-50yrWElev-map |
| Little_Sheep_Creek_Bridge_Fig6-50yrVel-map |
| calcscover |
| Wallowa-Mtn-Rd-reg-spec2014 |
| StreamStats Basin Characteristics Report |
| StreamStats Flow Statistics Report |
| Little_Sheep_Creek_SCOUR18-5a2017 |
| Semi-log Gradation Plot |
File details come from the government source that posted it.