Q&A_12-13-18.pdf

PDF 75 KB Posted

Attached to
OR BLM ERFO 2017(1)-32(1), Medford District Road Repairs
Solicitation number
69056718B000018
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid_Opening_Summary_Medford.pdf PDF
Q&A_12-19-18.pdf PDF
Amendment_A001.pdf PDF
Q&A_12-11-18.pdf PDF
Q&A_12-6-18.pdf PDF
Plan_Request_form.pdf PDF
IFB_Medford.pdf PDF
OR_BLM_ERFO_2017(1)-32(1)_Plans_10_18_18.pdf PDF
PROJECT_DESCRIPTION.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Project No.: OR BLM ERFO 2017(1)‐32(1) Project Title: Medford District Road Repairs

# General Technical Question Answer Date 1 X Can you tell me the Insurance requirement? See FP‐14 Subsection 107.05. 11/27/18

2 X Are there going to be any designated borrow sites for this project?

No. There are no government provided material sources for this project. See Subsection 105.02.

12/11/18

3 X Can you tell me where to find the Geogrid specifications and material requirements?

The first three digits of the pay item number identify the Section under which the work is performed. See Section 207 and Subsection 714.03.

12/11/18

5 The Summary Of Quantities (sheets B.1 and B.2) for the Totten Creek site does not show any quantities for excavation. However, the plan sheet for the site (D‐3) shows that there is excavation required to create the stepped base to support the embankment. It this excavation considered incidental to the embankment? The sane applies to Peavine Road, Wild Lily and Upper Left Spur Sites. Yes. See Subsection 204.16(a)(3).

12/13/18

6 Murphy Gulch is the only site where a disposal area is designated. Is the contractor expected to dispose of ALL excavated material (not just asphalt) off of government property for the other sites?

This will be addressed in a forthcoming Amendment.

12/13/18

Check General or

File details come from the government source that posted it.