Q&A_8-9-18.pdf

PDF 72 KB Posted

Attached to
OR FS ERFO 2016(1)-15(3), Umpqua Repairs 2016
Solicitation number
69056718B000013
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid_Opening_Summary_Umpqua_Repairs_2016_&_2017.pdf PDF
Amendment_A004.pdf PDF
Amendment_A003.pdf PDF
Q&A_9-14-18.pdf PDF
Amendment_A002.pdf PDF
Amendment_A001.pdf PDF
Q&A_8-20-18.pdf PDF
IFB_Umpqua_Repairs.pdf PDF
XS_Brownie.pdf PDF
Plan_Set_-_Umpqua_Repairs_2016-17_Signed_v3.1.pdf PDF
ESCP OR FS ERFO 2016(1)-15(3).pdf PDF
AOP_Brownie_Creek_Hydraulics.pdf PDF
XS_Brownie_Approach.pdf PDF
GM 09-18, OR FS ERFO 2016(1)-15(3), Umpqua Final Geotech Memo.pdf PDF
XS_Steamboat.pdf PDF
XS_Junetta_Sheets.pdf PDF
Plan_Request_for_Internet.pdf PDF
PROJECT_DESCRIPTION_Umpqua_Repairs_2016.pdf PDF
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

OR FS ERFO 2016(1)‐15(3)

Umpqua Repairs 2016

# General Technical Question Answer Date

1 X

Plans page F‐6 details a watertight joint. How is this joint going to transfer through the stem wall and base channel and remain economically feasible while maintaining the bolt pattern to the multi plate? We propose a square end foundation and stemwall with a 9" joint mastic on the backfill side to seal the joint which only adds a fraction to the project cost instead of thousands and accomplishes the same goal.

Bid according to the contract documents.

After contract award, a value engineering change proposal(s) may be submitted according to Subsection 103.03.

8/9/18

Check General or Technical

File details come from the government source that posted it.