6-Underwriting Evaluation and Score Sheet (1).pdf
PDF 54 KB Posted
- Attached to
- APA 2026-03 Bond Issuance Underwriting Services
- Solicitation number
- 26-District-Underwriting
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an Underwriting Evaluation and Scoring Rubric for a bond issuance underwriting services procurement conducted by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing on behalf of Utah Charter Academies (UCA). UCA is seeking a Managing Underwriter to provide investment banking services for a complex, multi-project bond issuance, with the primary objective of securing the lowest possible cost of capital through expert pricing negotiation, aggressive marketing, and high-level credit presentation to S&P Global Ratings. The procurement method is Value Based Selection under Utah Procurement Code 63G-6a Part 15, and submissions of qualifications are being accepted via Bonfire or email to dsharette@apamail.org. The vendor with the highest ranking will be selected to negotiate a contract at compensation determined to be fair and reasonable, with provisions to proceed to the next highest ranked vendor if agreement cannot be reached with the top-ranked firm.
The evaluation criteria are weighted as follows: National Charter School Expertise accounts for 40% of the evaluation and assesses demonstrated success in a "National Charter School Group" capacity with ability to reach institutional investors outside of Utah; UCA Institutional Continuity represents 35% and prioritizes firms with deep understanding of UCA's Master Indenture, past 2015/2018 bond performance, and current Zions Custodial Agreement; Technical Proficiency comprises 15% and evaluates expertise in balancing duties to both issuer and investors to ensure "fair and reasonable" pricing; and Proposed Fee Structure accounts for 10% and assesses the firm's underwriting spread in relation to services provided. Pricing should not be included in qualifications submissions, as compensation will be negotiated separately following selection based on fair and reasonable standards.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Underwriter RFSQ.pdf | ||
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf.pdf | ||
| 3-Att B IT Terms and Conditions.docx.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Att A Agency Contract Terms and Condition GS.docx.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation & Scoring Rubric The following weighted criteria will be used to ensure the selected firm can handle UCA's unique system-wide scale:
Criteria Weight Description
National Charter School Expertise
40% Demonstrated success in a "National Charter School Group" capacity, with the ability to reach institutional investors outside of Utah.
UCA Institutional Continuity
35% Priority is given to firms with a deep understanding of UCA’s Master Indenture, past 2015/2018 bond performance, and current Zions Custodial Agreement .
Technical Proficiency
15% Expertise in balancing duties to both the Issuer and investors to ensure a "fair and reasonable" price.
Proposed Fee Structure
10% Assessment of the firm's underwriting spread (e.g., 0.50%) in relation to the services provided.
Evaluation & Scoring Rubric
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .