6 Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire August 2020.pdf

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Protective Service 701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19106

ATTACHMENT 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: RFP 70RFPW23RW9000002

NAME OF CONTRACTOR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE: __________________

The purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain information regarding the quality of the above named Contractor’s past performance relative to a contract, completed or in progress, at your company/agency. The Federal Protective Service is considering this Contractor for Protective Security Officer services at various Federal buildings located in Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota. We would greatly appreciate your input regarding the quality of the Contractor’s past performance.

Handwritten responses are sufficient. It is requested that the individual(s) responsible for the administrative oversight of the project (e.g. security specialist, COR, COTR, etc.) respond to this questionnaire. More than one copy of the questionnaire may be submitted if responses from more than one individual are appropriate.

Upon completion of the survey, please email to cedric.bedgood@fps.dhs.gov and Paul.metzger@fps.dhs.gov. If you have any questions, please contact Cedric Bedgood at cedric.bedgood@fps.dhs.gov and Paul Metzger at Paul.metzger@fps.dhs.gov. We appreciate your efforts on our behalf.

CONTRACT NO. OR PROJECT TITLE: _____________________________________

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS:_________________________________________

TOTAL PROJECT VALUE TO

INCLUDE ALL OPTION PERIODS: _________________________________________

ANNUAL NO. OF PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER HOURS (Note: If ID/IQ contract, provide the maximum post hours available for the most recent one year ordering period):_________________________________________

If ID/IQ ACTUAL NO. OF PROTECTIVE SECURITY OFFICER HOURS PERFORMED FOR

THE MOST RECENT ONE YEAR ORDERING PERIOD:

ATTACHMENT 4

RFP 70RFPW23RW9000002, PSO Services for Nevada

Attachment 4 U.S. Department of Homeland Security

701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19106

August 2020 Version

Please provide a brief description of the scope of this project so that we determine any similarities to this contract:

QUESTIONS

PERFORMANCE:

Please provide your comments on the Contractor’s performance in the following areas:

1. How consistent is the Contractor in providing required staffing at each post of duty?

Comments:

2. How consistent is the Contractor in providing employees who report to duty properly groomed, uniformed, and equipped?

Comments:

3. How consistent is the Contractor in keeping training records, certifications, and related documentation complete, accurate, and current?

Comments:

701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19106

August 2020 Version

4. Discuss the overall level of professionalism, attentiveness, and bearing of the Contractor's workforce.

Comments:

5. How effective is the Contractor in identifying potential problems and resolving them on his own?

Comments:

6. How effectively does the Contractor respond to problems presented to him by owner and tenant representatives?

Comments:

7. Discuss the Contractor’s quality control of the project.

Comments:

701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19106

August 2020 Version

8. Discuss the Contractor’s overall management of the project

Comments:

9. Discuss the Contractor’s ability to seamlessly transition or phase-in under a newly awarded contract (if applicable):

Comments:

10. Discuss the Contactor’s ability to provide the level of supervision sufficient to ensure effective performance by the productive Protective Security Officers over the course of the Contract.

Comments:

11. Did this contract require the contractor to submit a subcontracting plan? If so, has the contractor been making a good faith effort to meet the subcontracting goals contained within the plan? (NOTE: The individual completing this questionnaire may need to contact the cognizant contracting officer in order to ascertain whether the contractor is meeting subcontracting goals.)

701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19106

August 2020 Version

12. If you had a choice, would you hire this Contractor again? Why or why not?

13. In summary, would you describe the quality of the Contractor's services and overall performance as:

a. _____ Highly Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is substantially less than the level expected from a competent vendor.

b. _____ Acceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is no more than the level expected from a competent vendor.

c. _____ Unacceptable – Based on the contractor’s performance under this project, the level of risk associated with this vendor is greater than the level normally expected from a competent vendor.

Your Name: ______________________________ Your Position: ______________________________ Company: ______________________________ Telephone No: ______________________________ Fax: ______________________________ E-mail address: ______________________________