52.212-2 ADDENDUM; EVALUATION –COMMERCIAL ITEMS.docx
DOCX document 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TRI-LAKES PROJECT WEED CONTROL
- Solicitation number
- W9128F26QA022
About this file
This is an evaluation addendum for commercial items establishing the criteria and methodology for awarding a contract under the Tri-Lakes Project Weed Control solicitation (W9128F26QA022) issued by the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District. The contract is a 100% small business set-aside requiring pesticide application services on heavily visited public lands and around water supply/irrigation reservoirs and streams, with project areas equivalent to or exceeding 750 acres.
Contractors must provide minimum two references from government or non-government projects completed within the past three years demonstrating successful pesticide application experience at comparable scope and scale. Past performance evaluation ratings are: exceptional (successful completion on all references with favorable PPIRS and Contracting Officer information), satisfactory (at least one successful reference with favorable additional information), or unsatisfactory (no successful references with unfavorable additional information). Technical approach evaluation requires recommendations of appropriate chemicals and application rates for specific sites in response to Technical Exhibit 4. Support equipment and facilities evaluation assesses the contractor's capability to meet scope requirements, including equipment availability, mixing water sourcing, and adequate personnel. Contractors must submit detailed equipment lists and capability documentation. Proposed prices must be submitted as acre rates inclusive of all costs including mobilization, labor, fuel, chemicals, mileage, equipment, rentals, licenses, and insurance, covering actual spray time and reasonable on-site setup time. Past performance, technical approach, and support equipment/facilities are significantly more important than price; however, price serves as the tiebreaker if two or more bidders achieve equal evaluation scores.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 ADDENDUM; EVALUATION –COMMERCIAL ITEMS
1.Past Performance - The quoter shall provide a minimum of two references of projects related the same or similar projects(s) for a government agency or a non-government firm completed within the past three (3) years. Contractor shall demonstrate successful past performance in applying pesticides to heavily visited public lands and around water supply/ irrigation reservoirs and streams. Past performance shall also demonstrate successful applications to areas equivalent to or exceeding 750 acres. Experience consists of projects completed as a prime contractor or projects of qualified subcontractors that have the capabilities to perform this work. These references need to be equal to or similar in scope of this requirement. The contractor shall provide dates and pertinent information to demonstrate how they are comparable to this requirement in size and complexity. The contractor shall include points of contact, titles, telephone numbers, and email addresses (if available) for all references.
Additionally, past performance may be based on the Contracting’s Officer’s knowledge of and previous experience with similar purchases acquired and any information contained in the Governmentwide Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), contained at www.ppirs.gov .
The quoter will receive a rating of exceptional for past performance that demonstrates successful completion of similar purchases on all references and the additional information retrieved from PPIRS and from the Contracting Officer is favorable. The quoter will receive a rating of satisfactory for past performance that has at least one reference that demonstrates successful completion of similar purchases and the information from PPIRS and the Contracting Officer is favorable. The quoter will receive a rating of unsatisfactory for past performance that does not demonstrate any successfully completed similar purchases on the references and the additional information from PPIRS and the Contracting Officer is not favorable.
2. Technical Approach – Recommend appropriate chemicals and rates of application for specific application sites. Responses to Technical Exhibit 4 will be used for evaluation.
3. Support Equipment and Facilities - Ability to meet or exceed all requirements outlined in the scope of work. The contractor shall submit a document that provides an equipment list, and identifies the ability to complete the spraying in terms of the ability to obtain mixing water, and provide adequate personnel.
After a preliminary consideration of all quotations, the government will identify from all quotations one that is the most suitable to the user and screen all lower priced quotations based on the readily discernible value factors (1-3) above. Past Performance, Technical Approach, and Support Equipment and Facilities when combined, are significantly more important than price. However, should two or more bidders be equal in evaluation score, price shall be used to break the tie.
4. Price: The prospective Contractor's proposed acre rates shall be inclusive of all costs that might be incurred during this agreement such as, but not limited to, mobilization fee, labor, fuel, chemical, mileage, equipment, rental fees, licenses, insurance, etc. The Contractor shall provide bid prices for all line items on the bid sheet. The Government may award an agreement resulting from this solicitation consisting of a single line item only or any combination of line items. Agreement will include actual spray time as listed on the PAR and reasonable on-site set-up time.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .