5-Utah Code 63G-6a-1203.pdf

PDF 8 KB Posted

Attached to
SY2026–2027 Food Products Bid (Breakfast, Snack, and Entrée Items)
Solicitation number
JB26-324 IFB
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Utah

About this file

This is a Utah state statute (Utah Code 63G-6a-1203) governing void and unenforceable provisions in procurement contracts for governmental entities, effective May 7, 2025. The statute establishes that certain contract provisions are automatically void and unenforceable in all procurement contracts entered into after the effective date, unless specifically exempted through authorized written authorization. The statute applies to all procurement units in Utah, including school districts such as Granite School District, which issued the related SY2026–2027 Food Products Bid for breakfast, snack, and entrée items with a contract term beginning July 1, 2026, for one year with four optional one-year renewals. The procurement will be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder meeting requirements by line item, with federal funds designated for this food products contract.

The statute renders void and unenforceable any contract provisions that restrict the state or procurement unit's governmental immunity protections, require indemnification or defense of other parties, subject the contract to non-Utah jurisdiction or dispute resolution, limit disclosure of required information, allow vendor unilateral modifications, or inappropriately limit vendor liability for negligence or willful misconduct. However, authorized legal counsel for the procurement unit may provide signed, express written authorization prior to contract formation to exempt certain provisions related to jurisdictional requirements under Subsection (4)(f) if circumstances warrant, or the procurement official may exempt insurance and renewal provisions under Subsection (4)(i) if the contract explicitly references this section. The statute further provides that neither the state nor any procurement unit may be held liable for special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages arising from any procurement contract, establishing an absolute liability limitation regardless of other contract provisions.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Utah Code

Effective 5/7/2025 63G-6a-1203 Void and unenforceable provisions of a contract -- Exemptions -- Limitation of liability and damages.

(1) As used in this section, "governmental entity" means the same as that term is defined in

Section 63G-7-102.

(2) This section does not apply to:

(a) a procurement contract that becomes operative or enforceable before the effective date of this section; or

(b) the extension or renewal of a contract described in Subsection (2)(a).

(3)

(a) Except as provided under Subsections (5) and (6), a provision of a procurement contract described in Subsection (4), including a provision incorporated into the contract by reference, is void and unenforceable.

(b) Notwithstanding any provision of a procurement contract that is void and unenforceable under Subsection (3)(a), the remaining provisions of the contract are severable, valid, and enforceable to the fullest extent provided under Utah law.

(4) A provision is void and unenforceable under Subsection (3)(a) if the provision:

(a) restricts the state's or a procurement unit's protection under Chapter 7, Governmental

Immunity Act of Utah, from suit, liability, judgment, or obligation, including an obligation to respond to or defend against any claim;

(b) requires a governmental entity to indemnify, defend, or hold harmless another person;

(c) restricts a governmental entity's ability to seek relief in state court;

(d) subjects a governmental entity to binding arbitration or other form of dispute resolution outside the courts;

(e) disallows the procurement unit from having legal counsel and representation from:

(i) legal counsel that the procurement unit chooses;

(ii) the attorney general; or

(iii) legal counsel chosen by a person that has a contractual obligation to indemnify, defend, or hold harmless the state or a procurement unit, subject to the written consent of the state or the procurement unit;

(f) subject to Subsection (5):

(i) subjects a procurement contract or a party to the contract to the laws of any jurisdiction other than Utah; or

(ii) requires the parties to resolve a dispute in a jurisdiction or venue other than Utah;

(g) restricts a governmental entity from making disclosures of information, as required by law or for any legitimate governmental purpose;

(h) allows a vendor to unilaterally modify any part of the procurement contract, including any provision to which the contract contemplates giving legal effect upon the vendor providing notice to the procurement unit of the modification or of the created legal effect; and

(i) subject to Subsection (6):

(i) requires a governmental entity to maintain insurance coverage beyond the types and limits required by the state risk manager appointed under Section 63A-4-101.5, or to name an additional insured under that coverage;

(ii) allows a vendor to automatically renew a procurement contract or that creates a contractual term in violation of the terms permitted under Section 63G-6a-1204; or

(iii) limits the liability of a vendor or any third-party for bodily injury, death, or damage to tangible property caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of a vendor, a third-party, or the vendor's or third-party's employees or agents.

Utah Code

(5) The assistant attorney general or authorized legal counsel for the procurement unit that will sign a procurement contract may, via a signed, express, written authorization made prior to the formation of the contract, exempt the contract from a provision described in Subsection (4)(f), if the assistant attorney general or authorized legal counsel determines that an exemption is necessary to promote the best interests of the state or the procurement unit due to:

(a) the relative disproportionate bargaining positions of the contracting parties;

(b) market conditions; or

(c) other unique circumstances identified and described in the authorization.

(6) The procurement official for a procurement unit seeking to enter into a procurement contract may, via a signed, express, written authorization made prior to the formation of the contract, exempt the contract from a provision described in Subsection (4)(i), if the contract indicates the procurement unit's intent to include the provision, with explicit reference to this section.

(7) Notwithstanding any provision of a procurement contract to the contrary, under no circumstance may the state or a procurement unit be held liable for any special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages arising from or relating to a procurement contract.

Amended by Chapter 69, 2025 General Session

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .