5-JK26-32 Score Sheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Part 15 Professional Services - Final
- Solicitation number
- JK26-32
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing, in partnership with the Cultural and Community Engagement unit, for Solicitation Number JK26-32 related to Utah's pavilion at the Great American Fair. The procurement seeks marketing and creative services to conceptualize and implement the state's pavilion exhibit. The contract is structured as a one-year professional services engagement under Utah Procurement Code 63G-6a Part 15. Vendors must meet four mandatory minimum requirements: certification of ability to meet the stated timeline, previous experience managing budgets of $500,000 or more, capability to work in Washington, DC during installation and de-installation periods, and experience managing products outside the State of Utah.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a technical scoring framework with a maximum of 500 points across two primary criteria: company profile and qualifications (weighted at 30 percent, 150 points possible) and portfolio with comparable project examples (weighted at 70 percent, 350 points possible). Evaluators score proposals on a scale from 0 to 5, with 0 representing failure to address requirements and 5 representing excellence that exceeds all requirements. A minimum technical point threshold of 350 points (70 percent) is required for proposal acceptance. Vendors are explicitly instructed not to include pricing in their submissions, as compensation will be negotiated separately according to Part 15 of the Utah Procurement Code with the highest-ranked vendor. If negotiations with the top-ranked vendor prove unsuccessful, the state reserves the right to proceed with negotiations with subsequent ranked vendors.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4-JK26-32 Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 3-Att.-A-Agency-Terms-and-Conditions-GS (18).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Great American Fair | ||||||||||
| SOLICITATION # JK26-32 | ||||||||||
| RFSQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||||||||||
| DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Division of Purchasing. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson | ||||||||||
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | ||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | ||||||||
| 1 | Vendor certifies that they will be able to meet the stated timeline. | |||||||||
| 2 | Vendor certifies that they have previous experience working with budgets of $500,000 or more. | |||||||||
| 3 | Vendor certifies that they are able to work in Washington, DC during the installation and de-installation period. | |||||||||
| 4 | Vendor certifies that they have managed products outside of the State of Utah | |||||||||
| 4 | ||||||||||
| 5 | ||||||||||
| 6 | ||||||||||
| 0 | ||||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||||
| 1 | Company profile: Please describe your companies qualifications for this project, include a brief history of providing services. Please list years in business, number of employees, location of your offices, and a brief description of staff expertise. | 30 | 30.0% | 150.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 2 | Portfolio - please provide comparable project experience examples. | 70 | 70.0% | 350.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 4 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 5 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 6 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 7 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 8 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 9 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 10 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 11 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 12 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 500.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 70% | 350.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| *Cost will be negotiated according to Part 15 of the Utah Procurement Code. | ||||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 500.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 500.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .