5-Attachment D - Scoresheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- B2B Agent Training Platform Administrator
- Solicitation number
- GN26-25
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a scoresheet evaluation document related to a Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing, conducted by the Governor's Office of Economic Development, for a B2B Agent Training Platform Administrator position. The procurement seeks qualified companies to maintain, support, and scale a customized, mobile-responsive B2B e-learning platform powered by the Braeze software system. The contract term is one year with four optional one-year renewals, totaling a potential five-year engagement. This is a professional services procurement conducted under Utah Procurement Code 63G-6a Part 15 for Design Professional Service Providers and Consultants, with the highest-ranked vendor selected to negotiate contract terms and compensation.
The scoresheet serves as the evaluation instrument for ranking vendor qualifications based on predetermined criteria. No pricing information is to be included in vendor submissions, as compensation will be determined through post-selection negotiations with the highest-ranked vendor. If fair and reasonable compensation and contract terms cannot be agreed upon with the top-ranked vendor, the state retains the right to proceed with negotiations with the next highest-ranked vendor. This approach prioritizes qualifications and capability assessment over cost considerations during the initial evaluation phase.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 3-Attachment C - Scope of Work.pdf | ||
| 6-Attachment B - Agency-IT-Terms-and-Conditions (4).docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Attachment A - Agency-Terms-and-Conditions-GS (5).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| B2B Agent Training Platform Administrator | |||||||||
| SOLICITATION #GN26-25 | |||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | |||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | ||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | ||||||||
| 1 | Vendor certifies they currently use or have access to Breaze Software | ||||||||
| 0 | |||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | ||||||||
| 1 | Design Expertise | 20 | 20.0% | 100.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 2 | Engineering Background | 20 | 20.0% | 100.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 3 | Content Maintenance, Optimazation & Iteration | 20 | 20.0% | 100.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 4 | Account Management & System Operations | 20 | 20.0% | 100.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 5 | Technical Specifications, Data & Privacy | 20 | 20.0% | 100.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 100.0% | 500.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 70% | 350.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | |||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .