5-AK26-30 Attachment D Contract Monitor Plan.docx
DOCX document 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Agency IFB - Final
- Solicitation number
- AK26-30
- Issued by
- Duchesne County, Utah
About this file
This Contract Monitor Plan attachment is associated with the State of Utah Department of Corrections' Invitation for Bid (IFB) for limited legal services provided to inmates at the Uintah and Duchesne County Jails Facilities. The contract is a five-year agreement with a total budget of $70,000.00, requiring vendors to guarantee pricing for the first year. The IFB anticipates a single contract award to the lowest cost responsive and responsible bidder. The contract monitor plan establishes oversight procedures and performance metrics to ensure the selected vendor delivers compliant legal services to the specified inmate population throughout the contract term.
The pricing structure requires vendor commitment to fixed rates for the initial 12-month period, with potential adjustments in subsequent years subject to contract terms. The State of Utah Division of Purchasing is the issuing procurement unit, while the Department of Corrections serves as the conducting procurement unit responsible for contract administration and monitoring. As the incumbent or service provider, the selected vendor will be required to adhere to the performance standards outlined in the contract monitor plan, which establishes key deliverables, quality metrics, and compliance requirements for delivering legal services within the correctional facility environment.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Utah Department of Correction - Contract Monitoring Plan
Contract Management Review Contract Number:
Vendor Name:
Risk Score:
Contract Start Date
Vendor Contact:
Contract End Date
Total Budget
Total Spent:
Total Remaining:
Budget Officer:
Division:
Director:
| Review Schedule: |
| · 15 months |
· 12 months
· 9 months
· 6 months
· 3 months
Contract Monitor:
Evaluated by
Contract Description
Expenditure
Total Budget
| Payment Schedule |
| · Annual |
· Monthly
· Semi-Annual
· Other:_______________
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Expected Spend
Amended Funds
Actual Spend
Difference
Notes:
Products/Services
| Type |
| Included? |
| Maintenance |
| Start Date |
| End Date |
| Notes |
| Software |
| · Perpetual |
· Subscription
· None
· Yes
· No
| Hardware |
| · State supported |
· Vendor supported
· None
· Yes
| Services |
| · Yes |
· No
· Yes
| Consulting |
| · Hourly |
· Deliverable
· None
Contract History
| Effective Date |
| Change |
| Notes |
Amendment 1
· Add funds:______________
· Extend:_________________
· Scope change
Amendment 2
· Add funds:______________
· Extend:_________________
· Scope change
Contract Management Review
| Year 1 |
| Review 1 |
| Review 2 |
| Review 3 |
| Review 4 |
| Notes |
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes (update management docs, ServiceNow, and State Purchasing)
Date Completed
| Year 2 |
| Review 1 |
| Review 2 |
| Review 3 |
| Review 4 |
| Notes |
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· Yes
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes (update management docs, ServiceNow, and State Purchasing)
Date Completed
| Year 3 |
| Review 1 |
| Review 2 |
| Review 3 |
| Review 4 |
| Notes |
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· Yes
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes (update management docs, ServiceNow, and State Purchasing)
Date Completed
| Year 4 |
| Review 1 |
| Review 2 |
| Review 3 |
| Review 4 |
| Notes |
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· Yes
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes (work through solicitation process with State Purchasing)
Date Completed
| Year 5 |
| Review 1 |
| Review 2 |
| Review 3 |
| Review 4 |
| Notes |
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· Yes
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· Yes
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· No
· Yes
· Yes
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
· No
· N/A
· Yes
Date Completed
Contract Management Review Notes
1.
Evaluation Findings and Recommendations
Response and correction are required for the following findings to successfully meet the Contract requirements.
Evaluation #
Response and correction are strongly encouraged for the following recommendations.
Contractor Unit Approval (Financial Manager) Finance Director image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .