5-4-MP27000-27041370 Limited HazMat Survey.pdf

ASBESTOS (LIMITED), LEAD (LIMITED), AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

INSPECTION, SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT

FOR THE

UTAH STATE FAIRPARK

RESTROOM 25 ROOF

155 NORTH 1000 WEST

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84116

A LIMITED ASBESTOS SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT

FOR THE

UTAH STATE FAIRPARK

RESTROOM 25 ROOF

May 15, 2026

Prepared for:

Mrs. Aubrey Stapel

Hazmat Program Manager

Utah Department of Government Operations

Division of Facilities, Construction and Management (DFCM)

Taylorsville State Office Building, 3rd Floor

4315 South 2700 West

Taylorsville, Utah 84114

PH: (801) 641-0964

Prepared by:

R & R Environmental, Inc. (R & R)

47 West 9000 South, Suite #2

Sandy, Utah 84070 steve@rrenviro.com

Phone (801) 318-5658

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ASBESTOS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3.0 SAMPLING METHODS

4.0 SURVEY RESULTS

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

6.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSION OF WARRANTY.……………………………………………………6

List of Appendices

Appendix A Sample Log

Appendix B Laboratory Report

Appendix C Photo Log

Appendix D Floor Plans

Appendix E State of Utah Certifications

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 1 Utah State Fairpark Restroom 25 Roof

1.0 INTRODUCTION

R & R Environmental, Inc. (R & R) was contacted to conduct a limited asbestos survey for the

Utah State Fairpark Restroom 25 Roof located at 155 North 1000 West in Salt Lake City, Utah

84116. The Restroom 25 Roof is scheduled to be replaced. The survey consisted of a visual assessment of the exterior of the residence for suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM) and bulk sampling of the materials. The fieldwork component of this survey was conducted by Mr.

Jamison Moss who is a Utah Certified Asbestos Building Inspector.

This report presents the conditions and observations noted on the visit dates.

The following general information is included in this survey report:

• Executive Summary (Section 2.0)

• Sampling Methods (Section 3.0)

• Analytical Results (Section 4.0)

• Conclusions (5.0)

• Limitations & Exclusion of Warranty (6.0)

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 2

Restroom 25 Roof

2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Material(s) containing asbestos or assumed to contain asbestos were identified during this limited survey.

Material Location Quantity % Asbestos Friable Condition Photo #

Penetration Tar Sealant Roof 2 ft2 5% Chrysotile No Undamaged 2

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 3

Restroom 25 Roof

UTAH STATE FAIRPARK, RESTROOM 25 ROOF

155 NORTH 1000 WEST, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84116

DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL 22, 2026

NESHAP - REGULATED

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS (R-ACM)

1. Friable asbestos material (>1% asbestos and can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure)

Thermal system insulation (TSI)*

Textured ceiling material (TCM)*

Spray-on insulation or fireproofing*

Blown-in insulation*

Ceiling tiles/panels*

Plaster, gypsum board, gypsum board joint compound*

Cloth materials* (Boiler Flue Gasket)

Paper materials* (HVAC Paper Tape and Insulating Board)

Electrical wiring insulation*

Sink undercoating (loose)*

Other*

2. Category I ACM which has become friable

Packings

Gaskets

Resilient floor coverings (floor tile and sheet vinyl)

Asphalt roofing products (Dust Debris, Roofing Underlayment Debris, Flashing Material)

3. Category I ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading

Packings

Gaskets

Resilient floor coverings (floor tile and sheet vinyl)

Asphalt roofing products

4. Category II ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become friable during demolition or renovation operations

Asbestos cement materials (TransiteT)*

Asphalt, tar and rubber-base ACM products other than roofing products*

Non-asphalt and non-paper roofing products*

Paint*

Fire brick and/or mortar*

Stainless steel sink undercoating (solid)*

Encapsulated TCM*

Encapsulated TSI*

Mastic for floor tile, ceiling tile, cove molding, etc.*

Other

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 4

Restroom 25 Roof

UTAH STATE FAIRPARK, RESTROOM 25 ROOF

155 NORTH 1000 WEST, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84116

DATE OF SURVEY: APRIL 22, 2026

NESHAP NON-REGULATED

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL (N-R-ACM)

1. > 1% asbestos

2. Category I Non-friable (cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure)

ACM with >1% asbestos by new PLM procedure

Packings

Gaskets (Window Glazing & Caulking)

Resilient floor coverings (floor tile)

X Asphalt roofing products

3. Category II Non-friable ACM with >1% asbestos by new PLM procedure (Category includes items meeting Category I definition but not specifically listed in that category)

Asbestos cement materials (TransiteT)* (Fume hoods, counter tops, and window panels)

Asphalt, tar and rubber-base ACM products other than roofing products*

Non-asphalt and non-paper roofing products*

Paint* (Silver Paint Sealant)

Fire brick and/or mortar*

Sink undercoating (solid)*

Mastic for floor tile, ceiling tile, cove molding, etc.*

Other*

Notes:

1. (*) Denotes R&R’s interpretation of materials included in this category.

2. New PLM procedure is outlined in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40 CFR, Part 783, Section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy.

3. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air

Pollutants (NESHAP) asbestos revision as outlined in 40 CFR, Part 61, became effective

November 20, 1990. The asbestos classification system outlined in the revision and included in this section is dynamic in nature. Asbestos materials classified as “NON-REGULATED” at the time of the survey may become “REGULATED” due to ongoing or planned maintenance, renovation, or demolition actions, which can transform a material containing greater than 1% asbestos from a “non-friable” and NON-REGULATED to a friable and REGULATED condition.

Classification of ACM in this section and in the executive summary of this report is, therefore, based on the observations of the surveyor at the time of the survey and may or may not be appropriate at later dates.

4. Maintenance, renovation, demolition, weathering, normal wear, water, or other damage can alter the “NON-REGULATED” status of materials, and necessitate precautions required for handling them as “REGULATED” asbestos-materials.

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 5

Restroom 25 Roof

3.0 SAMPLING METHODS

Survey procedures were based on those outlined in Title 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR)

Part 763, USEPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, and the Asbestos Model

Accreditation Plan (effective April 4, 1994). The procedures included visual observation, physical inspection, bulk sample collection, and condition assessment of suspect ACM. The number of samples collected was based on the amount and accessibility of each homogeneous material, with consideration given for the type, age, and condition.

Six (6) samples were collected from the suspect materials to assess the presence of asbestos (or lack thereof) in building materials/systems. Each sample collected was placed into a sealable plastic bag or tub, marked with a unique sample identification code, and packaged for subsequent shipment to the laboratory for analysis. Individual sample identification consisted of a numeric code denoting the sampling media/location.

After packaging and labeling, samples were submitted under proper chain-of-custody to

Reservoirs Environmental, Inc., Denver, Colorado. The National Voluntary Laboratory

Accreditation Program (NVLAP), Lab Code 101896 accredits Reservoirs for asbestos analysis.

Samples were analyzed via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) utilizing EPA Method 600/M4-

82-020. Please note that USEPA and OSHA regulations define an ACM as a material containing more than one (1) percent asbestos, by volume, as determined by PLM analysis. In the case of multi-layer systems (e.g., floor tile/mastic layers), the laboratory analyzed and reported each layer separately.

4.0 SURVEY RESULTS

Six (6) representative samples collected were submitted for analytical determination. A summary of analytical results for samples collected and analyzed for this survey are in Appendix B

(Laboratory Results) and are discussed below by building material/system type. Photographs of the buildings where samples were taken are included as Appendix C. Floor Plans of the building where samples were taken are included in Appendix D

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 6

Restroom 25 Roof

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

Asbestos-containing materials were identified in the building. See Executive Summary for details.

The identified materials must be removed prior to disturbance by a licensed abatement contractor.

6.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSION OF WARRANTY

This asbestos survey and assessment was performed using procedures and a level of diligence typically exercised by professional consultants performing similar services. However, asbestos-containing material (ACM) can be present in a structure, but not identified using ordinary investigative procedures.

No asbestos survey can completely, eliminate uncertainty regarding the presence of ACM.

R&R Environmental, Inc.’s level of diligence and investigative procedures are intended to reduce, but not eliminate, potential uncertainty regarding the presence of ACM. The procedures used for this survey attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative costs, time, and building damage, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, the determinations in this report should not be construed as a guarantee that all ACM present in the subject property has been included in this report.

This report presents R&R Environmental, Inc.’s professional determinations, which are dependent upon information obtained during performance of consulting services. R&R

Environmental, Inc. assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information provided by sources outside of R&R Environmental, Inc.

No warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is made regarding the findings, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report. The limitations presented above supersede the requirements or provisions of all other contracts or scopes of work, implied, or otherwise, except stated or acknowledged herein.

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 7

Restroom 25 Roof

A LIMITED ASBESTOS SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT

OF THE

UTAH STATE FAIRPARK

RESTROOM 25 ROOF

On April 22, 2026, R & R Environmental, Inc. (R & R) of Sandy, Utah, conducted a limited asbestos survey and assessment of the Utah State Fairpark, Restroom 25 Roof located at 155 North

1000 West in Salt Lake City, Utah 84116. Bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected and analyzed. The condition of all friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials was, assessed. The following accredited inspector conducted the survey and assessment.

Inspected by:

Jamison Moss Date

State of Utah, Division of Air Quality Inspector

Certification Number: ASB-6674

State of Utah Company Certification: ASBC-237

This report was reviewed by:

David C. Roskelley, MSPH, CIH, CSP Date

State of Utah, Division of Air Quality Inspector

Certification Number: ASB-1370

AHERA Inspector #5 PSI 65451 I

Certified Safety Professional #15774

Certified Industrial Hygienist #8529

State of Utah Company Certification: ASBC-237

Appendix A

Sample Log

SAMPLE LOG

Sample

Material/

Homogenous Area

Sample

Location Quantity

Lab Result

(%/Type) Assessment

R-01 Shingle Roof 2,500 ft2 None Detected Undamaged

R-02 Shingle Roof 2,500 ft2 None Detected Undamaged

R-03 Tar Paper Roof 2,500 ft2 None Detected Undamaged

R-04 Tar Paper Roof 2,500 ft2 None Detected Undamaged

R-05 Penetration Tar Sealant Roof 2 ft2 15% Chrysotile Undamaged

R-06 Penetration Tar Sealant Roof 2 ft2 13% Chrysotile Undamaged

Appendix B

Laboratory Report

April 23, 2026

Sincerely, Jeanne Spencer President

Subcontractor Number:

Laboratory Report: RES 744620-1

Project #/P.O. #: None Given

Project Description: Fairpark Restroom 25 Roof

Jamison Moss R & R Environmental 47 West 9000 South #2 Sandy, UT 84070

Dear Jamison, Eurofins Reservoirs is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene and Environmental matrices by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), Lab Code 101896-0 for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA LAP), Lab ID 101533 for Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) analysis. This laboratory is currently proficient in both Proficiency Testing and PAT programs respectively.

Eurofins Reservoirs has analyzed the following samples for asbestos content as per your request. The analysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodology as stated in the attached analysis table. The results have been submitted to your office.

RES 744620-1 is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential and the sole property of the customer. Eurofins Reservoirs will not discuss any part of this study with personnel other than those of the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples analyzed, as received and with the information provided by the customer (i.e. sample volumes and areas). This report must not be used to claim endorsement of products or analytical results by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval from Eurofins Reservoirs. Samples will be disposed of after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you have any questions about this report, please feel free to call 303-964-1986.

by Camryn Baumgartner

04/23/202604/23/202604/23/202604/23/2026

Eurofins Reservoirs Environmental, Inc Eurofins Reservoirs QA Manual

Effective July 31, 2025 Q:\QAQC\Eurofins Reservoirs QA Manual.pdf

(303) 964-1986

(866) RES-IENV

https://www.eurofinsus.com/builtenv https://clients.rei.et.eurofinsus.com

4955 Yarrow St, Suite 100, Arvada, CO 80002

Laboratory Sample IDLaboratory Sample IDLaboratory Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID LLLL Asbestos ContentAsbestos ContentAsbestos ContentAsbestos Content Non-Non-Non-Non- Non-Non-Non-Non- AAAA SubSubSubSub AsbestosAsbestosAsbestosAsbestos FibrousFibrousFibrousFibrous YYYY PhysicalPhysicalPhysicalPhysical PartPartPartPart MineralMineralMineralMineral VisualVisualVisualVisual FibrousFibrousFibrousFibrous ComponentsComponentsComponentsComponents EEEE DescriptionDescriptionDescriptionDescription EstimateEstimateEstimateEstimate ComponentsComponentsComponentsComponents

Client Sample NumberClient Sample NumberClient Sample NumberClient Sample Number RRRR (%) (%) (%) (%) 744620 -744620 -744620 -744620 - R-01R-01R-01R-01 A Red/black shingle 100 NDNDNDND 10 90.0 744620 -744620 -744620 -744620 - R-02R-02R-02R-02 A Red/black shingle 100 NDNDNDND 10 90.0 744620 -744620 -744620 -744620 - R-03R-03R-03R-03 A Black fibrous resinous tar w/ black resinous material 100 NDNDNDND 15 85.0 744620 -744620 -744620 -744620 - R-04R-04R-04R-04 A Black fibrous resinous tar w/ black resinous material 100 NDNDNDND 15 85.0 744620 -744620 -744620 -744620 - R-05R-05R-05R-05 A Gray/black fibrous tar 100 ChrysotileChrysotileChrysotileChrysotile 15151515 0 85.0 744620 -744620 -744620 -744620 - R-06R-06R-06R-06 A Gray/black fibrous tar 100 ChrysotileChrysotileChrysotileChrysotile 13131313 0 87.0 TEM Analysis recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%.

Tyler Hutchinson Analyst

Eurofins Reservoirs Environmental, Inc Eurofins Reservoirs QA Manual

Effective July 31, 2025 Q:\QAQC\Eurofins Reservoirs QA Manual.pdf

Job Number:

Client:

Client Project/P.O.:

Client Project Description:

Date Samples Received:

Analysis Type:

Turnaround:

Date Samples Analyzed:

744620-1 R & R Environmental None Given Fairpark Restroom 25 Roof April 23, 2026 EPA 600/R-93/116 - Short Report, Bulk Priority April 23, 2026

EUROFINS RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC

NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0

AIHA LAP, LLC. LAB ID 101533

TABLE: I ANALYSIS: PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME

NA = Not Analyzed NR = Not Received ND = None Detected TR = Trace; <1 % Visual Estimate Trem-Act = Tremolite-Actinolite

(303) 964-1986

(866) RES-IENV

https://www.eurofinsus.com/builtenv https://clients.rei.et.eurofinsus.com

SUBMITTED BY INVOICE TO

Client Sample ID Number

RES Job #: 744620

CONTACT INFORMATION SERIES

ASBESTOS LABORATORY REQUESTED ANALYSIS VALID MATRIX CODES LAB NOTES

CHEMISTRY LABORATORY

MICROBIOLOGY LABORATORY

**Turnaround times establish a laboratory priority, subject to laboratory volume and are not guaranteed. Additional fees apply for afterhours, weekends and holidays.**

Laboratory Analysis Instructions

(Sample ID's must be unique)

Company: R & R Environmental Company: R & R Environmental

Address: 47 West 9000 South #2 Address: 47 West 9000 South #2

Sandy, UT 84070 Sandy, UT 84070

Project Number and/or P.O. #: None Given Project Zip Code:

Project Description/Location: Fairpark Restroom 25 Roof

Contact: Jamison Moss -1 PLM Priority Phone: (801) 928-1560

Fax:

Cell: (801) 928-1560

Final Data Deliverable Email Address:

jamison@rrenviro.com (+ 3 ADDNL. CONTACTS)

PLM / PCM / TEM / NYS DTL RUSH PRIORITY STANDARD Air = A Bulk = B

Dust = D Food = F

Paint = P Soil = S

Dust RUSH PRIORITY STANDARD

*PRIOR NOTICE REQUIRED FOR SAME DAY TAT

Surface = SU Swab = SW

Tape = T Wipe = W

Metals RUSH PRIORITY STANDARD Drinking Water = DW

Waste Water = WW

Organics* SAME DAY RUSH PRIORITY STANDARD **ASTM E1792 approved wipe media only**

Viable Analysis** PRIORITY STANDARD

**TAT DEPENDENT ON SPEED OF MICROBIAL GROWTH

Medical Device Analysis RUSH STANDARD

Mold Analysis RUSH PRIORITY STANDARD

Special Instructions:

ASBESTOS CHEMISTRY MICROBIOLOGY ICO

1 R-01 X B

2 R-02 X B

3 R-03 X B

4 R-04 X B

5 R-05 X B

6 R-06 X B

P L

M

P L

M S h o rt R ep o rt (E

PA

/6

/R

-9 3/

6)

T E

M

P C

M

N Y

S

D U

S T

M E

TA

L

S

O R

G A

N

IC

S

V

IA

B L

E S

M E

D

IC

A L

M O

L D

S am pl e

V ol um e

(L

A re a

S am pl e

Te m pe ra tu re

C

Le ng th (o r A liq uo ts

) x W id th

(o r A re a/

A liq uo t)

M at rix C od e of

C on ta in er s

D at e C ol le ct ed m m

/d d/ yy

T im e C ol le ct ed hh :m m

Eurofins Reservoirs Environmental, Inc establishes a unique Lab Sample ID, for each sample, by preceding each unique Client Sample ID with the laboratory RES Job Number.

Eurofins Reservoirs Environmental, Inc will analyze incoming samples based on information received and will not be responsible for errors or omissions in calculations resulting from the inaccuracy of original data. By signing, client/company representative agrees that submission of the following samples for requested analysis as indicated on this Chain of Custody shall consitute an analytical services agreement with payment terms of NET30. Failure to comply with payment terms may result in a 18% APR finance charge.

Relinquished By:

Jamison Moss Date/Time: 04/22/2026 15:45:47 Sample Condition: Acceptable

Received By:

Emily Creasey Date/Time: 04/23/2026 10:46:33 Carrier: Fed-Ex

Eurofins Reservoirs Environmental, Inc Eurofins Reservoirs QA Manual

Effective July 31, 2025 Q:\QAQC\Eurofins Reservoirs QA Manual.pdf

(303) 964-1986

(866) RES-IENV

https://www.eurofinsus.com/builtenv https://clients.rei.et.eurofinsus.com

Appendix C

Photo Log

PHOTO 1: Utah State Fairpark, Restroom 25

Roof

PHOTO 2: Penetration Tar Sealant contains asbestos

R & R Environmental, Inc.

47 West 9000 South, Suite #2, Sandy, Utah 84070

(801) 352-2380 • Fax: (801) 352-2381

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

A LIMITED ASBESTOS SURVEY AND

ASSESSMENT

OF THE

UTAH STATE FAIRPARK

RESTROOM 25 ROOF

PROJECT NO:

DESIGNED BY:

SCALE:

REVIEWED BY:

DRAWN BY:

DATE:

FILE:

Appendix D

Floor Plan

N

UTAH STATE FAIR PARK

RESTROOM 25

155 NORTH 1000 WEST

SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116

APRIL 2026

ROOF

ASBESTOS FLOORPLAN

= ASBESTOS SAMPLE NUMBER & LOCATION##

= ASBESTOS CONTAINING PENETRATION TAR SEALANT

Appendix E

State of Utah Certifications

Utah Asbestos Certification

State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX

Governor

DETORE HENDERSON

Lieutenant Governor

February 27, 2026

Jamison Moss R&R Environmental

Depa1tment of Environmental Quality

Tim Davis fa:ec11tive Direc/01·

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY

Bryce C. Bird

Director

47 West 9000 South, Suite 2 Sandy, UT 84070

Dear Mr. Moss:

Re: Utah Asbestos Program Individual Certification Card

Jamison Moss

ASB-6674

"'" Inspector (Eitp:" 02/20/2027)

Project oeMner'(Exp. 01/12/2027) it V .

4U~hD-~~fA.'Q 1· Director, ta IvIs1on o ir ua 1ty

DAQA-001-26

The Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) has reviewed your Utah Asbestos Program Certification Application for Individuals and we are pleased to inform you that your application has been approved. Your new asbestos program individual certification card is enclosed with this letter and this card is the sole method of individual certification documentation that you will receive from the DAQ.

Please check the information on your asbestos program certification card carefully. Please confirm that the photograph, name, and certification discipline(s) are correct. Also, please remember to keep your current asbestos program certification card with you at all times when you are performing regulated asbestos work activities.

Please contact Barbara Perkins at (801) 536-0221 or at bperkins@utah.gov if you have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosed asbestos program certification card.

Sincerely, Leonard Wrlgll (Feht2026 09:17:31 Msn

Leonard Wright, Manager Air Toxics, Lead-Based Paint, and Asbestos Section

LW:BP:rh

195 North 1950 Wes1 • Sah Lakll Chy, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Sall Lake City, UT 84114-4820

Telephone (80 I) 536-4000 • flax (80 I) 536-4099 • T.D.D. 800 346-3128 www.1l1111,111ul,,Mo11 l'rinlcd on 100¼ recycled p11pcr

Utah Lead-Based Paint Certification

State of Utah

SPENCER J. COX

Go,·tmor

DEIDRE HENDERSON

litutenant Gol'limor

February 11, 2025

Steve Smith

Department of Environmental Quality

Kimberly D. Shelley Exec11tfre Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY

Bryce C Bird

Director

R&R Environmental, Inc.

4 7 West 9000 South, #2 Sandy, UT 84070

Dear Mr. Smith:

Re: Utah Lead-Based Paint Program Individual Certification Card

Inspector l Risk Aue

-4~;_·~

Director, Utah D1v1sion of Air Quality

DAQA-002-25

The Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) has reviewed your Utah Lead-Based Paint (LBP)

Program Certification Application for Individuals and we are pleased to inform you that your application has been approved. Your new LBP program individual certification card is enclosed with this letter and this card is the sole method of individual certification documentation that you will receive from the DAQ.

Please check the information on your LBP program certification card carefully. Please confirm that the photograph, name, and certification discipline(s) are correct. Also, please remember to keep your current LBP program certification card with you at all times when you are performing regulated LBP work activities.

Please contact Barbara Perkins at (80 l) 536-0221 or at bperkins@utah.gov if you have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosed LBP program certification card.

Sincerely, ~ Sl1J~ Leonard Wright (Feb 7, 2025 12:09 MST)

Leonard Wright, Manager Air Toxics, Lead-Based Paint, and Asbestos Section

LW:BP:lr

195 Nonh 1950 Wes,, 4~' Hoor • Sall Lake City, Ur Mailing Addrm l' 0 llo"< 144820 • Suh Lnl.c Cny. UT 84114-1820

'I elephone (80 I) 536-4000 • l·a"< (801) 536-4099 ·TDD (80 I) 536-1-11-1 ~• u ,, di:tJ mnh gm•

P11111cd on I00~. 1ccycled papc, LIMITED LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

UTAH STATE FAIRPARK

RESTROOM 25 ROOF

Utah Department of Government Operations

Division of Facilities, Construction and Management (DFCM)

Taylorsville State Office Building, 3rd Floor

4315 South 2700 West

47 West 9000 South, Suite #2

Sandy, Utah 84070

LIMITED LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Building Description

3.0 Lead-based Paint Definition

4.0 Procedures

4.1 Paint Sampling Methods

4.2 XRF Calibration

4.3 Field Documentation

5.0 Findings

6.0 Results and Recommendation

8.0 Limitations and Exclusion of Warranty

Appendices

A. Data Tables

Table 1 – Building Component with Lead Levels at 0.1 mg/cm2 and above

Table 2 – Building Component with Lead Levels at below 0.1 mg/cm2

B. Photograph Log

Utah State Fairpark Limited Lead-Based Paint Inspection

Restroom 25 Roof Page 1

Limited Lead-Based Paint Inspection

1.0 INTRODUCTION

On April 22, 2026, a limited lead-based paint (LBP) survey was conducted for the Utah

State Fairpark, Restroom 25 Roof. The purpose of the survey was to identify lead in paint on the roof of the building. Measurements for lead in paint were made using a SciApps

X550 X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum Analyzer. No chip sampling or laboratory analysis was performed for confirmation of XRF measurements.

The survey work was overseen by David Roskelley with R & R Environmental, Inc. in

Sandy, Utah. David Roskelley has completed Lead Inspector Training through the

University of Utah, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health

(RMCOEH), an EPA-sponsored Regional Lead Training Center, and is certified by the

State of Utah, Division of Environmental Quality, as a Lead Inspector.

The U.S. Department of housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the

Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in housing (HUD Guidelines), Chapter7: Lead-Based Paint Inspection, 1997 Revision, was generally followed for this survey, with modifications appropriate for a non-residential building.

The following accredited and certified inspector oversaw the inspection, collected the samples and made assessment:

May 15, 2026

David C. Roskelley, MSPH, CIH, CSP Date

Lead-Based Paint Inspector

Certification Number: PB-1041

This report was reviewed by:

David C. Roskelley, MSPH, CIH, CSP Date

Lead-Based Paint Inspector

Certification Number: PB-1041

Restroom 25 Roof Page 2

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Identification

Building Name ................................ Utah State Fairpark, Restroom 25 Roof

Building Address .............155 North 1000 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116

Building Construction

Building Construction Date ..................................................................... NA

Building Type ................................................................................ Restroom

Building Total Sq. Ft........................................................................ 2,500 ft2

Structural System ................................................................................. Wood

Exterior Wall Construction ................................................................... Brick

Floor Deck Construction .......................................................................... NA

Roof Construction ............................................................................. Shingle

Floors Above Grade

Floors Below Grade ................................................................................. NA

Interior Finishes

Floors ....................................................................................................... NA

Walls ........................................................................................................ NA

Attic.......................................................................................................... NA

Crawl space .............................................................................................. NA

Building Mechanical

Heating Plant ............................................................................................ NA

Main Heating Distribution ....................................................................... NA

Cooling Plant ........................................................................................... NA

Main A / C Distribution ........................................................................... NA

Restroom 25 Roof Page 3

3.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT DEFINITIONS

HUD defines “lead-based paint” as any coating that has a lead concentration of 1.0 milligram of lead per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) or greater, or if the lead concentration is greater than 0.5% by weight. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) currently considers paint to be lead-containing if the concentration of lead exceeds 600 ppm (0.06% by weight). In 1978, the CPSC banned the sale of lead-based paint to consumers, and banned its application in areas where consumers have direct access to painted surfaces. Both the CPSC and HUD definitions of lead-containing paint are aimed at protecting the general population from exposure to lead in the residential setting.

By contrast, the mission of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with respect to lead-containing paint, is to protect workers during construction activities that may generate elevated airborne lead concentrations. OSHA states that construction work (including renovation, maintenance, and demolition) carried-out on structures coated with paint have lead concentrations lower than the HUD or CPSC can still result in airborne lead concentrations in excess of regulatory limits. For this reason, OSHA has not defined lead-containing paint, but states that paint having any measurable level of lead may pose a substantial exposure hazard during construction work, depending upon the work performed.

4.0 PROCEDURES

4.1 Paint Sampling Methodologies

Direct measurements of lead in paint were made using a SciApps X550 X-ray Fluorescence

(XRF) Spectrum Analyzer. The SciApps X550 X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum

Analyzer non-destructively measures lead concentrations of painted surfaces, regardless of the number of layers present. These instruments were developed specifically for addressing lead-based paint issues in housing and their use in identifying potential exposure hazards for renovation or construction work must be augmented by selective collection and analysis of physical paint chip samples.

The newer XRF instruments are capable of identifying lead in paint at concentrations of about 0.01 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2) or greater. When lead concentrations are lower than this, the instruments are not capable of making accurate, reliable measurements, and the reported lead concentration may underestimate or overestimate the actual lead concentration in the paint. Therefore, an XRF readings of 0.01 mg/cm2 or greater may be considered lead-containing from an OSHA perspective, and any readings of 0.0mg/cm2 or less should be confirmed by the collection and laboratory analysis of paint chip samples, or assumed to be positive for lead.

Where paint chip samples are necessary, samples are collected according to the protocol specified in the HUD Guidelines. The samples are then submitted to a laboratory recognized under the EPA’s National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP) for analysis by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry according to American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) method ASTM E 1645.

Restroom 25 Roof Page 4

4.2 XRF Calibration

Before beginning the testing and after the testing was completed, the internal calibration of the LPA-1 was checked by taking two consecutive measurements on a National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) standard with a known concentration of lead. Three more readings were taken on a lead-free wood block. These calibration checks are reported within the XRF data tables found in Appendix A of this report and are maintained in a file at R & R Environmental, Inc. to detect changes in instrument performance over time.

4.3 Lead Paint Inspection Data Tables

The XRF instrument generates a unique set of data tables for each inspection and can be exported into Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet format .xls. The Sequential Report lists the measurements made throughout the property in sequential order, from the first measurement to the last. The Data table is maintained in a file at R & R Environmental, Inc.

5.0 FINDINGS

The XRF instrument indicated that lead is not present on the roof surfaces. These surfaces are listed in Table 1 “positive” building components (Measurements of 0.01 mg/cm2 and above) in Appendix A of this report.

If lead was detected in some of the building’s painted surfaces, the OSHA Lead in

Construction Standard (29 CFR 1926.62) will apply to any construction work (including renovation and demolition) that may disturb those surfaces. The standard requires, among other things, the following:

• Initial training on the hazards of lead exposure, proper work practices, respiratory protection, and other topics;

• An initial exposure assessment, by air monitoring, to determine the lead exposure assessment, until sample analysis indicates exposures below the

Permissible Exposure Limit;

• Hand washing facilities, designated clean change areas, and designated eating areas.

In addition to the above considerations, the presence of lead in demolition debris has the potential to impose limitations on where and how the debris may be disposed. The

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Subtitles C and D, require that the waste must be analyzed to determine the amount of leachable lead present. The type of test to be performed on the waste is the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for lead, and the results of this test will determine whether the material must be handled and disposed of as hazardous waste. For structures containing large amounts of lead-containing paint, significant potential for failing the TCLP exists.

Restroom 25 Roof Page 5

6.0 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Lead-based paint was not detected on the roof surfaces during this limited survey.

7.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF WARRANTY

This lead inspection was performed using procedures and a level of diligence typically exercised by professional consultants performing similar services. However, lead-based paint (LBP) can be present in a surface, but not identified using ordinary investigative procedures.

No lead inspection can completely eliminate uncertainty regarding the presence of LBP. R

& R Environmental, Inc. level of diligence and investigative procedures are intended to reduce, but not eliminate, potential uncertainty regarding the presence of LBP. The procedures used for this survey attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative costs, time, and building damage, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, the determinations in this report should not be construed as a guarantee that all LBP present in the subject property has been included in this report.

This report presents R & R Environmental, Inc.’s professional determinations, which are dependent upon information obtained during performance of consulting services. R &R

Environmental, Inc. assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information provided by sources outside of R & R Environmental, Inc.

No warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is made regarding the findings, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report. The limitations presented above supersede the requirements or provisions of all other contracts or scopes of work, implied or otherwise, except those stated or acknowledged herein.

Appendix A

Lead Paint Inspection Data Tables

Table 1

Building Components with Lead Levels at 0.01 mg/cm2 and Above

Room

Floor

(2)

Number

Lead

Level

(mg/cm2)

Component

Side (1)

Substrate

Color

Condition

3 1 CALIBRATION

1 1.1 CALIBRATION

2 1.1 CALIBRATION

18 1.1 CALIBRATION

19 1.1 CALIBRATION

20 1.1 CALIBRATION

*Side: A=North, B=East, C=South, D=West

Table 2

Building Components with Lead Levels Below 0.01 mg/cm2

Room

Floor (2)

Number

Lead

Level

(mg/cm2)

Component

Side (1)

Substrate

Color

Condition

EXTERIOR EXTERIOR 4 0 GUTTER A METAL WHITE INTACT

EXTERIOR EXTERIOR 5 0 GUTTER B METAL WHITE INTACT

EXTERIOR EXTERIOR 6 0 GUTTER C METAL WHITE INTACT

EXTERIOR EXTERIOR 7 0 GUTTER D METAL WHITE INTACT

EXTERIOR EXTERIOR 8 0 FLASHING A METAL WHITE INTACT

EXTERIOR EXTERIOR 9 0 FLASHING B METAL WHITE INTACT

EXTERIOR EXTERIOR 10 0 FLASHING C METAL WHITE INTACT

EXTERIOR EXTERIOR 11 0 FLASHING D METAL WHITE INTACT

ROOF ROOF 12 0 SKYLIGHT ROOF METAL BROWN INTACT

ROOF ROOF 13 0 SKYLIGHT ROOF METAL BROWN INTACT

ROOF ROOF 14 0 SKYLIGHT ROOF METAL BROWN INTACT

ROOF ROOF 15 0 PIPE ROOF METAL SILVER INTACT

ROOF ROOF 16 0 PIPE ROOF METAL SILVER INTACT

ROOF ROOF 17 0 PIPE ROOF METAL SILVER INTACT

*Side: A=North, B=East, C=South, D=West

Appendix B

Photograph Log

PHOTO 1: Utah State Fairpark, Restroom 25

Roof

R & R Environmental, Inc.

47 West 9000 South, Suite #2, Sandy, Utah 84070

(801) 352-2380 • Fax: (801) 352-2381

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

A LIMITED LEAD BASED PAINT INSPECTION

OF THE

PROJECT NO:

DESIGNED BY:

SCALE:

REVIEWED BY:

DRAWN BY:

DATE:

FILE:

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSPECTION

UTAH STATE FAIRPARK

RESTROOM 25 ROOF

Utah Department of Government Operations

Division of Facilities, Construction and Management (DFCM)

Taylorsville State Office Building, 3rd Floor

4315 South 2700 West

47 West 9000 South, Suite #2

Sandy, Utah 84070

Utah State Fairpark Hazardous Material Inspection

Hazardous Materials Inspection

Salt Lake City, Utah 84116

On April 22, 2026, Jamison Moss of R & R Environmental, Inc., conducted a hazardous materials inspection of the Utah State Fairpark, Restroom 25 Roof located at 155 North

1000 West in Salt Lake City, Utah 84116. The purpose of this survey was to identify the existence, extent, and condition of hazardous materials. The inspection was conducted based on an agreement with Aubrey Stapel with Utah DFCM.

Hazardous materials requiring proper removal and disposal were identified at the Utah

State Fairpark, Restroom 25 Roof, Salt Lake City, Utah as follows:

Material Location Quantity Unit Cost

NA NA NA NA

The State of Utah’s DFCM policy requires the items above to be removed and disposed of at a facility approved to accept such waste prior to demolition. This may or may not be applied to the city of Salt Lake City in Salt Lake County, but R & R Environmental, Inc.

recommends removal and proper disposal of these components prior to any demolition activities.

The cost estimate to remove and dispose of these hazardous materials is estimated at approximately $0.00. This cost estimate does not include transportation, removal, design, or management fees associated with dismantling and packaging the materials.

{"type":"Form","isBackSide":false,"languages":["en-us"],"usedOnDeviceOCR":false}

{"type":"Document","isBackSide":false,"languages":["en-us"],"usedOnDeviceOCR":false}

{"type":"Document","isBackSide":false,"languages":["en-us"],"usedOnDeviceOCR":false}