5-4-CS26096-27070030-HazMay Survey.pdf

LIMITED ASBESTOS INSPECTION

AND LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY

Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Services (DABS)

Liquor Store - #50

579 Lagoon Drive Farmington, Utah 84025

Exterior Wall Replacement

May 11, 2026

Prepared for:

Ms. Aubrey Stapel

Project Manager, Statewide Programs

State of Utah

Department of Administrative Services

Division of Facilities Construction and Management (DFCM)

Taylorsville State Office Building

4315 South 2700 West, 3rd Floor

Taylorsville, Utah 84025-2128

Prepared by:

Hill West Environmental

7963 Douglas Drive

Farmington, Utah 84025

State of Utah Company Certification # ASBC-495

Claude Dahlk, CHMM, CIEC

(801) 450-8060

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On April 16 and May 11, 2026, Hill West Environmental conducted a limited pre-renovation inspection for asbestos and lead-based paint of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Services (DABS) Liquor Store #50 located at 579 Lagoon Drive, Farmington, Utah 84025. The project includes replacement of the exterior siding.

Ms. Aubrey Stapel, Project Manager with the State of Utah, Division of Facilities Construction and Management (DFCM) requested this inspection to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and building components with lead-based paint that need to be addressed before the building is renovated.

The suspect materials sampled during the survey included the exterior wall panels of the building. Areas in which renovations are to occur were inspected, and all other areas were not inspected as part of this survey.

Hill West has identified the following asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paint during this inspection:

Asbestos-Containing Materials Homogeneous Area Number

Material Description Asbestos Content

Amount Cost Estimate

N/A No ACM was identified in this survey N/A N/A N/A

Building Components with XRF Lead readings ≥ 0.4 mg/cm2

Material Type Reading (mg/cm2)

Lead was not detected within the project area. N/A

Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes

Material Type Quantity

No Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes will be impacted during this renovation project. N/A

Conclusions

ACM – No Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) were identified within the project upgrade areas.

If the renovation or demolition contractor discovers additional suspect building materials that were not sampled as part of this inspection, they shall stop working and notify DFCM so that the materials can be sampled.

Lead – Lead was not detected within any building components within the upgrade area. If the renovation or demolition contractor discovers additional suspect building materials that were not sampled as part of this inspection that will be impacted, they shall stop working and notify DFCM so that the materials can be sampled.

Universal, Hazardous and Toxic Wastes – No Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes will be impacted during this renovation project.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

As per DFCM’s instructions, Hill West Environmental conducted a limited asbestos and lead-based paint inspection of the DABS Liquor Store #50 located at 579 Lagoon Drive, Farmington, Utah 84025. Due to the remodel and upgrades to the exterior wall replacement, Hill West was instructed to only inspect areas that will be impacted during the renovation project.

The purpose of this survey was to identify the existence, extent, and condition of both friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paint/lead materials within the renovation areas.

2.0 SITE VISIT /OBSERVATIONS

2.1 Asbestos Inspection

On April 16, 2026, Hill West Environmental visited the site to survey the renovation areas of the building. A complete asbestos inspection of the areas that will be impacted during renovations was made to determine conditions and develop a sampling scheme for the areas. The materials that will be impacted during this upgrade project include exterior wall panels. Table 1 summarizes the asbestos inspection results.

Table 1 – Asbestos Materials

Homogenous Area Number

Material Description/Location Asbestos Content Amount Cost Estimate

N/A No ACM was identified within the project areas.

N/A N/A N/A

Appendix A photographs of samples collected by Hill West Environmental.

Appendix B contains analytical results and certifications.

2.2 Lead-based Paint Inspection

On May 11, 2026, Hill West Environmental conducted a limited lead-based paint inspection of the Utah liquor store – store #50 within the project work area. Direct measurement of lead in paint/dust were made using a Niton XL2 X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum Analyzer. The Niton XRF non-destructively measures lead concentrations of painted surfaces, regardless of the number of layers present.

According to the manufacturer, the detection limit (lower limit of reliable measurement) for this instrument is 0.1 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) ±0.3 mg/cm2 with the instrument set on the “quick” measuring mode.

The quick mode provides 95% confidence that the lead concentration in the paint is above or below the set point of the instrument which, for this survey is 0.4 mg/cm2. For this survey, measurements below 0.4 mg/cm2 were not reported as lead containing.

The Niton XRF sometimes reports negative values. According to the manufacturer, negative values should be expected and interpreted as zero lead content due to the statistical variability of XRF measurement technology. Both HUD and the EPA recognize the statistical variability of XRF technology and the possibility of obtaining negative values where the lead content is near zero.

Table 2 summarizes the lead-based paint inspection results. Measurements are reported in milligrams of lead per square centimeter (mg/cm2). All the coatings tested during this inspection were in good to fair condition. Only positive readings (>0.4 mg/cm2) are summarized in Table 2. Appendix B contains all XRF readings for this survey.

Table 2 – Positive Lead-Based Paint/Lead Dust Readings

Building Component Material Description/Location Lead Content (mg/cm2)

N/A No lead was detected within the upgrade area. N/A

3.0 RESULTS

Table 3 summarizes the analytical results for the asbestos samples collected.

Table 3 – Asbestos Analytical Results

Sample Number

Homogeneous Area Number

Material Sampled Sample

Location Estimated Quantity*

Analytical Results

LS – 01A M001 White Facade Outside < 15,000 ft2 None Detected

LS – 01B M001 White Facade Outside <15,000 ft2 None Detected

LS – 01C M001 White Facade Outside <15,000 ft2 None Detected

LS – 01D M001 White Facade Outside <15,000 ft2 None Detected

LS – 01E M001 White Facade Outside <15,000 ft2 None Detected

LS – 01F M001 White Facade Outside <15,000 ft2 None Detected

LS – 01G M001 White Facade Outside <15,000 ft2 None Detected

* Estimated Quantity is based on amount to be disturbed during the upgrade project.

4.0 DISCUSSION/CONCLUSTIONS

In Utah, EPA asbestos regulations are administered by the Utah Division of Air Quality. Utah Occupational Safety and Health Administration (UOSHA) has adopted the Federal OSHA regulations. In addition, the Salt Lake Valley Health Department (SLVHD) regulates demolition activities in Salt Lake County. The SLVHD regulations for pre-demolition building inspections require an asbestos inspection, but also required building owners to inspect the building for other hazardous materials such as universal wastes, hazardous and toxic wastes and lead-based paint. Similar to asbestos, these wastes, if present must be removed prior to demolition/renovation.

A copy of this report should be on-site during all renovation activities.

This limited asbestos and lead-based paint inspection was conducted on the project area that will be impacted during renovation activities. Only items that are believed to be impacted during renovation activities were inspected during this survey. This survey is not intended to represent an exhaustive research of all asbestos or other hazards or conditions which may exist within other buildings located at this project site.

This report does not purport to represent future indoor conditions or events.

Situations or activities which transpire subsequent to this report, which result in adverse environmental, construction and/or engineering impacts, are not to be construed as relevant to this study.

This report is intended for the sole use of Hill West's client. This report may not be used or relied upon by any other party without the written consent of Hill West.

The scope of services performed in execution of the evaluation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and the use or re-use of this document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations is at the risk of said user. Appendix B contains all Company certifications and individual inspector certifications.

Prepared by:

Claude Dahlk, CHMM, CIEC Asbestos Inspector ASB-0433

Appendix A

Photographs of Samples

Farmington Liquor Store #50

579 Lagoon Drive

Farmington, Utah

LS – 01A White Facade

LS – 01B White Facade

LS – 01C White Facade

LS – 01D White Facade

LS – 01E White Facade

LS – 01F White Facade

LS – 01G White Facade

End of Photographs.

Appendix B

Analytical Results

Certifications

April 20, 2026

Mr. Claude Dahlk

Hill West Environmental

7963 Douglas Drive

Park City, UT 84098

Ref: Batch # 225944, Lab # HW6502 - HW6508

Received April 16, 2026

Test report, Page 1 of 3

579 Lagoon Dr Farmington UT 84025

Farmington Liquor Store #50

Sampled by Dominic Hobbs 4/16/26

Dear Mr. Dahlk:

Samples HW6502 through HW6508 have been analyzed using the qualitative analysis of bulk samples by polarized light microscopy (PLM), and the quantitation of asbestos content by calibrated visual estimate (CVE) based on EPA -- 40 CFR Appendix E to Subpart E of Part 763 (EPA 600/M4-

82-020), Interim Method of the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples, and EPA

600/R-93/116: Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials, as well as guidance from the OSHA ID-191 method. Appendix "A" contains statements which an accredited laboratory must make to meet the requirements of accrediting agencies. It also contains additional information about the method of analysis. Appendix "A" must be included as an essential part of this test report. This analysis is accredited under NVLAP Lab Code: 101012-0. It does not contain data or calibrations for tests performed under AIHA-LAP LLC Lab Code: 101579.

This report may be reproduced but all reproduction must be in full unless written approval is received from the laboratory for partial reproduction. The results of analysis are as follows:

Lab HW6502, Field LS-01A White Facade

This is 3% plant fiber and 1% wollastonite in white binder with limestone. Asbestos is none detected.

Lab HW6503, Field LS-01B White Facade

This is 3% plant fiber and 1% wollastonite in white binder with limestone. Asbestos is none detected.

Lab HW6504, Field LS-01C White Facade

This is 3% plant fiber and 1% wollastonite in white binder with limestone. Asbestos is none detected.

Batch # 225944

Lab # HW6502 - HW6508

Lab HW6505, Field LS-01D White Facade

This is 3% plant fiber and 1% wollastonite in white binder with limestone. Asbestos is none detected.

Lab HW6506, Field LS-01E White Facade

This is 3% plant fiber and 1% wollastonite in white binder with limestone. Asbestos is none detected.

Lab HW6507, Field LS-01F White Facade

This is 3% plant fiber and 1%wollastonite in white binder with limestone. Asbestos is none detected.

Lab HW6508, Field LS-01G White Facade

This is 3% plant fiber and 1% wollastonite in white binder with limestone. Asbestos is none detected.

In order to be sure reagents and tools used for analysis are not contaminated with asbestos, blanks are tested. Asbestos was none detected in the blanks tested with this bulk sample set.

Very truly yours, Steve H. Dixon, President

Analyzed by Alex C. Kachel on April 19, 2026

Batch # 225944

Lab # HW6502 - HW6508

APPENDIX "A"

This report relates only to the items tested. This report must not be used to claim product certification, approval or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, AIHA LAP, or any U.S. government agency.

NVLAP and AIHA LAP require laboratories to report the condition of samples received for testing. The condition of these samples is considered acceptable for analysis unless otherwise noted. If a test item is unacceptable for analysis, requires a modification to the standard method, or has limited analysis sensitivity, this will be noted under the laboratory number for that specific test item in the final report. If the samples are non-homogeneous, a statement will be included with the sample result. Each component or sub-sample is analyzed separately. The reported results and percentages of each material type are based on the sample received by the laboratory and may not be representative of the parent material. Because the sample’s orientation cannot always be determined, specifying top and bottom may not be possible.

METHODS OF ANALYSIS AND LIMIT OF DETECTION

For air count analysis, samples are not blank-corrected unless otherwise noted.

For air count analysis, results may be biased if interferences are present.

The accuracy of the Qualitative Analysis of Bulk Samples by Polarized Light Microscopy

(PLM) improves as asbestos concentration increases. However factors such as inhomogeneities, coatings, small fibers, interfering compounds, pigments, binders, small sample sizes, and multiple layers, may limit this analysis.

There are two methods for the Quantitation of Asbestos in Bulk Samples: Calibrated Visual

Estimate (CVE) and Point Count. CVE analysis with gravimetry is the most sensitive method.

With a patient search, an analyst can detect asbestos at concentrations of 0.1% or lower in a bulk sample. Point Count analysis, on the other hand, uses a statistical approach.

Regulatory agencies classify materials as Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) when asbestos content is greater than 1%. The EPA does not accept CVE to verify that trace amounts of asbestos are less than 1%. The EPA requires Point Count to verify that asbestos content is not greater than 1%. OSHA regulations apply to samples containing any amount of asbestos.

Due to the higher cost of Point Count analysis, Dixon Information, Inc. does not perform this analysis unless authorized by the client. When possible, a Point Count analysis includes various chemical and/or physical means to gravimetrically concentrate the asbestos in the sample.

The EPA allows this as it increases the accuracy of the Point Count.

Inspector: Dominic Hobbs

Date Inspected: 5-11-26

PB-2781

Limited-Lead Based Paint Readings Farmington Liquor Store

579 Lagoon Drive

Farmington, Utah

Index Time Results Component Substrate Condition Color Floor PbC

1 5/11/2026 13:27 Positive CALABRATE 1.32

2 5/11/2026 13:27 Positive CALABRATE 0.89

3 5/11/2026 13:27 Positive CALABRATE 0.97

4 5/11/2026 13:27 Positive CALABRATE 0.86

5 5/11/2026 13:28 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - North side <LOD

6 5/11/2026 13:28 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - North side <LOD

7 5/11/2026 13:28 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - North side <LOD

8 5/11/2026 13:28 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - North side <LOD

9 5/11/2026 13:28 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - East side <LOD

10 5/11/2026 13:28 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - East side <LOD

11 5/11/2026 13:28 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - East side <LOD

12 5/11/2026 13:28 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - East side <LOD

13 5/11/2026 13:28 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - South side <LOD

14 5/11/2026 13:29 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - South side 0.02

15 5/11/2026 13:29 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - South side 0.05

16 5/11/2026 13:29 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - South side <LOD

17 5/11/2026 13:29 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - West side 0.11

18 5/11/2026 13:29 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - West side 0.24

19 5/11/2026 13:29 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - West side 0.03

20 5/11/2026 13:29 Negative EXTERIOR WALL FIBER BOARD CRACKED WHITE Exterior - West side 0.03

21 5/11/2026 13:30 Positive CALABRATE 1.02

22 5/11/2026 13:30 Positive CALABRATE 0.82

23 5/11/2026 13:30 Positive CALABRATE 0.84