MMHF Vendor Questions_ Answers 47QFWA26K0006_ MMHF.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fence to Fence Environmental Services for Malstrom/Mountain Home/Fairchild (MMHF) Air Force Bases (AFB)
- Solicitation number
- 47QFWA26K0006
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) document from a site visit and draft Performance Work Statement (PWS) review for the Fence to Fence (F2F) Environmental Services solicitation (47QFWA26K0006) covering Malmstrom Air Force Base (MAFB), Mountain Home Air Force Base (MHAFB), and Fairchild Air Force Base (FAFB). The Q&A addresses 26 inquiries from prospective offerors regarding contract scope, requirements, and timelines.
Key clarifications from the Q&A include: the Government will not evaluate proposals based on Basic tasks only for LPTA pricing; technical evaluations will assess whether proposed staffing levels meet PWS requirements; the contractor will not serve as facility manager for the 90-day period or associated buildings; hazardous waste pickup notice requirements vary by base (3 days at MAFB, 72 hours at MHAFB, same-day at FAFB based on work requirements); contractors are not responsible for entering inspection deficiencies into EASIER or conducting follow-up SAP visits; contractors will prepare but not submit EPCRA Tier II and TRI reporting data; contractors are not required to transport hazardous waste off-installation. The Government confirmed it will provide supplemental documentation including base-specific reports, plans, permits, HWMPs, HW Contingency Plans, and sign-in sheets from site visits. Training materials currently exist for contractor use at all three bases. User and facility counts vary by installation: EESOH-MIS users range from 140 to 250; HM storage facilities requiring inspection range from 65 to 132. The final PWS and Instructions to Offerors were scheduled for release at the time of solicitation in Quarter 3 2026. The Q&A period closed on May 4, 2026.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| MMHF Vendor Questions_Answers 47QFWA26K0006_ MMHF.pdf | ||
| DRAFT PWS F2F MMHF.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q&A
F2F MMHF Environmental Services SITE VISIT AND DRAFT PWS Review QUESTION AND ANSWER (Q&A) TEMPLATE
Company Name:
| Note to Prospective Offerors: Please provide the specific Slide No and/or paragraph reference using the Section/Sub-Section numbers in the document referenced. | |||||
| Question # | PART # | SLIDE / PARAGRAPH # | SLIDE / PARAGRAPH TITLE | QUESTION | GOVERNMENT RESPONSE |
| 1 | General | Can the government provide all supplemental documentation for this solicitation such as base specific reports, plans and permits? | Yes | ||
| 2 | General | Will the government consider the evaluation of Basic tasks only for the LPTA pricing and award since it is unknown whether Optional tasks will be awarded? | No | ||
| 3 | General | Will the government’s evaluation of the contractor’s technical approach include an assessment of whether proposed staffing levels (e.g., number of FTEs) are sufficient to meet the PWS requirements? | Yes | ||
| 4 | General Site Visit | Can the government provide sign-in sheets from site visits? | Yes | ||
| 5 | 1.1.1.1 | HW Contract Support | Is it the intent of the government to assign the F2F contractor to the facility manager role for the 90-Days, TSDFs and all other associated buildings? | No | |
| 6 | 1.1.1.1 | HW Contract Support | Regarding excess expired HM, do any of the Bases have a historical backlog of HM above and beyond typical shop generation? Has the presence of expired HM ever been cited as a deficiency during State regulatory inspections? | No | |
| 7 | 1.1.1.1 | HW Contract Support | Is the same day pickup of waste only applicable if the SAP Manager notifies the contractor prior to 0800 the day of requested pickup? | Depends on the base, |
MAFB: 3 day notice MHAFB: 72 hours FAFB: Based on the work for the day. Same day pickup is anticipated.
| 8 | 1.1.1.1 | HW Contract Support | Is Malmstrom AFB's RCRA Part HW Permit expected to be renewed during this contract? | No | ||
| 9 | 1.1.1.1.1 | Hazardous Waste Accumulation Point Management | Can the government provide copies of the HWMPs and HW Contingency Plans? | Yes | ||
| 10 | 1.1.1.1.2 | Satellite Accumulation Point Assessment | Is the contractor responsible for SAP follow-up visits to ensure inspection findings are corrected? | No, extra visits will not be required. After notifying the MPM at initial discovery, follow ups during routine visits will allow extra attention to findings. | ||
| 11 | 1.1.1.1.2 | Satellite Accumulation Point Assessment | Is the contractor responsible for entering SAP inspection deficiencies into EASIER? | No | ||
| 12 | 1.1.1.1.3 | Data Management and Technical Support | Do base-specific HW training materials currently exist for contractor use? | Yes | ||
| 13 | 1.1.1.3 | Recycling, Other Regulated Waste | What are the disposal costs associated with the Oil Filter Recycling task that the contractor has to pay for? | None | ||
| 14 | 1.1.2.1.1 | Process Authorization | On average, how many personnel require aspects of HM training each month? Are training materials available for use by the contractor? | Depends on the flux of people. Malmstrom: 5-9; Mt Home: 10-12; Fairchild: 2-6; Training is currently available for contractor usage. | ||
| 15 | 1.1.2.1.2 | Installation Administration/User Management for EESOH-MIS | On average, how many EESOH-MIS users are there at each Base? | Malmstrom: 200; Mt Home: 250; Fairchild: 140 | ||
| 16 | 1.1.2.1.3 | Compliance Site Visits-HM | On average, how many HM storage facilities are there at each Base that require inspection? | Malmstrom: 120; Mt Home: 65; Fairchild: 132 | ||
| 17 | 1.1.2.1.3 | Compliance Site Visits-HM | Is the contractor responsible for entering HM storage location inspection deficiencies into EASIER? | No | ||
| 18 | 1.1.2.2 | Reporting, EPCRA | Can the government confirm that the contractor is responsible for preparation and submission of the EPCRA Tier II and TRI reporting data and not simply mining the data for the MPM to prepare the reports? | Yes for preparation/mining data, no for submission. | ||
| 19 | Draft PWS | C.4 | ||||
| Throughout | Can the government provide copies of current plans and permits where updates would be required? | Yes | ||||
| 20 | Draft PWS | C.4.2.1 | Can government clarify Hazardous Materials (HM) on-site support requirements at each installation? Some information shared during a site walk indicated HM may be included under separate/existing LRS contract and that services would not be provided under proposed F2F. | See PWS | ||
| 21 | Draft PWS | C.4.2 | (HM) Will contractor input HM & HW inspection findings into EASIER? | No | ||
| 22 | Draft PWS | 4.2 | Are contractors required to transport HW off-installation? | No | ||
| 23 | F2F Site Visit Slides | 12 | Acquisition Timeline | When should we expect the final PWS? | At the time of solicitaiton in Quarter 3 | |
| 24 | F2F Site Visit Slides | 12 | Acquisition Timeline | When can we expect the Instructions to Offerors? | At the time of solicitaiton in Quarter 3 | |
| 25 | F2F Site Visit Slides | 12 | Acquisition Timeline | Could the Government please provide offerors two-weeks after the final solicitation is issued to ask questions? | Pleas see the instructions to offerors | |
| 26 | N/A | Solicitation | N/A | Given that the Performance Work Statement (PWS) was provided on April 30, 2026, will the Government consider extending the Q&A period (currently due May 4, 2026, at 1700 CST) to allow sufficient time to review the PWS and prepare informed questions? | Q&A timeframe has closed out. |
&"Times New Roman,Italic"&10Template Version 09-26-24 &"Times New Roman,Regular"&10Page &P of &N image1.PNG
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .