MMHF Vendor Questions_Answers 47QFWA26K0006_ MMHF.pdf

Company Name:

Question # PART #

SLIDE /

PARAGRAPH #

PARAGRAPH

TITLE QUESTION

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

1 General Can the government provide all supplemental documentation for this solicitation such as base specific reports, plans and permits?

Yes

2 General

Will the government consider the evaluation of Basic tasks only for the LPTA pricing and award since it is unknown whether Optional tasks will be awarded?

No

3 General

Will the government’s evaluation of the contractor’s technical approach include an assessment of whether proposed staffing levels (e.g., number of FTEs) are sufficient to meet the PWS requirements?

Yes

4 General Site Visit Can the government provide sign-in sheets from site visits?

Yes

5 1.1.1.1 HW Contract Support

Is it the intent of the government to assign the F2F contractor to the facility manager role for the 90-Days, TSDFs and all other associated buildings?

No

6 1.1.1.1 HW Contract Support

Regarding excess expired HM, do any of the Bases have a historical backlog of HM above and beyond typical shop generation? Has the presence of expired HM ever been cited as a deficiency during State regulatory inspections?

No

7 1.1.1.1 HW Contract Support

Is the same day pickup of waste only applicable if the SAP Manager notifies the contractor prior to 0800 the day of requested pickup?

Depends on the base, MAFB: 3 day notice MHAFB: 72 hours FAFB: Based on the work for the day. Same day pickup is anticipated.

8 1.1.1.1 HW Contract Support Is Malmstrom AFB's RCRA Part HW Permit expected to be renewed during this contract?

No

9 1.1.1.1.1 Hazardous Waste

Accumulation Point Management

Can the government provide copies of the HWMPs and HW Contingency Plans?

Yes

10 1.1.1.1.2 Satellite Accumulation Point Assessment

Is the contractor responsible for SAP follow-up visits to ensure inspection findings are corrected?

No, extra visits will not be required.

After notifying the MPM at initial discovery, follow ups during routine visits will allow extra attention to findings.

11 1.1.1.1.2 Satellite Accumulation Point Assessment

Is the contractor responsible for entering SAP inspection deficiencies into EASIER?

No

12 1.1.1.1.3 Data Management and Technical Support

Do base-specific HW training materials currently exist for contractor use?

Yes

13 1.1.1.3 Recycling, Other Regulated Waste

What are the disposal costs associated with the Oil Filter Recycling task that the contractor has to pay for?

None

14 1.1.2.1.1 Process Authorization

On average, how many personnel require aspects of HM training each month? Are training materials available for use by the contractor?

Depends on the flux of people.

Malmstrom: 5-9; Mt Home: 10-12;

Fairchild: 2-6; Training is currently available for contractor usage.

15 1.1.2.1.2

Installation Administration/User

Management for

EESOH-MIS

On average, how many EESOH-MIS users are there at each Base?

Malmstrom: 200; Mt Home: 250;

Fairchild: 140

16 1.1.2.1.3 Compliance Site Visits-

HM

On average, how many HM storage facilities are there at each Base that require inspection?

Malmstrom: 120; Mt Home: 65;

Fairchild: 132

17 1.1.2.1.3 Compliance Site Visits-

HM

Is the contractor responsible for entering HM storage location inspection deficiencies into

EASIER?

No

18 1.1.2.2 Reporting, EPCRA

Can the government confirm that the contractor is responsible for preparation and submission of the EPCRA Tier II and TRI reporting data and not simply mining the data for the MPM to prepare the reports?

Yes for preparation/mining data, no for submission.

19 Draft PWS C.4 Throughout

Can the government provide copies of current plans and permits where updates would be required?

Yes

20 Draft PWS C.4.2.1

Can government clarify Hazardous Materials (HM) on-site support requirements at each installation? Some information shared during a site walk indicated HM may be included under separate/existing LRS contract and that services would not be provided under proposed F2F.

See PWS

21 Draft PWS C.4.2 (HM) Will contractor input HM & HW inspection findings into EASIER?

No

22 Draft PWS 4.2 Are contractors required to transport HW off-installation?

No

F2F Site Visit Slides 12 Acquisition Timeline When should we expect the final PWS?

At the time of solicitaiton in Quarter

F2F Site Visit Slides 12 Acquisition Timeline

When can we expect the Instructions to Offerors?

At the time of solicitaiton in Quarter

F2F Site Visit Slides 12 Acquisition Timeline

Could the Government please provide offerors two-weeks after the final solicitation is issued to ask questions?

Pleas see the instructions to offerors

N/A Solicitation N/A

Given that the Performance Work Statement (PWS) was provided on April 30, 2026, will the Government consider extending the Q&A period (currently due May 4, 2026, at 1700 CST) to allow sufficient time to review the PWS and prepare informed questions?

Q&A timeframe has closed out.

F2F MMHF Environmental Services SITE VISIT AND DRAFT PWS Review QUESTION AND ANSWER (Q&A) TEMPLATE

Note to Prospective Offerors: Please provide the specific Slide No and/or paragraph reference using the Section/Sub-Section numbers in the document referenced.

Template Version 09-26-24 Page 1 of 1

Q&A