Technical Evaluation Factors 2024 12 04.pdf

PDF 178 KB Posted

Attached to
Gate 6 Pedestrian Path Improvements, St Elizabeths West Campus SE WASH DC
Solicitation number
47PM0025R0002
Issued by

About this file

This file outlines the technical evaluation factors for RFP 47PM0025R0002 for Gate 6 Pedestrian Path Improvements at St. Elizabeths West Campus in Washington, DC. The evaluation includes three non-price factors: Experience on Comparable Projects, Designated Key Personnel, and Past Performance of Offeror, plus a mandatory Go/No-Go requirement to attend a pre-proposal conference/site visit on either November 18 or 22, 2024.

The experience factor requires contractors to demonstrate successful completion of two similar projects within the past 10 years, each valued at minimum $100,000, involving work on occupied campuses, installation of solar-powered LED signs/lights, and relocation of electrical/mechanical systems. Key personnel requirements include a Project Manager, On-Site Construction Superintendent, and Quality Control Manager, each with specific education, experience and OSHA certification requirements. For past performance, offerors must submit performance questionnaires for the same two reference projects. Award will be made to the lowest-priced technically acceptable offer meeting all factor requirements. Proposals are evaluated on a pass/fail basis, with failure on any factor resulting in the entire proposal being deemed unacceptable.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Issued under AMENDMENT 0001

RFP 47PM0025R0002, Gate 6 Pedestrian Path Improvements, St Elizabeths West Campus SE WASH DC

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

The following are the non-price evaluation factors:

GO/NO GO: MANDATORY Pre-Proposal Conference/Site Visit 11/18/2024 11/22/2024 Did your company attend either? If so, which date?

Factor A - Experience on Comparable Projects Factor B – Designated Key Personnel Factor C - Past Performance of Offeror.

(1) The Government will evaluate all technical proposals on a pass/fail basis to determine all offers that meet the minimum technically acceptable requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. An unacceptable rating for any one factor makes the entire proposal unacceptable. Any costs incurred by offerors in preparing or submitting offers are the offerors' sole responsibility; the United States will not reimburse any offeror for any proposal preparation costs.

(2) Award will be made based on the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors.

(3) The following non-price factors will be evaluated for acceptability:

A. Experience on Comparable Projects

This factor considers the extent of the Offeror’s past experience as a firm in providing similar construction services.

The Offeror must demonstrate successful experience as a General Contractor (GC) responsible for the construction of two “similar” projects substantially completed within the past ten (10) years from the date of RFP. Project shall be considered “similar” if it meets ALL of the following characteristics:

1. Project was performed on an occupied and functioning campus or campus-like environment.

2. Project involved the installation of solar powered LED signs and poles, or lights (pedestrian or traffic safety sign system).

3. Project included relocating any electrical and/or mechanical building system components.

4. The total project construction cost at award of the construction contract was at least $100,000.

(GC may use the experience of its contracted Electrical Subcontractor to fulfill this requirement.

Subcontractor must be indicated in the proposal.)

Submission Required by Offeror:

Submit two construction projects that demonstrate past experience described above. For the projects offered under this evaluation factor, the Offeror must include the information below:

Project Title

Name of Reference Company/Agency E-mail address Telephone Number Contract Number Type of Contract Award Amount and Final Construction Contract Amount Initial Completion Date and Actual Completion Date

Evaluation Criteria: This factor will evaluate the past experience of the firm to determine whether they have experience on two “similar” projects that were substantially completed within the last ten (10) years and meet ALL of the above similar characteristics.

Acceptability Standard: This factor will be evaluated based upon the Offeror’s written response to the RFP. However, the Government reserves the right to contact references under this evaluation factor to verify the scope of the project offered. If the Offeror materially misrepresents information relating to its experience, the Contracting Officer may reject the proposal. Any proposal which does not provide one “similar” project substantially completed within the past ten (10) years from the date of the RFP and meet ALL of the above similar characteristics then the project, will not be considered technically acceptable.

B. Designated Key Personnel

This factor evaluates the Offerors’ demonstrated qualifications of proposed key personnel.

The Offeror must provide a Resume for the following Key Personnel that includes the information identified below and must meet the minimum requirements stated here.

● Project Manager for Construction; and

● On-Site Construction Superintendent

● Quality Control Manager

All Resumes must include the following information and explain how the proposed Key Personnel’s experience meets the minimum requirements. Each Resume must not exceed two (2) pages:

● Name and title.

● Project assignment.

● Name of firm with which associated; and

● Years experience with this firm (in the key personnel’s field of expertise/discipline) and years of experience with other firms (in the key personnel’s field of expertise/ discipline).

Additionally, Key Personnel must possess the following:

a. Project Manager for Construction–

1) Education: Graduation from an accredited undergraduate program with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering, Construction Management, or a similar field of expertise.

Note: Appropriate experience may be substituted for education and credentials.

2) Project Experience: At least 5 years project management experience on construction with at least two projects at least $100,000 each of either repair and alteration, construction, renovation, reconfiguration, or reorganization of space. (10 years with no degree).

3) Training: Certification of completion, OSHA 30 HR Construction Safety & Health Course, or equivalent training.

4) Additional Qualifications: The Offeror may provide any additional qualifications regarding this individual.

b. On-site Construction Superintendent –

1) Education: Graduation from an accredited undergraduate program with Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering, Construction Management, a similar field of expertise, or a higher-level trade specific technical certification.

Note: Appropriate experience may be substituted for education and credentials.

2) Project Experience: Minimum 5 years field construction experience in Construction projects with at least two projects at least $100,000 each of either repair and alteration, construction, renovation, reconfiguration, or reorganization of space. (10 years with no degree).

3) Training: Certification of completion, OSHA 30 HR Construction Safety & Health Course, or equivalent training.

4) Additional Qualifications: The Offeror may provide any additional qualifications regarding this individual.

c. Quality Control Manager/Quality Assurance Manager –

1) Education: Graduation from an accredited undergraduate program with a Bachelor of Architecture, Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering, Construction Management, or a similar field of expertise.

2) Credentials: Registered Professional Architect (R.A.) and/or Professional Engineer (P.E.) and C.Q.M. for Contractors Course Certification; Note: Appropriate experience may be substituted for education and credentials.

3) Project Experience: At least 5 years CQC experience on at least two (2) projects at least $100,000 each of either repair and alteration, construction, renovation, reconfiguration, or reorganization of space. (10 years with no degree).

4) Training: Certification of completion, OSHA 30 HR Construction Safety & Health Course, or equivalent training.

5) Additional Qualifications: The Offeror may provide any additional qualifications regarding this individual.

Evaluation Standard: The government will consider the extent to which the key personnel have worked together as a team as well as consider previous education, experience, credentials, project experience, training, and other qualifications that determine the vendor to be capable of successfully performing this contract.

Acceptability Standard: This factor will be evaluated based upon the Offeror’s written response to the RFP. However, the Government reserves the right to contact references under this evaluation factor to verify the resumes. If the Offeror materially misrepresents information relating to the individual resumes, the Contracting Officer may reject the proposal.

C. Past Performance of Offeror.

Evaluation Criteria: This factor evaluates the past performance of the Offeror to determine responsibility.

Acceptability Standard (Pass): The Offeror’s past performance record demonstrates satisfactory performance on two (2) similar projects substantially completed within the last ten (10) years. The two

(2) similar projects submitted for consideration under this evaluation factor must be the same two (2) similar projects submitted under Factor 1: Past Experience. Any proposal which does not demonstrate satisfactory performance on at least two (2) similar projects substantially completed within the last ten

(10) years will not be considered technically acceptable. The Offeror must provide “ATTACHMENT A:

FIRM’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE” for each reference (a person or persons who may be contacted regarding the quality of the Offeror’s past performance). The name, title, company name, current address, current phone number, and current fax number for each reference must appear on the form. (Another form may be submitted but the form must contain all information requested in the Attachment A – PPQ) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sX2IOyI1aSvjfTNwIwX4w2byngI6AYkq/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sX2IOyI1aSvjfTNwIwX4w2byngI6AYkq/view?usp=sharing

The Government reserves the right to use other government data available in its assessment of the Offeror. The quality of the reference information supplied will be considered. In accordance with FAR 15.306, the offeror will be given the opportunity to respond to adverse past performance information.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .