Attachment_B_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 66 KB Posted

Attached to
IDIQ CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR & ALTERATIONS IN THE STATES OF MI, MN & WI
Solicitation number
47PF0019R0001
Issued by

About this file

This document contains an attachment for a past performance questionnaire and a notice for an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is a reference form for contractors to submit with proposals, evaluating quality, budget, schedule, management and staffing, and administration on previous projects.

The federal contract opportunity is for repair and alteration services in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin through multiple indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contracts awarded by the General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Region 5. Services include interior and exterior renovations, build-outs, HVAC, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, fire suppression, security, site work, and other construction. The base period of performance is one year with four one-year options, and task orders will be issued for individual projects. The set-aside is for small businesses with a NAICS code of 236220 and size standard of $36.5 million. There is a guaranteed minimum of $2,000 for the base year only and maximum task order limitation of $7.5 million per year. Bonding will be required at the task order level when applicable. Proposals are due as specified in the solicitation to be released on November 1, 2018. Award will be made to the responsible contractor providing the best value based on technical evaluation and pricing.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT B: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please complete and submit this reference with your proposal package

Section 1 – To be completed by the Contractor

Contractor’s Name: Address:

Telephone Number: Point of Contact (POC): Role of the POC:

Project Title or Brief Description of the Work:

Dates of Performance:

Section 2 – To be completed by the Reference

Please complete the following questionnaire on behalf of the contractor listed in Section 1. Only the project listed in Section 1 shall be considered for this evaluation. For each question below, select the rating that best describes the Contractor’s performance. Please provide a narrative explanation where appropriate; any narrative comments are greatly appreciated. If the contractor has completed other work for your agency/organization in the last five (5) years, you may note that as additional comments.

Your responses will be reviewed solely for the purposes of a past performance evaluation and no one other than the Government selection committee will see your response.

Name of Respondent:

Title/Company Name:

Role of Respondent on the Project being Referenced:

Telephone:

Email:

If you have additional comments to provide, please add them at the end of the attached questionnaire. Thank you, in advance, for your time and providing GSA with this valuable feedback.

Solicitation No. 47PF0019R0001

QUALITY

1. Overall, how well did the quality of the work conform to the contract requirements?

Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor

BUDGET

2. Overall, how was the contractor’s performance with regards to budget?

Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor

3. Was the project completed within the original contract budget? Yes No If not, please provide the reason for actual cost differences. (e.g. owner driven changes, differing site conditions, errors and omissions, etc…)

4. Was change order work pricing determined fair and responsible? Yes No If there were issues with change order pricing, please explain.

SCHEDULE

5. Overall, how was the contractor’s performance with regards to schedule?

Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor

6. Did the contractor complete the project within the original contract schedule? Yes No If not, what were the reasons for changes to the schedule?

MANAGEMENT & STAFFING

7. Did the Contractor staff the job adequately? (PM, Superintendent, etc.)
Yes
No
8. Were key personnel adequately qualified for their positions?
Yes
No

9. How well did the prime contractor manage his subcontractors? (e.g. Coordinating trades, updating subs on changes to the SOW, prompt payment, performance issues, etc…)

Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor

10. How effective was the Contractor at communicating with key project stakeholders?

Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor

11. How well did the Contractor demonstrate sensitivity to client/tenant concerns? (e. g. Coordination issues, site cleanliness, noise, etc…)

Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor

ADMINISTRATION

12. How responsive and responsible was the contractor in administrative areas? (e.g. Documenting progress, responding to RFI’s, processing payments, tracking changes, etc.)

Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor

OVERALL

13. How would you rate this Contractor’s overall performance?

Excellent 5 4 3 2 1 Poor

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .