43ADG-S3740_Proposal Evaluation and Scoring.pdf

137 KB Posted

Attached to
Fencing and Gate Repair Services
Solicitation number
43ADG-S3740
Issued by
Clark County, Nevada

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This is a Proposal Evaluation and Scoring document for a Nevada state contract solicitation (43ADG-S3625) that outlines the evaluation framework and criteria for vendor responses. The document establishes the evaluation process conducted in accordance with Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS 333.335) and Nevada Administrative Code (NAC 333.160-333.165). All vendor responses remain confidential until contract award, and responses maintain confidentiality even if the solicitation is withdrawn prior to award. An independent evaluation committee will assess qualitative factors, and the State reserves the right to limit participation in cost scoring and presentations to vendors above natural breaks in relative scores. The State may require vendor presentations but retains the discretion to select vendors based solely on written responses. Additionally, the State reserves the right to request best and final offers from vendors to obtain optimal proposals.

Vendor proposals will be evaluated and scored across five weighted criteria: Demonstrated Technical Competence and Specialization (25 points), Past Performance on Similar or Previous State or Government Contracts (25 points), Availability of Key Personnel and Familiarity with Facilities (15 points), Compliance and Safety (15 points), and Cost factor (20 points). Financial stability is scored on a pass or fail basis. The cost factor score employs a standardized equation that compares each vendor's proposed cost against the highest and lowest proposed costs to generate a weighted score. Vendors are encouraged to submit their best offer with the initial response rather than relying on subsequent best and final offer opportunities.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
43ADG-S3740_RFP_Service Contract_Fencing and Gate Services_REV 3-6-2026.pdf PDF
ufc_4_022_03_2013.pdf_safe.pdf PDF
Quote Instructions.pdf PDF
43ADG-S3740_SoW_Service Contract_Fencing and Gate Services_REV 3-6-2026.pdf PDF
43ADG-S3740 Vendor-Information-Response.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Page 1 of 1 43ADG-S3625

PROPOSAL EVALUATION

1.1. Evaluation and scoring are conducted in accordance with NRS 333.335 and NAC 333.160-333.165.

1.1.1. Responses shall be kept confidential until a contract is awarded.

1.1.2. In the event the solicitation is withdrawn prior to award, responses remain confidential.

1.1.3. The evaluation committee is an independent committee established to evaluate and score qualitative evaluation factors for the solicitation.

1.1.4. The State, at its option, may limit participation in cost scoring, presentations, or both to vendors above a natural break in relative scores.

1.1.5. Financial stability shall be scored on a pass or fail basis.

1.1.6. Responses shall be consistently evaluated and scored based upon the following factors and relative weights.

1.1.6.1. Demonstrated Technical Competence and Specialization in this RFP

1.1.6.2. Past Performance on Similar or Previous State or Government Contracts

1.1.6.3. Availability of Key Personnel and Familiarity with the Facilities Contained in this RFP

1.1.6.4. Compliance and Safety

1.1.6.5. Cost factor

1.1.7. Cost factor. The cost factor score is based on the following equation, unless the subject solicited requires alternative scoring. The highest proposed cost from any vendor and the lowest proposed cost from any vendor will be added together to generate a combined total. For each vendor, that proposed cost will be subtracted from the previously combined total. This number is then divided by the highest proposed cost.

The resulting number is multiplied by the cost factor weight to generate a weighted cost score.

1.1.8. Presentations. The State may require vendors to make a presentation. The State reserves the right to add additional criteria for presentations. The State reserves the right to forego presentations and select vendor(s) based on written responses submitted.

1.1.9. Best and final offers. Pursuant to NAC 333.165, the State reserves the right to permit revised responses or add criteria to obtain the best offers. Vendors are encouraged to submit their best offer at time of initial response.

https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec335 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nac/nac-333.html#NAC333Sec160

1.1. Evaluation and scoring are conducted in accordance with NRS 333.335 and NAC 333.160-333.165.
1.1.1. Responses shall be kept confidential until a contract is awarded.
1.1.2. In the event the solicitation is withdrawn prior to award, responses remain confidential.
1.1.3. The evaluation committee is an independent committee established to evaluate and score qualitative evaluation factors for the solicitation.
1.1.4. The State, at its option, may limit participation in cost scoring, presentations, or both to vendors above a natural break in relative scores.
1.1.5. Financial stability shall be scored on a pass or fail basis.
1.1.6. Responses shall be consistently evaluated and scored based upon the following factors and relative weights.
1.1.6.1. Demonstrated Technical Competence and Specialization in this RFP 25
1.1.6.2. Past Performance on Similar or Previous State or Government Contracts 25
1.1.6.3. Availability of Key Personnel and Familiarity with the Facilities Contained in this RFP 15
1.1.6.4. Compliance and Safety 15
1.1.6.5. Cost factor 20
1.1.7. Cost factor. The cost factor score is based on the following equation, unless the subject solicited requires alternative scoring. The highest proposed cost from any vendor and the lowest proposed cost from any vendor will be added together to g...
1.1.8. Presentations. The State may require vendors to make a presentation. The State reserves the right to add additional criteria for presentations. The State reserves the right to forego presentations and select vendor(s) based on written responses...
1.1.9. Best and final offers. Pursuant to NAC 333.165, the State reserves the right to permit revised responses or add criteria to obtain the best offers. Vendors are encouraged to submit their best offer at time of initial response.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .