43ADG-S3723 Proposal Evaluation and Scoring.pdf
PDF 137 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Utility Vault and Sitework Services
- Solicitation number
- 43ADG-S3723
- Issued by
- Clark County, Nevada
About this file
This is a Proposal Evaluation and Scoring document for Nevada state contract opportunity 43ADG-S3625, established under Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 333.335 and Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) 333.160-333.165. The document outlines the evaluation framework that will be applied to vendor responses, though it does not specify the particular products or services being solicited, project timelines, due dates, site visits, bidder meetings, award dates, or contract terms. The evaluation will be conducted by an independent committee, and all vendor responses will remain confidential until contract award. The State reserves the right to limit vendor participation in cost scoring and presentations to those above a natural break in relative scores and may require vendor presentations or select vendors based solely on written responses.
Vendor responses will be evaluated and scored across five weighted factors: Demonstrated Technical Competence and Specialization (25 points), Past Performance on Similar or Previous State or Government Contracts (25 points), Availability of Key Personnel and Familiarity with Facilities (15 points), Compliance and Safety (15 points), and Cost Factor (20 points). Financial stability will be scored on a pass or fail basis. The cost factor score is calculated using a comparative formula in which the highest and lowest proposed costs are combined, the individual vendor's proposed cost is subtracted from that total, and the result is divided by the highest proposed cost and multiplied by the 20-point cost weight. The State reserves the right to request best and final offers from vendors and encourages vendors to submit their most competitive proposals with initial responses.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Quote Instructions.pdf | ||
| Invitation to Bid Vault-Site Work.pdf | ||
| SoW_Service Contract_Utility Vault Services_REV 6 Feb 2026.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page 1 of 1 43ADG-S3625
PROPOSAL EVALUATION
1.1. Evaluation and scoring are conducted in accordance with NRS 333.335 and NAC 333.160-333.165.
1.1.1. Responses shall be kept confidential until a contract is awarded.
1.1.2. In the event the solicitation is withdrawn prior to award, responses remain confidential.
1.1.3. The evaluation committee is an independent committee established to evaluate and score qualitative evaluation factors for the solicitation.
1.1.4. The State, at its option, may limit participation in cost scoring, presentations, or both to vendors above a natural break in relative scores.
1.1.5. Financial stability shall be scored on a pass or fail basis.
1.1.6. Responses shall be consistently evaluated and scored based upon the following factors and relative weights.
1.1.6.1. Demonstrated Technical Competence and Specialization in this RPF
1.1.6.2. Past Performance on Similar or Previous State or Government Contracts
1.1.6.3. Availability of Key Personnel and Familiarity with the Facilities Contained in this RFP
1.1.6.4. Compliance and Safety
1.1.6.5. Cost factor
1.1.7. Cost factor. The cost factor score is based on the following equation, unless the subject solicited requires alternative scoring. The highest proposed cost from any vendor and the lowest proposed cost from any vendor will be added together to generate a combined total. For each vendor, that proposed cost will be subtracted from the previously combined total. This number is then divided by the highest proposed cost.
The resulting number is multiplied by the cost factor weight to generate a weighted cost score.
1.1.8. Presentations. The State may require vendors to make a presentation. The State reserves the right to add additional criteria for presentations. The State reserves the right to forego presentations and select vendor(s) based on written responses submitted.
1.1.9. Best and final offers. Pursuant to NAC 333.165, the State reserves the right to permit revised responses or add criteria to obtain the best offers. Vendors are encouraged to submit their best offer at time of initial response.
https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec335 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nac/nac-333.html#NAC333Sec160
| 1.1. Evaluation and scoring are conducted in accordance with NRS 333.335 and NAC 333.160-333.165. |
| 1.1.1. Responses shall be kept confidential until a contract is awarded. |
| 1.1.2. In the event the solicitation is withdrawn prior to award, responses remain confidential. |
| 1.1.3. The evaluation committee is an independent committee established to evaluate and score qualitative evaluation factors for the solicitation. |
| 1.1.4. The State, at its option, may limit participation in cost scoring, presentations, or both to vendors above a natural break in relative scores. |
| 1.1.5. Financial stability shall be scored on a pass or fail basis. |
| 1.1.6. Responses shall be consistently evaluated and scored based upon the following factors and relative weights. |
| 1.1.6.1. Demonstrated Technical Competence and Specialization in this RPF 25 |
| 1.1.6.2. Past Performance on Similar or Previous State or Government Contracts 25 |
| 1.1.6.3. Availability of Key Personnel and Familiarity with the Facilities Contained in this RFP 15 |
| 1.1.6.4. Compliance and Safety 15 |
| 1.1.6.5. Cost factor 20 |
| 1.1.7. Cost factor. The cost factor score is based on the following equation, unless the subject solicited requires alternative scoring. The highest proposed cost from any vendor and the lowest proposed cost from any vendor will be added together to g... |
| 1.1.8. Presentations. The State may require vendors to make a presentation. The State reserves the right to add additional criteria for presentations. The State reserves the right to forego presentations and select vendor(s) based on written responses... |
| 1.1.9. Best and final offers. Pursuant to NAC 333.165, the State reserves the right to permit revised responses or add criteria to obtain the best offers. Vendors are encouraged to submit their best offer at time of initial response. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .