40DHHS-S3926_RFP_AVS.docx

DOCX document 61 KB Posted

Attached to
Asset Verification Services
Solicitation number
40DHHS-S3926
Issued by
Nevada

About this file

This is a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the State of Nevada Purchasing Division on behalf of the Department of Human Services, Division of Social Services, for Asset Verification Services. The RFP seeks qualified vendors to provide comprehensive asset verification services as detailed in the attached scope of work. The contract is designed to support the state's social services operations by verifying applicant and recipient assets to ensure program eligibility and compliance. Specific details regarding project timelines, response deadlines, site visits, bidder conferences, and contract term options are contained within the scope of work documentation referenced in the RFP attachments.

The pricing structure, any set-asides for targeted vendors, incumbent contractor information, and current operational requirements are detailed in the proposal specifications and supporting exhibits. Funding for this contract will be provided through the Nevada Department of Human Services budget allocations designated for social services program administration and asset verification operations. Additional information regarding evaluation criteria, submission requirements, and other material terms and conditions are outlined in the complete RFP documentation.

View the file

Other files

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Nevada State Purchasing Division Department of Administration 515 E Musser St Ste 300 Carson City, NV 89701 purchasing.nv.gov nevadaepro.com

Request for proposals 40DHHS-S3926

Release Date 7/16/2026

Solicitation number 40DHHS-S3926

Single point of contact name Jennifer Thomas

Single point of contact email jennthomas@admin.nv.gov

Single point of contact phone 775-531-3311

Soliciting agency Nevada State Purchasing Division

Contracting agency DHS/Division of Social Services

Solicitation title Asset Verification Services

Deadline for submissions 8/26/2026

For deaf and hard of hearing, call 711 and ask the relay agency to dial the single point of contact phone number above.

This request for proposals is available at nevadaepro.com as a bid solicitation.

Table of Contents

1.Applicable regulations governing procurement2
2.Project overview2
3.Attachments3
4.Timeline3
5.Evaluation4
6.Mandatory minimum requirements5
7.Critical items6
8.Submission checklist8

Applicable regulations governing procurement

Statute and code. All applicable Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) and Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) documentation can be found at: www.leg.state.nv.us/law1.cfm.

Single point of contact. Vendors and their representatives shall only contact the single point of contract or use the electronic procurement system regarding this solicitation until after a notice of award (NOA) has been issued. Failure to observe this restriction may result in disqualification of a response per NAC 333.155(3).

Ethics. Prospective vendors are advised to review Nevada’s ethical standards requirements, including but not limited to NRS 281A, NRS 333.800, and NAC 333.155.

Project overview

The Nevada State Purchasing Division, on behalf of the Department of Human Services (DHS), Division of Social Services (DSS) is seeking proposals from qualified vendors to provide asset verification services as described in the scope of work and attachments found in ePro under the attachments tab.

The State intends to award one contract in conjunction with this request for proposals (RFP), as determined in the best interests of the State. DSS shall administer a contract resulting from this solicitation. The resulting contract is expected to be for a contract term of four years, subject to Board of Examiners approval.

The Division of Social Services (DSS) under the Nevada Department of Human Services (DHS) administers Nevada Medicaid eligibility programs and oversees adherence to federal and state requirements related to applicant eligibility determinations. The Asset Verification System (AVS) project is intended to implement a secure, automated solution for electronically verifying financial assets of aged, blind, and disabled Medicaid applicants and recipients, as required under Section 1940 of the Social Security Act.

The project will modernize and streamline the State’s current asset verification processes by integrating with a vendor-supported financial institution network capable of securely exchanging asset verification information electronically. The new solution will support eligibility staff with timely and accurate financial account data, reduce reliance on manual verification processes, strengthen program integrity, and improve compliance with federal regulations governing Medicaid asset verification requirements.

Contracting agency background

The Division of Social Services (DSS) has long administered Nevada’s Medicaid eligibility programs for aged, blind, and disabled individuals, including responsibility for verifying applicant financial eligibility in accordance with federal regulations. Historically, asset verification activities relied heavily on manual processes, applicant-provided documentation, and limited electronic verification capabilities, creating operational inefficiencies and increasing the risk of incomplete or delayed eligibility determinations.

In response to federal requirements established under the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008, states are required to implement an electronic Asset Verification System (AVS) consistent with the Social Security Administration’s Supplemental Security Income (SSI) asset verification model. Nevada’s AVS Modernization effort was initiated to address these federal mandates while improving operational efficiency, program integrity, and access to accurate financial data during the eligibility determination process.

Through this initiative, DSS seeks to modernize its Medicaid eligibility infrastructure by implementing a secure and automated electronic verification solution capable of integrating with participating financial institutions across the country. The modernization effort supports the State’s long-term strategy of reducing manual workloads, strengthening compliance and audit readiness, improving accuracy in eligibility determinations, and enhancing service delivery for Nevada Medicaid applicants and recipients.

Goals and objectives

The primary objectives of the AVS Modernization Project are:

1. Improve Efficiency – Replace manual and paper-based asset verification processes with an automated electronic verification solution capable of supporting both individual and batch inquiries.

2. Enhance Program Integrity – Improve the State’s ability to identify undisclosed financial assets and ensure accurate Medicaid eligibility determinations for aged, blind, and disabled populations.

3. Increase Automation – Implement a system capable of automatically querying participating financial institutions and returning electronic responses securely and efficiently.

4. Strengthen Data Security and Compliance – Ensure the solution aligns with federal and state security, privacy, and data protection requirements, including HIPAA, HITECH, and NIST-aligned security standards.

5. Support Scalability and Flexibility – Deploy a scalable cloud-based solution that can adapt to future program, enrollment, and policy changes without significant system redesign.

6. Enhance Reporting and Analytics – Provide comprehensive reporting capabilities, including verification activity, response metrics, and identification of undisclosed assets to support oversight, auditing, and program evaluation.

7. Support Interoperability – Ensure seamless integration between the AVS vendor solution and the State’s Medicaid eligibility systems while supporting secure electronic data exchange with financial institutions nationwide.

8. Improve User Access and Operational Support – Provide secure 24/7 access for authorized Division staff and ensure vendor-supported help desk, implementation, and operational support services are available to maintain system reliability and responsiveness.

Attachments

Attachments incorporated by reference. To be read and not returned.

Scope of work Terms and conditions for services Deliverables Federal laws and authorities NIST.SP.800-53r5 NIST.SP.800-171r2

NIST.SP.800-210

Attachments for review. To be read and not returned (unless redlining).

Standard form contract Insurance schedule

Attachments for response. To be completed and returned.

Cost schedule Cloud checklist Data use and cloud service agreement Vendor information response Reference questionnaire Certification regarding lobbying

Timeline

Questions. All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted using the bid Q&A feature at nevadaepro.com.

Timeline. The following represents the proposed timeline for this project.

All times stated are Pacific Time (PT).

These dates represent a tentative schedule of events.

The State reserves the right to modify these dates at any time.

The deadline for submissions is the nevadaepro.com bid opening date and time. Late quotes will not be accepted.

Deadline for questionsNo later than 5:00 pm on 8/5/2026
Answers postedOn or about 8/12/2026
Deadline for referencesNo later than 5:00 pm on 8/25/2026
Deadline submissions and openingNo later than 2:00 pm on 8/26/2026
Evaluation period (estimated)9/8/2026
Vendor presentations (estimated)9/16/2026
Notice of intent (estimated)On or about 9/16/2026
Notice of award (estimated)On or about 10/2/2026
BOE approval (estimated)11/10/2026
Contract start date (estimated)Upon BOE Approval

Evaluation

Evaluation and scoring are conducted in accordance with NRS 333.335 and NAC 333.160-333.165.

Responses shall be kept confidential until a contract is awarded.

In the event the solicitation is withdrawn prior to award, responses remain confidential.

The evaluation committee is an independent committee established to evaluate and score qualitative evaluation factors for the solicitation.

The State, at its option, may limit participation in cost scoring, presentations, or both to vendors above a natural break in relative scores.

Financial stability shall be scored on a pass or fail basis.

Responses shall be consistently evaluated and scored based upon the following factors and relative weights.

Technical factor #1-Experience Performing Comparable Engagements: The vendor demonstrates successful experience providing Asset Verification Services or similar services for state Medicaid agencies or other large public-sector programs. Evaluation will consider the number of comparable engagements completed, the similarity of those engagements to the services requested in this RFP, the size and complexity of the organizations served, and information obtained through reference checks30
Technical factor #2-Technical Approach and Understanding of Requirements: The vendor demonstrates an understanding of the requirements of this RFP and describes how the proposed solution will meet the functional, technical, security, reporting, implementation, and support requirements. Evaluation will consider the extent to which the proposal addresses the requirements and demonstrates the vendor's ability to successfully perform the services30
Technical factor #3-Qualifications and Availability of Key Personnel: The vendor identifies key personnel assigned to the contract and demonstrates that proposed staff possess qualifications and experience relevant to the services requested in this RFP. Evaluation will consider the roles, responsibilities, experience, and availability of proposed personnel to perform the required services20
Technical factor #4-Conformance with RFP Requirements: The vendor submits a proposal that includes all required information, forms, certifications, and attachments and complies with the submission requirements identified in this RFP. Evaluation will consider the completeness and responsiveness of the proposal10
Cost factor20

Presentation factor #1-Did the vendor provide sufficient data to convince you they possess a full understanding of the State’s requirements 25 Presentation factor #2-Are you confident that this vendor has the knowledge, skills, and abilities to meet all the

state’s requirements50
Presentation factor #3- Did the vendor present sufficient performance history to convince you of their ability25

Cost factor. The cost factor score is based on the following equation, unless the subject solicited requires alternative scoring. The highest proposed cost from any vendor and the lowest proposed cost from any vendor will be added together to generate a combined total. For each vendor, that proposed cost will be subtracted from the previously combined total. This number is then divided by the highest proposed cost. The resulting number is multiplied by the cost factor weight to generate a weighted cost score.

Presentations. The State may require vendors to make a presentation. The State reserves the right to add additional criteria for presentations. The State reserves the right to forego presentations and select vendor(s) based on written responses submitted.

Best and final offers. Pursuant to NAC 333.165, the State reserves the right to permit revised responses or add criteria to obtain the best offers. Vendors are encouraged to submit their best offer at time of initial response.

Mandatory minimum requirements

Pursuant to NRS 333.311 a contract cannot be awarded to a response that does not comply with the requirements listed in this section. Response shall include confirmation of compliance with all mandatory minimum requirements.

Nevada Law and State indemnity. Pursuant to NRS 333.339, any contract that is entered into may not: (1) require the filing of any action or the arbitration of any dispute that arises from the contract to be instituted or heard in another state or nation; or (2) require the State to indemnify another party against liability for damages.

No Boycott of Israel. Pursuant to NRS 333.338, the State of Nevada cannot enter a contract with a company unless that company agrees for the duration of the contract not to engage in a boycott of Israel. By submitting a response, vendor agrees that if it is awarded a contract, it will not engage in a boycott of Israel as defined in NRS 333.338(3)(a).

nevadaepro.com vendor registration. Pursuant to NRS 333.313, vendor must be registered at nevadaepro.com to respond to the solicitation. Vendor information must match Nevada business license and sam.gov entity registration. Vendor information in nevadaepro.com will be used for contract formation. Email address(es) associated with general mailing address or default bid mailing address (if different from general mailing address) in nevadaepro.com will be used for formal notifications. If a vendor has a different contact name and email for negotiations, that should be indicated on the title page(s) of their response.

Nevada business license. Pursuant to NRS 353.007, prior to contract execution awarded vendor must hold a state business license pursuant to NRS chapter 76 unless exempted by NRS 76.100(7)(b). Business license must match nevadaepro.com vendor registration.

System for Award Management (sam.gov) Prior to contract award vendor must hold an active entity registration in sam.gov. Entity registration must match nevadaepro.com vendor registration.

Contract responsibility. Awarded vendor shall be the sole point of contract responsibility. The State shall look solely to the awarded vendor for the performance of all contractual obligations which may result from an award based on this solicitation, and the awarded vendor shall not be relieved for the non-performance of any or all subcontractors.

Data encryption and stateside data. State IT requires that data be encrypted in transit and in rest. State IT requires that State data assets must be maintained in the United States and data will not be held offshore.

Confidentiality and certification of indemnification

Submitted responses, which are marked confidential in their entirety, or those in which a significant portion of the submitted response is marked confidential may not be accepted. Pursuant to NRS 333.333, only proprietary information may be labeled a trade secret as defined in NRS 600A.030(5). All proposals are confidential until the contract is awarded; at which time, both successful and unsuccessful vendor proposals become public information.

Vendors shall submit proprietary information and confidential business information in separate files, flagged as confidential in nevadaepro.com. The State is not responsible for any information contained within a response; responses shall be released as submitted.

By submitting a response vendor acknowledges its responsibility to act in protection of labeled information and agrees to defend and indemnify the State of Nevada for honoring such designation. Failure to so act shall constitute a complete waiver, and all submitted information shall become public information; additionally, failure to label any information that is released by the State shall constitute a complete waiver of any and all claims for damages caused by the release of the information.

Vendor certifications

Vendor understands and acknowledges that the representations within their response are material and important and are relied on by the State in evaluation of the response. Any vendor misrepresentations can be treated as fraudulent concealment from the State of the true facts relating to the response.

Any and all prices that may be charged under the terms of the contract do not and shall not violate any existing federal, State, or municipal laws or regulations concerning discrimination or price fixing. Vendor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the State harmless from liability for any such violation.

All response terms, including prices, shall remain in effect for a minimum of 180 days after the response due date. In the case of the awarded vendor, all response terms, including prices, shall remain in effect throughout the contract term.

The price(s) and amount of this response have been arrived at independently and without consultation, communication, agreement or disclosure with or to any other contractor, vendor, or potential vendor. No attempt has been made at any time to induce any firm or person to refrain from proposing or to submit a response higher than this response, or to submit any intentionally high or noncompetitive response. All responses shall be made in good faith and without collusion.

The information included in this response has been arrived at independently and without non-public information obtained from State officials, staff, or their agents.

All employees and contractors assigned to the project are authorized to work in this country.

Vendor has a written equal opportunity policy that does not discriminate in employment practices with regard to race, color, national origin, physical condition, creed, religion, age, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, developmental disability or disability of another nature.

Vendor has a written policy regarding compliance for maintaining a drug-free workplace.

Critical items

In addition to the scope of work and attachments, the items listed in this section are critical to the success of the project. These items will be used in evaluating and scoring responses. Vendor response should address items in this section in enough detail to provide evaluators an accurate understanding of vendor capabilities. Responses that fail to sufficiently respond to these items may be considered non-responsive.

Standard form contract. The State strongly prefers vendors agree to the terms of the attached standard form contract as is. Ability to agree to contract terms is a high priority to the State. Vendors who cannot agree to the contract as is must include a redlined Word version of the attached standard form contract with their response, with comments justifying the benefit to the State for each requested change. To the extent a vendor has prior contractual dealings with the State, no assumption should be made that terms outside those provided herein have any influence on this project.

Indemnification. Required contract terms on Indemnification: "To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend, not excluding the State’s right to participate, the State from and against all liability, claims, actions, damages, losses, and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, arising out of any breach of the obligations of Contractor under this contract, or any alleged negligent or willful acts or omissions of Contractor, its officers, employees and agents. Contractor’s obligation to indemnify the State shall apply in all cases except for claims arising solely from the State’s own negligence or willful misconduct. Contractor waives any rights of subrogation against the State. Contractor’s duty to defend begins when the State requests defense of any claim arising from this Contract."

Limited liability. Required contract terms on Limited Liability: "The State will not waive and intends to assert available NRS Chapter 41 liability limitations in all cases. Contract liability of both parties shall not be subject to punitive damages. Damages for any State breach shall never exceed the amount of funds appropriated for payment under this Contract, but not yet paid to Contractor, for the Fiscal Year budget in existence at the time of the breach. Contractor’s tort liability shall not be limited."

Insurance schedule. The State strongly prefers vendors agree to the terms of the attached insurance schedule as is. Vendors who cannot agree must explain which areas are causing non-compliance and attach a redline if necessary. Awarded vendor shall maintain, for the duration of the contract, insurance coverages as set forth in the fully executed contract. Work on the contract shall not begin until after the awarded vendor has submitted acceptable evidence of required insurance. Failure to maintain any required insurance coverage or acceptable alternative method of insurance shall be deemed a breach of contract.

Vendor background

Provide a background, history, and why vendor is qualified to provide the services described in this solicitation. Background should include, at a minimum, the location(s) of the office(s) that would perform the work and the number of employees locally and in total. History should include, at a minimum, the number of years in business and company headquarters location. Provide a brief description of the length of time vendor has been providing services described in this solicitation to the public or private sector. If your company has worked with the State previously, include information about those engagements.

No marketing material desired. Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond those requested and sufficient to present a complete response are not desired.

Key personnel. Provide a resume free of photos or overly stylized formatting for proposed key personnel, whether employed directly or through a subcontractor.

Current or former employees. If you employ (a) any person who is a current employee of an agency of the State of Nevada, or (b) any person who has been an employee of an agency of the State of Nevada within the past two (2) years, and if such person is performing or producing the services which you shall be contracted to provide under this contract, you must disclose the identity of each such person in your response, and specify the services that each person shall be expected to perform.

Exclusions. All conditions and provisions of this solicitation are deemed to be accepted by the vendor and incorporated by reference in the response, except such conditions and provisions that the vendor expressly excludes in the response. Any exclusion shall be in writing and included in the response at the time of submission.

Subcontractors

Subcontractors are defined as a third party, not directly employed by the contractor, who shall provide services identified in this solicitation. This does not include third parties who provide support or incidental services to the contractor.

Vendor shall disclose all proposed subcontractors. Response should include a vendor information response form for each proposed subcontractor.

Vendor shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work until all insurance required of the subcontractor is provided to the vendor.

Vendor shall certify that subcontractors comply with mandatory minimum requirements except contract responsibility.

Vendor response shall identify specific requirements of the project for which each subcontractor shall perform services.

How the work of any subcontractor(s) shall be supervised How channels of communication shall be maintained How compliance with contracts terms and conditions will be assured Previous experience with subcontractor(s)

Confidential business information

The information requested in this section is designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5)(b) and is not public information pursuant to NRS 333.333.

This information should be submitted as a separate attachment, flagged as confidential in nevadaepro.com.

Dun and Bradstreet number. Vendor shall provide their Dun and Bradstreet Number.

Financial information. Vendor shall provide the last two full years and current year interim (a) profit and loss statements and (b) balance statements.

Disclosure. Vendor shall provide complete disclosure of any alleged significant prior or ongoing contract failures, contract breaches, any civil or criminal litigation or investigations pending which involves the vendor or in which the vendor has been judged guilty or liable.

Conflict of interest. Vendor shall disclose any existing or potential conflict of interest relative to the performance of the contractual services resulting from this solicitation. Any such relationship that might be perceived or represented as a conflict shall be disclosed. By submitting a response in response to this solicitation, vendors affirm that they have not given, nor intend to give at any time hereafter, any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, or service to a public servant or any employee or representative of same, in connection with this procurement. Any attempt to intentionally or unintentionally conceal or obfuscate a conflict of interest shall result in disqualification of a vendor response. An award shall not be made where a conflict of interest exists. The State shall determine whether a conflict of interest exists and whether it may reflect negatively on State vendor selection. The State reserves the right to disqualify any vendor on the grounds of actual or apparent conflict of interest.

Client references

Vendor may be asked to provide reference questionnaire attachment to client references from similar projects performed for private or public sector clients within the last five years.

The single point of contact may receive up to three complete reference questionnaire documents directly from the client references via email, if determined to be required for evaluation of the work solicited.

The purpose of these references is to document relevant experience and aid in the evaluation process.

Reference questionnaire will not be accepted directly from proposing vendors.

Client references are not to be requested from the contracting agency.

The State will not disclose client references, but may confirm the quantity of reference questionnaires received.

The State reserves the right to contact client references during evaluation or negotiations.

Submission checklist

This section identifies documents that vendors can submit to be considered responsive. Vendors are encouraged to review all requirements to ensure all requested information is included in their response.

This is a general request for most solicitations. There may be additional instructions within the body of the solicitation that require scope specific response documents. Vendors are encouraged to thoroughly review all requirements.

Responses must be submitted as a quote through nevadaepro.com.

Vendors are encouraged to submit a single file attachment per section where possible.

Technical proposal information and cost proposal information are not to be included in the same attachment.

Cost proposal attachment needs to be a not be flagged as confidential in nevadaepro.com.

Additional attachments may be included, but are discouraged and should be kept to a minimum.

Technical proposal

Title page Table of contents Signed certification regarding lobbying Response to mandatory minimum requirements Response to critical items Response to scope of work Other informational material

Proprietary information. If necessary. Attachment should be flagged confidential in nevadaepro.com.

Title page Table of contents Trade secret information, cross referenced to the technical proposal (alternatively, a redacted technical proposal and a full confidential technical proposal can be submitted)

Cost proposal

Confidential business information. Attachment should be flagged confidential in nevadaepro.com.

Other attachments. If necessary, not recommended.

Client references. Not submitted directly by vendor.

Revised 2024-10 Page 2 of 6

Page 1 of 1 Request for proposals 40DHHS-S3926 image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .