40DHHS-S3774 Reference Questionaire.pdf
PDF 176 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Generator Maintenance Solicitation
- Solicitation number
- 40DHHS-S3774
- Issued by
- Clark County, Fish Springs CDP, Nevada
About this file
This is a Reference Questionnaire form issued by the Nevada State Purchasing Division, Department of Administration, for use in evaluating vendors responding to formal solicitations. The document is specifically designed for client references to provide feedback on proposing vendors or subcontractors for projects of similar size and scope. The questionnaire must be completed by clients who have worked with the vendor and submitted to the designated single point of contact via email with the solicitation number in the subject line by the stated due date. The form requests comprehensive information about the vendor's past performance across multiple dimensions.
The evaluation comprises 15 items, with 13 items requiring numerical ratings on a scale of 1-10, where 0 represents poor or inadequate performance, 1-3 indicates below average performance, 4-6 indicates average performance, 7-9 indicates above average performance, and 10 indicates exceptional performance. Rating categories include vendor knowledge and expertise, flexibility relative to scope and timeline changes, satisfaction with delivered materials and developed products, staff interaction dynamics, schedule adherence and timeliness of deliverables, customer service and issue resolution, billing accuracy and timeliness, and likelihood of future recommendation. Two items request narrative responses without ratings: the capacity in which the client worked with the vendor and aspects of the vendor's services the client is most satisfied with. Completed questionnaires are designated as confidential business information under NRS 333.020(5)(b) and are not subject to public disclosure. The State reserves the right to contact references for further clarification beyond the submitted responses.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 40DHHS-S3774 Attachment DD - Global Business Associate Addendum.docx | DOCX document | |
| 40DHHS-S3774 Terms and Conditions for Services.pdf | ||
| 40DHHS-S3774 Vendor Information Response.pdf | ||
| 40DHHS-S3774 Attachment BB - Insurance Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment AA Generator Maintenance Services - Scope of Work .docx | DOCX document | |
| 40DHHS-S3774 Certification Regarding lobbying.pdf | ||
| 40DHHS-S3774 Standard Form Contract.docx | DOCX document | |
| State Solicitation RFP 40DHHS-S3774.docx | DOCX document | |
| 40DHHS-S3774 Cost Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Quote Instructions.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Nevada State Purchasing Division Department of Administration 515 E Musser St Ste 300 Carson City, NV 89701 purchasing.nv.gov nevadaepro.com
Revised 2024-10 Page 1 of 2
Reference questionnaire
Due Date
Solicitation number
Single point of contact name
Single point of contact email
Proposing vendor or subcontractor
Client providing the reference
Client contact name and title
Client telephone and email
Period of performance
1. CLIENT REFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS
1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposing vendor or subcontractor above. Once you have completed the reference questionnaire, please submit to the single point of contact via email, with the solicitation number in the subject line, no later than the due date above.
1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach additional pages. If attaching additional pages, please place your company/organization name on each page and reference the appropriate RFP number.
1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) and not public information pursuant to NRS 333.333. In addition to the reference questionnaire, the State may contact references for further clarification.
1.1. Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3; Average performance: 4-6; Above average performance: 7-9; Exceptional performance: 10.
2. EVALUATION ITEMS
2.1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating) https://purchasing.nv.gov/ https://nevadaepro.com/ https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec020 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec020 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec333
Page 2 of 2 Reference questionnaire
2.2. Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating:
2.3. Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating:
2.4. Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating:
2.5. Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating:
2.6. Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating:
2.7. Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating:
2.8. Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating:
2.9. Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating:
2.10. Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating:
2.11. Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating:
2.12. Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating:
2.13. Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating:
2.14. Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating)
2.15. Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating)
| 1. Client reference instructions |
| 1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposi... |
| 1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach add... |
| 1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) a... |
| 1.1. Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3;... |
| 2. Evaluation items |
| 2.1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating) |
| 2.2. Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating: |
| 2.3. Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating: |
| 2.4. Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating: |
| 2.5. Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating: |
| 2.6. Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating: |
| 2.7. Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating: |
| 2.8. Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating: |
| 2.9. Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating: |
| 2.10. Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating: |
| 2.11. Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating: |
| 2.12. Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating: |
| 2.13. Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating: |
| 2.14. Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating) |
| 2.15. Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating) |
| text2: |
| 1: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| 6: |
| 7: |
| 8: |
| 9: |
| 10: |
| 211: |
| 12: |
| 13: |
| 14: |
| 15: |
| rating2: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| 6: |
| 7: |
| 8: |
| 9: |
| 10: |
| 11: |
| 12: |
| 13: |
| Solicitation-number: |
| POC-name: |
| POC-email: |
| Proposing-vendor-or-subcontractor: |
| Client-providing-the-reference: |
| Client-contact-name-and-title: |
| Client-telephone-and-email: |
| Period-of-performance: |
| Due-date: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .