4._CBDG-DR_Scorecard_-_Template.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 80 KB Posted

Attached to
25-0425-RFP Management, Administration & Implementation of Community Development Block Grant -Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Program
Solicitation number
25-0425-RFP
Issued by
Pinellas County, Florida

About this file

The document is a comprehensive evaluation scorecard for Pinellas County, Florida's Request for Proposal (RFP) for Management, Administration & Implementation of the Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Program. The county is seeking vendors to provide disaster recovery program and housing program management services for its $813,783,000 CDBG-DR funding allocation. The RFP evaluation process involves multiple assessment teams scoring vendors across four primary criteria: Qualifications & Experience (35% weight), Technical Approach & Project Methodology (30% weight), Past Performance & References (25% weight), and Cost (10% weight). The scoring uses a 0-5 point scale, with vendors evaluated on their expertise in managing HUD CDBG-DR programs, understanding of federal requirements, project management methodology, and implementation capabilities.

The scorecard reveals that two primary vendors, Meyer Technology and LAIC AG, were extensively evaluated, with Meyer Technology consistently scoring higher across all evaluation categories. The financial review section shows varied pricing structures, with vendors like Seabury, PDMS, CASR NOVA, GCR, Troy Meyer, and LAIC AG presenting different cost ranges and project durations spanning 2-12 months. Notably, Pinellas County reserves the right to select multiple vendors and modify bid parameters, with cost ranges potentially fluctuating by 15-20% after initial discovery. The evaluation emphasizes the county's focus on vendors with demonstrated experience in large-scale disaster recovery programs, federal regulatory compliance, and effective program administration.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
25-0425-RFP_Management,_Administration_&_Implementation_of_Community_Development_Block_Grant_-Disaster_Recovery_(CDBG-DR)_Program_(Addendum_#4_Revision).pdf PDF
5b.Option_A_PinellasCDBG-DR_RFPCostMatrixDetail.6.24.25.Unlocked.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
5b.Option_A_PinellasCDBG-DR_RFPCostMatrixDetail.6.24.25.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
5b.Option_A_Pinellas_CDBG-DR_RFP_Cost_Matrix_Detail.6.24.25.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
6b.Option_B_Pinellas_CDBG-DR_RFP_Cost_Matrix_Detail.6.24.25.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
2._Pinellas_Procurement_Clauses__2025_Uniform_Guidancev1.2_FINAL.pdf PDF
1._Pinellas_Vendor_Submission_Guidelines_Form..pdf PDF
6b.Option_B_Pinellas_CDBG-DR_RFP_Cost_Matrix_Detail.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
5b.Option_A_Pinellas_CDBG-DR_RFP_Cost_Matrix_Detail.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Human_Trafficking_Affidavit_02.05.2025.pdf PDF
Common_Carrier_Attestation_02.05.2025.pdf PDF
3._Pinellas_County_Request_for_Proposal_v6.4FINALSUBMITTEDDRAFT_(003).docx DOCX document
Pinellas_County_Request_for_Proposal_v6.4_FINALSUBMITTEDDRAFT_(003).pdf PDF
5b.Option_A_Pinellas_CDBG-DR_RFP_Cost_Matrix_DetailV1.3_FINALDRAFTSUBMITTED.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Foreign_Countries_of_Concern_Affidavit_02.05.2025.pdf PDF
AttachmentsToInclude.pdf PDF
Non-Competitive_Oversight_Committee_Justification_Form.docx DOCX document
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Instructions

Instructions for Completing the RFP Scorecard
This scorecard is designed to evaluate vendor responses for the CBDG-DR Program. Please review each criterion carefully and assign a numeric score to each vendor based on their proposal content.

Step-by-Step Guidance

1. Locate Your Evaluation Sheet
Go to the sheet labeled with your team name (e.g., "Team 1", "Team 2", etc.).
2. Understand the Evaluation Categories
Each vendor is scored across three primary sections:
A. Qualification & Experience
B. Technical Approach & Project Methodology
C. Past Performance & References
Each section includes multiple sub-criteria.
3. Review Proposal Content
For each sub-criterion, read the corresponding section in the vendor proposal carefully.
4. Score Each Vendor
Enter a numerical score (0 to 5) for each criterion under the appropriate vendor column.
Reference the “Evaluation Legend” sheet to understand what each score represents.
5. Use Whole or Half Points
You may use half-point increments (e.g., 2.5, 3.5) where appropriate.
6. Average Scores
The “Average Score” rows under each category should automatically calculate if formulas are set.
If not, manually average the scores you entered for each vendor in that category.
7. Do Not Modify Headers or Structure
Only input scores. Avoid altering row titles, column headings, or formulas.
8. Repeat for All Vendors
Score all vendors listed across the top of the sheet for each applicable criterion.
9. Save and Submit
Once completed, save your sheet and send it to the Evaluation Coordinator or follow your team lead’s instructions.

Consolidated- Summary Management, Administration & Implementation of Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery (CBDG-DR) Program

CRITERIA CHECKLIST
Please enter your scores for each submission on the vendor tab. See Evaluation Legend tab for scoring.
1. Quality of ProposalVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Demonstrated direct experience managing HUD CDBG-DR programs, specifically in large-scale disaster recovery.0000002020
Clearly documented qualifications, credentials, and training of key project personnel, particularly the Lead Project Manager and compliance specialists.0000002012
Proven expertise and thorough knowledge of federal requirements including 2 CFR Part 200, Davis-Bacon Act, Section 3 compliance, URA, Environmental Reviews (Tier 1 & 2), and HUD regulations.0000002012
Firms Experience coordinating effectively with FEMA, HUD, and other governmental agencies.0000002012
Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.0020.0014.00
2. Approach and CapabilityVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Comprehensive project management methodology demonstrating clarity, feasibility, efficiency, and alignment with Pinellas County’s Action Plan priorities ("People First" approach).000000208
Clearly defined mobilization plan, demonstrating capability to initiate Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program intake.000000012
Innovative and streamlined approach to applicant intake, customer service, communication/outreach, and administrative processes ensuring rapid deployment of resources000000164
Effective strategies for compliance monitoring, reporting, transparency, and integration with Pinellas County’s financial and data management systems0000001612
Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.0013.009.00
3. ExperienceVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Documented successful implementation of comparable CDBG-DR projects over the past five years, including clearly defined outcomes, timelines met, and budget adherence.0000001612
Positive references from governmental or public sector clients, verifying reliability, responsiveness, regulatory compliance, and quality of deliverables.000000169
Demonstrated history of effective problem-solving, adaptability, and proactive risk management during past projects of comparable complexity and size.00000000
Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.0010.677.11
4. CostVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Proposed fee structure, including billing rates, hourly rates, reimbursable expenses, etc.00000000
Competitiveness and reasonableness of proposed fees, hourly rates, and reimbursable expenses.000000
Clear and transparent cost structure, minimizing potential for unexpected or additional fees.000000
Average Score0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
CRITERIA SCORESWEIGHTVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
1. Quality of Proposal35%0.000.000.000.000.000.007.004.90
2. Approach and Capability30%0.000.000.000.000.000.003.902.70
3. Experience25%0.000.000.000.000.000.002.671.78
4. Cost10%0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Weighted Score1.000.000.000.000.000.000.0013.579.38

Finance Review

FirmDevelopmentMaintenance
(over 10 years)LicencingTotalNotesSchedule
LowHighLowHighLowHigh
Seabury$1,228,550$1,228,550$1,174,500$1,174,500$2,403,000$2,403,000Cost range will be +- 20% after discovery

Confusing, how does it break down?

PDMS € 400,000 € 550,000 € 550,000 € 700,000 € 400,000 € 1,350,000 € 1,650,000 Data migration: 25k-40 Training: 15k

Travel and Hotel: 15kDeveloped system for the Isle of Man aircraft registry
EMPIC---------
Total AOC€ 0€ 0€ 266,400€ 266,400€ 0€ 266,400€ 266,400Development and maintenance included in licencing.12 months
CASR NOVA$1,290,000$1,290,000$979,492$979,492$550,000$2,819,492$2,819,492Reserve the right to modify the bid +- 15%

Includes local technical support Once annual hours are exceeded, $172.50 per hour

9 months
GCR$496,612$619,595$569,346$569,346$0$1,065,958$1,188,941Licencing included in maintenance11 months / 44 weeks / 266 days
Troy Meyer$150,000$225,000$150,000$225,000Not Provided$300,000$450,000Pricing does not include equipment, travel, hosting, or 3rd party software licences9 - 12 months
LAIC AG€ 55,000€ 55,000€ 450,000€ 450,000€ 50,000€ 555,000€ 555,000Travel and accomodations are not included2 months Gantt Chart is hard to read

Evaluation Legend

Evaluation Legend
12345
Poor/Below expectations.Vendor did not meet requirements, or the vendor did not provide enough information to evaluate.
(0-19%)The vendor met some requirements

(20-50%) The vendor met most requirements (51-95%)

The vendor fully met this requirement.
(96-100%)The vendor met this requirement and exceeded expectations.

(>100%)

Team 1 Management, Administration & Implementation of Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery (CBDG-DR) Program

CRITERIA CHECKLIST
Please enter your scores for each submission on the vendor tab. See Evaluation Legend tab for scoring.
A. Qualification & ExperienceVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Demonstrated direct experience managing HUD CDBG-DR programs, specifically in large-scale disaster recovery.55
Clearly documented qualifications, credentials, and training of key project personnel, particularly the Lead Project Manager and compliance specialists.53
Proven expertise and thorough knowledge of federal requirements including 2 CFR Part 200, Davis-Bacon Act, Section 3 compliance, URA, Environmental Reviews (Tier 1 & 2), and HUD regulations.53
Firms Experience coordinating effectively with FEMA, HUD, and other governmental agencies, preferably in Florida or similar jurisdictions.53
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!5.003.50
B. Technical Approach & Project MethodologyVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Comprehensive project management methodology demonstrating clarity, feasibility, efficiency, and alignment with Pinellas County’s Action Plan priorities ("People First" approach).52
Clearly defined mobilization plan, demonstrating capability to initiate Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program intake.03
Innovative and streamlined approach to applicant intake, customer service, communication/outreach, and administrative processes ensuring rapid deployment of resources41
Effective strategies for compliance monitoring, reporting, transparency, and integration with Pinellas County’s financial and data management systems (Neighborly Software experience preferred).43
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!3.252.25
C. Past Performance & ReferencesVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Documented successful implementation of comparable CDBG-DR projects over the past five years, including clearly defined outcomes, timelines met, and budget adherence.42
Positive references from governmental or public sector clients, verifying reliability, responsiveness, regulatory compliance, and quality of deliverables.42
Demonstrated history of effective problem-solving, adaptability, and proactive risk management during past projects of comparable complexity and size.43
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!4.002.33
4. CostVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Proposed fee structure, including billing rates, hourly rates, reimbursable expenses, etc.50
Competitiveness and reasonableness of proposed fees, hourly rates, and reimbursable expenses.
Clear and transparent cost structure, minimizing potential for unexpected or additional fees.
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!5.000.00
CRITERIA SCORESWEIGHTVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
A. Qualifications & Experience35%ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!0.750.53
B. Technical Approach & Project Methodology30%ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#VALUE!1.230.88
C. Past Performance & References25%ERROR:#DIV/0!0.00ERROR:#DIV/0!0.000.000.001.000.67
D. Cost10%ERROR:#DIV/0!0.00ERROR:#DIV/0!0.000.000.001.250.00
Weighted Score1.00ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!4.232.07

Team 2 Management, Administration & Implementation of Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery (CBDG-DR) Program

CRITERIA CHECKLIST
Please enter your scores for each submission on the vendor tab. See Evaluation Legend tab for scoring.
A. Qualification & ExperienceVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Demonstrated direct experience managing HUD CDBG-DR programs, specifically in large-scale disaster recovery.55
Clearly documented qualifications, credentials, and training of key project personnel, particularly the Lead Project Manager and compliance specialists.53
Proven expertise and thorough knowledge of federal requirements including 2 CFR Part 200, Davis-Bacon Act, Section 3 compliance, URA, Environmental Reviews (Tier 1 & 2), and HUD regulations.53
Firms Experience coordinating effectively with FEMA, HUD, and other governmental agencies, preferably in Florida or similar jurisdictions.53
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!5.003.50
B. Technical Approach & Project MethodologyVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Comprehensive project management methodology demonstrating clarity, feasibility, efficiency, and alignment with Pinellas County’s Action Plan priorities ("People First" approach).52
Clearly defined mobilization plan, demonstrating capability to initiate Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program intake.03
Innovative and streamlined approach to applicant intake, customer service, communication/outreach, and administrative processes ensuring rapid deployment of resources41
Effective strategies for compliance monitoring, reporting, transparency, and integration with Pinellas County’s financial and data management systems (Neighborly Software experience preferred).43
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!3.252.25
C. Past Performance & ReferencesVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Documented successful implementation of comparable CDBG-DR projects over the past five years, including clearly defined outcomes, timelines met, and budget adherence.42
Positive references from governmental or public sector clients, verifying reliability, responsiveness, regulatory compliance, and quality of deliverables.42
Demonstrated history of effective problem-solving, adaptability, and proactive risk management during past projects of comparable complexity and size.43
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!4.002.33
4. CostVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Proposed fee structure, including billing rates, hourly rates, reimbursable expenses, etc.50
Competitiveness and reasonableness of proposed fees, hourly rates, and reimbursable expenses.
Clear and transparent cost structure, minimizing potential for unexpected or additional fees.
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!5.000.00
CRITERIA SCORESWEIGHTVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
A. Qualifications & Experience35%ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!0.750.53
B. Technical Approach & Project Methodology30%ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#VALUE!1.230.88
C. Past Performance & References25%ERROR:#DIV/0!0.00ERROR:#DIV/0!0.000.000.001.000.67
D. Cost10%ERROR:#DIV/0!0.00ERROR:#DIV/0!0.000.000.001.250.00
Weighted Score1.00ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!4.232.07

Team 3 Management, Administration & Implementation of Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery (CBDG-DR) Program

CRITERIA CHECKLIST
Please enter your scores for each submission on the vendor tab. See Evaluation Legend tab for scoring.
A. Qualification & ExperienceVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Demonstrated direct experience managing HUD CDBG-DR programs, specifically in large-scale disaster recovery.55
Clearly documented qualifications, credentials, and training of key project personnel, particularly the Lead Project Manager and compliance specialists.53
Proven expertise and thorough knowledge of federal requirements including 2 CFR Part 200, Davis-Bacon Act, Section 3 compliance, URA, Environmental Reviews (Tier 1 & 2), and HUD regulations.53
Firms Experience coordinating effectively with FEMA, HUD, and other governmental agencies, preferably in Florida or similar jurisdictions.53
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!5.003.50
B. Technical Approach & Project MethodologyVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Comprehensive project management methodology demonstrating clarity, feasibility, efficiency, and alignment with Pinellas County’s Action Plan priorities ("People First" approach).52
Clearly defined mobilization plan, demonstrating capability to initiate Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program intake.03
Innovative and streamlined approach to applicant intake, customer service, communication/outreach, and administrative processes ensuring rapid deployment of resources41
Effective strategies for compliance monitoring, reporting, transparency, and integration with Pinellas County’s financial and data management systems (Neighborly Software experience preferred).43
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!3.252.25
C. Past Performance & ReferencesVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Documented successful implementation of comparable CDBG-DR projects over the past five years, including clearly defined outcomes, timelines met, and budget adherence.42
Positive references from governmental or public sector clients, verifying reliability, responsiveness, regulatory compliance, and quality of deliverables.42
Demonstrated history of effective problem-solving, adaptability, and proactive risk management during past projects of comparable complexity and size.43
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!4.002.33
4. CostVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Proposed fee structure, including billing rates, hourly rates, reimbursable expenses, etc.50
Competitiveness and reasonableness of proposed fees, hourly rates, and reimbursable expenses.
Clear and transparent cost structure, minimizing potential for unexpected or additional fees.
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!5.000.00
CRITERIA SCORESWEIGHTVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
A. Qualifications & Experience35%ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!0.750.53
B. Technical Approach & Project Methodology30%ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#VALUE!1.230.88
C. Past Performance & References25%ERROR:#DIV/0!0.00ERROR:#DIV/0!0.000.000.001.000.67
D. Cost10%ERROR:#DIV/0!0.00ERROR:#DIV/0!0.000.000.001.250.00
Weighted Score1.00ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!4.232.07

Team 4 Management, Administration & Implementation of Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery (CBDG-DR) Program

CRITERIA CHECKLIST
Please enter your scores for each submission on the vendor tab. See Evaluation Legend tab for scoring.
A. Qualification & ExperienceVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Demonstrated direct experience managing HUD CDBG-DR programs, specifically in large-scale disaster recovery.55
Clearly documented qualifications, credentials, and training of key project personnel, particularly the Lead Project Manager and compliance specialists.53
Proven expertise and thorough knowledge of federal requirements including 2 CFR Part 200, Davis-Bacon Act, Section 3 compliance, URA, Environmental Reviews (Tier 1 & 2), and HUD regulations.53
Firms Experience coordinating effectively with FEMA, HUD, and other governmental agencies, preferably in Florida or similar jurisdictions.53
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!5.003.50
B. Technical Approach & Project MethodologyVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Comprehensive project management methodology demonstrating clarity, feasibility, efficiency, and alignment with Pinellas County’s Action Plan priorities ("People First" approach).52
Clearly defined mobilization plan, demonstrating capability to initiate Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program intake.03
Innovative and streamlined approach to applicant intake, customer service, communication/outreach, and administrative processes ensuring rapid deployment of resources41
Effective strategies for compliance monitoring, reporting, transparency, and integration with Pinellas County’s financial and data management systems (Neighborly Software experience preferred).43
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!3.252.25
C. Past Performance & ReferencesVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Documented successful implementation of comparable CDBG-DR projects over the past five years, including clearly defined outcomes, timelines met, and budget adherence.42
Positive references from governmental or public sector clients, verifying reliability, responsiveness, regulatory compliance, and quality of deliverables.42
Demonstrated history of effective problem-solving, adaptability, and proactive risk management during past projects of comparable complexity and size.43
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!4.002.33
4. CostVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Proposed fee structure, including billing rates, hourly rates, reimbursable expenses, etc.50
Competitiveness and reasonableness of proposed fees, hourly rates, and reimbursable expenses.
Clear and transparent cost structure, minimizing potential for unexpected or additional fees.
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!5.000.00
CRITERIA SCORESWEIGHTVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
A. Qualifications & Experience35%ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!0.750.53
B. Technical Approach & Project Methodology30%ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#VALUE!1.230.88
C. Past Performance & References25%ERROR:#DIV/0!0.00ERROR:#DIV/0!0.000.000.001.000.67
D. Cost10%ERROR:#DIV/0!0.00ERROR:#DIV/0!0.000.000.001.250.00
Weighted Score1.00ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!4.232.07

Team 5 Management, Administration & Implementation of Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery (CBDG-DR) Program

CRITERIA CHECKLIST
Please enter your scores for each submission on the vendor tab. See Evaluation Legend tab for scoring.
A. Qualification & ExperienceVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Demonstrated direct experience managing HUD CDBG-DR programs, specifically in large-scale disaster recovery.55
Clearly documented qualifications, credentials, and training of key project personnel, particularly the Lead Project Manager and compliance specialists.53
Proven expertise and thorough knowledge of federal requirements including 2 CFR Part 200, Davis-Bacon Act, Section 3 compliance, URA, Environmental Reviews (Tier 1 & 2), and HUD regulations.53
Firms Experience coordinating effectively with FEMA, HUD, and other governmental agencies, preferably in Florida or similar jurisdictions.53
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!5.003.50
B. Technical Approach & Project MethodologyVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Comprehensive project management methodology demonstrating clarity, feasibility, efficiency, and alignment with Pinellas County’s Action Plan priorities ("People First" approach).52
Clearly defined mobilization plan, demonstrating capability to initiate Homeowner Housing Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program intake.03
Innovative and streamlined approach to applicant intake, customer service, communication/outreach, and administrative processes ensuring rapid deployment of resources41
Effective strategies for compliance monitoring, reporting, transparency, and integration with Pinellas County’s financial and data management systems (Neighborly Software experience preferred).43
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!3.252.25
C. Past Performance & ReferencesVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Documented successful implementation of comparable CDBG-DR projects over the past five years, including clearly defined outcomes, timelines met, and budget adherence.42
Positive references from governmental or public sector clients, verifying reliability, responsiveness, regulatory compliance, and quality of deliverables.42
Demonstrated history of effective problem-solving, adaptability, and proactive risk management during past projects of comparable complexity and size.43
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!4.002.33
4. CostVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
Proposed fee structure, including billing rates, hourly rates, reimbursable expenses, etc.50
Competitiveness and reasonableness of proposed fees, hourly rates, and reimbursable expenses.
Clear and transparent cost structure, minimizing potential for unexpected or additional fees.
Average ScoreERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!5.000.00
CRITERIA SCORESWEIGHTVendor 1Vendor 2EMPICVendor 3Vendor 4Vendor 5Meyer TechnologyLAIC AG
A. Qualifications & Experience35%ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!0.750.53
B. Technical Approach & Project Methodology30%ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#VALUE!ERROR:#VALUE!1.230.88
C. Past Performance & References25%ERROR:#DIV/0!0.00ERROR:#DIV/0!0.000.000.001.000.67
D. Cost10%ERROR:#DIV/0!0.00ERROR:#DIV/0!0.000.000.001.250.00
Weighted Score1.00ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!ERROR:#DIV/0!4.232.07

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .