4-Attachment C Technical Scorable Criteria Questions.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 11 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JH26-8 Mohrland Adit and Collection Box Project
- Solicitation number
- JH26-8
- Issued by
- Duchesne County, Utah
About this file
The document is an Attachment C Technical Scorable Criteria spreadsheet for the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and Division of Oil, Gas and Mining, specifically for the JH26-8 Mohrland Adit and Collection Box Project in Emery County. The project seeks engineering services for abandoned mine reclamation, with a contract term of five years and a deliverable deadline of June 1st, 2026. The procurement will be conducted under Utah Procurement Code 63G-6a Part 15 for Design Professional Service Providers and Consultants, with vendor selection based on a technical scoring system across six key evaluation criteria including investigation and field inventory, water rights research, engineering and design, construction specifications, project summary, and examples of previous work.
The solicitation will award the contract to the vendor with the highest technical score, with a total possible score of 500 points. Vendors are instructed not to include pricing in their qualifications, and the state will negotiate compensation determined to be fair and reasonable with the highest-scoring vendor. If negotiations fail with the top-scored vendor, the state may proceed to negotiate with the next highest-scoring vendor. The project appears to focus on abandoned mine reclamation, water rights research, and engineering design for a specific site in Emery County, Utah, with an emphasis on technical expertise and demonstrated previous work in similar environmental remediation projects.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 5-JH26-8 Score Sheet for Information Purposes Only.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 3-Attachment A Agency Terms and Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Request for Statement of Qualifications (RFSQ) Document.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Attachment C: Technicable Scorable Criteria Questions | |||
| Question # | Technical Scorable Criteria | Request for Statement of Qualifications (RFSQ)Section | Points Possible |
| #1 | Investigation and Field Inventory: |
1.a STATEMENT and technical approach show an understanding of OWNER‘s goals.
1.b STATEMENT shows direct experience and expertise with abandoned mine inventory and site investigation. Understanding of a variety of abandoned mine reclamation technologies with knowledge of the limitations and advantages of each. Exhibits an understanding of cultural resources, legal concerns/needs and their technical ramifications.
| 1.c Staff qualifications | Scope of Work B.2, B.3, B.4 | 100.0 | ||
| #2 | Water Rights Research: |
2.a STATEMENT shows the ability to research and accurately determine water rights and ownership of water leaving the mine .
2.b Direct experience and expertise in water rights and records research, particularly with water.
| 2.c Staff qualifications | Scope of Work B.7 | 50.0 | ||
| #3 | Engineering and Design: |
3.a STATEMENT demonstrates direct experience and expertise in design and engineering of abandoned mine reclamation projects and engineereing water collection system
| 3.b Staff qualifications | Scope of Work B.8 | 100.0 | ||
| #4 | Bid Ready Construction Specifications and Project summary: |
4.a STATEMENT shows the ability to produce bid-ready specification packages that adhere to OWNER’s template/requirements.
| 4.b Staff qualifications | Scope of Work B.9 | 75.0 | ||
| #5 | Project Summary: |
5.a STATEMENT presents a logical, thorough process for the design of the project.
| 5.b Identified obstacles are realistic and proposed solutions demonstrate ability of FIRM to overcome them. | Request for Statement of Qualifications (RFSQ) | 100.0 | ||
| #6 | Examples of previous work: |
6.a Examples of previous work such as investigation reports, maps, etc., hazard assessment, and earthwork designs show VENDOR’s capability to perform the required work at the highest quality level. Product quality and media are compatible with OWNER’s needs and hardware and software capabilities.
| 6.b Provide an example of previous work in related tasks where the client identified problems and how VENDOR resolved the issues. | Request for Statement of Qualifications (RFSQ) | 75.0 | ||
| Total Possible Points | 500.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .