4-Attach-C Questions-for-potential-vendors MW26-13-1.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- MW26-13-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an Attachment C questionnaire document issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for Request for Statement of Qualifications solicitation MW26-13-1, which seeks vendors to provide workforce development training on the Universal Prevention Curriculum Coordinator Series (UPC-C) professional education program developed by Zili Sloboda. The procurement is intended to result in a 5-year contract with a single vendor selected through a competitive qualifications-based process under Utah Procurement Code 63G-6a Part 15. Submissions must be received by the specified deadline via the U3P system or email to mwoodward@utah.gov with the subject line "MW26-13-1 Statement of Qualifications submission," and late submissions will not be accepted.
The questionnaire requires potential vendors to address six primary areas: submission of resumes for one to three key personnel with emphasis on those holding doctorates in behavioral health, research, or education; documentation of experience teaching prevention science training with specific frameworks or curricula used and participant feedback; experience working with governmental entities and consulting on substance use prevention policy implementation and evaluation; quality assurance practices for customer service and administrative tasks; confirmation of UPC-C training capability or submission of equivalent training models with evidence-based justification; and assessment of resource capacity to meet the scope of work objectives within stated timeframes. Vendors are explicitly instructed not to include pricing in their qualifications submissions, with final contract compensation to be determined through negotiation based on fair and reasonable rates once the highest-ranked vendor is selected.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-Attach-D Example-Scoresheet MW26-13-1.pdf | ||
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 5-Attach-B SOW MW26-13-1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Attach-A DHHS Terms and Conditions MW26-13-1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment C - Questions for Potential Vendors Training for Substance Use Prevention Professionals
REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Solicitation # MW26-13-1
Vendor Name
Questions for potential vendors to answer:
1. Attach resumes of 1-3 key people in your organization who would perform this work, if your company received an “award and intent to contract” under MW26-13-1 (this procurement). Please emphasize any of your people who hold a Doctorate degree in the fields of behavioral health, research, and/or education.
2. What experience does your company and the key people from question #1 have teaching training on applying prevention science to address substance use and other behavioral problems. Please include which framework(s) or curriculum model(s) were used in these historical training(s) and the composition of the training audience (for example: government employees, teachers, students, the general public, etc.)? Additionally, if you have quotes of post-training participants (giving you feedback on the training), please include 3-4 brief participant quotes.
3. What experience does your company and the key people from question #1 have working for governmental entities and consulting for government professionals who make policy decisions regarding the support and implementation of substance use prevention interventions and policies at the community level? What is your experience with teaching these professionals best practices for evaluating prevention activity efforts and outcomes?
4. How does your company ensure quality customer service and accuracy in administrative tasks (for example: ease of booking training; accuracy in training records; contract compliance; and prompt, accurate invoicing)?
5a. Though this procurement was written with the UPC-C model in mind, the State is open to considering “or equivalent” trainings. Is the training you offer the UPC-C model? Check one of these two options:
| |_| |
| Yes. My company is qualified to train the Universal Prevention Curriculum Coordinator Series (UPC-C) professional education program (developed by Zili Sloboda) to substance use prevention professionals and/or other government workforce development audiences |
| Answer question 5b below |
| |_| |
| No. My company does not train the UPC-C but offers an “or equivalent” training model |
| Answer question 5c below |
5b. If you answered “yes” to question 5a above… What experience does your company and the key people from question #1 have teaching UPC-C to substance use prevention professionals and/or other government workforce development audiences? Additionally, what UPC-C training format(s) are offered by your company (for example: on-line; in-person; instructor-led, etc.) and what makes your trainer(s) qualified to teach the UPC-C model?
5c. If you answered “no” to question 5a above… Which substance use prevention model(s) does your company offer training for? What experience does your company and the key people from question #1 have teaching the proposed model? What training format(s) are offered by your company (for example: on-line; in-person; instructor-led, etc.) and what makes your trainer(s) qualified to teach the proposed model? Additionally, provide a concise description of the proposed “or equivalent” training so that the State can confirm that this proposed “or equivalent” training can accomplish the same desired outcomes as the UPC-C model. Is the proposed “or equivalent” training “evidence-based” and/or referenced on the https://www.samhsa.gov/substance-use/prevention/substance-use-disorders website?
6. Please review the MW26-13-1 scope of work and think about the estimated time and resources it would take your company to accomplish the SOW as written (or “as modified” for an “or equivalent” training model). Can your company commit the resources it would take to achieve the SOW objectives within the time frame described in the SOW? If your company would like to propose any changes in this regard, please outline the changes here.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .