3-Attach-D Example-Scoresheet MW26-13-1.pdf
PDF 797 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- MW26-13-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an example scoresheet for a Request for Statement of Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for solicitation MW26-13-1, Training for Substance Use Prevention Professionals. The procurement seeks a vendor to provide workforce development training specific to the Universal Prevention Curriculum Coordinator Series (UPC-C) professional education program developed by Zili Sloboda. The contract term is five years. Submissions must be received by the stated deadline via email to mwoodward@utah.gov with the subject line "MW26-13-1 Statement of Qualifications submission," and late submissions will not be accepted. Prospective vendors should not include pricing information in their qualifications statements.
The scoresheet establishes six scoreable technical criteria weighted across 600 total possible points, with a minimum required threshold of 390 points (65 percent) for advancement. The evaluation criteria include: resumes of key personnel (23 points, 19.2 percent); experience teaching training on applying prevention science to substance use and behavioral problems (13 points, 10.8 percent); experience with governmental entities and government consulting (13 points, 10.8 percent); quality of administrative capabilities (13 points, 10.8 percent); quality of training model and trainer qualifications (45 points, 37.5 percent); and capacity to accomplish the scope of work (13 points, 10.8 percent). Minimum mandatory requirements include holding a doctorate degree in behavioral health, research, or education and possessing experience providing training on applying prevention science. The vendor with the highest ranking will be selected to negotiate a contract at fair and reasonable compensation as determined by the state, with the option to proceed to the next highest-ranked vendor if negotiations fail with the top-ranked firm.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4-Attach-C Questions-for-potential-vendors MW26-13-1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 5-Attach-B SOW MW26-13-1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Attach-A DHHS Terms and Conditions MW26-13-1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Date:
Evaluator Score (0-5)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible
Points Earned
1 23 19.2% 115.0 0.0
2 13 10.8% 65.0 0.0
Vendor and its staff members, collectively as a team, must possess the following qualifications… Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
0 = Fail, the statement of qualification(s) fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ or cannot be assessed due to missing information;
1 = Poor, the statement of qualification(s) inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information;
2 = Unsatisfactory, the statement of qualification(s) addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ in an unsatisfactory manner;
Vendor:
ATTACHMENT D - EXAMPLE SCORESHEET
Training for Substance Use Prevention Professionals
REQUEST FOR STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Solicitation # MW26-13-1
Experience teaching training on applying prevention science to address substance use and other behavioral problems (see attachment C question 2 for more detail)
Have expertise in providing an evidence-based curriculum or framework that encompass prevention knowledge, skills, and competencies needed for today’s prevention professionals
Evaluator:
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Hold a Doctorate degree in behavioral health, research, or education
Have experience providing training on applying prevention science to address substance use and other behavioral problems
3 = Satisfactory, the statement of qualification(s) addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ in a minimum satisfactory manner;
4 = Good, the statement of qualification(s) addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ and in some respects exceeds them;
5 = Excellent, the statement of qualification(s) addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFSQ.
Score will be assigned as follows:
Resumes of key people (see attachment C question 1 for more detail)
Exa mple
3 13 10.8% 65.0 0.0
4 13 10.8% 65.0 0.0
5 45 37.5% 225.0 0.0
6 13 10.8% 65.0 0.0
100.0% 600.0 0.0
Min Percent
Min Points Required
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Status
65% 390.0 0.0 0.0%
Ensure quality customer service and accuracy in administrative tasks (see attachment C question 4 for more detail)
Quality of training model and trainers' qualifications / experience in the model (see attachment C question 5 for more detail)
Experience working for governmental entities and consulting for government professionals (see attachment C question 3 for more detail)
Totals:
Required Technical Point Threshold
Vendor has the capacity (time and resources) to accomplish the scope of work (SOW) (see attachment C question 6 and attachment C for more detail)
Exa mple
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .