4-AS27-122 Score Sheet - Informational Only.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 33 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- AS27-122
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
Summary
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Willard Bay State Park Concession Operations (SOLICITATION # AS27-122) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and conducted by the State of Utah Division of State Parks. The procurement seeks a single contract award to operate concessions at Willard Bay State Park for a five-year initial term with one five-year renewal option. The contract requires vendors to guarantee their concession fee for the full five-year initial period. The scoresheet is structured to evaluate up to twenty vendors across both mandatory requirements and scoreable technical criteria, with evaluations to be completed by a panel of five evaluators using a standardized scoring rubric ranging from 0 (Fail) to 5 (Excellent).
The evaluation framework allocates 850 total technical points across eleven criteria covering operational safety, site infrastructure, management experience, and financial capability, with a minimum threshold score of 595 points (70 percent) required for technical qualification. An additional 150 points are allocated for the concession fee proposal, calculated based on the highest proposed percentage of gross receipts, resulting in a maximum possible score of 1,000 points. The six mandatory requirements—site visit verification, professional experience baseline, financial and bonding viability, insurance indemnification capacity, clean operational history, and contractual and statutory compliance—must receive a passing evaluation before a vendor's technical proposal is scored. This scoresheet is identified as informational only and remains blank pending completion of vendor evaluations.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Attachment E Mandatory Minimums and Technical Criteria.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Att.-A-Agency-Terms-and-Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 9-Attachment D Fee Proposal.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 3-Attachment B Concession Standard Terms and Conditions rev. 08-04-26 (1).docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 7-Willard Bay Site Visit Location Map.jpg | JPG image | |
| 8-RFP Overview.docx | DOCX document | |
| 10-Attachment C Scope of Services - as.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Willard Bay State Park Concessions Operations |
| SOLICITATION # AS27-122 |
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET |
| Evaluator: | Score will be assigned as follows: | |||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||||||||||||
| Date: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |||||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||||||||||||
| 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||||||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||||||||||||
| 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||||||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor F | Vendor G | Vendor H | Vendor I | Vendor J | |||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Site Visit Verification | Att D | ||||||||||
| 2 | Professional Experience Baseline | Att D | ||||||||||
| 3 | Financial and Bonding Viability | Att D | ||||||||||
| 4 | Insurance Indemnification Capacity | Att D | ||||||||||
| 5 | Clean Operational History | Att D | ||||||||||
| 6 | Contractual and Statutory Compliance | Att D |
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor F | Vendor G | Vendor H | Vendor I | Vendor J | ||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points | |||||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points | |||||||||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points | |||||||||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points | |||||||||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points | |||||||||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points | |||||||||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points | |||||||||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points | |||||||||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points | |||||||||||||||
| Earned | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Points |
Earned
| 1.1 | Motorized Fleet & Boarter Safety Plan | Att D | 20 | 11.8% | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1.2 | Floating Inflatable Aqua Park Operations and Contingency Plan | Att D | 18 | 10.6% | 90.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1.3 | Waterfront Safety, Lifeguarding & Emergency Protocols | Att D | 12 | 7.1% | 60.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 2.1 | Temporary Mobile Infrastructure & Site Logistics | Att D | 20 | 11.8% | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 2.2 | Customer Service, Technology & Staffing | Att D | 16 | 9.4% | 80.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 2.3 | Environmental Stewardship, AIS & Fleet Fueling Safety | Att D | 14 | 8.2% | 70.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 3.1 | Experience & Operational Track Record | Att D | 20 | 11.8% | 100.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 3.2 | Key Leadership & Site Management Resumes | Att D | 15 | 8.8% | 75.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 4.1 | Proof of Capital & Fleet Financing | Att D | 16 | 9.4% | 80.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 4.2 | 5-year Financial Forecast | Att D | 12 | 7.1% | 60.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 4.3 | Financial History & Security Commiment | Att D | 7 | 4.1% | 35.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 850.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required |
| Att D | 70% | 595.0 |
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each Offeror’s fee proposal will be based on the highest percentage of gross receipts. The Offeror with the highest proposed percentage will receive 100% of the price points. All other Offerors will receive a portion of the total points based on what percentage lower their proposed percentage is than the highest proposed percentage. The formula to compute the points is: price points x (Offeror’s Proposed Percentage/Highest Proposed Percentage). | ||
| Total Evaluation Points | Points Possible | |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 850.0 | |
| Total Concession Fee Evaluation Points | 150.0 | |
| Total Evaluation Points | 1,000.0 |
Scoresheet Summary AS27-122 Willard Bay State Park Concessions Operations
| Signatures: | Date: |
| Evaluator 1 | __________________ |
| Evaluator 2 | __________________ |
| Evaluator 3 | __________________ |
| Evaluator 4 | __________________ |
| Evaluator 5 | __________________ |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor F | Vendor G | Vendor H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T | |
| 1 | Site Visit Verification | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | Professional Experience Baseline | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | Financial and Bonding Viability | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | Insurance Indemnification Capacity | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | Clean Operational History | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | Contractual and Statutory Compliance |
| Weight | Technical Scores | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor F | Vendor G | Vendor H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T |
| Criteria #1.1 Motorized Fleet & Boater Safety Plan | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 20.0 | Criteria #1.1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 100) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #1.2. Floating Inflatable Aqua Park Operations & Contingency Plan | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 18.0 | Criteria #1.2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 90) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #1.3. Waterfront Safety, Lifeguarding & Emergency Protocols | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 12.0 | Criteria #1.3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 60) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #2.1. Temporary Mobile Infrastructure & Site Logistics | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 20.0 | Criteria #2.1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 100) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #2.2. Customer Service, Technology & Staffing | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 16.0 | Criteria #2.2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 80) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #2.3. Environmental Stewardship, AIS & Fleet Fueling Safety | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 14.0 | Criteria #2.3 - Total Points (Total Possible 70) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Criteria #3.1. | Experience & Operational Track Record | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
| 20.0 | Criteria #3.1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 100) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||
| Criteria #3.2. | Key Leadership & Site Management Resumes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
| 15.0 | Criteria #3.2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 75) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||
| Criteria #4.1. | Proof of Capital & Financial Backing | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
| 16.0 | Criteria #4.1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 80) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||
| Criteria #4.2. 5-Year Financial Forecast | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||||
| 12.0 | Criteria #4.2- Total Points (Total Possible Points = 60) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||
| Criteria #4.3. Financial History & Creditworthiness | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Evaluator 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Average Score | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 7.0 | Criteria #4.3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = 35) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = 850) Minimum Threshold = 595 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Total Fee Points | Concession Fee Scores | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor F | Vendor G | Vendor H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T |
| Concession Fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 150.0 | Concession Fee Points | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Score Summary | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor F | Vendor G | Vendor H | Offeror I | Offeror J | Offeror K | Offeror L | Offeror M | Offeror N | Offeror O | Offeror P | Offeror Q | Offeror R | Offeror S | Offeror T | |
| Total Technical Points (Total Possible = 850) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Total Cost Points (Total Possible = 150) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Grand Total Points (Total Possible = 1000) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .