36E77619R0038-006.docx
DOCX document 59 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36E77619R0038
About this file
36E77619R0038 Attachment 1 - Specs RFP for DB - 5-2-2019.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36E77619R0038-005.pdf | ||
| 36E77619R0038-007.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36E77619R0038-003.pdf | ||
| 36E77619R0038-012.pdf | ||
| 36E77619R0038-001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36E77619R0038-010.pdf | ||
| 36E77619R0038-008.zip | ZIP file | |
| 36E77619R0038-004.pdf | ||
| 36E77619R0038-013.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36E77619R0038-002.pdf | ||
| 36E77619R0038-009.pdf | ||
| 36E77619R0038-011.pdf | ||
| 36E77619R0038-000.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 1
SECTION 00 11 21
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO DESIGN-BUILD
A. PART I - General A1. Scope of Contract
| Provide all labor, materials, tools, equipment, design and construction services necessary to complete the design and subsequent construction of the project described herein and other specific tasks as further defined by this request for proposal (RFP). |
| A. Project Number: 618-18-115 |
B. Project Title: Replace NFS Refrigerators, Freezers & Controls
| C. Project Location: Building #1 Overton Brooks VAMC, Shreveport, LA | |
| D. Scope of Work: Final SOW - 5-1-2019 | |
| E. General Drawing Submission Requirements: Shop Drawing Submission Requirements are available on the internet at the following address: http://www.cfm.va.gov/. Architectural as-built drawings for the Medical Center are available. (note: these drawings are not completely accurate. A-E shall verify existing conditions.) All drawings will be prepared with the VA Standard Title Block and Border. All drawings shall be provided in the 2013 version of AutoCAD (or newest version accepted by Overton Brooks VAMC Engineering) and in PDF format. Each individual file on a DVD shall be named by numbers corresponding to the construction documents (i.e. the specs shall be named 00 11 22, 33 44 55, etc. and the drawings shall be E1, E2, etc.) and the final AutoCAD/ specifications files shall be exactly as submitted in the final submission. | |
| G. Incorporated References: The following Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Construction and Facilities Management, information is incorporated within the Scope of Work by reference and can be found on the VA web site at http://www.cfm.va.gov/ Master Specifications; Design Guides; Design Manuals; Standard Details; Design Alerts; and Quality Alerts. | |
| A2. | Definitions |
| A. | Design-Build (D-B) as defined by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the procurement by the Government, under one contract, with one firm or Joint Venture (JV) for both design and construction services for a specific project. |
| 1. | Contracting Officer (C0): A person with the authority to enter into, administer, and/or terminate contracts and make related determinations and findings. The term includes certain authorized representatives of the contracting officer acting within the limits of their authority as delegated by the contracting officer. “Administrative contracting officer (ACO)” refers to a contracting officer who is administering contracts. “Termination contracting officer (TCO)” refers to a contracting officer who is settling terminated contracts. A single contracting officer may be responsible for duties in any or all of these areas. |
| 2. | Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR): The Contracting Officer's written designation of a representative responsible for administering contracts under the immediate direction of the Contracting Officer. For the purposes of this contract the term “COR” will be used herein. |
| 3. | Technical Monitor (TM): This term, as used herein, refers to the person(s) assisting the COR in administering contracts under the immediate direction of the Contracting Officer. |
| 4. | Design-Build Contract: This term, as used herein, refers to the Contract(s) to perform the design and construction of the project. |
5. Design-bid-build (D-B-B): The traditional delivery method where design and construction are sequential and contracted for separately with two contracts and two contractors.
| 6. | Contractor: This term, as used herein, refers to the contractor under this contract or the D-B team. The contractor or D-B team is solely responsible for the management (planning, supervision, and contract coordination), design, and (professional) services and installation (including all labor, equipment, materials, tools, and inspections) to meet the requirements of this contract. |
| 7. | Architect-Engineer (A-E): This term, as used herein, refers to the A-E firm(s) that is a part of the D-B team, also referred to as D-B A-E. |
8. Project Management: The contractor shall provide an individual in the capacity of a contractor project manager. The contractor project manager shall have legal (on-site signature) authority to represent the Contractor. The Project Manager shall be the initial point of contact for coordinating with the VA.
| A3. | Pre-Proposal Site Visit (This section will be removed after award.) |
| A pre-proposal site visit will be conducted in Phase II. The most highly qualified firms selected to proceed to Phase II will be invited to attend the pre-proposal site visit. The Contracting Officer will establish the date and time and notify the Phase II offerors in writing. See Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Clause 52.236-27 of this solicitation. |
Location: Overton Brooks VA Medical Center, 510 E Stoner Ave, Shreveport, LA 71101 Date / Time: TBD
| All Offerors, consultants, subcontractors, manufacturers and suppliers are invited to attend. The following agenda is furnished for this meeting: | |
| 1. | Open meeting & Introductions; |
| 2. | Review of project and Design-Build method for construction contracting; |
| 3. | Specifications; |
| 4. | General requirements, Solicitation Documents and Offer Submission Procedure; |
| 6. | Questions and answers; |
| 7. | Close; and |
| 8. | Site walk through – attendance is optional. |
*Please note that attendance for the pre-proposal conference and / or the site walkthrough is voluntary.
A5. Permit Requirements A. The D-B Contractor is responsible for obtaining all permits and approvals necessary to complete the project, prior to starting Construction.
A6. Selection Criteria (This section will be removed after award.)
A. In accordance with FAR part 15 the Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror on a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) basis after evaluation in accordance with the factors in the Two-Phase Design-Build solicitation. A responsible determination will be made in accordance with FAR 9.1, Responsible Prospective Contractors.
B. Evaluations: All Phase I and Phase II proposals shall be subject to evaluation by a team of Government personnel. In Phase I of the Two-Phase Design-Build process, Offerors will submit a Phase I proposal in accordance with the two (2) evaluation factors listed in C.3. Upon receipt of the Phase I proposals, the VA team will evaluate and determine the highest qualified Offerors based on their Phase I proposal submissions. The Phase I proposals will only be evaluated on the three (3) evaluation factors listed. The Offerors not selected to provide Phase II proposals will be notified that they are no longer being considered for this project. The Phase II proposals will consist of both technical and price factors, which are listed in D.4. The Government intends to award without discussions; however, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary based on the initial evaluation of the Phase II proposals.
| B. | PART II - RESPONSIBILITIES |
| B1. | VA Team |
A. The VA team is comprised of the VHA-PCAC Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist, the COR who will be located at the construction site, and VA Medical Center staff.
B2. Use of Advisors A. Contractors are advised that VA contractor personnel may assist the Government during the Government’s evaluation of Proposals. The persons shall be authorized access to only those portions of the proposal and discussions that are necessary to enable them to provide technical advice on specialized matters or on specific problems. These individuals will be required to protect the confidentiality of any specifically identified trade secrets and/or privileged or confidential commercial or financial information obtained because of their participation in this evaluation. They shall be expressly prohibited from scoring, ranking or recommending the selection of a vendor.
| B3. | Design-Build Team: |
| A. | The D-B team includes all J/V partners, consultants, and sub-contractors to the one firm. The D-B team shall provide Architectural and Engineering disciplines for the preparation of construction documents, and construction contractor capabilities for construction of the project. |
| B. | If the D-B Team and A-E contractor are a J/V (not one and the same firm), engineering and other technical consultants shall be subcontractors of the J/V Architect - not the Design-Build construction contractor or sub-contractors. If the D-B Team A-E and contractor are one and the same firm (not a J/V) those consultants shall be subcontractors of the D-B firm, not the construction subcontractors. |
| C. | The RFP documents are intended to define existing conditions, certain required items, and design parameters to be included in the project. It is the contractor's responsibility to visit the site or ascertain the conditions at each site. In addition, the Contractor acknowledges that it has taken steps reasonably necessary to ascertain the nature and location of the work, and that it has investigated and satisfied itself as to the general and local conditions which can affect the work or its cost, the existing conditions, certain required items, and design parameters to be included in the project. It is the D-B Team’s responsibility to complete the documents and construction in a manner consistent with the intent of the RFP documents within the required period of performance. |
| C. | PART III - PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS (This section will be removed after award.) |
| C1. | General |
PHASE I
| A. | Phase I proposals shall be based on the solicitation documents issued for RFP Solicitation Number 36E77619R0038. Phase I proposals will be in the format stipulated elsewhere in Section C2. Phase I Proposal Format. |
| B. | Phase I proposals shall be received on or before the date listed in Block 13a of the SF 1442. There will be no public opening of the proposals. |
| C. | Submit Phase I proposals via email to: |
| 1. | bailey.donato@va.gov |
| 2. | Emails are limited to five (5) MB. |
3. Phase I proposals will only be accepted via email.
| C2. | PHASE I Proposal Format |
| A. | The Offeror shall submit the Phase I proposal in one (1) PDF document. The proposal shall be labeled with the Offeror’s organization, business address and VA solicitation number. The Offeror shall not include any price or price related material in the Phase I proposal. |
B. The Offeror shall submit the Phase I proposal in electronic format only. Include page numbers and the company name in the header or footer of each page.
C. The Offer, including title page, detailed table of contents, preface, for the Phase I proposal shall not exceed a total of 25 (twenty-five) pages in Microsoft Arial size 12 font. Use graphic presentations where such use will contribute to the compactness and clarity of the proposal.
D. A page is defined as each face of an 8.5 X 11-inch sheet of paper containing information. All information (except for document numbers, page numbers, etc.) shall be provided in an image area of 7 X 9 inches. The background color of each page of the submission shall be white or ivory stock only. Excess pages will not be evaluated. Text lines will be single-spaced. A smaller font size for any graphics presented in a proposal is permitted as long as the information is legible to the human eye. Fonts other than Arial are permissible in the presentation of graphic material only.
C3. PHASE I Proposal Evaluation Factors Factor 1, Technical Approach: Provide a brief narrative (page limitation: six (6) pages, not including cover page or table of contents) on the offeror’s proposed technical approach for this design-build project as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror’s method to manage the project shall be used as a means of evaluating the offeror’s ability to successfully meet the requirements of the solicitation. If the page limits are exceeded, the pages exceeding the limit will not be read or considered. The following shall be included in the narrative:
· Design Approach: Describe the techniques and methods.
· Construction Approach: Describe the techniques and methods for this construction project to include coordination with the design packages, projected timelines and phases, and coordination of work.
· Quality Control: Describe quality control processes during design and construction phases that will lead to an effective and successful project that completes on-time within budget Factor 2, Technical Qualifications:
a. Key Personnel Experience: The Offeror shall provide a resume (page limitation, two (2) pages per requested resume) for each of the following A-E personnel: Lead Architect, Lead Mechanical Engineer, and Lead Electrical Engineer. These are intended to be the Architect and Engineers that will actually affix their seal to the appropriate construction drawings.
The Offeror shall also provide a resume for each of the following key construction personnel: Project Manager and Site Superintendent, and the lead person for any known major subcontractors. For each resume, include company name; name of individual; relevant listing of experience; qualifications such as specialized training, education experience, etc. For any subcontractors identified, provide a resume of the lead person who will be directly involved in the work subcontracted for that company, identify any key personnel that will be assigned to the contract resulting from this solicitation, and the relevant experience of both the company and any key personnel that were identified. Please delineate the approximate percentage of work the prime contractor will perform and the approximate percentage of work the subcontractors (collectively) will perform. The VA will use the information provided to evaluate, among other things, specialized experience and technical competence.
b. Capability to Perform: The Offeror shall provide a letter from their surety demonstrating the Offeror’s total bonding capacity and current available bonding capacity. Total bonding capacity and current available bonding must be outlined in a letter dated no earlier than the solicitation release date.
C4. Evaluation of Offers (Phase I) The Phase I evaluations will be conducted in accordance with the Two-Phase Design-Build Evaluation process and the methodologies outlined below.
Factor 1, Technical Approach: Will be evaluated based on the Offeror’s proposed technical approach for this design-build project as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror’s method to manage the project shall be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s ability to successfully meet the requirements of the solicitation.
Factor 2, Technical Qualifications: Will be evaluated on the Offeror’s key personnel experience and capability to perform. Key personnel experience will be evaluated by the resumes provided by the Offeror. Capability to perform will be evaluated based on whether the Offeror has adequate total bonding capacity and available bonding capacity to accommodate the design and construction of the project.
PHASE II
| D1. | General (This section will be removed after award.) |
| A. | Phase II proposals shall be based on solicitation documents issued for RFP Solicitation Number 36E77619R0038 and the instructions provided by the Contracting Officer in the Phase II Notice of Offerors that they were selected as one of the qualified offerors in Phase I. Proposals will be in the format stipulated in Section D2. Phase II Proposal Format. |
| B. | Proposals shall be received on or before the date specified in the Phase II Notice of Offerors. |
| C. | Submit Phase II proposals via email to: |
| 1. | bailey.donato@va.gov |
| 2. | Emails are limited to five (5) MB. |
3. Phase II proposals will only be accepted via email.
| D. | Submit the original Bid Bond by mail to: |
| 1. | US Postal Service Deliveries: |
Bailey Donato Veterans Health Administration Program Contracting Activity Central (VHA-PCAC) 6150 Oaktree Blvd Suite 300 Independence, OH 44131
2. Commercial Delivery Services / Hand Carry (Monday- Friday, 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM (EDT)) Bailey Donato Veterans Health Administration Program Contracting Activity Central (VHA-PCAC) 6150 Oaktree Blvd Suite 300 Independence, OH 44131
3. Failure to furnish the required bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time specified in Block 13 of the SF 1442, may result in rejection of the Phase II proposal. SEE FAR Provision 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee, of this solicitation.
d2. PHASE II Proposal Format (This section will be removed after award.)
A. Non-Price, Price and Administration sections of the Offerors Phase II proposals will be evaluated independently; therefore, the Offeror shall submit the Phase II proposal in three (3) Volumes (Volume I: Non-Price, Volume II: Price, and Volume III: Administrative). In order to evaluate Volume I: Non-Price strictly on the merit of the material submitted, the contractor shall include NO price information in Volume I. The Offeror shall separately bind Volumes I, II, and III. All three (3) volumes must be labeled with the Offeror's organization, business address, and VA Solicitation Number. The Offeror shall submit Volumes I, II, and III in electronic format only. No hard copies will be accepted. Each volume shall be submitted in a separate email, no larger than 5MB. Include page numbers and the company name in the header or footer of each page.
B. Volume I: Non-Price: Offerors shall format the Volume I: Non-Price proposal as listed below. The specific evaluation criteria and methodology for Volume I are contained in D.3 and D.4.
a. The Offer, including title page, detailed table of contents, and preface, for Volume I: Non-Price shall not exceed a total of FIFTEEN (15) pages in Microsoft Arial size 12 font.
b. A page is defined as each face of an 8.5 X 11-inch sheet of paper containing information. Note, submission of Draft Project Schedule only, can be submitted utilizing larger paper (11 x 17 inch. All information (except for document numbers, page numbers, etc.) shall be provided in an image area of 7 X 9 inches. The background color of each page of the submission shall be white or ivory stock only. Excess pages will not be evaluated. Text lines will be single-spaced. A smaller font size for any graphics presented in a proposal is permitted as long as the information is legible to the human eye. Fonts other than Arial are permissible in the presentation of graphic material only.
c. The Offeror’s responses shall clearly address each evaluation factor listed in the solicitation. Failure to submit in the format required and clearly address those factors may result in this Offer being rated as unacceptable.
C. Volume II: Price: Offerors shall format the Volume II: Price proposal as listed below. The specific evaluation criteria and methodology for Volume II are contained in D.3 and D.4.
a. Volume II: Price shall not exceed TEN (10) in Arial size 12 font.
b. Offerors shall ensure the signed Standard Form (SF) 1442 is provided. Offerors shall acknowledge receiving amendments by filling out section 19 of the SF 1442.
c. The Offeror’s signature on the SF1442 must be a hard signature and not an electronic signature.
D. Volume III: Administrative: Offerors shall include the following in Volume III. All of the below information must be provided. An Offeror may be considered unacceptable if these items are not provided in the Volume III proposal.
a. Offeror may return a signed copy of the amendment(s) that are acknowledged in section 19 of the SF 1442.
b. Offeror shall provide their Representations and Certifications or their response to FAR 52.204-8 (2) (i) or (ii) Annual Representations and Certifications.
c. Offeror shall provide their response to FAR 52.209-7 (b) Information Regarding Responsibility Matters.
d. Offeror shall provide their response to FAR 52.209-13 (b) or (2) Violation of Arms Controls Treaties or Agreements.
e. Offeror shall provide their response to FAR 52.219-28 (g) Post Award Small Business Program Representations.
f. Offeror shall include their Safety or Environmental Violations and Experience Modification Rating Information as part of Volume III, including filling out Attachment 8 – CONTRACTOR SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD EVALUATION FORM of the solicitation. It will not be evaluated as part of Volume III Price but will be used as part of the Responsibility Determination. It will also not count against the page limitations for Volume III.
| 1. All Offerors shall submit information pertaining to their past Safety and Environmental record. The information must contain a certification that the Offeror has no more than three (3) serious, or one (1) repeat or one (1) willful OSHA or any EPA violation(s) in the past three years. If such certification cannot be made, an Offeror shall explain why and submit as much information as possible regarding the circumstances of its past safety and environmental record, including the number of EPA violations and/or the number of serious, repeat, and/or willful OSHA violations, along with a detailed description of those violations. |
| 2. All Offerors shall submit information regarding their current Experience Modification Rate (EMR). This information shall be obtained from the Offeror’s insurance carrier and be furnished on the insurance carrier’s letterhead. If an Offeror’s EMR is above 1.0, Offeror must submit a written explanation of the EMR from its insurance carrier furnished on the insurance carrier’s letterhead, describing the reasons for the elevated EMR and the anticipated date the EMR may be reduced to 1.0 or below. |
| 3. Self-insured contractors or other contractors that cannot provide their EMR rating on insurance letterhead must obtain a rating from the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. (NCCI) by completing/submitting form ERM-6 and providing the rating on letterhead from NCCI. Note: Self-insured contractors or other contractors that cannot provide EMR rating on insurance letterhead from the states or territories of CA, DE, MI, NJ, ND, OH, PA, WA, WY, and PR shall obtain their EMR rating from their state-run worker’s compensation insurance rating bureau. |
| 4. If the NCCI cannot issue an EMR because the Offeror lacks insurance history, Offeror shall submit a letter indicating so from its insurance carrier furnished on the insurance carrier’s letterhead and include a letter from the NCCI indicating that is has assigned Offeror a Unity Rating of 1.0. |
| 5. The above information, along with other information obtained from Government systems, such as the OSHA and EPA online inspection history databases, will be used to make an initial Determination of Responsibility. *The above information is not required for subcontractors. |
6. Failure to provide Attachment 8 of the solicitation containing the above information, may result in a determination that an Offeror is not responsible and therefore ineligible for award.
D3. PHASE II – Proposal Evaluation Factors The Phase II Proposal shall address the following evaluation factors.
Factor 1, Technical Solution (Non-Price) Based on the solicitation documents, site visit, and the Offeror’s Phase I Technical Approach provide a detailed narrative (page limitation: eight (8) pages for detailed narrative) describing the Offeror’s technical solution to the project to achieve design and construction design objectives as described in the solicitation. If the page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit will not be read or considered.
The Offeror’s narratives shall include, at minimum, the following technical areas:
· Phasing
· Infection Control
· Abatement
· HVAC
· Electrical
· Commissioning of systems
· Refrigerator and freezer design and installation knowledge
· QC management and solutions
· Safety management Factor 2, Draft Project Schedule (Non-Price) The firm shall demonstrate their understanding of the Specification Section 01 32 16 Project Schedule for Design-Build (located in ATTACHMENT 3 - SPEC Project Schedule) by submitting a draft project schedule for the design and construction of the Emergency NFS Refrigerator and Freezer Replacement – Overton Brooks VAMC that adheres to the requirements outlined in the RFP. Each Offerors schedule must address the following:
· Phasing and how to meet Nutrition & Food Service (NFS) & Pharmacy refrigeration, thaw box and freezer needs in the basement area along with NFS Dry Storage needs.
· How to manage impacts due to working in and around a functioning kitchen (NFS) with food prep areas and scheduling of disruptive type work (noise, dust generating, asbestos abatement, etc.) around NFS food prep and work hours.
· Planning/Construction issues associated with negative air work and Infection Control requirements.
The project will start at the issuance of the Notice to Proceed. For scheduling purposes, assume the Notice to Proceed will be issued fourteen (14) calendar days after the award date. (Note that there is no guarantee the Notice to Proceed will be issued within this timeframe.)
Factor 3, Price Proposal Requirements (Volume III) A. Carefully follow “Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors”. Standard Form (SF) 1442 Solicitation, Offer and Award (Construction, Alteration, or Repair) and the pricing schedule located on page 6 when submitting price offers. Submit a bid guarantee as stipulated in the solicitation”.
B. In addition to the pricing schedule, Offerors shall submit a complete Breakdown of the Division Pricing for CLIN 0001 and CLIN 0002.
C. The prices shall be Firm Fixed Price. The Offeror shall take care not to include remarks that take exception to the Government’s SOW/Specifications or pricing requirements or otherwise preclude the Government from evaluating the offer or render the offer as non-responsive or unacceptable.
D. If the Offeror communicates in its proposal any qualifications, exceptions, exclusions, or conditions to the proposed prices not provided for in the Offerors proposal documents, the Contracting Officer may reject the proposal and exclude the Offeror from further discussions.
D4. Evaluation of Offers The Phase II evaluations will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.101-2; award will be made to the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer. To receive consideration for award, a rating of Acceptable must be achieved for each of the three (3) Phase II Technical Factors (Non-Price). Acceptable is defined as “Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.”
Factor 1, Technical Solution (Volume I): The VA will evaluate and use as an aid to help determine that the Offeror understands the project and can perform all of the required elements. The technical solution will be evaluated for inclusion of the technical areas listed in the criteria. The VA will evaluate an Offeror’s specific detail in each of the technical areas regarding design and constructability of design. The Offeror’s narrative should provide enough detail to demonstrate that the scope and complexity of the project requirements are understood and will be successfully completed.
Factor 2, Draft Project Schedule (Volume II): The VA will evaluate and use as an aid to help determine that the Offeror understands and can perform all of the required elements to complete the project in the time frame specified with limited impact, to the greatest extent possible, to the Medical Center. (The project schedule submitted with the offer should not be construed as the agreed upon schedule as per FAR 52.236-15, the contractor shall, within twenty-one (21) Calendar days after receiving the Notice to Proceed, submit an interim project schedule which will supersede the project schedule submitted in the Phase II proposal. The interim project schedule will be subject to VA approval and must show the project being accomplished within the time frame specified on the SF 1442 (Block 11).
Factor 3, Price (Volume III): The Contracting Officer will evaluate Offers in accordance with the process identified in the Price Schedule. The total evaluated price will be determined by the Offeror’s price for all the CLINs listed. Note: The VA will look at the total evaluated price and non-price factors to determine the best value.
| D5. | Final Proposal Revisions (FAR 52.215-1) |
| A. | If determined to be necessary, Phase II proposal revisions will be requested from the Phase II proposals received. The CO will identify those Offerors, whose Phase II proposals are within the competitive range, considering the selection criteria identified in this section. Negotiations may be conducted with those Offerors falling within the competitive range, after which Phase II proposal revisions will be requested. Sealed Phase II proposal revisions will be submitted as per Part III.D1.D, above, except as noted below and will be due at a time and place to be determined. |
| B. | Offerors submitting Phase II proposal revisions will not be requested to re-submit any documents which are unchanged from their initial Phase II proposals. They should provide necessary changes to individual paragraphs, as briefly as possible, together with a table of contents, which clarifies where within the initial Phase II proposal the additional information or changed documents would be placed. Phase II proposal revisions shall include a completed SF 1442 that acknowledges receiving all amendments, by number. A new bid bond shall be submitted only if the final Phase II proposal revisions Offeror’s price proposal is greater than its initial price proposal. |
| E. | PART IV - POST AWARD REQUIREMENTS |
| E1. | Construction Document Preparation: |
A. Design Review Meetings:
| The Design-Build Contractor (and A/E if separate entities) shall attend meetings at the time and place requested by the Contracting Officer and COR. Minutes of the meetings shall be taken by the Design-Build Contractor and submitted to the Contracting Officer and COR. | |
| 1. | A review meeting to resolve design issues will be held for each design review package submitted. The meeting will include discussion of VA comments on functional relationships and technical peer review comments (by others). |
| 2. | Participants will include VA Staff and D-B team members as appropriate for the specific package to be reviewed. The DB team members will each allow for (1) full day for each discipline/package design review meeting. DB team management will be present at each review meeting. |
| 3. | The D-B team shall allow a minimum of 14 calendar days for each review cycle. A cycle includes: |
| a. | The VA’s receipt of the design review submission package. |
| b. | The review meeting. |
| c. | D-B teams receipt of comments from the VA, either electronically, by fax, or by hard copy delivery. |
| 4. | Coordination of the review meeting schedules will be the responsibility of the VA COR and the D-B Team Project Manager. See section I. Quality Assurance/Quality Control. |
| B. | Electronic Media: |
| 1. | Design review submission drawings and final Construction Document submission drawings will be executed in electronic format AutoCAD version 2016 |
| 2. | The drawings included in the VA RFP will be available to the DB team in electronic format in AutoCAD or PDF for use in preparing the construction drawings. The Contractor’s DB Team shall independently verify all information provided. Where the VA does not have existing drawings, the Contractor’s DB Team will have to collect the data and create the drawing(s). |
| 3. | Design review submission specifications and other 8 1/2 by 11 formatted material and final Construction Document submission specifications and other 8 1/2 by 11 formatted material will be executed in electronic format Microsoft Office, Word and in PDF format. |
| 4. | The specifications included in the VA RFP shall be available to the DB team in electronic format in Microsoft Office, Word, for use in preparing the construction specifications (reference solicitation package and VA Technical Information Library (TIL)). The design builder shall independently verify all information in the files. |
| 5. | The construction record drawings shall be completed in AutoCAD version 2016. |
| 6. | Construction shop drawings are not required to be completed in AutoCAD version 2016. |
| C. | Professional Licensing: |
| 1. | The D-B A-E who prepares the construction documents shall be a professional architect or engineer licensed in a state within the United States. |
| 2. | The professional seal indicating such license by the state shall appear on the final construction documents. The architect whose seal is shown will be known as the Architect of Record. The D-B A-E shall certify compliance with the VA RFP and all applicable codes. |
| D. | Approved Construction Documents: |
| 1. | The final construction document submission package will be submitted by the DB team for approval by the VA after completion of the 100% review cycle for the final package to be submitted by the DB team. The VA will have 16 calendar days to take approval action. |
| 2. | The final construction documents submission package will include a full set of construction documents including all disciplines/packages as indicated in this document. |
| 3. | The final construction documents submission package will incorporate all VA supplied comments from the earlier 30%,95%, and 100% (if any) submission package reviews and will comply with the VA RFP. |
| 4. | If the final construction documents (100%) submission package is not complete, a post submittal may be required and the cost of which will be borne by the DB Team. |
| 5. | The approved final construction documents include such details that the project can be constructed and will be used for construction of the project. |
| 6. | See PART IV, D2 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD SUBMITTALS for Approved Construction Document distribution. |
| E. | Construction Specifications - Project specifications shall include specifications for all products, materials, equipment, methods, and systems shown on the construction drawings in accordance with standard professional practice and the SOW. DB Contractor/Team to reference the VA Technical Information Library for applicable Program Guides, Design Guidelines and Master Specifications. The specification submitted for review shall include: |
| 1. | The name of the manufacturer, the product name, model number, or other identification as appropriate to clearly identify the product that will be used in the construction of the project; |
| 2. | Other data as appropriate to clearly identify the product that will be used in the construction of the project i.e. shop drawings, product data, and samples as required by the VA RFP documents; and |
| 3. | The required stamp of the licensed architect or engineer of record will be considered as certification of compliance with the RFP requirements. |
| F. | Quality Assurance/Quality Control: |
| 1. | To reduce design errors and omissions, the DB team shall develop and execute a QA/QC plan that demonstrates the project plans and specifications have gone through a rigorous, thorough review and coordination effort. |
| 2. | Within 2 weeks of receipt of Notice to Proceed, the DB Team will submit a detailed QA/QC plan describing each QA/QC task that will be taken during the development of the various design submission packages and the name of the DB Team member responsible for QA/QC. |
| a. | Upon its completion each task shall be initialed and dated by the responsible DB Team member. |
| b. | A 100% completed QA/QC plan shall be submitted with the final construction document submission package. |
| D2. | Construction Period Submittals |
| A. | The DB contractor shall distribute a total of 7 sets of the approved construction documents prepared by the DB Team to the VA and RFP AE, as directed by the VA Project Manager. |
| B. | Other submittals - The DB team shall submit test results, certificates, manufacturer’s instructions, manufacturers field reports, etc. as required by the VA RFP specifications, to the VA R/E. |
| C. | Project record drawings - The DB team will maintain a set of construction documents (field as-built drawings) to record actual construction changes during the construction process as required by the RFP specifications. The project record drawings will be available for review by the VA COR at all times. |
| D. | Shop drawings and submittals - The DB A/E shall check government furnished and/or the DB construction contractor's shop drawings, detail drawings, schedules, descriptive literature and samples, testing labor-laboratory reports, field test data and review the color, texture and suitability of materials for conformity with the RFP Documents and construction documents. The DB A/E shall recommend approval, disapproval, or other suitable disposition to the VA Project Manager/COR. The VA Project Manager/COR will have final approval authority. The DB AE shall evaluate the submittals with reference to any companion submittals that constitute a system. When necessary, the DB A-E will request the D-B Construction Contractor to submit related components of a system before acting on a single component. Should this procedure be inappropriate, the DB A/E shall review all prior submittals for related components of the system before acting on a single component. The DB A-E may be required to hold joint reviews with the VA technical staff on complicated system submittals. The DB A-E shall notify the VA COR in writing of any and all deviations from the requirements of the construction documents that he has found in the submittals. |
| D3. | Project Close-Out |
| The DB team shall comply with the requirements in FAR 4.804 Closeout of Contract Files, for submission of final RFP as built drawings, Operation & Maintenance manuals, and other documents as noted (hard copy and electronic format. Required as built drawings and specifications will be submitted in the same format required for the construction documents / Final Design submission. | |
| D4. | Site Visits and Inspections |
| During the construction period the DB A-E shall make weekly visits to the project site when requested by the COR. The VA COR may also request visits for special purposes. Only registered architects and engineers thoroughly familiar with the project may make these site visits. The VA COR has the prerogative to determine the professional discipline(s) required for any visit. The DB A-E shall observe the construction, advise the VA COR of any deviations or deficiencies or solutions to issues discussed. A site inspection report which includes the purpose of the inspection, items reviewed, deficiencies observed, recommendations and additional actions required, shall be furnished to the VA COR within three calendar days following the site visit date. |
- - - E N D - - -
00 11 21-21
File details come from the government source that posted it.