36E77619B0002-0004004.pdf
PDF 45 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36E77619B0002
About this file
36E77619B0002 0004 Substitution Request Tennant Company.pdf
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
701 N. Lilac Drive P.O. Box 1452 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1452
T: 763.540.1200 F: 763.540.1437
Terrence Scholz
PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION REQUEST:
To: Thomas Council, US Department of Veterans Affairs-National Energy
Business Center Project: New Inpatient Mental Health Building-Danville VAMC Item: Requesting approval of or equal to product substitution Description: Seamless Resinous/Epoxy Flooring
Division: 9 Finishes Section: 09 6723 Resinous Flooring Paragraph/Article: 2.1.A Dur-A-Flex; Accelera HC
TENNANT COMPANY- ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS REQUEST THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT
SUBSTITUTION:
Tennant Company Equivalent System:
Tennant Eco-Crete SL Flake DB:
Base Coat: Eco-Crete SL with vinyl flake broadcast Broadcast Coat: Eco-TCP with vinyl flake broadcast Grout Coat: Eco-TCP Topcoat: Eco-TCP
Attached data includes product description, specifications, performance and test data adequate for evaluation of the request.
The undersigned certifies that the following paragraphs, unless modified by attachment are correct:
I. The proposed substitution does not affect dimensions shown on drawings.
II. The proposed substitution will have no adverse effect on the trades, the construction schedule, or specified warranty requirements.
III. Local support and availability will be available for proposed substitution.
The undersigned further states that the function and quality of the product substitution is equivalent or superior to the specified item.
Submitted By:
Signature: _____________________________________________ Name: Terrence Scholz Firm: Tennant Company-Architectural Coatings Address: 2454 Louisiana Ave. N., Golden Valley, MN 55427 Date: 2/6/19 Telephone: 763-513-2182 Attachments: Product Bulletins
Approved Not Approved Approved As Noted More Information Requested
By: __________________________________________ Date: __________________ Remarks: ____________________________________________________________
X
Tara D. Carlile 2/14/2019 Comparing the two products' characteristics, it was determined that they are not the same and the specified product is superior to the proposed substitution.
File details come from the government source that posted it.